Re: workflow in ardour?
i tried to do it after your descripton, but i'm still not able to do so Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:27:45 +0100 Von: mentoj dija mentoj_d...@gmx.de An: Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Betreff: Re: workflow in ardour? thanks. that will help... Am 08.02.2012 01:04, schrieb Mike Holstein: On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Hartmut Noack zettber...@linuxuse.de mailto:zettber...@linuxuse.de wrote: Am 08.02.2012 00:26, schrieb mentoj_d...@gmx.de mailto:mentoj_d...@gmx.de: hi, i just started a little project. a kind of podcast.. but what ever. i record 3 signals at a time with ardour and edit them after the recording to get best results. stuff i do is: limiting, expanding, compressing. what i always did was: i played the signals - in realtime - back, put them through a calf-compressor (for example) and re-record them on another track in ardour. that needs time. even if the recording is just 20 minutes, i need at least 1,5 hours to get it done. is there a way around it? of course there is can i play the signal back faster than realtime for this workaround? kind of: 1.) set compressor, limiter etc. as desired means, i put plugins in the post-fader section? 2.) use the range-tool to select the part of the track you want to manipulate 3.) right klick the range and select Consolidate range with processing i cant find this entry in the menu. i still work with ubuntu 10.04 and ardour 2.8.6. does this matter? Ardour will render a new region with all your processing as fast as your CPU can deliver ;-) does ardour write the new processed region in a new track? or will the old track be overwritten? yup... export the track, and that can happen faster than realtime, and if not, at least you only need to do it one time... hm, yes this is also a way, but then i have to import the result again, to do further edits. -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com mailto:Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users -- MH mikeholstein.info http://www.mikeholstein.info/ -- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: workflow in ardour?
Am 21.02.2012 17:57, schrieb mentoj_d...@gmx.de: i tried to do it after your descripton, but i'm still not able to do so where do you got stuck? it would be best if you would quote my initial mail to point us to the problem... best regs HZN Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:27:45 +0100 Von: mentoj dijamentoj_d...@gmx.de An: Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussionubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Betreff: Re: workflow in ardour? thanks. that will help... Am 08.02.2012 01:04, schrieb Mike Holstein: On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Hartmut Noackzettber...@linuxuse.de mailto:zettber...@linuxuse.de wrote: Am 08.02.2012 00:26, schrieb mentoj_d...@gmx.de mailto:mentoj_d...@gmx.de: hi, i just started a little project. a kind of podcast.. but what ever. i record 3 signals at a time with ardour and edit them after the recording to get best results. stuff i do is: limiting, expanding, compressing. what i always did was: i played the signals - in realtime - back, put them through a calf-compressor (for example) and re-record them on another track in ardour. that needs time. even if the recording is just 20 minutes, i need at least 1,5 hours to get it done. is there a way around it? of course there is can i play the signal back faster than realtime for this workaround? kind of: 1.) set compressor, limiter etc. as desired means, i put plugins in the post-fader section? 2.) use the range-tool to select the part of the track you want to manipulate 3.) right klick the range and select Consolidate range with processing i cant find this entry in the menu. i still work with ubuntu 10.04 and ardour 2.8.6. does this matter? Ardour will render a new region with all your processing as fast as your CPU can deliver ;-) does ardour write the new processed region in a new track? or will the old track be overwritten? yup... export the track, and that can happen faster than realtime, and if not, at least you only need to do it one time... hm, yes this is also a way, but then i have to import the result again, to do further edits. -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com mailto:Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users -- MH mikeholstein.infohttp://www.mikeholstein.info/ -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: workflow in ardour?
