Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-27 Thread Daniel Green
 Right now I'm looking at this:
 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834220349
 For a modest $849.99

Just went up to $999.99 :-(

On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Daniel Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Awesome. Thanks for the continual support and information.

 Right now I'm looking at this:
 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834220349
 For a modest $849.99

 The cool part is that it has an eSATA port so that I can connect an
 uber second storage device instead of replacing the internal hard
 drive. That is what is recommended, right? Working off of a fast
 access drive for audio recording?

 Here are the relevant stats:

 Brand:  ASUS
 Series: M51 Series
 Model: M51TA-X2
 CPU Type: AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 2.2G
 Screen: 15.4 WXGA+
 Memory Size: 4GB DDR2
 Hard Disk : 250GB
 Optical Drive: DVD Super Multi
 Graphics Card:  ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650
 Video Memory:   512MB
 CPU Type:  AMD Turion X2 Ultra
 CPU Speed:  ZM-82(2.20GHz)
 CPU L2 Cache: 2MB
 USB: 4
 IEEE 1394: 1
 1 x E-SATA
 1 x Headphone-out jack (S/PDIF)
 Audio: Integrated Sound card # Wont be using it!!!
 Speaker: Internal Speakers # Ewww, uh no. See above.
 Battery: 6-cell lithium ion

 What do you guys think?

 On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Karoliina Salminen
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I agree.  The premium payed for Macs is not reflected in the actual
 hardware used.  I just priced out a loaded Dell Latitude E6400, which
 fully loaded is the same price as the starter Macbook.  The Dell is
 using a better CPU, double the RAM, a fast hard drive (7200 RPM laptop
 drive) etc.  It just doesn't make sense unless you actually care about
 the solid aluminum body :)

 I have 7200 rpm laptop drive on my older Macbook and I upgraded the
 RAM to 4GB using cheap Mac compatible RAMs (other than sold by Apple)
 and the setup works fine.

 And I do care about the solid aluminium body. The older model did not
 have that, but even with that I have been pretty happy. The build
 quality is excellent. I have used Dells for couple of years and I can
 not say the same for their build quality, they are cheap crap where
 the Mac is a solid product. If you want cheap, then go for Dell, if
 you want good quality, awesome design / styling etc.  get a Mac. If
 you don't care about style and having the nice beautiful product
 doesn't make you feel like Christmas each time you look and touch it,
 then just forget about it, get something cheap that will do the task
 and buy a new when it breaks. In my case, it is not that simple as
 that. After tens of years of plastic boxes, I got really bored to the
 cheap plastics that break because their build quality is so awful (one
 old Dell we have is no longer usable because the plastic chassis is
 not rigid enough to not cause disconnects etc. inside if moved at all)
 and I buy now only good quality hardware which looks  feels really
 nice and Macs meet that criteria, I am no longer just looking at the
 price-raw-performance ratio. It is a personal choice.

 I don't personally need the firewire (and I kind of feel it is a bit
 overrated), because I am using the internal sound card and for all
 MIDI etc. connectivity USB is just fine. At home I am using the iMac
 for music. I don't have audio interface on it either, I figured that
 after all, I may not need one, the internal sound is good enough. I
 have a mixer connected to the line input. Works for me since I am
 doing electronic music and only recording one synthesizer (when using
 the external hardware synths) at a time (because I don't have anybody
 else but me playing). I have a 8 in / 8 out audio interface on the
 custom desktop PC (which is running Ubuntu Studio), its internal audio
 hardware is unusable for music (unlike on Mac).

 Best Regards,
 Karoliina
 ( http://karoliinamusic.blogspot.com )
 (Typing this from non-studio-Ubuntu Intrepid running on Thinkpad T61p
 (which is okay for a PC, but not as nice as my Macs are, and came with
 unnecessary Windows-license (never booted it to Windows before
 installing the Ubuntu)))

 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users



-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-27 Thread hollunder
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:25:35 +0100
Gerhard Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 There are many users out there with low budgets, like me trying ubuntu
 studio because they are looking for alternatives from MS-dependency
 and for them Apple-products even more are out of range.
 I'm lucky with a nexoc osiris s620ii, a barebone, my configuration is
 Intel cpu medium speed dualcore and chipsets,  FW, 4G RAM,  320 G HD,
 ~700€ wto OS in Germany 9/08. Edirol FW101 as sound interface. I'm
 messing around with live-played sw-synths, wine, wineasio, reaper,
 vst, especially korg MS20 legacy, synchronous instrument and voice
 recording. For low latency audio performance this machine is much
 better then an other notebook with amd64x2 processor, nvidia chipset
 and 3d graphics. This notebook solution is for life performance and
 recording, so it has to be small, light weighted and needs no
 3d-gamer-screen. For more elaborated production and composition you
 either will use stationary machines with 20 screens.
 

I'm kind of curious about barebone. I'm thinking about getting a laptop
or netbook but barebone sounds interesting to me. Wouldn't a barebone
kind of allow one to get the best stuff there is?
I know that barebones are quite common for normal boxes but I don't
really have experience with laptops and wonder about the ups and downs..

