Re: [ubuntu-uk] Dad's Computer - for want of a better subject

2011-06-22 Thread Avi Greenbury

Jon Reynolds wrote:

1. Why on Earth did they choose to put Vista on there??
Perhaps because a new board supposedly means a new install of Windows 
and you're not supposed to be using XP licenses any more. Perhaps 
they're also tired of supporting an OS that's way past end-of-life.


Did you ask them?


3. Wouldn't he have needed to buy a new license for Vista or would his
existing XP license cover him (I somehow doubt it)?


Yeah, he would have needed a new license.

--
Avi

--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Dad's Computer - for want of a better subject

2011-06-22 Thread Sean Miller
On 22 June 2011 08:59, Avi Greenbury li...@avi.co wrote:

 Jon Reynolds wrote:

 1. Why on Earth did they choose to put Vista on there??

 Perhaps because a new board supposedly means a new install of Windows and
 you're not supposed to be using XP licenses any more. Perhaps they're also
 tired of supporting an OS that's way past end-of-life.


You sure about that?

I always believed that even an OEM licence was tied to the machine, but if
you had to replace a motherboard you could still re-install legally.   The
automatic activation facilities in XP might tell you too many aspects of
the machine has changed, but a call to Microsoft can resolve that.

Anyway, I wouldn't be inclined to re-install because I changed a motherboard
anyway.  I may have to install new graphics/sound drivers etc. after
changing the mobo (if they were using onboard) but I don't see why a
re-install would be necessary.

Sean
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Dad's Computer - for want of a better subject

2011-06-22 Thread Jon Reynolds

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:59:45 +0100, Avi Greenbury wrote:

Jon Reynolds wrote:

1. Why on Earth did they choose to put Vista on there??

Perhaps because a new board supposedly means a new install of Windows
and you're not supposed to be using XP licenses any more. Perhaps
they're also tired of supporting an OS that's way past end-of-life.


Is XP no longer sold (now I think about it that may be obvious!)? What 
about all the people and businesses who are not ready/capable of 
supporting/running Win7? Are existing XP license holders not able to 
have their PCs repaired and continue using their XP License? That's 
rubbish!!



Did you ask them?


No, just had an email from my Dad today.



3. Wouldn't he have needed to buy a new license for Vista or would 
his

existing XP license cover him (I somehow doubt it)?


Yeah, he would have needed a new license.



So is Vista still sold then? I wonder if they told him they were going 
to put it on?


Either way, I wish my Dad would just let me put Ubuntu on there and 
just LEARN to use OOo instead of MSO... stubborn git! :)



--
Avi


--


Jon Reynolds (j0nr)
http://www.jcrdevelopments.com

--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Dad's Computer - for want of a better subject

2011-06-22 Thread Avi Greenbury

Sean Miller wrote:

On 22 June 2011 08:59, Avi Greenburyli...@avi.co  wrote:


Jon Reynolds wrote:


1. Why on Earth did they choose to put Vista on there??


Perhaps because a new board supposedly means a new install of Windows and
you're not supposed to be using XP licenses any more. Perhaps they're also
tired of supporting an OS that's way past end-of-life.



You sure about that?


Nope :)

I thought when pressed for a definition, MS decreed that the part of the 
computer the license was tied to was the motherboard, but I've never had 
cause to find out for sure.


--
Avi

--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Dad's Computer - for want of a better subject

2011-06-22 Thread Simon Greenwood
On 22 June 2011 09:14, Jon Reynolds maill...@jcrdevelopments.com wrote:

 On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:59:45 +0100, Avi Greenbury wrote:

 Jon Reynolds wrote:

 1. Why on Earth did they choose to put Vista on there??

 Perhaps because a new board supposedly means a new install of Windows
 and you're not supposed to be using XP licenses any more. Perhaps
 they're also tired of supporting an OS that's way past end-of-life.


 Is XP no longer sold (now I think about it that may be obvious!)? What
 about all the people and businesses who are not ready/capable of
 supporting/running Win7? Are existing XP license holders not able to have
 their PCs repaired and continue using their XP License? That's rubbish!!

