Re: [ubuntu-uk] Google Funds Work for Photoshop on Linux

2008-02-22 Thread Kris Douglas
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:59 AM, Sean Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 There is a customised version of GIMP called Gimpshop which, I am told,
 brings the product much closer to the Photoshop look/feel... the website
 implies that in terms of the multiple windows vs. single windows debate that
 is resolved for only Windows users (deweirdify or something), so it might be
 worth Jai considering running Gimpshop under wine, perhaps?


Eh? There is a Linux version too...
 DEB package:
http://rapidshare.com/files/86270575/gimpshop_2.2.11-1_i386.deb
 SRC: http://rapidshare.com/files/86270572/gimp-2.2.8.tar.bz2


-- 
Kris Douglas
 Softdel Limited Hosting Services
 Web: www.softdel.net
 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Setting PATH and other env variables

2008-02-22 Thread Andrew Black (delete obvious bit)
Sean Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 

 BUT, the way that it works is that the settings are applied at the
 time of LOGIN, therefore if you simply open new Gnome sessions the
 script won't be run, as the new window will simply inherit the details
 at the time of login...

That is what I would expect to happen.

But something is not quite happening like this. I have added a line touch 
bash_profile_ran to the file.  It is called when I su - username but 
not when I log into gnome.



-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Google Funds Work for Photoshop on Linux

2008-02-22 Thread Kris Douglas
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:59 AM, Sean Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 2/22/08, Paul Tansom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  ** Jai Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-20 23:08]:
 
   I disagree. The GIMP has a difficult user interface. Photoshop was
   extremely easy to learn to use where as I've never managed to get
   anywhere with GIMP. The way it is now whenever I need a photo edited
   or an image created/modified I ask a Windows/Photoshop user to do the
   task for me - that's definitely not the intended result.
  ** end quote [Jai Harrison]
 
  Personally I've always been quite happy with GIMP. When I first started
  using it there was a small culture shock from not having a menu bar
  across the top, but it took a matter of minutes to get used to that. I'm
  no power user though.


 I think Jai is being extremely harsh... there are positives and negatives
 about the way that GIMP presents itself, but on aggregate (for me at least)
 it makes very little difference... if anything, I'd say that having used it
 for several years now I probably prefer the GIMP presentation to that of,
 say, Photoshop as it empowers me to put each window/image/toolbox etc. where
 I want it rather than where the software says I must.


  The combination of price tag and an unwillingness to use pirated
  software mean I've never even seen Photoshop, and it doesn't even figure
  in my top 100 apps I'd like to see ported to Linux :) I've no idea how
  representative Elements is of the Photoshop UI (likely not at all), but
  I'm not a big fan of that from using it on my parents PC.


 There is a customised version of GIMP called Gimpshop which, I am told,
 brings the product much closer to the Photoshop look/feel... the website
 implies that in terms of the multiple windows vs. single windows debate that
 is resolved for only Windows users (deweirdify or something), so it might be
 worth Jai considering running Gimpshop under wine, perhaps?



  Perhaps I'm just atypical when it comes to software. So many people
  consider Dreamweaver the ultimate web development package, but from what
  little I've seen of it I'd actively avoid it, and I've not been
  enthusiastic about what little experience I've had of Contribute.


 I was trying to help somebody design a website on Wednesday, who was using
 Dreamweaver, and I must admit it brought back nightmares and reinforced my
 view that the best WYSIWYG for web development is a plain tried and tested
 text editor (vi, emacs or whatever) used in combinatin with a couple of open
 browsers... ;-)

 Sean
 --
  ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
  https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
  https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/



Talking about said image software above, its like a distro, everyone
likes a different flavour... I like them both for doing different
things, depends What, When, Where really...

-- 
Kris Douglas
 Softdel Limited Hosting Services
 Web: www.softdel.net
 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Google Funds Work for Photoshop on Linux

2008-02-22 Thread Sean Miller
 Eh? There is a Linux version too...