Philipp

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-27 Thread Daniel Green
It would be cool if we could ensemble some laptops preloaded with
UbuntuStudio and perhaps had some kind of contest with them as prizes,
or something. It seems like a fun project for the community to
undertake. We could vote on it piece by piece and document the
process. We could then release a guide on building a laptop DAW and
promote UbuntuStudio in the same swing.

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:31 PM,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:25:35 +0100
 Gerhard Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 There are many users out there with low budgets, like me trying ubuntu
 studio because they are looking for alternatives from MS-dependency
 and for them Apple-products even more are out of range.
 I'm lucky with a nexoc osiris s620ii, a barebone, my configuration is
 Intel cpu medium speed dualcore and chipsets,  FW, 4G RAM,  320 G HD,
 ~700€ wto OS in Germany 9/08. Edirol FW101 as sound interface. I'm
 messing around with live-played sw-synths, wine, wineasio, reaper,
 vst, especially korg MS20 legacy, synchronous instrument and voice
 recording. For low latency audio performance this machine is much
 better then an other notebook with amd64x2 processor, nvidia chipset
 and 3d graphics. This notebook solution is for life performance and
 recording, so it has to be small, light weighted and needs no
 3d-gamer-screen. For more elaborated production and composition you
 either will use stationary machines with 20 screens.


 I'm kind of curious about barebone. I'm thinking about getting a laptop
 or netbook but barebone sounds interesting to me. Wouldn't a barebone
 kind of allow one to get the best stuff there is?
 I know that barebones are quite common for normal boxes but I don't
 really have experience with laptops and wonder about the ups and downs..

 Philipp

 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-26 Thread Karoliina Salminen
 Generalizations tend to be innaccurate.  Certainly Dell has their low
 cost lines (the Inspiron), but their Latitude lines are awesome.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I have one Latitude D600 on my
table and I never liked it. I have stopped using it (replaced it with
Thinkpad T61p which is from another planet in comparison, still not as
nice as a Mac, but as nice as a PC gets). Another huge downside with
the both mentioned is that Bill Gates got some additional funding for
nothing since the laptops came with Windows installed despite I do not
care about Windows. It is lesser evil to pay the money to Apple, that
pretty much avoids MS getting funded with Linux laptops which
otherwise forcefully come with Windows installed even if the customer
does not want that.

Karoliina

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-25 Thread Simon Loewen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Sony Vaio SZ90PS.  No fan noise when using the Intel GPU. Fan noise when
using the nVidea GPU, but one has no need for 3D graphics in music.

aYo Binitie wrote:
 I love my Dell Inspiron 1720 - no noise from the fan
 
 a
 
 
 On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 6:51 PM, sh0099 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 for audio i think dell is not so nice because of its loud fan
 
 a friend have a asus laptop which are more quiet
 
 
 
 Daniel Green schrieb:
  I'm looking to get my hands on a laptop I can use for audio production
  and live performance with UbuntuStudio. I need a bit of help finding
  something suitable. I figure the following should be taken into
  consideration:
 
  Fast hard drive
  Multiple(?) Firwire ports
  USB ports
  Decent sized screen.
  Long battery life
  Linux friendly.
 
  No need to worry about the audio card as it should be replaced with
  something external anyways. Any recommendations for this too?
 
  I am open to and appreciate all advice.
 
  Thank you!
  Daniel.
 
 
 
 
 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
 mailto:Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
 
 

- --
You can thank God for atheists!
http://www.justgiving.com/atheistbus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFJK7aJKTaqpMPqlXYRAot3AJ4+XZ0Nx+k+dWzy72FQa+NSu1si4QCeO2Ud
Jr7E0qv9TkBnMYp+K5pZbPY=
=HnRS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-25 Thread Joseph Atanacio
I was considering exactly this and I chose a refurb macbook.   (Black  
one...$1099)

When purchased from apple they are warrantee them as a new box.
FW 800 is not a mandate for 'me'.  FW400 and usb 2.0 get me threw the  
day.  That, coupled with 2.4 GHz 2mb Ram and 250 G hd work for me.   
Hard drive and ram upgrades will be easy enuf in the future but get me  
threw for the next year or so.

Ardour 2.5 SAE now works really well in OSX too.
The apple product is solid.  They charge you for it.
FW800 is the MBpro only so that will bump you up a few $$ but if you  
can get by w/ FW400 I'd encourage you to consider the previous  
generation Macbook. (refurbished)


Hope this helps.



On Nov 24, 2008, at 7:16 PM, Eric Hedekar wrote:

The new macbooks don't even have firewire until you get into the pro  
range.  Why pay for the marketing hype?

