Re: Which ubustu-configuration makes you happy at present?
-- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: Which ubustu-configuration makes you happy at present?
-- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: Which ubustu-configuration makes you happy at present?
Tx to all who made an exciting thread out of my whining, esp. Asmo for his engagement :) I'll give 64studio beta3 a try and since i need firewire essentially i'll try to integrate up-to-date ffado and jack. This weekend i'll free a partition ... In the moment for real work I freezed karmic alpha 3 with 2.6.29.6-1-rt kernel, customized jack 1.9.3 svn, ffado svn. This works stable and reproducable for my needs: jack-late...@~8ms, hydrogen, rakarrack, wine, wineasio, reaper with vst-instruments. Vst-host is less performant. Ardour 2.8...(without vst-support) brings jack earlier to the limits then wine/reaper!? Til now i had no success compiling ardour beta3. In Ardour beta3 64bit-version will be no vst support anyway. Sorry for not giving more input cause I have to do hard work for a living all the week. best regards Gerhard Gustin Johnson schrieb: asmo.koski...@arkki.info wrote: Asmo Koskinen wrote: Is it possible to use rt-kernel with 64 studio? They have added own rt-kernel to 64Studio. Use it, not one from Ubuntu's repositories if you like to test difference. This is correct, use the 64Studio RT kernel. One thing that is still missing is ffado, no ffado at all in 64Studio. 64 Studio 3 is still in beta, and is based on Hardy which also does not have FFADO support. Having said that FFADO will be supported out of the box for the final released 3 version. If you are impatient I believe there are some experimental packages for it. Don't quote me on that, since I don't use or care for FFADO. -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: Which ubustu-configuration makes you happy at present?
Le mardi 21 juillet 2009 12:10:28, asmo.koski...@arkki.info a écrit : You need change few lines in SConstruct file for ffado. And install new jackd and ffado in /usr, not in /usr/local. http://wiki.ubuntu-fi.org/Ubuntu_Studio#head-fac2b5944e332a1dc7f13c9974fd aa67446d23b9 FYI: JACK 1.9.3 released http://jackaudio.org/node/25 I try to build that tomorrow for Ubuntu Studio 8.04 and 9.04. Best Regards Asmo Koskinen. Can you please compile it with the -mixed option so that applications like EnergyXT (32 bits) will work well with jackd on 64 bits machines ? Thanks, /Fabien -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: Which ubustu-configuration makes you happy at present?
Asmo Koskinen wrote: Is it possible to use rt-kernel with 64 studio? They have added own rt-kernel to 64Studio. Use it, not one from Ubuntu's repositories if you like to test difference. One thing that is still missing is ffado, no ffado at all in 64Studio. http://www.mail-archive.com/64studio-us...@lists.64studio.com/msg00291.html Best Regards Asmo Koskinen. -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: Which ubustu-configuration makes you happy at present?
Asmo Koskinen wrote: One thing that is still missing is ffado, no ffado at all in 64Studio. Here are my notes (sorry, in finnish) about installing ffado in Ubuntu 8.04, you can do it same way in 64Studio 3.0 Beta 3. You need change few lines in SConstruct file for ffado. And install new jackd and ffado in /usr, not in /usr/local. http://wiki.ubuntu-fi.org/Ubuntu_Studio#head-fac2b5944e332a1dc7f13c9974fdaa67446d23b9 Best Regards Asmo Koskinen. -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: Which ubustu-configuration makes you happy at present?
Gerhard Lang kirjoitti: In the last weeks I was impatiently testing front-ends What you can do is put your name here and then do some testing that benefits next version/everyone. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/KarmicTaskList Next big thing is Karmic Alpha 3. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KarmicReleaseSchedule In the meanwhile... Ubuntu Studio 8.04.1 (Hardy) This is our recommended release for production critical machines. http://ubuntustudio.org/downloads https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudioPreparation Best Regards Asmo Koskinen. -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: Which ubustu-configuration makes you happy at present?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerhard Lang schrieb: Now I have to do straight audio production and some live-performance. I want to demonstrate efficient linux-audio without tinkering around onstage. Try openSuse 11.1 plus packman and jengelh-kernel. Besides a reliable basic ffado/jack installation I need a full performant wine/vst-host-gui, in which I can edit all parameters on the fly. Must not be reaper, which becomes fat and eats too much resources. For the rest I am contented with genuine linux ardour, hydrogen, rakarrack etc... I'll have to downgrade i.e. reinstall former version. I'm no coder but group, priority, raw1394, rights , dev, udev, security management issues are under control. Any experience-based recommendation will be appreciated Gerhard -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpi3DkACgkQ1Aecwva1SWNOhACZAS48wwg7qKx2EU3rFP5CUind t7QAnj92ZrFzr8NU1uJ0XGgX2X9otp52 =tytJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: Which ubustu-configuration makes you happy at present?
