[ubuntu-uk] regarding for solution

2007-05-16 Thread fatma oymak
Dear all,

I have one problemI couldnt find right answer...do you have any idea? 
please please let me know

many thanks
fatma


Consider the behaviour of two machines in a distributed system. 
Both have clocks that are supposed to tick 1000 times per millisecond. One 
of them ticks 990 times per millisecond. The other ticks 1015  times per 
millisecond. If the system designer want to guarantee that clocks of these 
two machines never differ by more than 5 seconds, how often must be clocks 
be re-synchronized? Supposing that all machines in this distributed systems 
come from same manufacturer and the maximum drift rate is specified as 1.0%, 
how often must the clocks of this system must be re-synchonized  if the 
system designers want to guarantee that clocks of these two machines never 
differ by more than 5 seconds? Describe in steps how you get your 
result...

_
Txt a lot? Get Messenger FREE on your mobile. 
https://livemessenger.mobile.uk.msn.com/


-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] looking work placement/voluntary option

2007-01-05 Thread fatma oymak


dear all

currently i am using ubuntu.

i am living london and looking some placement or voluntary work with 
linux

do you know any placeplease let me know

all the best
fatma


From: London School of Puppetry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],British Ubuntu Talk 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com

To: Robin Menneer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: British Ubuntu Talk ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] ubuntu sophisticated
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:12:01 +

Robin
Thanks I will try-Can I ask someone something else- why does open Office
crash when I try to paste something out of it into an email? Sorry I am so
new to this and I appreciate all you with so much practical knowledge.
Caroline

On 05/01/07, Robin Menneer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Caroline
I assume that you are at the same level of simplicity and find that the
help facility is like the curate's egg, good in parts.  You type your
message in open office then save as, under file type, click on windows XP
which gives you a .doc suffix.  Microsoft should understand this.
Robin
On 1/5/07, London School of Puppetry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Robin, I am a recent convert? to Ubuntu- which I find great- and I am
 useless at this klind of thing. the Help stuff is clear- ish - except 
for
 some terms are hard to understand- But the biggest problem I have is 
sending

 files to colleagues who use Microsoft- and they say they can't open
 them.Caroline

 On 05/01/07, Robin Menneer  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Toby
  If Ubuntu is to be as successful as has been mooted, the package 
needs
  to be lubriciously simple so that complete beginners with nil 
knowledge can
  take advantage of the secondhand machines which are said to abound.  
For

  instance I would advocate a starting screen, after loading, of a
  typewriter-only facility with the keyboard control c keys suitably 
locked
  sofly,  So the newboy can, unless he uses the one menu which gets him 
out of

  it, can only use the machine as a typewriter with save, print and new
  facilities.  Then when he has mastered typing (or sooner) he can 
elect to
  move another stage towards open office etc etc.  Many of the people 
coming
  into computing are those who have either been bypassed or actively 
rejected
  computing and are possibly candidates for open-source coupled with 
cheap
  secondhand machine, but a simple step-by-step initiation is needed.  
What is

  simple to you is impossible to most of them.  I envisage a pensioner
  attending a charity meeting being given a machine and being told just 
to
  take it away and use it.  Comparing its procedures with windows is 
not
  useful.  Dumbing down ridiculously is what's needed to get ubuntu 
being

  favoured by the masses.
  Robin
 
  On 1/5/07, Toby Smithe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
  
   On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 12:29 +, Robin Menneer wrote:
Alan
Yes - cash book, address book c.  I didn't have a cd and had
   never
made one, nor had the facilities.  I didn't need a cd for suse 
but

   I
do not know what Novell have done with it since they took it 
over.
You fall into the trap of comparing installing ubuntu with 
windows
instead of the real world whch does exist outside windows.  Yes 
it

  
should get better if it's going to be much more widely used.  I
   want a
package that I can click on on the web, chose the thicky
   (beginner's)
version and go away and leave it for half an hour, returning to
   find
the opening page offering help.  Other more expert versions I
   would
possibly like to delve into later but would be happy ot go again
   to
the web so as to get the latest version.
Robin
  
   Hmm... I'm not quite certain what this means. I'm also unsure as to
   what
   you find sophisticated. It always all seemed perfectly clear to me.
   Could you elaborate some more, please?
  
On 1/4/07, alan c  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Robin Menneer wrote:
  Alan
  Cornwall.  You can see some of my interests on
   www.cornishhedges.com.
  (comments welcome).   Yes, I agree about different needs - 
all

   one
  needs is a simple menu offering switchable facilities by
   function
  rather than by name

 Email, Word Processing, Internet Browse,  (more?)

  Protection should be inbuilt with user status.

 I believe this is already there.

  Surely in the 21st century we do not need an install person

 You said you got someone else to install for you. Installs are
   about
 as easy as I could imagine now. Insert cd, say yes take over
   hard
 drive, ok, english ok, then have a few cups of tea. Knowing 
that

 nobody in their right mind installs windows themselves (quite
 difficult), I think ubuntu does pretty well and will probably
   get
 better too.

   Aged
  late-departed mother in laws should not have to be daunted by
   install
  problems.  I gather one Ubuntu difficulty