-Eric

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Karoliina Salminen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:


I think you could consider a Mac. The new unibody Macbook is pretty  
nice.
I have the older model. It has Intel chipset, fast processor etc.  
and you can

install Ubuntu-Studio  on it with bootcamp. The internal audio
hardware is pretty good,
at least on MacOSX side there is no such thing as latency in the Logic
Studio (Logic Pro 8). I have not tested
Ubuntu Studio with it (the Ubuntu Studio is on a desktop PC). The fan
noise is low and
in general the laptop is very nice. The new model should be even
nicer. It is manufactured from
aluminum block with machining - awesome! I am pretty happy with the
Mac hardware, and I think it would worth to spend
the little premium also for a Linux machine to get the Apple HW. The
Macbook is quite reasonably priced.
http://www.apple.com/macbook/

Best Regards,
Karoliina

--
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users



--
___
http://greyrockstudio.blogspot.com
--
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-25 Thread Gustin Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Eric Hedekar wrote:
 The new macbooks don't even have firewire until you get into the pro
 range.  Why pay for the marketing hype?
 -Eric

I agree.  The premium payed for Macs is not reflected in the actual
hardware used.  I just priced out a loaded Dell Latitude E6400, which
fully loaded is the same price as the starter Macbook.  The Dell is
using a better CPU, double the RAM, a fast hard drive (7200 RPM laptop
drive) etc.  It just doesn't make sense unless you actually care about
the solid aluminum body :)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJK9ZxwRXgH3rKGfMRAt4nAJ49GZyaZ4pHmQHEdm59flLgzqIuCwCdF8rQ
gtspHk2ieUfbEsil2fGe9g4=
=zCK3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-25 Thread Mac
Hi,

Just to add my $.02.

I have a Dell XPS. I have not noticed any fan noise.

Mac



-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-25 Thread Hakan Koseoglu
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Mac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have a Dell XPS. I have not noticed any fan noise.
Dell Inspiron 9400 - didn't have any fan noise when I got it two years
ago. Now I can hear the fan noise. I blame the worn down fan bearings
+ dust + grime blocking the passages. Still very quiet laptop IMHO.

-- 
Hakan (m1fcj) - http://www.hititgunesi.org

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-25 Thread Karoliina Salminen
 I agree.  The premium payed for Macs is not reflected in the actual
 hardware used.  I just priced out a loaded Dell Latitude E6400, which
 fully loaded is the same price as the starter Macbook.  The Dell is
 using a better CPU, double the RAM, a fast hard drive (7200 RPM laptop
 drive) etc.  It just doesn't make sense unless you actually care about
 the solid aluminum body :)

I have 7200 rpm laptop drive on my older Macbook and I upgraded the
RAM to 4GB using cheap Mac compatible RAMs (other than sold by Apple)
and the setup works fine.

And I do care about the solid aluminium body. The older model did not
have that, but even with that I have been pretty happy. The build
quality is excellent. I have used Dells for couple of years and I can
not say the same for their build quality, they are cheap crap where
the Mac is a solid product. If you want cheap, then go for Dell, if
you want good quality, awesome design / styling etc.  get a Mac. If
you don't care about style and having the nice beautiful product
doesn't make you feel like Christmas each time you look and touch it,
then just forget about it, get something cheap that will do the task
and buy a new when it breaks. In my case, it is not that simple as
that. After tens of years of plastic boxes, I got really bored to the
cheap plastics that break because their build quality is so awful (one
old Dell we have is no longer usable because the plastic chassis is
not rigid enough to not cause disconnects etc. inside if moved at all)
and I buy now only good quality hardware which looks  feels really
nice and Macs meet that criteria, I am no longer just looking at the
price-raw-performance ratio. It is a personal choice.

I don't personally need the firewire (and I kind of feel it is a bit
overrated), because I am using the internal sound card and for all
MIDI etc. connectivity USB is just fine. At home I am using the iMac
for music. I don't have audio interface on it either, I figured that
after all, I may not need one, the internal sound is good enough. I
have a mixer connected to the line input. Works for me since I am
doing electronic music and only recording one synthesizer (when using
the external hardware synths) at a time (because I don't have anybody
else but me playing). I have a 8 in / 8 out audio interface on the
custom desktop PC (which is running Ubuntu Studio), its internal audio
hardware is unusable for music (unlike on Mac).

Best Regards,
Karoliina
( http://karoliinamusic.blogspot.com )
(Typing this from non-studio-Ubuntu Intrepid running on Thinkpad T61p
(which is okay for a PC, but not as nice as my Macs are, and came with
unnecessary Windows-license (never booted it to Windows before
installing the Ubuntu)))

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-25 Thread Daniel Green
Awesome. Thanks for the continual support and information.

Right now I'm looking at this:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834220349
For a modest $849.99

The cool part is that it has an eSATA port so that I can connect an
uber second storage device instead of replacing the internal hard
drive. That is what is recommended, right? Working off of a fast
access drive for audio recording?

Here are the relevant stats:

Brand:  ASUS
Series: M51 Series
Model: M51TA-X2
CPU Type: AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 2.2G
Screen: 15.4 WXGA+
Memory Size: 4GB DDR2
Hard Disk : 250GB
Optical Drive: DVD Super Multi
Graphics Card:  ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650
Video Memory:   512MB
CPU Type:  AMD Turion X2 Ultra
CPU Speed:  ZM-82(2.20GHz)
CPU L2 Cache: 2MB
USB: 4
IEEE 1394: 1
1 x E-SATA
1 x Headphone-out jack (S/PDIF)
Audio: Integrated Sound card # Wont be using it!!!
Speaker: Internal Speakers # Ewww, uh no. See above.
Battery: 6-cell lithium ion

What do you guys think?

