Re: Pulseaudio, qjackctl .. nearly working :(

[Benjamin Martin]

On 06/08/12 11:06, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
Open pavucontrol, then select the pulse sink as the device for 
Audacious since it's not going through the Jack but waits for the real 
audio device to be ready. As soon as you switch to the sink, you'll be 
fine.


Exactly as you said! :)

Thanks very much for the help, shocking that I did not spot this before ;)

Everything seems to working so smoothly now, I am stocked I tried out 
UbuntuStudio, it's brilliant and a audio/video editors heaven .. well 
done and thanks to the people behind US.


--
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

Re: Linux Tools for Serious Photographers

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 00:14 +0200, Set Hallstrom wrote:
> http://youtu.be/mvI7rJ_AZys

Thank you. I'll watch it later.

Regards,
Ralf
Hair Model & Bomb Planter :D


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

Re: Linux Tools for Serious Photographers

[Set Hallstrom]

I guess the difference depends on what lens you buy, iiuc the lens
mounting thing is standard, so the request the commenteer you quote is
doing wouldn't really be relevant. Amateurs could just opt for a cheaper
lens. http://youtu.be/mvI7rJ_AZys

> Somebody asked for a recorder, I didn't read everything, only had a
> brief look, but IIUC it's a camera for a special software, right?

I'm not sure i understand your question about the "special software". I
never really got interested in doing video, so my knowledge is little in
that field. The little i know is that it can record in several video
formats, with pretty insane resolutions and frame rates, which (i think
at least some) are editable in various videosequencers. But what makes
the particular software that apertus team is offering special imho is
that it is very powerfull open source libre software (and i believe
google used some of elphels cameras for google street view.) Hence the
reason i thought there could be interest for their project on this list.

Yours,
Set

On 08/06/2012 11:49 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 22:23 +0200, Set Hallström wrote:
>>  http://www3.elphel.com/index.php
> "Make two cameras. One with a big sensor for the pros and one with a
> smaller sensor for us enthusiasts." - http://apertus.org/en/node/152
>
> Perhaps good, but how much without lens and how much with lens?
>
> http://apertus.org/en/audio
>
> *chuckle* Everything is better than analog optical soundtrack. One of
> the issues where digital is better, than analog.
>
> Somebody asked for a recorder, I didn't read everything, only had a
> brief look, but IIUC it's a camera for a special software, right?
>
>
>


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

Re: Linux Tools for Serious Photographers

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 22:23 +0200, Set Hallström wrote:
>  http://www3.elphel.com/index.php

"Make two cameras. One with a big sensor for the pros and one with a
smaller sensor for us enthusiasts." - http://apertus.org/en/node/152

Perhaps good, but how much without lens and how much with lens?

http://apertus.org/en/audio

*chuckle* Everything is better than analog optical soundtrack. One of
the issues where digital is better, than analog.

Somebody asked for a recorder, I didn't read everything, only had a
brief look, but IIUC it's a camera for a special software, right?



-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

Re: Linux Tools for Serious Photographers

[Set Hallström]

Some of you may be happy to find out about http://www3.elphel.com/index.php 
especialy film makers.

Make sure you check out the project called "apertus" 

Open hardware / libre software photography at its best :)

Have a good evening/morning/night/day all!
-- 
Set Hallström
AKA Sakrecoer
+46 (0) 708 134 377
http://sakrecoer.com
http://basspistol.com
http://holyhertz.com

Sent from my Phonografic Computer-Integrated Camera with K-9 Mail (Open source 
libre software)
Excuse my brevity and my spellign.

Ralf Mardorf  wrote:

PS: For film Werner Nekes (I sometimes made audio for his films) did
(perhaps still does) use a digital version of the Sony Betacam. There
are no prices for professional Sony cameras in the Internet
available :D.

>From Canon to Hasseblad there are already prices from 300,-€ to 3,-€
and my impression is that those 300,-€ cameras are crap, while an analog
300,-€ camera already was a good camera.

Any informing link is welcome. I won't buy a camera, but I like to get
knowledge about modern digi cams.



-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

Re: Linux Tools for Serious Photographers

[Ralf Mardorf]

PS: For film Werner Nekes (I sometimes made audio for his films) did
(perhaps still does) use a digital version of the Sony Betacam. There
are no prices for professional Sony cameras in the Internet
available :D.

From Canon to Hasseblad there are already prices from 300,-€ to 3,-€
and my impression is that those 300,-€ cameras are crap, while an analog
300,-€ camera already was a good camera.

Any informing link is welcome. I won't buy a camera, but I like to get
knowledge about modern digi cams.



-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

Re: Linux Tools for Serious Photographers

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 21:03 +0800, C. F. Howlett wrote:
> A little insight into the whole photo processing theme
> 
> Linux Tools for Serious Photographers

Interesting.

I'm missing apps to scan photographic negatives, slides and photos on
paper. Dunno if this is possible with getting good quality results,
since all I've seen caused a bad quality. I suspect more old
photographers still need to handle those, but just a few perhaps do
cartography photos with digi cams.
Btw. I'm not a photographer, but I learned all kinds of arts and had to
learn photography too. I still own a 35mm camera and never bought a digi
cam. I can't pay professional photo laboratories, my photo laboratory
mouldered in cartons and there are no "averaged" payable photo
laboratories today that do a good job, at least I don't know them.
My former girlfriend is also not a photographer, but during her studying
she also had to learn it. She did use 35mm to shoot photos for large
posters, no medium format camera or larger format was needed. I suspect
that we got a quality loss for photography too. At least for audio I'm
missing my old analog equipment, but for audio digital stuff is less
expensive, while for photography it seems to be the other way round.