  Did you ask them?


 No, just had an email from my Dad today.



  3. Wouldn't he have needed to buy a new license for Vista or would his
 existing XP license cover him (I somehow doubt it)?


 Yeah, he would have needed a new license.


 So is Vista still sold then? I wonder if they told him they were going to
 put it on?

 Either way, I wish my Dad would just let me put Ubuntu on there and just
 LEARN to use OOo instead of MSO... stubborn git! :)

  --


It's not a question of not being sold (it isn't), but as many companies
still use it as their desktop build, MS are having to support it for a lot
longer than they wanted to.

s/



-- 
Twitter: @sfgreenwood
Is this your sanderling?
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Dad's Computer - for want of a better subject

2011-06-22 Thread Avi Greenbury

Jon Reynolds wrote:

Is XP no longer sold (now I think about it that may be obvious!)? What
about all the people and businesses who are not ready/capable of
supporting/running Win7? Are existing XP license holders not able to
have their PCs repaired and continue using their XP License? That's
rubbish!!


It was hard to get hold of XP in a MS-blessed way last time I was 
interested a year or so ago, I don't imagine it's got easier.


Those businesses are supposed to have upgraded by now. The EOL for XP 
was widely publicised long before it happened, and it was then extended, 
and even then you could still buy it for a bit. I imagine it's still 
possible to get hold of, but perhaps not with MS's blessing.


As said, I'd expect it to have just worked - replace the board and boot 
(perhaps a bit of hoop-jumping), but I don't know if this shop's got 
some deal with MS going on whereby they agree to actually abide by the 
licenses.



So is Vista still sold then? I wonder if they told him they were going
to put it on?


Well, if you've a license in stock you're still allowed to sell it, but 
MS are definitely less concerned about people selling Vista licenses 
when they should be selling 7 ones than they are about XP.



Either way, I wish my Dad would just let me put Ubuntu on there and just
LEARN to use OOo instead of MSO... stubborn git! :)


Surely this isn't that far from what the shop did, just you're imparting 
a different OS upon him... :)


--
Avi

--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Dad's Computer - for want of a better subject

2011-06-22 Thread Jon Reynolds

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:22:51 +0100, Avi Greenbury wrote:

Either way, I wish my Dad would just let me put Ubuntu on there and 
just

LEARN to use OOo instead of MSO... stubborn git! :)


Surely this isn't that far from what the shop did, just you're
imparting a different OS upon him... :)

--
Avi


Heh, true!
--


Jon Reynolds (j0nr)
http://www.jcrdevelopments.com

--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Dad's Computer - for want of a better subject

2011-06-22 Thread Sean Miller
On 22 June 2011 09:14, Jon Reynolds maill...@jcrdevelopments.com wrote:

 Is XP no longer sold (now I think about it that may be obvious!)? What
 about all the people and businesses who are not ready/capable of
 supporting/running Win7? Are existing XP license holders not able to have
 their PCs repaired and continue using their XP License? That's rubbish!!


No, XP is still being sold widely.  In fact many retailers are still
offering new PCs with XP as their operating system.

Sean
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Dad's Computer - for want of a better subject

2011-06-22 Thread Sean Miller
On 22 June 2011 09:16, Avi Greenbury li...@avi.co wrote:

 I thought when pressed for a definition, MS decreed that the part of the
 computer the license was tied to was the motherboard, but I've never had
 cause to find out for sure.


No, the automatic online activation may not work (due to the hardware
changes) but if you phone the Microsoft activation line and explain the
situation they will let it through as they're not stupid - they know that
people will have blown motherboards etc. and need to replace them.

Much as some of the most rabid Microsoft haters might try to make it out,
Microsoft are not deliberately trying to make life difficult for people.
They are just trying to protect their investment against pirates and, in all
my dealings with them, are perfectly reasonable if you explain the situation
to them.