On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Karoliina Salminen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I agree.  The premium payed for Macs is not reflected in the actual
 hardware used.  I just priced out a loaded Dell Latitude E6400, which
 fully loaded is the same price as the starter Macbook.  The Dell is
 using a better CPU, double the RAM, a fast hard drive (7200 RPM laptop
 drive) etc.  It just doesn't make sense unless you actually care about
 the solid aluminum body :)

 I have 7200 rpm laptop drive on my older Macbook and I upgraded the
 RAM to 4GB using cheap Mac compatible RAMs (other than sold by Apple)
 and the setup works fine.

 And I do care about the solid aluminium body. The older model did not
 have that, but even with that I have been pretty happy. The build
 quality is excellent. I have used Dells for couple of years and I can
 not say the same for their build quality, they are cheap crap where
 the Mac is a solid product. If you want cheap, then go for Dell, if
 you want good quality, awesome design / styling etc.  get a Mac. If
 you don't care about style and having the nice beautiful product
 doesn't make you feel like Christmas each time you look and touch it,
 then just forget about it, get something cheap that will do the task
 and buy a new when it breaks. In my case, it is not that simple as
 that. After tens of years of plastic boxes, I got really bored to the
 cheap plastics that break because their build quality is so awful (one
 old Dell we have is no longer usable because the plastic chassis is
 not rigid enough to not cause disconnects etc. inside if moved at all)
 and I buy now only good quality hardware which looks  feels really
 nice and Macs meet that criteria, I am no longer just looking at the
 price-raw-performance ratio. It is a personal choice.

 I don't personally need the firewire (and I kind of feel it is a bit
 overrated), because I am using the internal sound card and for all
 MIDI etc. connectivity USB is just fine. At home I am using the iMac
 for music. I don't have audio interface on it either, I figured that
 after all, I may not need one, the internal sound is good enough. I
 have a mixer connected to the line input. Works for me since I am
 doing electronic music and only recording one synthesizer (when using
 the external hardware synths) at a time (because I don't have anybody
 else but me playing). I have a 8 in / 8 out audio interface on the
 custom desktop PC (which is running Ubuntu Studio), its internal audio
 hardware is unusable for music (unlike on Mac).

 Best Regards,
 Karoliina
 ( http://karoliinamusic.blogspot.com )
 (Typing this from non-studio-Ubuntu Intrepid running on Thinkpad T61p
 (which is okay for a PC, but not as nice as my Macs are, and came with
 unnecessary Windows-license (never booted it to Windows before
 installing the Ubuntu)))

 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-25 Thread Christopher Stamper
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Daniel Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Awesome. Thanks for the continual support and information.

 Right now I'm looking at this:
 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834220349
 For a modest $849.99

 The cool part is that it has an eSATA port so that I can connect an
 uber second storage device instead of replacing the internal hard
 drive. That is what is recommended, right? Working off of a fast
 access drive for audio recording?

 Here are the relevant stats:

 Brand:  ASUS
 Series: M51 Series
 Model: M51TA-X2
 CPU Type: AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 2.2G
 Screen: 15.4 WXGA+
 Memory Size: 4GB DDR2
 Hard Disk : 250GB
 Optical Drive: DVD Super Multi
 Graphics Card:  ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650
 Video Memory:   512MB
 CPU Type:  AMD Turion X2 Ultra
 CPU Speed:  ZM-82(2.20GHz)
 CPU L2 Cache: 2MB
 USB: 4
 IEEE 1394: 1
 1 x E-SATA
 1 x Headphone-out jack (S/PDIF)
 Audio: Integrated Sound card # Wont be using it!!!
 Speaker: Internal Speakers # Ewww, uh no. See above.
 Battery: 6-cell lithium ion

 What do you guys think?


I'm stuck with a 15 screen on my laptop, and wishing I wasn't. You may feel
differently, though... ;-)

-- 
Christopher Stamper

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://tinyurl.com/2ooncg
gTalk: http://tinyurl.com/6e359r
Skype: cdstamper
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-25 Thread Gustin Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Karoliina Salminen wrote:
 I agree.  The premium payed for Macs is not reflected in the actual
 hardware used.  I just priced out a loaded Dell Latitude E6400, which
 fully loaded is the same price as the starter Macbook.  The Dell is
 using a better CPU, double the RAM, a fast hard drive (7200 RPM laptop
 drive) etc.  It just doesn't make sense unless you actually care about
 the solid aluminum body :)
 
 I have 7200 rpm laptop drive on my older Macbook and I upgraded the
 RAM to 4GB using cheap Mac compatible RAMs (other than sold by Apple)
 and the setup works fine.

Those cost extra, putting the cost benefit ratio further out for me.
 
