Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu Server Install

2010-06-09 Thread Chris Rowson
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Alan Pope a...@popey.com wrote:
 On 8 June 2010 12:18, Chris Rowson christopherrow...@gmail.com wrote:
 ubuntu-10.04-rc-dvd-amd64Ubuntu 10.04 x86_64 DVD
 ubuntu-10.04-rc-dvd-i386Ubuntu 10.04 i386 DVD

 o_O

 rc?

 Cheers,
 Al.



Yeah, I noticed that. To be honest though, if you only install the
core system, you only have to install 80MB or updates or so to bring
it up to date.

Chris

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu Server Install

2010-06-09 Thread Alan Pope
On 9 June 2010 12:55, Chris Rowson christopherrow...@gmail.com wrote:
 Yeah, I noticed that. To be honest though, if you only install the
 core system, you only have to install 80MB or updates or so to bring
 it up to date.


Getting owned in the time between the install and you doing updates?

Surely a machine should be provisioned with an updated install? Or am
I missing something?

Cheers
Al.

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu Server Install

2010-06-09 Thread Chris Rowson
 Yeah, I noticed that. To be honest though, if you only install the
 core system, you only have to install 80MB or updates or so to bring
 it up to date.


 Getting owned in the time between the install and you doing updates?

 Surely a machine should be provisioned with an updated install? Or am
 I missing something?

 Cheers
 Al.


You're technically right, I'll message the server operator and see if
he can update the available images.

I don't think that the risk is exceptionally high however as OOTB with
a core install there are no network services like Apache or SSH
running so the attack profile would be pretty small.

Chris

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu Server Install

2010-06-09 Thread Chris Rowson
 Surely a machine should be provisioned with an updated install? Or am
 I missing something?

Oooh, and come to think of it under Xen HVM the machine isn't
provisioned with any kind of install. You're responsible for setting
it up yourself. Of course it doesn't help with the install media is
old!

Chris

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu Server Install

2010-06-08 Thread Chris Rowson
I'm posting this information here just in case anyone finds it
interesting. I don't have any connection to the company mentioned but
as these VPSs seem pretty cheap considering they're hosted in the UK,
I thought I'd share the info!

The new Xen HVM provider I have been using (and this thread was in
reference to) is called Damn::VPS.

www.damnvps.com

I can't vouch one way or the other for them (they are new and I've
only just set up an account with them) but as it's only a little over
six quid for a VPS with 512MB RAM, 15GB HDD  1000GB Monthly
bandwidth, it's worth getting a VPS just for learning/testing. Use the
coupon code OPENING for 10% off at checkout.

Once you're setup, you can choose from the following install media:

8.0-RELEASE-amd64-dvd1FreeBSD 8.0 64 Bit
8.0-RELEASE-i386-dvd1FreeBSD 8.0 32 Bit
CentOS-4.8-i386-binDVDCentos 4.8 i386 DVD
CentOS-4.8-x86_64-binDVDCentos 4.8 x86_64 DVD
CentOS-5.4-i386-bin-DVDCentos 5.4 i386 DVD
CentOS-5.4-x86_64-bin-DVDCentos 5.4 x86_64 DVD
Fedora-12-i386-DVDFedora 12 i386 DVD
Fedora-12-x86_64-DVDFedora 12 x86_64 DVD
Gentoo-amd64-20100408Gentoo x86_64
Gentoo-i386-20100408Gentoo i386
NetBSD-5.0.2-i386NetBSD 5.0.2 i386
NetBSD-5.0.2-x86_64NetBSD 5.0.2 x86_64
OpenBSD-i386-4.6OpenBSD i386 4.6
OpenBSD-x86_64-4.6OpenBSD x86_64 4.6
chrome-i686Chrome i386
debian-504-amd64-DVD-1Debian 5 x86_64 DVD
debian-504-i386-DVD-1Debian 5 i386 DVD
slackware-12.2-install-dvdSlackware 12 Install DVD
slackware-13.0-install-dvdSlackware 13 i386 Install DVD
slackware64-13.0-install-dvdSlackware 13 x86_64 Install DVD
ubuntu-10.04-rc-dvd-amd64Ubuntu 10.04 x86_64 DVD
ubuntu-10.04-rc-dvd-i386Ubuntu 10.04 i386 DVD
ubuntu-8.04.1-dvd-amd64Ubuntu 8.04 x86_64 DVD
ubuntu-8.04.1-dvd-i386Ubuntu 8.04 i386 DVD
ubuntu-9.04-dvd-amd64Ubuntu 9.04 x86_64 DVD
ubuntu-9.04-dvd-i386Ubuntu 9.04 i386 DVD
dsl-4.4.10-syslinuxDamn Small Linux
osol-0906-x86OpenSolaris 0906
Windows2008-r2Windows 2008 R2
clonezilla-live-1.2.4-28-686Clonezilla
CentOS-5.5-x86_64-bin-DVD-1of2Centos 5.5 x86_64
CentOS-5.5-i386-bin-DVDCentos 5.5 i386 DVD
Windows2003Windows 2003
openSUSE-11.2-NET-x86_64OpenSuse 11.2 Network Installer
Elastix-1.6.0-x86_64-bin-29oct2009Elastix 1.6 VOIP
Fedora-13-i386-DVDFedora 13 i386
Fedora-13-x86_64-DVDFedora 13 x86_64
Windows2003-32bitWindows 2003 32bit

Cheers,

Chris

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu Server Install

2010-06-08 Thread Alan Pope
On 8 June 2010 12:18, Chris Rowson christopherrow...@gmail.com wrote:
 ubuntu-10.04-rc-dvd-amd64Ubuntu 10.04 x86_64 DVD
 ubuntu-10.04-rc-dvd-i386Ubuntu 10.04 i386 DVD

o_O

rc?