Hartmut Noack kirjoitti: Try openSuse 11.1 plus packman and jengelh-kernel. Try Yet Another Ubuntu - 64Studio 3.0 Beta 3. http://www.arkki.info/howto/64Studio/64Studio_01.png Best Regards Asmo Koskinen. -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: Which ubustu-configuration makes you happy at present?
i have a similar setup, but with a TI expresscard firewire interface. i had heard that TI worked better than my Thinkpad T61's Ricoh chipset, so i ordered one specifically. i also have an FA-101. as i mentioned in the previous post on this list, i've been able to tune 64-bit jaunty to run quite stably with low latency. i'll outline that experience in more detail below. unfortunately i decided to try 32-bit for various reasons with the same environment jack crashes every few minutes. the kernel from ubuntu studio dev ppa solves that but introduces an annoying keyboard bug. fyi trying jackdmp always resulted in decreased stability for me. under the following environment i was able to get my FA-101 running with 128 buffers and 3 periods (8.7ms latency), no xruns and no crashes: * 64-bit jaunty * jaunty -rt kernel * jaunty jackd 0.116.1 * custom-built ffado 2.0 rc2 - didn't actually experiment much with rc1. if you'd like i can upload my rc2 debs to a ppa. * blacklisted wifi drivers * disabled CPU scaling (use performance scaling_governor), slighly underclocked CPU, and fan at max * configured rtirq to give only rtc and firewire interrupts real-time priority, SCHED_OTHER for everything else * /etc/udev/rules.d/99-raw1394.rules: KERNEL==raw1394, GROUP=disk * tweak /etc/security/limits.conf as described in ubuntu studio preparation * add your user to disk and audio groups * run jack with real-time priority 50 (anything 0 is probably fine) * also used x-updates PPA for newer intel graphics drivers, not sure this was consequential at all. * disabled apparmour, pulseaudio my /etc/default/rtirq (this really made a big difference!) -- RTIRQ_NAME_LIST=rtc ohci1394 snd RTIRQ_PRIO_HIGH=90 RTIRQ_PRIO_DECR=5 RTIRQ_RESET_ALL=1 RTIRQ_NON_THREADED=rtc snd RTIRQ_HIGH_LIST=softirq-timer softirq-hrtimer softirq-tasklet my /etc/modules -- rtc raw1394 On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Gerhard Lang lang.gerh...@gmail.comwrote: -ubuntu version, 32 or 64bit, rt-kernel, ffado/jack versions, wine/wineasio versions...? In the last weeks I was impatiently testing front-ends - karmic 64bit, 2.6.29.6-1-rt, self-compiled 2.6.29rt's, ffado from svn, jack 1.9.3 from svn, wine asio 64bit from svn. Sometimes got nice performance, but allways very unstable, lots of crashes, freezings, only randomly success. Wasn't able to figure out reproducable circumstances, in google I found a disorder of contributions from 2002 to 2008, so I lost track and disconsolately didn't report bugs. My hardware: Nexoc/Clevo-Notebook intel-core-duo-t5...@2ghz 4GRAM with all standard Intel-board/chips exc. onboard VIA vt6306 Fire2 IEEE 1394 controller. EmuX2x2midi-usb. Edirol-FA101. Now I have to do straight audio production and some live-performance. I want to demonstrate efficient linux-audio without tinkering around onstage. Besides a reliable basic ffado/jack installation I need a full performant wine/vst-host-gui, in which I can edit all parameters on the fly. Must not be reaper, which becomes fat and eats too much resources. For the rest I am contented with genuine linux ardour, hydrogen, rakarrack etc... I'll have to downgrade i.e. reinstall former version. I'm no coder but group, priority, raw1394, rights , dev, udev, security management issues are under control. Any experience-based recommendation will be appreciated Gerhard -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