 And I do care about the solid aluminium body. The older model did not
 have that, but even with that I have been pretty happy. The build
 quality is excellent. I have used Dells for couple of years and I can
 not say the same for their build quality, they are cheap crap where
 the Mac is a solid product. If you want cheap, then go for Dell, if

Generalizations tend to be innaccurate.  Certainly Dell has their low
cost lines (the Inspiron), but their Latitude lines are awesome.  We
have been using them at work for a while now and I do enjoy the
noticeable build quality difference.  The same goes for the XPS lines as
well.

 you want good quality, awesome design / styling etc.  get a Mac. If
 you don't care about style and having the nice beautiful product
 doesn't make you feel like Christmas each time you look and touch it,

This is the e6400 for me.  Whatever you may want to say about Dell, you
at least know exactly what you are getting.  How many different 2.4 Ghz
CPUs does Intel make?  For those of use who care, we can get exactly the
CPU we want.  For those of you who don't care you can always buy a Mac :)

 then just forget about it, get something cheap that will do the task
 and buy a new when it breaks. In my case, it is not that simple as
 that. After tens of years of plastic boxes, I got really bored to the
 cheap plastics that break because their build quality is so awful (one
 old Dell we have is no longer usable because the plastic chassis is
 not rigid enough to not cause disconnects etc. inside if moved at all)
 and I buy now only good quality hardware which looks  feels really
 nice and Macs meet that criteria, I am no longer just looking at the
 price-raw-performance ratio. It is a personal choice.
 
I have been beating up Dell laptops for 10 years, and my experience has
been different from yours.  I have a Dell 733 that just won't die.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJLOnqwRXgH3rKGfMRAmKkAJ9it1GRBQM3pikAA8fyQqPNQRA9fwCggoME
JqdsSiiF2ZzjOQ4Wiv8Aejc=
=xkmi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-25 Thread aYo Binitie
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Gustin Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Karoliina Salminen wrote:
  I agree.  The premium payed for Macs is not reflected in the actual
  hardware used.  I just priced out a loaded Dell Latitude E6400, which
  fully loaded is the same price as the starter Macbook.  The Dell is
  using a better CPU, double the RAM, a fast hard drive (7200 RPM laptop
  drive) etc.  It just doesn't make sense unless you actually care about
  the solid aluminum body :)
 
  I have 7200 rpm laptop drive on my older Macbook and I upgraded the
  RAM to 4GB using cheap Mac compatible RAMs (other than sold by Apple)
  and the setup works fine.

 Those cost extra, putting the cost benefit ratio further out for me.
 
  And I do care about the solid aluminium body. The older model did not
  have that, but even with that I have been pretty happy. The build
  quality is excellent. I have used Dells for couple of years and I can
  not say the same for their build quality, they are cheap crap where
  the Mac is a solid product. If you want cheap, then go for Dell, if

 Generalizations tend to be innaccurate.  Certainly Dell has their low
 cost lines (the Inspiron),


*** My Inspiron 1720 cost me $2500, I would not really call that cheap. Its
also very beautiful in a minimalist sort of way :).


 but their Latitude lines are awesome.  We
 have been using them at work for a while now and I do enjoy the
 noticeable build quality difference.  The same goes for the XPS lines as
 well.

  you want good quality, awesome design / styling etc.  get a Mac. If
  you don't care about style and having the nice beautiful product
  doesn't make you feel like Christmas each time you look and touch it,

 This is the e6400 for me.  Whatever you may want to say about Dell, you
 at least know exactly what you are getting.  How many different 2.4 Ghz
 CPUs does Intel make?  For those of use who care, we can get exactly the
 CPU we want.  For those of you who don't care you can always buy a Mac :)

  then just forget about it, get something cheap that will do the task
  and buy a new when it breaks. In my case, it is not that simple as
  that. After tens of years of plastic boxes, I got really bored to the
  cheap plastics that break because their build quality is so awful (one
  old Dell we have is no longer usable because the plastic chassis is
  not rigid enough to not cause disconnects etc. inside if moved at all)
  and I buy now only good quality hardware which looks  feels really
  nice and Macs meet that criteria, I am no longer just looking at the
  price-raw-performance ratio. It is a personal choice.
 
 I have been beating up Dell laptops for 10 years, and my experience has
 been different from yours.  I have a Dell 733 that just won't die.

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iD8DBQFJLOnqwRXgH3rKGfMRAmKkAJ9it1GRBQM3pikAA8fyQqPNQRA9fwCggoME
 JqdsSiiF2ZzjOQ4Wiv8Aejc=
 =xkmi
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-24 Thread sh0099
for audio i think dell is not so nice because of its loud fan

a friend have a asus laptop which are more quiet



Daniel Green schrieb:
 I'm looking to get my hands on a laptop I can use for audio production
 and live performance with UbuntuStudio. I need a bit of help finding
 something suitable. I figure the following should be taken into
 consideration:

 Fast hard drive
 Multiple(?) Firwire ports
 USB ports
 Decent sized screen.
 Long battery life
 Linux friendly.

 No need to worry about the audio card as it should be replaced with
 something external anyways. Any recommendations for this too?

 I am open to and appreciate all advice.

 Thank you!
 Daniel.