I am aware of this, but the website says...

GIMPshop modifies the menu structure to closely match Photoshop's, adjusts
the program's terminology to match Adobe's, and, in the
Windowshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windowsversion, uses a
plugin called 'Deweirdifier' to combine the application's
numerous windows in a similar manner to the
MDIhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_document_interfacesystem
used by most Windows graphics packages.

http://gimpshop.com

...and, in the Windows version... appears to imply that the Linux version
doesn't have the windows combined, which appeared to be on of Jai's main
gripes with GIMP...

I do not know for sure because I haven't ever installed the thing.  Perhaps
somebody who has will be able to clarify the situation.

Sean

ps. Jai's Windows-using friends ought to be targeted by the Ubuntu
evangelists... think of all the time they'd have on their hands if they were
no longer capable of doing all his photo/image manipulation for him, lol!!
As good a reason to change OS as any, methinks... ;-)
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Google Funds Work for Photoshop on Linux

2008-02-22 Thread Kris Douglas
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Sean Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


  Eh? There is a Linux version too...

 I am aware of this, but the website says...

 GIMPshop modifies the menu structure to closely match Photoshop's, adjusts
 the program's terminology to match Adobe's, and, in the Windows version,
 uses a plugin called 'Deweirdifier' to combine the application's numerous
 windows in a similar manner to the MDI system used by most Windows graphics
 packages.

 http://gimpshop.com

 ...and, in the Windows version... appears to imply that the Linux version
 doesn't have the windows combined, which appeared to be on of Jai's main
 gripes with GIMP...

 I do not know for sure because I haven't ever installed the thing.  Perhaps
 somebody who has will be able to clarify the situation.

 Sean

 ps. Jai's Windows-using friends ought to be targeted by the Ubuntu
 evangelists... think of all the time they'd have on their hands if they were
 no longer capable of doing all his photo/image manipulation for him, lol!!
 As good a reason to change OS as any, methinks... ;-)


I see..



-- 
Kris Douglas
 Softdel Limited Hosting Services
 Web: www.softdel.net
 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


[ubuntu-uk] Can I use a desktop PC as a network hub?

2008-02-22 Thread James Grabham
Right, Im setting up a p3 800mhz 256mb box as a firewall, file server, media
player and to use for other stuff.

Now I will have

ModemPCold wireless router

If I do this, I will have all network traffic coming at it through a single
10/100 connection.

Instead of plugging all my wired computers into the router, can I shove some
more NICs into the srever, and plug them into this, making it act as a hub
as well.

So Id have eth0 eth1 eth2

Will this work.

Will I need patch or crossover cables.


All help much appreciated.
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Can I use a desktop PC as a network hub?

2008-02-22 Thread Kris Douglas
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:58 PM, James Grabham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Right, Im setting up a p3 800mhz 256mb box as a firewall, file server, media
 player and to use for other stuff.

 Now I will have

 ModemPCold wireless router

 If I do this, I will have all network traffic coming at it through a single
 10/100 connection.

 Instead of plugging all my wired computers into the router, can I shove some
 more NICs into the srever, and plug them into this, making it act as a hub
 as well.

 So Id have eth0 eth1 eth2

 Will this work.

 Will I need patch or crossover cables.


 All help much appreciated.


That would work well, we have a similar system that basically
firewalls a router, with a web based interface that lets me change
settings.

If you have pci wireless cards you can use ubuntu as a wireless AP.
Additionally, as you can firewall the interfaces on the machine you
could also use it as a hub.

By installing Samba you are able to share the files over the network.

I couldn't personally tell you how to configure the interfaces for
sharing the internet connection, or the firewall configuration, but it
is possible.

-- 
Kris Douglas
 Softdel Limited Hosting Services
 Web: www.softdel.net
 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Can I use a desktop PC as a network hub?

