Re: Blender for video editing tutorial

2009-03-05 Thread Derek Parr
http://blendernewbies.blogspot.com/2006/12/video-titling-techniques-1-basics.html
This one goes over some interesting techniques.
There are several other good tutorials on that site as well.

Good to see this question. I was beginning to think that this list was 
only for audio people.

-derek



Cory K. wrote:
 laurent.bellegarde wrote:
 hi, if you have a tutorial to use the video editing part of blender, in 
 paper/html or video, i'm interested in.
 
 I would have to Google just like you would. :) They are out there.
 
 
 -Cory K.
 


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Ubuntu-Studio-users Digest, Vol 22, Issue 35

2009-03-05 Thread Alfons Verreijt
Will jaunty have an rt kernel?
Can I upgrade from hardy, or is a clean install recommended?

On Feb 24, 2009 1:00 PM, ubuntu-studio-users-requ...@lists.ubuntu.com
wrote:

Send Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list submissions to
   ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
   https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
   ubuntu-studio-users-requ...@lists.ubuntu.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
   ubuntu-studio-users-ow...@lists.ubuntu.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of Ubuntu-Studio-users digest...


Today's Topics:

  1. Re: couple of problems (Henry W. Peters)
  2. Re: couple of problems (alex stone)
  3. Re: [FFADO-devel] debian/ubuntu packages (Andrew Hunter)


--

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:17:49 -0500
From: Henry W. Peters hwpet...@jamadots.com
Subject: Re: couple of problems
To: Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion
   ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Message-ID: 49a2e84d.1030...@jamadots.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-users/attachments/20090223/02d95e7c/attachment-0001.htm

--

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:33:46 +0200
From: alex stone compos...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: couple of problems
To: Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion
   ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Message-ID:
   caa95e270902231133j520c5888l55f93a0a6215a...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Henry,
It may well be the case that i am indeed saying that.
That's not to detract from the value of the UBStudio project at all. We all
have different uses, and requirements. I have an orchestral writing
requirement, so, for example, i'm chasing a lot of ports, and features that
enhance the workflow of my particular process.
 The UBStudio team got me started in Linux, and as a straight install of
Gutsy, with a few tweaks and updates to fix small challenges, it worked
well. Since my initial trip through the Tux Stargate, i've learnt a little
and been able to refine what it is i'm expecting. Kind of like knowing which
question to ask i guess.

UBS isn't a monster by any means, quite the contrary.
But for updates beyond the UBS cycle, and a user driven intent of using
brand new features to enhance the workflow, then there is the choice of
building to a finer level, by source, selecting more specifically what it is
we want to install, and importantly, install.

As my still desperately modest knowledge grows, and given my specific
requirements, i've learnt there is a big opportunity in a user specific
build, tailored to a higher standard, for daily use.

If you were a writer of pop, or hiphop music, my intended build could be
totally unsuitable, for example, as i'd have apps and utilties installed,
and configured to a different setup.

So UBS performs a valuable service in getting a general audio centric OS in
the hands of users who want to write, and record music, (Even pop, or
hiphop. :) ) within the overall Ubuntu philosophy. For a unique build, we
have the choice of a clean sheet, and build from there, app by app.

As you wrote, it may be more useful to you to install vanilla Ubuntu, and
add from there.

It depends entirely on your usage requirements.

I've offered just one perspective, that may or may not give you a view of
what's possible, but practically, there are far cleverer chaps than me here,
who could offer to you still another choice, or set of choices that are more
suited, and almost certainly more intelligent than my perspective.

You could say we have so many choices, that they.persuade the User to be
'more' sure of what he or she wants.