   


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-24 Thread Eric Hedekar
The new macbooks don't even have firewire until you get into the pro range.
Why pay for the marketing hype?
-Eric

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Karoliina Salminen 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 I think you could consider a Mac. The new unibody Macbook is pretty nice.
 I have the older model. It has Intel chipset, fast processor etc. and you
 can
 install Ubuntu-Studio  on it with bootcamp. The internal audio
 hardware is pretty good,
 at least on MacOSX side there is no such thing as latency in the Logic
 Studio (Logic Pro 8). I have not tested
 Ubuntu Studio with it (the Ubuntu Studio is on a desktop PC). The fan
 noise is low and
 in general the laptop is very nice. The new model should be even
 nicer. It is manufactured from
 aluminum block with machining - awesome! I am pretty happy with the
 Mac hardware, and I think it would worth to spend
 the little premium also for a Linux machine to get the Apple HW. The
 Macbook is quite reasonably priced.
 http://www.apple.com/macbook/

 Best Regards,
 Karoliina

 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users




-- 
___
http://greyrockstudio.blogspot.com
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


RE: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sounds like he saw something similar to what I mentioned in an earlier post.

But, the Ubuntu CD I received with mine was an official Ubuntu CD.

I didn't pursue why it wouldn't re-format the FAT partition that Dell had
used.

I just used Gparted live to reformat and then reloaded Ubuntu.

Mac


Original Message:
-
From: Matthew Polashek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:11:53 -0500
To: ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: RE: Audio Production Laptop


An importsant note here!!  My brother purchased a dell ubuntu laptop but
ubuntustudio did not install on it off the mirror iso images.  He actually
was unable to easily install ubuntustudio and runs the dell version of
ubuntu on it, having become too frustrated.  Granted he's probably a little
time challenged, but this is a really important consideration.  

On the otherhand, I run a dell d510 all day every day, and though I wish
the screen resolution was better, it's awesome!  I never use my apple G4
powerbook anymore.




mail2web.com – Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft®
Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail



-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-20 Thread Daniel Green
 I am a fan of firewire, in fact it's my favourite kind of wire.

Should I limit myself to laptops that have multiple firewire ports? Or
would getting a PCMCIA card with firewire interfaces or something be a
better bet? Judging by several conversations I've had with digital
audio enthusiasts, I'm on the side of firewire as well.

On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Sorry to go off topic, but I'm fascinated by the line:
 I am not a fan of firewire.

 Not a fan of firewire(more correctly, ieee 1394) because of
 compatability issues or because of the standard itself?

 I am a fan of firewire, in fact it's my favourite kind of wire.
 Firewire does things that USB simply cannot do, ie, reliably feed my
 7-year-old computer with 12 channels of audio simultaneously. And I
 easily expand that a great deal.

 Philip Schleihauf
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Gustin Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Daniel Green wrote:
  I'm looking to get my hands on a laptop I can use for audio production
  and live performance with UbuntuStudio. I need a bit of help finding
  something suitable. I figure the following should be taken into
  consideration:
 
  Fast hard drive
  Multiple(?) Firwire ports

 I am not a fan of firewire.  Check the FFADO site for hardware
 compatability.
  USB ports
  Decent sized screen.

 Inversely proportional to battery life.  The larger the screen, the
 shorter the battery life

  Long battery life
  Linux friendly.
 
  No need to worry about the audio card as it should be replaced with
  something external anyways. Any recommendations for this too?
 
  I am open to and appreciate all advice.

 I am in the process of getting a new laptop as wll.  I eventually
 settled on a Dell Latitude (business line, more expensive but very well
 made) e6400.  14 screen (1440x900 w/ LCD backlighting, good visuals and
 low power draw).  Of course fully loaded I will be spending ~$2400 CDN
 (including docking station and 3 years accidental damage coverage).

 My second choice is a Thinkpad, with similar specs.

 Also, CPU, Chipset, Video, LAN, WiFi is all made by Intel, which are all
 currently well supported under Linux.

 I would also be very careful with the firewire devices, check the ffado
 site for supported hardware *before* you buy.


 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


 --
 Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
 Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-20 Thread Gustin Johnson
Phil wrote:
 Sorry to go off topic, but I'm fascinated by the line:
 I am not a fan of firewire.
 
 Not a fan of firewire(more correctly, ieee 1394) because of
 compatability issues or because of the standard itself?
 
I used to be a fan of ieee 1394, but years of experience have jaded me.
  There are two reasons that I dislike ieee 1394.

The first is that a lot of firewire devices use proprietary protocols to
communicate across the link, which makes them useless to Linux users
(RME Fireface anyone?).  This is not a problem with ieee 1394 per se,
but it means that most firewire audio gear is useless to me.  I used
FFADO back when it was called FreeBob, not a pleasant experience.

The second is that firewire is a security problem.  The idea that an
external device can directly read and copy the contents in RAM without
any sort of authentication or access control scares me.  This is one of
those things that I am glad USB does *not* do.  Even more unbelievable
is that this behaviour is part of the spec.

 I am a fan of firewire, in fact it's my favourite kind of wire.
 Firewire does things that USB simply cannot do, ie, reliably feed my
 7-year-old computer with 12 channels of audio simultaneously. And I
 easily expand that a great deal.
 
