Re: [ubuntu-studio-users] Frescobaldi package broken in Jammy
> > Missing context. You appear to have replied to the thread in the wrong > mailing > list? I know Steve Langasek but he's not subscribed to this mailing list, and > if your intent was to bring this mailing list into the discussion, it > would've > been better to add this mailing list so that there could've been some sort > of > trail to follow, i.e. we could've seen the previous messages for some > context. > It's the wrong mailing list! Frescobaldi's developer asked me to add my voice to this issue and there was a link to the mailing list. I saw the first few letters of the list and presumed that this (ubuntu-users) is the one. As I couldn't find the email thread in my archives, I presumed that I have deleted it. So I thought, copying the email headline and continuing from the last email will do the job. How very, very silly of me! So many wrong presumptions. I do apologise. > > That said, I'm at least tangentially aware of the frescobaldi situation. > Frescobaldi isn't a package we carry in Ubuntu Studio. Ubuntu Studio is > merely > a different default installation of Ubuntu, otherwise it's completely > Ubuntu > once installed and not a separate distribution. Therefore, there's no need > to > go through Ubuntu Studio for the issues you're having. Steve is one of the > highest-ranking developers in Ubuntu (above even me), so you're already > talking to the right people. > Point taken, thank you. VM -- ubuntu-studio-users mailing list ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: [ubuntu-studio-users] Frescobaldi package broken in Jammy
Frescobaldi is having problems on Ubuntu 22.04, I advise you to install the flatpak version or upgrade to Ubuntu 22.10. Em qui., 17 de nov. de 2022 às 12:51, Erich Eickmeyer escreveu: > Hi Viktor, > > On Thursday, November 17, 2022 12:57:16 AM PST Viktor Mastoridis wrote: > > But On Tue Oct 25 2022 at 05:50:44 UTC, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > I am prepared to argue in this case that a full-upstream update in SRU > > > would be appropriate on the grounds that the package is completely > > > unusable > > > and therefore the regression potential is nil, and has a better chance > > > of correctness than cherry-picking individual commits and hoping we've > > > caught all the type errors. > > > > This doesn't obviously fix the problem of the missing dependency. I > > > > > will check with the rest of the SRU team how they would want this > handled. > > > > I would like to add my vote to this issue. I am a music teacher relying > > heavily on Frescobaldi. It was never broken in the last 10 years on UBS > and > > this time I was taken by surprise, hoping that I can easily install 3.2 > > from code - but failed miserably and wasted many hours. > > > > I understand if nobody has the time to fix this. But I would like to say > my > > opinion on the importance of Frescobaldi. > > > > Music production, performance and education are closely connected. Many, > if > > not most of us musicians teach in addition to music making. *Especially > > during and after Covid. * > > In that light, Ubuntu Studio could reconsider the importance of > > Frescobaldi. It plays a crucial role in music education (alongside > > Lilypond, of course:-) and should have a status same as Ardour or Jack; > and > > not treated as a secondary 'add-on'. > > > > Viktor Mastoridis > > Music producer and educator > > Missing context. You appear to have replied to the thread in the wrong > mailing > list? I know Steve Langasek but he's not subscribed to this mailing list, > and > if your intent was to bring this mailing list into the discussion, it > would've > been better to add this mailing list so that there could've been some sort > of > trail to follow, i.e. we could've seen the previous messages for some > context. > > That said, I'm at least tangentially aware of the frescobaldi situation. > Frescobaldi isn't a package we carry in Ubuntu Studio. Ubuntu Studio is > merely > a different default installation of Ubuntu, otherwise it's completely > Ubuntu > once installed and not a separate distribution. Therefore, there's no need > to > go through Ubuntu Studio for the issues you're having. Steve is one of the > highest-ranking developers in Ubuntu (above even me), so you're already > talking to the right people. > > -- > Erich Eickmeyer > Project Leader - Ubuntu Studio > Ubuntu MOTU-- > ubuntu-studio-users mailing list > ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users > -- ubuntu-studio-users mailing list ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: [ubuntu-studio-users] Frescobaldi package broken in Jammy
Hi Viktor, On Thursday, November 17, 2022 12:57:16 AM PST Viktor Mastoridis wrote: > But On Tue Oct 25 2022 at 05:50:44 UTC, Steve Langasek wrote: > > I am prepared to argue in this case that a full-upstream update in SRU > > would be appropriate on the grounds that the package is completely > > unusable > > and therefore the regression potential is nil, and has a better chance > > of correctness than cherry-picking individual commits and hoping we've > > caught all the type errors. > > This doesn't obviously fix the problem of the missing dependency. I > > > will check with the rest of the SRU team how they would want this handled. > > I would like to add my vote to this issue. I am a music teacher relying > heavily on Frescobaldi. It was never broken in the last 10 years on UBS and > this time I was taken by surprise, hoping that I can easily install 3.2 > from code - but failed miserably and wasted many hours. > > I understand if nobody has the time to fix this. But I would like to say my > opinion on the importance of Frescobaldi. > > Music production, performance and education are closely connected. Many, if > not most of us musicians teach in addition to music making. *Especially > during and after Covid. * > In that light, Ubuntu Studio could reconsider the importance of > Frescobaldi. It plays a crucial role in music education (alongside > Lilypond, of course:-) and should have a status same as Ardour or Jack; and > not treated as a secondary 'add-on'. > > Viktor Mastoridis > Music producer and educator Missing context. You appear to have replied to the thread in the wrong mailing list? I know Steve Langasek but he's not subscribed to this mailing list, and if your intent was to bring this mailing list into the discussion, it would've been better to add this mailing list so that there could've been some sort of trail to follow, i.e. we could've seen the previous messages for some context. That said, I'm at least tangentially aware of the frescobaldi situation. Frescobaldi isn't a package we carry in Ubuntu Studio. Ubuntu Studio is merely a different default installation of Ubuntu, otherwise it's completely Ubuntu once installed and not a separate distribution. Therefore, there's no need to go through Ubuntu Studio for the issues you're having. Steve is one of the highest-ranking developers in Ubuntu (above even me), so you're already talking to the right people. -- Erich Eickmeyer Project Leader - Ubuntu Studio Ubuntu MOTU signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- ubuntu-studio-users mailing list ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
[ubuntu-studio-users] Frescobaldi package broken in Jammy
But On Tue Oct 25 2022 at 05:50:44 UTC, Steve Langasek wrote: > I am prepared to argue in this case that a full-upstream update in SRU > would be appropriate on the grounds that the package is completely unusable > and therefore the regression potential is nil, and has a better chance > of correctness than cherry-picking individual commits and hoping we've > caught all the type errors. This doesn't obviously fix the problem of the missing dependency. I > will check with the rest of the SRU team how they would want this handled. I would like to add my vote to this issue. I am a music teacher relying heavily on Frescobaldi. It was never broken in the last 10 years on UBS and this time I was taken by surprise, hoping that I can easily install 3.2 from code - but failed miserably and wasted many hours. I understand if nobody has the time to fix this. But I would like to say my opinion on the importance of Frescobaldi. Music production, performance and education are closely connected. Many, if not most of us musicians teach in addition to music making. *Especially during and after Covid. * In that light, Ubuntu Studio could reconsider the importance of Frescobaldi. It plays a crucial role in music education (alongside Lilypond, of course:-) and should have a status same as Ardour or Jack; and not treated as a secondary 'add-on'. Viktor Mastoridis Music producer and educator -- ubuntu-studio-users mailing list ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
