Re: Ubuntu Studio Project Lead

2010-06-08 Thread Alessio Igor Bogani
Hi Brian,

2010/6/8 Brian David :
[..]
> On a final note, a long running issue for me is how often a quality rt
> kernel is left out of the releases.  On my system, at least, the RT kernel
> is the only one that gives good enough performance.  The vanilla and preempt
> kernels produce far too many x-runs.  I seem to have no problems with the
> 2.6.31 RT kernel, but it would be awfully nice to have a 32 version.

Could you evaluate and compare those results with -lowlatency kernel
available on https://launchpad.net/~abogani/+archive/ppa/+packages,
please?

Thank you very much.

Ciao,
Alessio

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Ubuntu Studio Project Lead

2010-06-08 Thread Det
Hartmut Noack schrieb:
[snipped]
> PLUS: Audio is most important for UBS because one can install GIMP, 
> Blender, Synfig, Inkscape or any other graphics-app on any standard 
> generic Linux and it will work. Not so will jack, Ardour and the like, 
> they need a system, that is carefully tweaked to RT-needs and a generic 
> Linux would not be adeaquate. And Video-apps need more or less the same 
> tweaks.

Not to mention the fact that one cannot create
a sensible video without a good sound track.
And as far as I know  "sound" = "audio".

So at least in the final production steps
both will be equally demanded.

> So, if users say, they find UBS to be too much focused on audio, one
> should explain, that this is not the case and not try to follow
> "customer-demands" that derive from wrong assumtions made at
> first-glance.

Well, hum, the simple question is, what those users
miss from the video support of UBS.

If one says "I miss nothing, but it's too audio centered
nevertheless" then give him a mild smile and a pitying
clap on the shoulder. Otherwise  listen.

KR
Det

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Ubuntu Studio Project Lead

2010-06-08 Thread Hartmut Noack
Am 08.06.2010 01:53, schrieb teza:
> Le 07/06/2010 22:29, Hartmut Noack a écrit :
>>
> Hi, I agree for Guitarix this software made a big jump lately. Where did
> you find the calf plugin you show in the picture?

This is the stand of affairs in:

http://repo.or.cz/r/calf.git

:-) :-)

most of the new plug ins are from Markus Schmidt:

http://mein-neues-blog.de/2010/01/27/aktuell-linux-audio-goes-professional/

> Thanks
> Best Regards
> Teza
>
>
>


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Ubuntu Studio Project Lead

2010-06-08 Thread Steve Batte
If Brian is going to play DA, I have to stick up for him: real pro
audio equipment requires constant cleaning, tuning and calibration,
unlike your consumer-grade home-E system. What sets Logic and ProTools
apart from Garage Band are deep functionality and flexibility, which
come with steep learning curves. Personally, I'm looking for that
level of performance (or better) from Ubuntu Studio, I don't mind
having to work to get it, and it seems to me you're almost there.

And I am setting off now to look for that link where I can sign up to
help with documentation. Time to do my part.

On 6/7/10, Brian David  wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Jose H.  wrote:
>
>> I have the crazy idea that Ubuntu Studio should be user oriented.
>>
>> If that was the case, ubuntu studio needs to solve two really big issues:
>>1) complexity: PA vs Jack => ubuntu studio vs the user, Windows and Mac
>> will win
>>2) stability: jacks crashes, timidity crashes, etc.
>>
>> Shouldn't JACK+Timidity start with init.d and be stable, working without
>> issues with PA ?
>>
>> My Two cents.
>>
>>
>
> I'm going to play devil's advocate here, and suggest that Ubuntu Studio
> should not be user oriented.  At least, not in the sense that a main
> priority would be to make things as simple as possible.  It seems to me that
> a lot of problems have resulted from the active marketing of Ubuntu Studio
> as easy to use.
>
> At this point, I've accepted that Linux audio is never going to be easy.
> I've also accepted that this is a good thing, because the payoff is that the
> software is of higher quality and greater versatility.  My suggestion is
> that Ubuntu Studio should brand itself as a serious audio production system,
> one the provides the highest quality tools out there, but that requires
> patience and experience to utilize.  Not the easiest sell, but I'd say
> closer to reality.
>
> Having said that, I think there are a few things that could be done to make
> Ubuntu Studio more user friendly.  The most obvious would be to make sure
> that the user is automatically put in the 'audio' and 'video' groups, and
> that firewire access is available out of the box without needing to mess
> with Ubuntu Studio Controls.  This should allow JACK to start right away for
> most users.  However, above all else, what Ubuntu Studio needs is much much
> much better documentation and tutorials.
>
> On a final note, a long running issue for me is how often a quality rt
> kernel is left out of the releases.  On my system, at least, the RT kernel
> is the only one that gives good enough performance.  The vanilla and preempt
> kernels produce far too many x-runs.  I seem to have no problems with the
> 2.6.31 RT kernel, but it would be awfully nice to have a 32 version.
> --
> -Brian David
>

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users