 Philip Schleihauf
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-19 Thread Daniel Green
Wow, take a look at the Rain Recording Livebook L7 Laptop Audio Computer

CPU: 2.5GHz Intel Penryn Core 2 Duo (T9300)
Hard Drive: 200GB SATA 300 7200RPM (16MB Cache)
RAM: 4GB DDR2 (Dual Channel - Matched Pair)
Display: 15.4 WXGA+ Widescreen (1280x800)
Graphics: NIVIDIA Goforce 8600M GS (256MB)
USB: 4 x USB 2.0 Ports
FireWire: 2 x 6-pin on PCI Express Card (TI Chipset), 1 x 4-pin onboard
PCIe: PCI Express Notebook Card Slot
Optical Drive: Dual Layer DVD±RW/CD-RW Combo Drive
WiFi : Integrated mobile Intel 802.11
LAN: 10/100/1000 Ethernet
Modem: 56k V.90/V.92 Modem RJ-11
Webcam: 2 megapixel
Media Card: 7 in 1 Card Reader
Battery: 6 cell Li-Ion battery
Audio: Intel HD Audio, Built-in Stereo Speakers and Microphone
Video Out: 1 x VGA Port for external display, 1 x s-video out
Input Devices: Touchpad, 88 key keyboard
Bluetooth: Optional
Dimensions: 14. x 10.1 x 1.1~1.5 (WxDxH)
Weight: 6.1 lbs. w/ 6 cel battery

Too bad it's $2,199.00. I'm not sure that's worth it. I'm looking for
something much closer to $1,000

On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Daniel Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm looking to get my hands on a laptop I can use for audio production
 and live performance with UbuntuStudio. I need a bit of help finding
 something suitable. I figure the following should be taken into
 consideration:

 Fast hard drive
 Multiple(?) Firwire ports
 USB ports
 Decent sized screen.
 Long battery life
 Linux friendly.

 No need to worry about the audio card as it should be replaced with
 something external anyways. Any recommendations for this too?

 I am open to and appreciate all advice.

 Thank you!
 Daniel.


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-19 Thread Cory K.
Daniel Green wrote:
 On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Daniel Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 I'm looking to get my hands on a laptop I can use for audio production
 and live performance with UbuntuStudio. I need a bit of help finding
 something suitable. I figure the following should be taken into
 consideration:

 Fast hard drive
 Multiple(?) Firwire ports
 USB ports
 Decent sized screen.
 Long battery life
 Linux friendly.

 No need to worry about the audio card as it should be replaced with
 something external anyways. Any recommendations for this too?

 I am open to and appreciate all advice.
 
 Wow, take a look at the Rain Recording Livebook L7 Laptop Audio Computer

 CPU: 2.5GHz Intel Penryn Core 2 Duo (T9300)
 Hard Drive: 200GB SATA 300 7200RPM (16MB Cache)
 RAM: 4GB DDR2 (Dual Channel - Matched Pair)
 Display: 15.4 WXGA+ Widescreen (1280x800)
 Graphics: NIVIDIA Goforce 8600M GS (256MB)
 USB: 4 x USB 2.0 Ports
 FireWire: 2 x 6-pin on PCI Express Card (TI Chipset), 1 x 4-pin onboard
 PCIe: PCI Express Notebook Card Slot
 Optical Drive: Dual Layer DVD±RW/CD-RW Combo Drive
 WiFi : Integrated mobile Intel 802.11
 LAN: 10/100/1000 Ethernet
 Modem: 56k V.90/V.92 Modem RJ-11
 Webcam: 2 megapixel
 Media Card: 7 in 1 Card Reader
 Battery: 6 cell Li-Ion battery
 Audio: Intel HD Audio, Built-in Stereo Speakers and Microphone
 Video Out: 1 x VGA Port for external display, 1 x s-video out
 Input Devices: Touchpad, 88 key keyboard
 Bluetooth: Optional
 Dimensions: 14. x 10.1 x 1.1~1.5 (WxDxH)
 Weight: 6.1 lbs. w/ 6 cel battery
   

Looks good.

 Too bad it's $2,199.00. I'm not sure that's worth it. I'm looking for
 something much closer to $1,000
   

You pay for size. If that's the range you're looking at go for something
used.

-Cory K.

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-19 Thread AJ Moon
Considering the Linux friendly I'd say Dell is your best bet.  Orderit 
with linux on it.  You will have to reformat and install Studio but 
atleaste you know you have all the drivers . Besides dell makes good 
sturdy products.


Daniel Green wrote:
 I'm looking to get my hands on a laptop I can use for audio production
 and live performance with UbuntuStudio. I need a bit of help finding
 something suitable. I figure the following should be taken into
 consideration:

 Fast hard drive
 Multiple(?) Firwire ports
 USB ports
 Decent sized screen.
 Long battery life
 Linux friendly.

 No need to worry about the audio card as it should be replaced with
 something external anyways. Any recommendations for this too?

 I am open to and appreciate all advice.

 Thank you!
 Daniel.

   


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-19 Thread Hakan Koseoglu
Daniel Green wrote:
 I'm looking to get my hands on a laptop I can use for audio production
 and live performance with UbuntuStudio. I need a bit of help finding
 something suitable. I figure the following should be taken into
 consideration:
Having a Dell Inspiron 9400 and recently got and installed 8.04 Studio on a 
Dell Inspiron 1525, I can say that their internal sound card is completely 
useless. USB-plugged cards works reasonably fine (unless it's an M-Audio 
Quattro - which will be my bane). I haven't tried a firewire card yet, the only 
one that used to be around at home was a Digidesign Protools interface and I 
never had time to try it out.