Personally in this situation I would phone the PC shop and ask them to
remove Vista and re-install the original version of XP.   If they argue that
they will not do this, then do it yourself - you probably have CDs that came
with the PC, but if not it should be relatively easy to borrow one and do it
yourself (assuming the licence key is still attached to the machine and they
haven't airblasted that off or something) quite legitimately.

Sean
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Dad's Computer - for want of a better subject

2011-06-22 Thread Sean Miller
By the way, the official line with regard to sales of Windows XP and Vista
is that both are now past their sell by date, as XP officially end of
retail sales was June 30th 2008, and Vista October 22nd 2010.

Which makes me wonder why, if this PC shop wanted to move your dad
forward, they didn't just go for Windows 7 which has been proven to be
SIGNIFICANTLY faster than Vista (and in some cases XP) on lower
specification machines.

But, in reality, XP is far from dead or unavailable

http://www.google.co.uk/#hl=enq=windows+xp+pcum=1ie=UTF-8tbo=utbm=shopsource=ogsa=Ntab=wfbav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.fp=6feb340e24106346biw=1262bih=664

Sean
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


[ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu LoCo Meeting

2011-06-22 Thread Paul Mellors
Hello All

Last night I attended the LocO meeting for re-approving LoCo teams,
you can read a brief summary about it on my blog

http://paulmellors.blogspot.com/2011/06/loco-council-meeting.html

It was rather interesting to see the process, especially seeing as our
UK team is up for re-approval is soon.  Thanks for the heads up Alan

Cheers
MooDoo

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Dad's Computer - for want of a better subject

2011-06-22 Thread Steve Fisher
The new hardware may not be compatible with XP,  as long as the shop
authenticated the Vista install, I wouldn't make a big issue about it.  Just
be prepared for lots of questions from your Dad, everything moved or was
given a different name in Vista and the UAC is a royal PITA :)

Steve
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Reapproval

2011-06-22 Thread Paul Mellors
Hay Alan

Do we have a list of things that need doing anywhere?

MooDoo

On 21 June 2011 16:24, Paul Mellors prjmell...@gmail.com wrote:
 Yeah i'll try and be there ...

 MooDoo :)

 On 21 June 2011 16:21, Alan Bell alanb...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 On 21/06/11 15:41, gazz wrote:


 I wish these meetings weren't so late - I just can't keep working till
 9pm!

 Paula

 you don't need to follow it live, logs will be available at
 http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/06/21/%23launchpad-meeting.html

 it is somehow more fun live though

 Alan

 --
 ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/



-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Dad's Computer - for want of a better subject

2011-06-22 Thread Dave Hanson
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Jon Reynolds
maill...@jcrdevelopments.comwrote:

 I have to follow up on my Dad's computer situation. I previously posted
 about how he bought MS Office rather than use OpenOffice etc.

 Well his computer then crashed again. He took it to the local shop (a small
 outfit, which is nice and a bit personal) who eventually diagnosed a faulty
 motherboard. They offered to rebuild the computer with some spares from
 another computer.

 Anyway, when it returned, it had Vista on it! I am just wondering the
 following:

 1. Why on Earth did they choose to put Vista on there??

 2. If the machine was struggling with XP, why put something more demanding
 on there?? (and if they argue the new bits are more powerful, then why then
 cripple them again with something more demanding?)

 3. Wouldn't he have needed to buy a new license for Vista or would his
 existing XP license cover him (I somehow doubt it)?

 4. If they charge him for a license, they certainly didn't ask him if he
 wanted Vista!

 I find this amazing. Suddenly my opinion of these guys has dropped. Shame
 as they are nice and helpful by the sounds of it, coming out to his house to
 help.

 --


 Jon Reynolds (j0nr)
 http://www.jcrdevelopments.com

 --
 ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/**mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-ukhttps://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/**UKTeam/ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


I think it may just be easier for companies like that to do a complete
re-install rather than diagnose the actual problem and blame it on dodgy
hardware, as for the Vista install, if they did actually take the parts from
another PC perhaps they switched the license over and scrapped the other PC
- perhaps they thought they were doing him a favour by giving him a more up
to date OS. I'd certainly check that the license is valid with someone (Not
sure who, Microsoft?) as there may be a load of computers in your area all
running the same Vista install - they won't be able to get licences for free
will they?

