Re: [ubuntu-uk] UFW logs

2013-02-16 Thread Mark Fraser
On Thursday 14 Feb 2013 12:30:48 Simon Greenwood wrote:
 On 14 February 2013 12:02, Mark Fraser mfraz74+ubu...@gmail.com wrote:
  I've recently noticed that I've been getting lots of [UFW BLOCK] in my
  syslogs:
  
  [ 6378.481677] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT=
  MAC=50:46:5d:b8:7a:58:1c:c6:3c:9b:dd:0e:08:00 SRC=173.194.41.99
  DST=192.168.2.102 LEN=40 TOS=0x08 PREC=0x40 TTL=55 ID=17891 PROTO=TCP
  SPT=443
  DPT=50069 WINDOW=0 RES=0x00 RST URGP=0
  
  [ 6391.079634] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT=
  MAC=50:46:5d:b8:7a:58:1c:c6:3c:9b:dd:0e:08:00 SRC=173.194.66.108
  DST=192.168.2.102 LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=46 ID=35432 PROTO=TCP
  SPT=995
  DPT=52449 WINDOW=0 RES=0x00 RST URGP=0
  
  Going from the above, I tried to add rules for ports 443 and 995, but the
  ports are still blocked.
  
  Any ideas?
 
 As you probably know, port 443 is HTTPS and port 995 is POP3 with SSL. The
 inbound addresses are from Google (the reverse lookup shows 1e100.net,
 which is their network) which would suggest Gmail reading POP mail and
 looking at a web site. Would that make sense?

That makes sense, but why are they blocked as I've got these:
[28] 443ALLOW INAnywhere
[29] 995ALLOW INAnywhere
As rules in UFW.

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] UFW logs

2013-02-16 Thread Simon Greenwood
On 16 February 2013 15:13, Mark Fraser mfraz74+ubu...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Thursday 14 Feb 2013 12:30:48 Simon Greenwood wrote:
  On 14 February 2013 12:02, Mark Fraser mfraz74+ubu...@gmail.com wrote:
   I've recently noticed that I've been getting lots of [UFW BLOCK] in my
   syslogs:
  
   [ 6378.481677] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT=
   MAC=50:46:5d:b8:7a:58:1c:c6:3c:9b:dd:0e:08:00 SRC=173.194.41.99
   DST=192.168.2.102 LEN=40 TOS=0x08 PREC=0x40 TTL=55 ID=17891 PROTO=TCP
   SPT=443
   DPT=50069 WINDOW=0 RES=0x00 RST URGP=0
  
   [ 6391.079634] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT=
   MAC=50:46:5d:b8:7a:58:1c:c6:3c:9b:dd:0e:08:00 SRC=173.194.66.108
   DST=192.168.2.102 LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=46 ID=35432 PROTO=TCP
   SPT=995
   DPT=52449 WINDOW=0 RES=0x00 RST URGP=0
  
   Going from the above, I tried to add rules for ports 443 and 995, but
 the
   ports are still blocked.
  
   Any ideas?
 
  As you probably know, port 443 is HTTPS and port 995 is POP3 with SSL.
 The
  inbound addresses are from Google (the reverse lookup shows 1e100.net,
  which is their network) which would suggest Gmail reading POP mail and
  looking at a web site. Would that make sense?

 That makes sense, but why are they blocked as I've got these:
 [28] 443ALLOW INAnywhere
 [29] 995ALLOW INAnywhere
 As rules in UFW.

 -


Is Gmail picking up from the location and is whatever is listening on port
443 working? My guess would be that you've got conflicting rules somewhere.

s/
-- 
Twitter: @sfgreenwood
TBA are particularly glib
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


[ubuntu-uk] team meeting today in an hour or so

2013-02-16 Thread Alan Bell
I meant to send this email yesterday, but totally failed to do so, sorry 
about that.
I figure it is time we go together for a bit of a chat about events and 
things we can do to promote Ubuntu in the UK. There is a global jam 
initiative coming up and we have a possible venue for a bit of a get 
together in London on the 9th March and perhaps one in the Coventry area 
too.


Do pop along to the #ubuntu-uk-meeting channel any time from 8 ish, I 
will start a meeting and let it roll all evening, so feel free to pop in 
any time. You can join in a browser here:

http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=ubuntu-uk-meeting

or with any IRC client.

Alan.

--
I work at http://libertus.co.uk


--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


[ubuntu-uk] Beware updating to latest nvidia experimental driver

2013-02-16 Thread SuperEngineer
A friendly warning folks...

If your system matches this [or close to it]... and maybe you use
Steam ;)

12.04.2, nVidia Geforce 21n series, and kernel 3.2.0.37  - *do not* try
the 310 version of the driver as it = borked x, stay with 304, despite
Steam's annoying reminders.

To avoid borking your system, Beware updating to latest experimental
nvidia driver just because Steam asks you to!  Go to 304 - no higher.


-- 
Cheers,
Bill B. [SuperEngineer]

--
-Registered Linux User 523667-
-Registered Ubuntu User 32366-
-Free  as in Freedom--


-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/