-- 
Hakan - http://www.hititgunesi.org


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-19 Thread Sean Edwards
IBM has some good deals at their refurb site:

Certified Used Lenovo 3000 Y410
Model: T59011897
Intel Core Duo 1.66GHz

http://www-304.ibm.com/shop/americas/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/default/ProductDisplay?productId=4611686018425709792storeId=1langId=-1categoryId=2576396dualCurrId=73catalogId=-840



IBM.com - Products - Certified Used Equipment - Notebooks

The refurb ThinkPads usually have MS pre-installed.

-=cybersean=-



  

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-19 Thread Jason Schaefer
I am a huge fan of the Lenovo (ibm) thinkpads! They have the best
suspend support and they use well supported hardware, which is not
always true of Dell or anyone else. I have the thinkpad t61 15.4
widescreen 1680x1050, which is a great resolution for working with
ardour and hydrogen, etc. It is a little large for lots of travel, but
with the 6 cell battery, its very light. I have the iwl 3945 ABG
wireless. Its awesome except the need for proprietary firmware. The
atheros has free drivers now, ath9k https://www.fsf.org/news/ath9k So
I might replace the mini-pci intel wireless with one of those:-) I
also love how rugged the computer is, great for traveling. I take my
laptop everywhere and my previous dell laptops would get wobly screens
and flimsy keys. The price was great too, (2gb mem, 2.1 intel core 2
duo, bluetooth, wifi, dvd/cd burner, 3 yr full protection warranty,
built in mem card reader) $1170.00

Oh and lastly, I recently built the 2.6.26.5 kernel patched with
realtime rt and the internal intel hda sound card became a rock solid,
extremely low latency sound card (~ 5ms). Previously it was crap and I
was forced to always use my m-audio fast track pro (~8ms).

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-19 Thread Gustin Johnson
Daniel Green wrote:
 I'm looking to get my hands on a laptop I can use for audio production
 and live performance with UbuntuStudio. I need a bit of help finding
 something suitable. I figure the following should be taken into
 consideration:
 
 Fast hard drive
 Multiple(?) Firwire ports

I am not a fan of firewire.  Check the FFADO site for hardware
compatability.
 USB ports
 Decent sized screen.

Inversely proportional to battery life.  The larger the screen, the
shorter the battery life

 Long battery life
 Linux friendly.
 
 No need to worry about the audio card as it should be replaced with
 something external anyways. Any recommendations for this too?
 
 I am open to and appreciate all advice.

I am in the process of getting a new laptop as wll.  I eventually
settled on a Dell Latitude (business line, more expensive but very well
made) e6400.  14 screen (1440x900 w/ LCD backlighting, good visuals and
low power draw).  Of course fully loaded I will be spending ~$2400 CDN
(including docking station and 3 years accidental damage coverage).

My second choice is a Thinkpad, with similar specs.

Also, CPU, Chipset, Video, LAN, WiFi is all made by Intel, which are all
currently well supported under Linux.

I would also be very careful with the firewire devices, check the ffado
site for supported hardware *before* you buy.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-19 Thread Gustin Johnson
Gustin Johnson wrote:
 Daniel Green wrote:
 I'm looking to get my hands on a laptop I can use for audio production
 and live performance with UbuntuStudio. I need a bit of help finding
 something suitable. I figure the following should be taken into
 consideration:

 Fast hard drive

7200 RPM drive is what you will likely want.  I bought mine from a local
shop and then installed it into the laptop.   Usually laptop
manufacturers charge a premium for these, so you are better off adding
one after the fact.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


RE: Audio Production Laptop

2008-11-19 Thread Matthew Polashek
An importsant note here!!  My brother purchased a dell ubuntu laptop but 
ubuntustudio did not install on it off the mirror iso images.  He actually was 
unable to easily install ubuntustudio and runs the dell version of ubuntu on 
it, having become too frustrated.  Granted he's probably a little time 
challenged, but this is a really important consideration.  

On the otherhand, I run a dell d510 all day every day, and though I wish the 
screen resolution was better, it's awesome!  I never use my apple G4 powerbook 
anymore.

-Original Message-
From: AJ Moon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 12:45 PM
To: Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion 
ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: Audio Production Laptop

Considering the Linux friendly I'd say Dell is your best bet.  Orderit 
with linux on it.  You will have to reformat and install Studio but 
atleaste you know you have all the drivers . Besides dell makes good 
sturdy products.


Daniel Green wrote:
 I'm looking to get my hands on a laptop I can use for audio production
 and live performance with UbuntuStudio. I need a bit of help finding
 something suitable. I figure the following should be taken into
 consideration:

 Fast hard drive
 Multiple(?) Firwire ports
 USB ports
 Decent sized screen.
 Long battery life
 Linux friendly.

 No need to worry about the audio card as it should be replaced with
 something external anyways. Any recommendations for this too?

 I am open to and appreciate all advice.

 Thank you!
 Daniel.


[The entire original message is not included]

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users