2008-02-22 Thread Andrew Oakley
Kris Douglas wrote:
 On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:58 PM, James Grabham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Instead of plugging all my wired computers into the router, can I shove some
 more NICs into the srever, and plug them into this, making it act as a hub
 That would work well, we have a similar system that basically

Er... yes, but not easily.

Each NIC would need its own IP address; I'm not aware that you can 
assign the same IP address to multiple NICs without a great deal of hassle.

It's relatively easy to share the modem across multiple NICs with 
different IP addresses, but the final devices would not be able to talk 
to other devices without setting up routing, which is reasonably 
advanced. For example:

Modem - PC - Laptop1
 - Laptop2

...would prevent Laptop1 talking to Laptop2 unless you set up routing.

Given that you can buy a brand new network switch for less than five pounds:

http://www.google.co.uk/products?q=network+switchscoring=p

...this is an extremely complicated way of achieving a very simple 
result. Instead I recommend:

Modem - PC - FiveQuidSwitch - Laptop1
   - Laptop2
   - Printer
   - etc.

If by modem you mean Broadband modem with Cat5 rather than USB 
modem or pre-broadband modem, then you can achieve even better 
results with:

Modem - FiveQuidSwitch - PC
 - Laptop1
 - Laptop2
 - Printer
 - etc.

-- 
Andrew Oakley


-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Can I use a desktop PC as a network hub?

2008-02-22 Thread Tom Bamford
On 2/22/08, James Grabham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Right, Im setting up a p3 800mhz 256mb box as a firewall, file server,
 media player and to use for other stuff.

 Now I will have

 ModemPCold wireless router

 If I do this, I will have all network traffic coming at it through a
 single 10/100 connection.

 Instead of plugging all my wired computers into the router, can I shove
 some more NICs into the srever, and plug them into this, making it act as a
 hub as well.

 So Id have eth0 eth1 eth2

 Will this work.


As far as I know, there are two ways of achieving this. You can either
configure each card on a separate subnet and set your box up to forward
packets between them, or you can create a bridge device containing each ethX
device you want to bridge, and they will be configured as one device. The
latter is probably what you're after, I have done this before to bridge my
VirtualBox VMs with the rest of my lan and it works quite well.

Will I need patch or crossover cables.


Whether to use a straight or crossed cable depends on the device you're
using rather than the configuration. PC to PC, or hub to hub uplink demands
a crossed cable, most other applications use straight cables (eg. PC to hub,
hub to hub non-uplink).

All help much appreciated.

 --
 ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
 https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Can I use a desktop PC as a network hub?

2008-02-22 Thread Kris Douglas
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Tom Bamford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 2/22/08, James Grabham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Right, Im setting up a p3 800mhz 256mb box as a firewall, file server,
 media player and to use for other stuff.
 
  Now I will have
 
  ModemPCold wireless router
 
  If I do this, I will have all network traffic coming at it through a
 single 10/100 connection.
 
  Instead of plugging all my wired computers into the router, can I shove
 some more NICs into the srever, and plug them into this, making it act as a
 hub as well.
 
  So Id have eth0 eth1 eth2
 
  Will this work.

 As far as I know, there are two ways of achieving this. You can either
 configure each card on a separate subnet and set your box up to forward
 packets between them, or you can create a bridge device containing each ethX
 device you want to bridge, and they will be configured as one device. The
 latter is probably what you're after, I have done this before to bridge my
 VirtualBox VMs with the rest of my lan and it works quite well.

  Will I need patch or crossover cables.

 Whether to use a straight or crossed cable depends on the device you're
 using rather than the configuration. PC to PC, or hub to hub uplink demands
 a crossed cable, most other applications use straight cables (eg. PC to hub,
 hub to hub non-uplink).

  All help much appreciated.
 
  --
 
  ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
  https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
  https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/
 
 



 --
 ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
 https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/



Hmm, would hardy's new Easy Firewall work in this situation? it lets
you route prots with simple commands.

