Re: [LAU] iPad and Linux audio

[Paul Davis]

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Ralf Mardorf  wrote:
> Hi :)
>
> sorry for the cross posting. I'm interested if there's really an
> important usage for Linux (especially audio/MIDI), perhaps within the
> limits of a jailbreak, for an iPod.
>
> Someone from a Linux mailing list already sent me this links:
>
>> http://hexler.net/software/touchosc
>> http://liine.net/en/products/lemur/
>
> I won an iPod 2 and I flirt with selling it and then to buy some Android
> thingy instead.

speaking personally, i consider this more interesting:

http://saitarasoftware.com/Site/Home.html

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

RE: [LAU] iPad and Linux audio

[Nick Copeland]

> From: ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
> To: p...@linuxaudiosystems.com
> > > I won an iPod 2 and I flirt with selling it and then to buy some Android
> > http://saitarasoftware.com/Site/Home.html
> 
> Wow, thank you Paul. I still wonder if it's useful to own an iPad ;).

There was a discussion recently on andraudio regarding Linux audio and the 
Google platform. The going response was that Linux is Linux, Android is 
blahblah blah. In short, the teams felt that never the twain should meet.
Personally I found that not just a bit black and white, but worse that 
Linuxaudio which has lived a life in a corner of a far of field was missing out 
on the chance to ride on the crest of a wave that android is continuing to 
bring home.
There is plenty to lament in what Android brings to audio but at the sametime 
it has an immensity to offer to the audio isolate that is Linux audio. It is a 
shame that LAD/LAU has not jumped on the Andriod bandwagon, or even bothered to 
hi-jack it for their own needs. This is probably the only chancethat any kind 
of Linux audio can become mainstream.
I think Paul has a perspective on this although he has not expressed an 
opinion.My personal feeling is that Linux audio is a dynamic, open and very 
capableenvironment but that it might never break out into mainstream without 
embracing a major platform such as Android now is. There are ~500,000 
systemsbeing sparked up every day, and it is almost greenfield for audio 
development.
Kind regards, nick.   -- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

RE: [LAU] iPad and Linux audio

[Nick Copeland]

> 1) (care of lincoln spiteri):
> http://subversion.ardour.org/svn/thirdparty/ardroid/
> 
> 2) Android audio is unusable for anything related to music creation or
> pro-audio.
> The incredibly long bug report on this leaves me with only one
> feeling: Android's
>  master's don't care. If they don't care, its hard for me to.

You make very relevant points here and they are hard to argue against.
There  is a bigger picture though. The performance of device such as the ASUS
and Lenovo quad core tablets means android does not need to be relegated to 
remotecontrol. I still fully acknowledge the issues of android's masters and 
audio creation. The thing is that the same issues never stopped Linux audio 
from developing,LAD/LAU laid the grounds for things that the kernel developers 
are finally embracingand that the Android people will also be forced to address.
Perhaps Android will remain another world but I don't see any other development 
thatreally puts linux so close to mainstream, and it is being ignored by pretty 
much the wholeof LAD/LAU. It is fast becoming a missed opportunity - as soon as 
Android resolves itsissues of real-time then the commercial audio companies 
will invade the space, they havealready expressed that desire and that will 
leave Linux audio in even more of a niche.
Regards, nick.
  -- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

Re: [LAU] iPad and Linux audio

[Paul Davis]

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Nick Copeland  wrote:

> I think Paul has a perspective on this although he has not expressed an
> opinion.

my perspective is two-fold:

1) (care of lincoln spiteri):
http://subversion.ardour.org/svn/thirdparty/ardroid/

2) Android audio is unusable for anything related to music creation or
pro-audio.
The incredibly long bug report on this leaves me with only one
feeling: Android's
 master's don't care. If they don't care, its hard for me to.

--p

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

Re: workflow in ardour?

[Mike Holstein]

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Hartmut Noack wrote:

> Am 08.02.2012 00:26, schrieb mentoj_d...@gmx.de:
>
>  hi,
>>
>> i just started a little project. a kind of podcast.. but what ever.
>>
>> i record 3 signals at a time with ardour and edit them after the
>> recording to get best results. stuff i do is: limiting, expanding,
>> compressing.
>> what i always did was: i played the signals - in realtime - back, put
>> them through a calf-compressor (for example) and re-record them on another
>> track in ardour. that needs time. even if the recording is just 20 minutes,
>> i need at least 1,5 hours to get it done. is there a way around it?
>>
>
> of course there is
>
>
>  can i play the signal back faster than realtime for this workaround?
>>
>
> kind of:
>
> 1.) set compressor, limiter etc. as desired
>
> 2.) use the range-tool to select the part of the track you want to
> manipulate
>
> 3.) right klick the range and select "Consolidate range with processing"
>
> Ardour will render a new region with all your processing as fast as your
> CPU can deliver ;-)
>
> yup... export the track, and that can happen faster than realtime, and if
not, at least you only need to do it one time...