-- 
Best Regards,

Dave Hanson
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Dad's Computer - for want of a better subject

2011-06-22 Thread alan c

On 22/06/11 09:14, Jon Reynolds wrote:


  Either way, I wish my Dad would just let me put Ubuntu on there and


Do you intend to support his use of non free software when you 
obviously feel strongly about it?


If any of my family, or friends want my support for their PCs, it 
*only* comes if they are using Ubuntu, no way for Windows. Although if 
they use Windows, that is their choice.


My own life is too short to spend time supporting something I dislike 
for many reasons.


--
alan cocks
Ubuntu user

--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Dad's Computer - for want of a better subject

2011-06-22 Thread Jon Reynolds

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:52:24 +0100, alan c wrote:

On 22/06/11 09:14, Jon Reynolds wrote:

  Either way, I wish my Dad would just let me put Ubuntu on there 
and


Do you intend to support his use of non free software when you
obviously feel strongly about it?

If any of my family, or friends want my support for their PCs, it
*only* comes if they are using Ubuntu, no way for Windows. Although 
if

they use Windows, that is their choice.

My own life is too short to spend time supporting something I dislike
for many reasons.

--
alan cocks
Ubuntu user


Well he doesn't have too many problems usually, but I fear he may have 
questions if Vista is much different. I don't mind helping him 
obviously, but unfortunately I have never used Vista so would struggle 
to help remotely anyway.


--


Jon Reynolds (j0nr)
http://www.jcrdevelopments.com

--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Dad's Computer - for want of a better subject

2011-06-22 Thread Rob Beard

On 22/06/2011 11:32, Dave Hanson wrote:


I think it may just be easier for companies like that to do a complete 
re-install rather than diagnose the actual problem and blame it on 
dodgy hardware, as for the Vista install, if they did actually take 
the parts from another PC perhaps they switched the license over and 
scrapped the other PC - perhaps they thought they were doing him a 
favour by giving him a more up to date OS. I'd certainly check that 
the license is valid with someone (Not sure who, Microsoft?) as there 
may be a load of computers in your area all running the same Vista 
install - they won't be able to get licences for free will they?


Actually it is easy to get round the Vista activation with a BIOS 
modification (as it is also with XP and Windows 7) so I wonder if this 
is what they have done?


Doesn't make it legal though.

My other thought was that maybe they are a registered Microsoft 
refurbisher and provided a licence that way, that is until I read that 
the options are Windows XP or Windows 7, NOT Vista...


http://www.microsoft.com/refurbishedpcs/Programs/registeredRefurbFAQ.htm

Rob

--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Dad's Computer - for want of a better subject

2011-06-22 Thread Rob Beard

On 22/06/2011 09:14, Sean Miller wrote:
On 22 June 2011 08:59, Avi Greenbury li...@avi.co 
mailto:li...@avi.co wrote:


Jon Reynolds wrote:

1. Why on Earth did they choose to put Vista on there??

Perhaps because a new board supposedly means a new install of
Windows and you're not supposed to be using XP licenses any more.
Perhaps they're also tired of supporting an OS that's way past
end-of-life.


You sure about that?

I always believed that even an OEM licence was tied to the machine, 
but if you had to replace a motherboard you could still re-install 
legally.   The automatic activation facilities in XP might tell you 
too many aspects of the machine has changed, but a call to Microsoft 
can resolve that.



This is a blog post about what Microsoft class as the machine nowadays...

4.1 We grant you a nonexclusive right to distribute an individual 
software license only with a fully assembled computer system. A fully 
assembled computer system means a computer system consisting of at 
least a central processing unit, a motherboard, a hard drive, a power 
supply, and a case.