-- 
Kris Douglas
  Softdel Limited Hosting Services
  Web: www.softdel.net
  Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Can I use a desktop PC as a network hub?

2008-02-22 Thread Rob Beard
Quoting James Grabham [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Right, Im setting up a p3 800mhz 256mb box as a firewall, file server, media
 player and to use for other stuff.

 Now I will have

 ModemPCold wireless router

 If I do this, I will have all network traffic coming at it through a single
 10/100 connection.

 Instead of plugging all my wired computers into the router, can I shove some
 more NICs into the srever, and plug them into this, making it act as a hub
 as well.

 So Id have eth0 eth1 eth2

 Will this work.

 Will I need patch or crossover cables.


 All help much appreciated.



It's an expensive and complicated way of doing it.  I'd keep it how  
you've got it at the moment.  It might not be such a good idea to run  
a firewall on the same box as a server.  What sort of media are you  
storing?  You should be able to support up to high definition video on  
a 10/100Mbit connection.  I have 8 machines connected to my server for  
media sharing, over a 100Mbit connection and it runs fine.  My server  
is even running VMWare too so it's technically split into two machines.

If you did decide to go ahead though, you'd need crossover cables to  
go from the PC to the NIC on the server, plus you're limited on how  
many slots you have.  If you're worried about bandwidth maybe you  
should invest in a gigabit switch and gigabit NICs.

Rob




-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Can I use a desktop PC as a network hub?

2008-02-22 Thread Gaurav Patel
On 22/02/2008, Rob Beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Quoting James Grabham [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

   Right, Im setting up a p3 800mhz 256mb box as a firewall, file server, 
 media
   player and to use for other stuff.
  
   Now I will have
  
   ModemPCold wireless router
  
   If I do this, I will have all network traffic coming at it through a single
   10/100 connection.
  
   Instead of plugging all my wired computers into the router, can I shove 
 some
   more NICs into the srever, and plug them into this, making it act as a hub
   as well.
  
   So Id have eth0 eth1 eth2
  
   Will this work.
  
   Will I need patch or crossover cables.
  
  
   All help much appreciated.
  



 It's an expensive and complicated way of doing it.  I'd keep it how
  you've got it at the moment.  It might not be such a good idea to run
  a firewall on the same box as a server.  What sort of media are you
  storing?  You should be able to support up to high definition video on
  a 10/100Mbit connection.  I have 8 machines connected to my server for
  media sharing, over a 100Mbit connection and it runs fine.  My server
  is even running VMWare too so it's technically split into two machines.

  If you did decide to go ahead though, you'd need crossover cables to
  go from the PC to the NIC on the server, plus you're limited on how
  many slots you have.  If you're worried about bandwidth maybe you
  should invest in a gigabit switch and gigabit NICs.

  Rob





  --

 ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
  https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
  https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


I would recommend doing the switching/connectivity of other
workstations using a hub or a switch, they're inexpensive now. You
state that you have a router, is it a multi-port router? That could
interconnect your other devices. You'll keep your server's CPU free to
do other things.

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Google Funds Work for Photoshop on Linux

2008-02-22 Thread Jai Harrison
On 2/22/08, Sean Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 ps. Jai's Windows-using friends ought to be targeted by the Ubuntu
 evangelists... think of all the time they'd have on their hands if they were
 no longer capable of doing all his photo/image manipulation for him, lol!!
 As good a reason to change OS as any, methinks... ;-)


I've tried showing them the light before but they continue to refuse
to so much as try Pidgin, let alone a new operating system. Their
general approach to free alternatives is that the software they use
already meets their requirements so they've no reason (that matters to
them) to change.

I can understand why people who have never used Photoshop might not
find the GIMP complicated to use - especially if they've spent time
learning to use it but it presents a problem to people who are used to
image tool standards (such as those used in Photoshop and Paintshop).
The GIMP manages to be completely different in my eyes (and I'm sure
everyone else who complains about the GIMP).