Am I mistaken, regarding to a lack of knowledge?
Is good quality digital photography payable?

Regards,
Ralf



-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

Re: Linux Tools for Serious Photographers

[Scott Lavender]

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:03 AM, C. F. Howlett  wrote:

> A little insight into the whole photo processing theme
>
> Linux Tools for Serious 
> Photographers
>
> --
> Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
> ubuntu-studio-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
>
>
heh, i just learned that digikam can edit the raw picture.

i thought that digikam only would import and manage the library, that
begins to explain why digikam is such a large download :P
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

Linux Tools for Serious Photographers

[C. F. Howlett]

A little insight into the whole photo processing theme

Linux Tools for Serious
Photographers
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

Re: linuxsampler on UbuntuStudio?

[Ralf Mardorf]

Douglas I forward a message from Bart to you [1].
You also could take a look at the mailing lists archives:

https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-users/

e.g.

https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-users/2012-August/008388.html
your first mail already came through the list.

The devel list's archive:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/

[1]
 Forwarded Message 
From: bart deruyter 
Reply-to: Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion

To: Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion

Subject: Re: linuxsampler on UbuntuStudio?
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 14:31:24 +0200

I replyed about this in your previous email about it. Did something get
wrong in sending it, or you receiving it? I don't know, anyways, here's
what I wrote:


Aparently, due to licensing issues (I don't know the details),
linuxsampler is not included in ubuntu's repositories. That was the case
a couple of years ago at least. I don't know if that's still the issue.


You do can get it from kx-studio's ppa though, that's where I get it
from.


Grtz,
Bart


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

Re: linuxsampler on UbuntuStudio?

[bart deruyter]

I replyed about this in your previous email about it. Did something get
wrong in sending it, or you receiving it? I don't know, anyways, here's
what I wrote:

Aparently, due to licensing issues (I don't know the details), linuxsampler is
not included in ubuntu's repositories. That was the case a couple of years
ago at least. I don't know if that's still the issue.

You do can get it from kx-studio's ppa though, that's where I get it from.


Grtz,
Bart
http://www.bartart3d.be/
On facebook 
On Twitter 
On Identi.ca 
On Google+ 



2012/8/6 Douglas Regehr 

> How do I install linuxsampler on UbuntuStudio 12.04 amd64?  When I do
> "sudo apt-get install linuxsampler" I get this response:
>
> Package linuxsampler is not available, but is referred to by another
> package.
> This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
> is only available from another source
>
> Strangely, I can install qsampler just fine...but of course it doesn't run
> without linuxsampler.  What is the recommended way to get linuxsampler?
>  Compile it from source?  Install it from a PPA?
> --
> Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
> Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
>
>
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

linuxsampler on UbuntuStudio?

[Douglas Regehr]

How do I install linuxsampler on UbuntuStudio 12.04 amd64?  When I do "sudo
apt-get install linuxsampler" I get this response:

Package linuxsampler is not available, but is referred to by another
package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source

Strangely, I can install qsampler just fine...but of course it doesn't run
without linuxsampler.  What is the recommended way to get linuxsampler?
 Compile it from source?  Install it from a PPA?
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

Re: Pulseaudio, qjackctl .. nearly working :(

[Hakan Koseoglu]

> The problem comes when using Audacious, it will act as if it is playing an
> mp3, but it is sort of stuck and althou I have clicked 'Play' the tack time
> does not move... when I stop qjackctl, Audacious will kick in and become
> un-stuck and just play as normal.
>
> Open pavucontrol, then select the pulse sink as the device for Audacious
since it's not going through the Jack but waits for the real audio device
to be ready. As soon as you switch to the sink, you'll be fine.


> When qjackctl is running, I have checked that jack is "set as fallback" in
> PulseAudio mixer
>
> I believe "fallback" means if the default audio device doesn't exist, use
this one. It exists but in use by jack. Happy to be corrected.
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

Pulseaudio, qjackctl .. nearly working :(

[Benjamin Martin]

hello all,

I have UbuntuStudio12.04 on a P4 machine with 2GB of memory and 2 sounds 
cards (1xBuilt in, 1xSoundBlaster)


On the whole it works well and i can change the sound output using the 
PulseAudio mixer.


I setup a Rivendell by following this guide 
(http://bluedrava.com/rivendell-on-ubuntu-12.04) and it too works well, 
therefore showing that jack is working


When qjackctl is running all seems to be fine and shows the correct 
connections with PulseAudio JACK Sink etc.


The problem comes when using Audacious, it will act as if it is playing 
an mp3, but it is sort of stuck and althou I have clicked 'Play' the 
tack time does not move... when I stop qjackctl, Audacious will kick in 
and become un-stuck and just play as normal.


When qjackctl is running, I have checked that jack is "set as fallback" 
in PulseAudio mixer


My problem sounds like this invalid bug report:
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/925257

I guess this is Audacious trying to use PulseAudio which it can't until 
qjackctl have killed jackd .. but I think they "should"  play nicely 
together?? (providing the PulseAudio JACK Sink is setup correctly) ... 
what could the problem be?


I have googled about for abit and read some stuff on the ubuntu studio 
wiki but I am abit stuck for a solution... can anyone offer any pointers?


Thanks for any help you can offer,

-Ben








--
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users