>
>
> --
> Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
> Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.**ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/**
> mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-**studio-users
>



-- 
MH

mikeholstein.info 
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

Re: workflow in ardour?

[Hartmut Noack]

Am 08.02.2012 00:26, schrieb mentoj_d...@gmx.de:

hi,

i just started a little project. a kind of podcast.. but what ever.

i record 3 signals at a time with ardour and edit them after the recording to 
get best results. stuff i do is: limiting, expanding, compressing.
what i always did was: i played the signals - in realtime - back, put them 
through a calf-compressor (for example) and re-record them on another track in 
ardour. that needs time. even if the recording is just 20 minutes, i need at 
least 1,5 hours to get it done. is there a way around it?


of course there is


can i play the signal back faster than realtime for this workaround?


kind of:

1.) set compressor, limiter etc. as desired

2.) use the range-tool to select the part of the track you want to 
manipulate


3.) right klick the range and select "Consolidate range with processing"

Ardour will render a new region with all your processing as fast as your 
CPU can deliver ;-)



--
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

workflow in ardour?

[mentoj_dija]

hi,

i just started a little project. a kind of podcast.. but what ever.

i record 3 signals at a time with ardour and edit them after the recording to 
get best results. stuff i do is: limiting, expanding, compressing.
what i always did was: i played the signals - in realtime - back, put them 
through a calf-compressor (for example) and re-record them on another track in 
ardour. that needs time. even if the recording is just 20 minutes, i need at 
least 1,5 hours to get it done. is there a way around it? can i play the signal 
back faster than realtime for this workaround?
-- 
Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

Re: Ubuntu-Studio-users Digest, Vol 58, Issue 7

[Matthew Churchill]

I think it could be good to get a freecycle computer then pay out for
reasonable sound and graphics card.
just incase, freecycle run on yahoo groups and people without vans give
away things they dont need.


On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:00 PM, <
ubuntu-studio-users-requ...@lists.ubuntu.com> wrote:

> Send Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list submissions to
>ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>ubuntu-studio-users-requ...@lists.ubuntu.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>ubuntu-studio-users-ow...@lists.ubuntu.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Ubuntu-Studio-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: what's cheapest desktop for ubuntustudio these days?
>  (Hector A. Henry S.)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 17:41:53 -0500
> From: "Hector A. Henry S." 
> To: Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion
>
> Subject: Re: what's cheapest desktop for ubuntustudio these days?
> Message-ID:
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> 2012/2/6 Gustin Johnson 
>
> > I personally start here:
> > http://pcper.com/leaderboard
> >
> > Right now a midrange system built around the core i5 is a good start
> > though I would drop the sound card (caveat, I already have an RME) and I
> > would go with an ATI as opposed to the nVidia for better out of the box
> > support.  I only put an ATI in my system to support 3 monitors, otherwise
> > the onboard video should be good enough.
> >
> > The upcoming Ivy Bridge should have even better on board graphics and
> > hopefully Intel does not miss the boat with drivers this time around.
> >
> > Just my 2c
> >
> >
>
> > On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Tom Poe  wrote:
> >
> >> Running Dell GX260 desktop now.  What's cheapest upgrade desktop I might
> >> look for, that will handle better graphics cards?  Poor man's gaming
> >> desktop?
> >> Tom
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
> >> Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.**ubuntu.com<
> Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com>
> >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/**
> >> mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-**studio-users<
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
> > Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
> > Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
> >
> >
> Look on this link it will help you to decide, have in concideration your
> real need, it might not be so much as our ego.
> http://www.reddit.com/r/buildapc/comments/f3efg
>
>
>
> --
> *Hector A. Henry Sjogreen
> Tel. (1+613) 3639140
> ON, CA.
>
> Profile: **http://bit.ly/ProfilE* * *
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-users/attachments/20120206/32f787da/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> --
>
> --
> Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
> Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
>
>
> End of Ubuntu-Studio-users Digest, Vol 58, Issue 7
> **
>
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users