GNU/Linux programs and Desktop Environments inherit a lot of standards
from Windows and Mac OSes. AbiWord, Microsoft Word and Open Office
Writer all follow similar user interface standards and, as a result,
people can easily use one after having originally learnt another. The
same applies for Evolution, Thunderbird and Microsoft Outlook. In
fact, the same applies for most photo editing and image manipulation
programs too - GIMP is the exception.

As GIMP is, apparently, *THE* image editing tool for Linux and the
only choice people are presented with when it comes to image editing
it is a SERIOUS problem that it does everything so differently. You
may consider my views harsh but, unless anyone else can explain why
everyone that finds GIMP impossible to use is complaining, then it's
the truth.

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Google Funds Work for Photoshop on Linux

2008-02-22 Thread Gavin Ford
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:59:04PM +, Jai Harrison wrote:
 I can understand why people who have never used Photoshop might not
 find the GIMP complicated to use - especially if they've spent time
 learning to use it but it presents a problem to people who are used to
 image tool standards (such as those used in Photoshop and Paintshop).
 The GIMP manages to be completely different in my eyes (and I'm sure
 everyone else who complains about the GIMP).

I used to use Photoshop on a Mac at Uni many years ago, also I used PSP at home
in the Windows 3.1 days before I switched to Linux.


 GNU/Linux programs and Desktop Environments inherit a lot of standards
 from Windows and Mac OSes. AbiWord, Microsoft Word and Open Office
 Writer all follow similar user interface standards and, as a result,
 people can easily use one after having originally learnt another. The
 same applies for Evolution, Thunderbird and Microsoft Outlook. In
 fact, the same applies for most photo editing and image manipulation
 programs too - GIMP is the exception.

Maybe it's because it's been such a long time since I used Photoshop, but what
is so different about the GIMP?

For me it was a complete replacement in a very short time.  I've never looked
back or missed anything from the closed source apps.

  -Gav

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://revford.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk 

I think we need to:
Deflect the particle condenser


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


[ubuntu-uk] Software Freedom Day 2008

2008-02-22 Thread Alan Pope
It's that time again!

Ok, it isn't, but it's worth mentioning that Software Freedom Day 2008 is on 
20th September this year. Just a heads up so you might want to put it in 
your diary and start thinking about what we can do this year.

Cheers,
Al.

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Software Freedom Day 2008

2008-02-22 Thread Rob Beard
Alan Pope wrote:
 It's that time again!
 
 Ok, it isn't, but it's worth mentioning that Software Freedom Day 2008 is on 
 20th September this year. Just a heads up so you might want to put it in 
 your diary and start thinking about what we can do this year.
 
 Cheers,
 Al.
 

Well in Devon  Cornwall (if the Devon  Cornwall LUG can agree!) we may 
be having three events running on the day, one in Penzance, one in 
Plymouth and another in Exeter.  Of course this is currently in theory, 
actually pulling it off is another matter!

Rob


-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Software Freedom Day 2008

2008-02-22 Thread Ciaran Mooney
Hi,

I'll organise a Birmingham Team again. But this year I want MORE! :)

If your in the Midlands and want to help, email me.

CiarĂ¡n


On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Rob Beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Alan Pope wrote:
   It's that time again!
  
   Ok, it isn't, but it's worth mentioning that Software Freedom Day 2008 is 
 on
   20th September this year. Just a heads up so you might want to put it in
   your diary and start thinking about what we can do this year.
  
   Cheers,
   Al.
  

  Well in Devon  Cornwall (if the Devon  Cornwall LUG can agree!) we may
  be having three events running on the day, one in Penzance, one in
  Plymouth and another in Exeter.  Of course this is currently in theory,
  actually pulling it off is another matter!

  Rob




  --
  ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
  https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
  https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/