Big sorry for not seeing the quotes below :-) Am 21.02.2012 17:57, schrieb mentoj_d...@gmx.de: i tried to do it after your descripton, but i'm still not able to do so Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:27:45 +0100 Von: mentoj dijamentoj_d...@gmx.de An: Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussionubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Betreff: Re: workflow in ardour? thanks. that will help... Am 08.02.2012 01:04, schrieb Mike Holstein: On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Hartmut Noackzettber...@linuxuse.de mailto:zettber...@linuxuse.de wrote: Am 08.02.2012 00:26, schrieb mentoj_d...@gmx.de mailto:mentoj_d...@gmx.de: hi, i just started a little project. a kind of podcast.. but what ever. i record 3 signals at a time with ardour and edit them after the recording to get best results. stuff i do is: limiting, expanding, compressing. what i always did was: i played the signals - in realtime - back, put them through a calf-compressor (for example) and re-record them on another track in ardour. that needs time. even if the recording is just 20 minutes, i need at least 1,5 hours to get it done. is there a way around it? of course there is can i play the signal back faster than realtime for this workaround? kind of: 1.) set compressor, limiter etc. as desired means, i put plugins in the post-fader section? exactly 2.) use the range-tool to select the part of the track you want to manipulate 3.) right klick the range and select Consolidate range with processing i cant find this entry in the menu. i still work with ubuntu 10.04 and ardour 2.8.6. does this matter? could be but should not, I am not sure ift that functionality was implemented in 2.8.6 But you have used the range-tool for sure? Because in the region-menu there is no such entry. Ardour will render a new region with all your processing as fast as your CPU can deliver ;-) does ardour write the new processed region in a new track? or will the old track be overwritten? It would look like the old track is being overwritten but the original material is not changed in the process, you can still find the pristine recordings in the regions-list. If you do not want it to look that way, choose Export to region list. yup... export the track, and that can happen faster than realtime, and if not, at least you only need to do it one time... hm, yes this is also a way, but then i have to import the result again, to do further edits. No, the result is immediately available in the Ardour-project. You can choose, if it replaces the original regions (without overwriting the original material as described above...) or if it shall be available in the region - list. best regards HZN -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com mailto:Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users -- MH mikeholstein.infohttp://www.mikeholstein.info/ -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: workflow in ardour?
Original-Nachricht Datum: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:28:53 +0100 Von: Hartmut Noack zettber...@linuxuse.de An: ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Betreff: Re: workflow in ardour? Big sorry for not seeing the quotes below :-) Am 21.02.2012 17:57, schrieb mentoj_d...@gmx.de: i tried to do it after your descripton, but i'm still not able to do so Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:27:45 +0100 Von: mentoj dijamentoj_d...@gmx.de An: Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussionubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Betreff: Re: workflow in ardour? thanks. that will help... Am 08.02.2012 01:04, schrieb Mike Holstein: On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Hartmut Noackzettber...@linuxuse.de mailto:zettber...@linuxuse.de wrote: Am 08.02.2012 00:26, schrieb mentoj_d...@gmx.de mailto:mentoj_d...@gmx.de: hi, i just started a little project. a kind of podcast.. but what ever. i record 3 signals at a time with ardour and edit them after the recording to get best results. stuff i do is: limiting, expanding, compressing. what i always did was: i played the signals - in realtime - back, put them through a calf-compressor (for example) and re-record them on another track in ardour. that needs time. even if the recording is just 20 minutes, i need at least 1,5 hours to get it done. is there a way around it? of course there is can i play the signal back faster than realtime for this workaround? kind of: 1.) set compressor, limiter etc. as desired means, i put plugins in the post-fader section? exactly 2.) use the range-tool to select the part of the track you want to manipulate 3.) right klick the range and select Consolidate range with processing i cant find this entry in the menu. i still work with ubuntu 10.04 and ardour 2.8.6. does this matter? could be but should not, I am not sure ift that functionality was implemented in 2.8.6 But you have used the range-tool for sure? Because in the region-menu there is no such entry. ah, thats what i missed. i'll check that out. but this is not working with external effects like the extern calf plugin pack (with the nice graphical output ;) ), does it? Ardour will render a new region with all your processing as fast as your CPU can deliver ;-) does ardour write the new processed region in a new track? or will the old track be overwritten? It would look like the old track is being overwritten but the original material is not changed in the process, you can still find the pristine recordings in the regions-list. If you do not want it to look that way, choose Export to region list. yup... export the track, and that can happen faster than realtime, and if not, at least you only need to do it one time... hm, yes this is also a way, but then i have to import the result again, to do further edits. No, the result is immediately available in the Ardour-project. You can choose, if it replaces the original regions (without overwriting the original material as described above...) or if it shall be available in the region - list. best regards HZN -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com mailto:Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users -- MH mikeholstein.infohttp://www.mikeholstein.info/ -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users -- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: workflow in ardour?