You will notice the loophole that people have been exploiting (the 
former language which stated that an OEM desktop Operating System 
license could be sold with non-peripheral hardware,) is no longer in 
place. It is now very simple and straightforward: an OEM license must be 
sold only with a fully assembled computer system. Loophole closed.


http://blogs.msdn.com/b/mssmallbiz/archive/2005/09/07/461950.aspx

Seems pretty strict, last I heard it was tied to the motherboard and case.

Anyway, I wouldn't be inclined to re-install because I changed a 
motherboard anyway.  I may have to install new graphics/sound drivers 
etc. after changing the mobo (if they were using onboard) but I don't 
see why a re-install would be necessary.


In the olden days Windows could be more fussy about hardware changes, 
such as changing from one motherboard to another.  I guess this still 
can be the case if you're using the built in Windows disk drivers.  I 
found that for instance going from a Pentium 4 to a Pentium 2 didn't 
work.  A place I used to work at used to do images of Windows for 
deployment, they found that creating the images on newer hardware 
wouldn't work on older hardware, in the end we had to use the oldest 
hardware we had such as a P2 and install what we wanted, and then run 
Sysprep with the hardware drivers available for newer disk controller, 
otherwise the machines wouldn't boot.


I gather in Vista and Windows 7 things have improved greatly and if the 
machine can't boot you have the option of loading a gui recovery mode 
and adding drivers that way.


Rob

--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Dad's Computer - for want of a better subject

2011-06-22 Thread Barry Titterton
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 11:52 +0100, alan c wrote:
 On 22/06/11 09:14, Jon Reynolds wrote:
 
Either way, I wish my Dad would just let me put Ubuntu on there and
 
 Do you intend to support his use of non free software when you 
 obviously feel strongly about it?
 
 If any of my family, or friends want my support for their PCs, it 
 *only* comes if they are using Ubuntu, no way for Windows. Although if 
 they use Windows, that is their choice.
 
 My own life is too short to spend time supporting something I dislike 
 for many reasons.
 
 -- 
 alan cocks
 Ubuntu user
 

I help local Windows users but try to get in a comment like you
wouldn't have had this problem with Ubuntu. I see it as a form of
evangelism.

There is one women whose machine got borked by a virus, who is now
considering giving Ubuntu a try.

Barry T



-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Dad's Computer - for want of a better subject

2011-06-22 Thread Avi
alan c wrote:
 If any of my family, or friends want my support for their PCs, it 
 *only* comes if they are using Ubuntu, no way for Windows. Although
 if they use Windows, that is their choice.

Heh. I started not even trying to fix systems I wasn't familiar with a
while ago in search of the quiet life.

Now they're all ruddy running *buntus. So that plan failed. :(

-- 
Avi

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Reapproval

2011-06-22 Thread Alan Bell

On 22/06/11 11:22, Paul Mellors wrote:

Hay Alan

Do we have a list of things that need doing anywhere?

MooDoo


well there are two parts to it, stuff we did, and stuff we intend to do.
Some of our events are listed here, 
http://loco.ubuntu.com/teams/ubuntu-uk/events/history but that only goes 
back a year or so, and doesn't include everything, and I am not sure all 
of the intended events there went ahead. We need to go through that 
list, add the other events and find blog articles and photos showing 
what we got up to. Photos are really important, the LoCo council love 
them. We are basically going back 2 ish years, but there isn't a hard 
limit on where we stop, if there was something particularly interesting 
a bit further back.


In the stuff we intend to do section we need to expand on items listed 
here: http://pad.ubuntu-uk.org/2011plan and hopefully add more to it 
with more detail, and get them listed in the loco directory.


We also have https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/TeamReports to refer to

Alan.




--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


[ubuntu-uk] Latest podcast episode out

2011-06-22 Thread Alan Pope
Hullo!

http://podcast.ubuntu-uk.org/2011/06/22/s04e09-brave-new-world/

We have an interview with the guy behind http://www.textbookstuff.com/
which is a rather excellent no-DRM audio-book company. They're even
available directly in the Ubuntu One Music Store.

https://one.ubuntu.com/music/l/9717779/21

Feedback welcome!

Cheers,
Al.

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/