There's been a few comments in this mailing list from those who just use a
vanilla Ubuntu install, and are happy with that.
Maybe a bit of a peruse could reveal something that will catch your eye. :)

Alex.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-users/attachments/20090223/39ac8b5a/attachment-0001.htm

--

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:34:06 -0500
From: Andrew Hunter and...@aehunter.net
Subject: Re: [FFADO-devel] debian/ubuntu packages
To: Pieter Palmers piet...@joow.be
Cc: Ubuntu Studio Development  Technical Discussion
   ubuntu-studio-de...@lists.ubuntu.com,
   ffado-de...@lists.sourceforge.net,
   ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Message-ID:
   636a7f460902231934r5488c1b0lbfeffd3dce562...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hey everyone,

Just thought I'd revive this thread and let you guys know that I was
able to get ffado 2.0~rc1 into the 

Re: Will jaunty have an rt kernel?

2009-03-05 Thread Cory K.
wayne wrote:
 On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 07:37 -0500, Cory K. wrote:
   
 Alfons Verreijt wrote:
 
 Will jaunty have an rt kernel?
 Can I upgrade from hardy, or is a clean install recommended?
   
 We're still working out -rt. It's more of a pain then you guys know.
 It's gonna come down to the wire.

 

 thanks for answering the question everyone is dying to know ;)  is there
 a deadline as to when this decision will be made?  maybe the Jaunty
 feature freeze date?
   

(Please don't top-post)

It doesn't come down to any decision. It comes down to *if* it can be
done. It's one thing to build a -rt kernel locally against vanilla. It's
quite another to build it against the Ubuntu kernel, make sure it works
with all the GFX drivers and finally, works for all.

As far as a time-frame, we have none. If we can get it together it will
go in. So once we know you guys will. ;)


-Cory K.


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Will jaunty have an rt kernel?

2009-03-05 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:07 AM, Cory K. coryis...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 wayne wrote:
  On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 07:37 -0500, Cory K. wrote:
 
  Alfons Verreijt wrote:
 
  Will jaunty have an rt kernel?
  Can I upgrade from hardy, or is a clean install recommended?
 
  We're still working out -rt. It's more of a pain then you guys know.
  It's gonna come down to the wire.
 
 
 
  thanks for answering the question everyone is dying to know ;)  is there
  a deadline as to when this decision will be made?  maybe the Jaunty
  feature freeze date?
 

 (Please don't top-post)

 It doesn't come down to any decision. It comes down to *if* it can be
 done. It's one thing to build a -rt kernel locally against vanilla. It's
 quite another to build it against the Ubuntu kernel, make sure it works
 with all the GFX drivers and finally, works for all.

 As far as a time-frame, we have none. If we can get it together it will
 go in. So once we know you guys will. ;)


 -Cory K.



Thanks guys for working so hard on this.  I also wanted to add that the
Jaunty vanilla kernel with the new Jack is quite stable for audio (from my
testing so far).

-Eric H.


-- 
___
http://greyrockstudio.blogspot.com
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Ipv6 to Ipv4...

2009-03-05 Thread Gustin Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Robert Klaar wrote:
 Hi all!
 Installed Hardy version of US today on my toshiba a300 laptop.
 Unfortunately I have no internet/net, after some troubleshooting it
 seems that it's not about my drivers(able to ping loopback), nor is it
 the hardware(able to ping my own ip), however; after that it fails. I
 cannot ping router/gateway or else and thus no internet. I've checked
 about in the networkconfigurations box and all I could come up with is
 the use of ipv6 protocols, seems to me that this could be the problem,
 rest of net runs on ipv4, so; how do I fix this?, have tried by turning
 ipv6 off in /etc/modprobe/aliases without succes...
 //best regards Paco
 
It probably has nothing to with IPv6.  Can you ping your IP from another
box on the network?  What driver and hardware is this?  Are we talking
about a wired or wireless connection?  How is your IP assigned (ie. is
it static or dhcp)?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkmwZNYACgkQwRXgH3rKGfMfRACgneRHsNLzjgMoT3Nlqop67OwJ
hiUAoKnIzFRZLpgK8LeAxjvmnxz4u9OV
=P3Ee
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users