thanks. that will help... Am 08.02.2012 01:04, schrieb Mike Holstein: On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Hartmut Noack zettber...@linuxuse.de mailto:zettber...@linuxuse.de wrote: Am 08.02.2012 00:26, schrieb mentoj_d...@gmx.de mailto:mentoj_d...@gmx.de: hi, i just started a little project. a kind of podcast.. but what ever. i record 3 signals at a time with ardour and edit them after the recording to get best results. stuff i do is: limiting, expanding, compressing. what i always did was: i played the signals - in realtime - back, put them through a calf-compressor (for example) and re-record them on another track in ardour. that needs time. even if the recording is just 20 minutes, i need at least 1,5 hours to get it done. is there a way around it? of course there is can i play the signal back faster than realtime for this workaround? kind of: 1.) set compressor, limiter etc. as desired 2.) use the range-tool to select the part of the track you want to manipulate 3.) right klick the range and select Consolidate range with processing Ardour will render a new region with all your processing as fast as your CPU can deliver ;-) yup... export the track, and that can happen faster than realtime, and if not, at least you only need to do it one time... -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com mailto:Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users -- MH mikeholstein.info http://www.mikeholstein.info/ -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
workflow in ardour?
hi, i just started a little project. a kind of podcast.. but what ever. i record 3 signals at a time with ardour and edit them after the recording to get best results. stuff i do is: limiting, expanding, compressing. what i always did was: i played the signals - in realtime - back, put them through a calf-compressor (for example) and re-record them on another track in ardour. that needs time. even if the recording is just 20 minutes, i need at least 1,5 hours to get it done. is there a way around it? can i play the signal back faster than realtime for this workaround? -- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: workflow in ardour?
Am 08.02.2012 00:26, schrieb mentoj_d...@gmx.de: hi, i just started a little project. a kind of podcast.. but what ever. i record 3 signals at a time with ardour and edit them after the recording to get best results. stuff i do is: limiting, expanding, compressing. what i always did was: i played the signals - in realtime - back, put them through a calf-compressor (for example) and re-record them on another track in ardour. that needs time. even if the recording is just 20 minutes, i need at least 1,5 hours to get it done. is there a way around it? of course there is can i play the signal back faster than realtime for this workaround? kind of: 1.) set compressor, limiter etc. as desired 2.) use the range-tool to select the part of the track you want to manipulate 3.) right klick the range and select Consolidate range with processing Ardour will render a new region with all your processing as fast as your CPU can deliver ;-) -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: workflow in ardour?
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Hartmut Noack zettber...@linuxuse.dewrote: Am 08.02.2012 00:26, schrieb mentoj_d...@gmx.de: hi, i just started a little project. a kind of podcast.. but what ever. i record 3 signals at a time with ardour and edit them after the recording to get best results. stuff i do is: limiting, expanding, compressing. what i always did was: i played the signals - in realtime - back, put them through a calf-compressor (for example) and re-record them on another track in ardour. that needs time. even if the recording is just 20 minutes, i need at least 1,5 hours to get it done. is there a way around it? of course there is can i play the signal back faster than realtime for this workaround? kind of: 1.) set compressor, limiter etc. as desired 2.) use the range-tool to select the part of the track you want to manipulate 3.) right klick the range and select Consolidate range with processing Ardour will render a new region with all your processing as fast as your CPU can deliver ;-) yup... export the track, and that can happen faster than realtime, and if not, at least you only need to do it one time... -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.**ubuntu.comUbuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/** mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-**studio-usershttps://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users -- MH mikeholstein.info http://www.mikeholstein.info/ -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