Cheers,
Al.

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


[ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu Server Install

2010-06-07 Thread Chris Rowson
Hey ladies  gents,

I've been trying to install Ubuntu Lucid Server onto a XEN HVM based
VPS and have come across a strange problem.

Using the Ubuntu 10.04 i386 DVD I highlighted 'install ubuntu in text
mode' and selected the 'install a server' option. I then went through
the installer selecting default options (except choosing a standard
partition layout instead of LVM) and finished up the installation by
leaving all of the server setup options like 'setup a LAMP server' etc
deselected  (thus leaving only a core system install on the VPS).

Upon logging into the newly installed system (and I've done this twice
now) I find that the server is running a generic rather than a server
kernel. Running sudo apt-get install linux-server and rebooting
doesn't seem to replace the kernel either.

Any ideas where I may have gone wrong? :-S

Thanks in advance,

Chris

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu Server Install

2010-06-07 Thread John Stevenson
On 7 June 2010 19:29, Chris Rowson christopherrow...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hey ladies  gents,

 I've been trying to install Ubuntu Lucid Server onto a XEN HVM based
 VPS and have come across a strange problem.

 Using the Ubuntu 10.04 i386 DVD I highlighted 'install ubuntu in text
 mode' and selected the 'install a server' option. I then went through
 the installer selecting default options (except choosing a standard
 partition layout instead of LVM) and finished up the installation by
 leaving all of the server setup options like 'setup a LAMP server' etc
 deselected  (thus leaving only a core system install on the VPS).

 Upon logging into the newly installed system (and I've done this twice
 now) I find that the server is running a generic rather than a server
 kernel. Running sudo apt-get install linux-server and rebooting
 doesn't seem to replace the kernel either.

 Any ideas where I may have gone wrong? :-S

 Thanks in advance,

 Chris

 Hello Chris,
You may not have gone wrong at all.  According to the dependencies for
linux-image-server it depends on a package linux-image-generic-pae which
installs the latest linux-generic-pae image.

Are you running the linux-image-generic or the linux-image-generic-pae.  If
you see the grub menu at boot up, what images are displayed in the kernel
list?  Is the one you want at the top?

I think either shift or space key displays grub if it is not shown as the
system boots.

There also seems to be separate packages for kernel running as a virtual
guest, linux-image-virtual.  Maybe that is a more appropriate image for
running on Xen, I am afraid I dont know at present.
-- 
John Stevenson
jr0cket.com
leanagilemachine.com
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu Server Install

2010-06-07 Thread Chris Rowson

 Hey ladies  gents,

 I've been trying to install Ubuntu Lucid Server onto a XEN HVM based
 VPS and have come across a strange problem.

 Using the Ubuntu 10.04 i386 DVD I highlighted 'install ubuntu in text
 mode' and selected the 'install a server' option. I then went through
 the installer selecting default options (except choosing a standard
 partition layout instead of LVM) and finished up the installation by
 leaving all of the server setup options like 'setup a LAMP server' etc
 deselected  (thus leaving only a core system install on the VPS).

 Upon logging into the newly installed system (and I've done this twice
 now) I find that the server is running a generic rather than a server
 kernel. Running sudo apt-get install linux-server and rebooting
 doesn't seem to replace the kernel either.

 Any ideas where I may have gone wrong? :-S

 Thanks in advance,

 Chris

 Hello Chris,
 You may not have gone wrong at all.  According to the dependencies for
 linux-image-server it depends on a package linux-image-generic-pae which
 installs the latest linux-generic-pae image.

 Are you running the linux-image-generic or the linux-image-generic-pae.  If
 you see the grub menu at boot up, what images are displayed in the kernel
 list?  Is the one you want at the top?

 I think either shift or space key displays grub if it is not shown as the
 system boots.

 There also seems to be separate packages for kernel running as a virtual
 guest, linux-image-virtual.  Maybe that is a more appropriate image for
 running on Xen, I am afraid I dont know at present.
 --
 John Stevenson
 jr0cket.com
 leanagilemachine.com



Hi John,

It is running the linux-generic-pae kernel. I wanted the server kernel
as I was worried that the generic one might have kernel preemption
turned on.

I'm not an expert in this, but I believe that Xen HVM (where
virtualisation is done in hardware) doesn't require that the guest has
a modified kernel.

Cheers,

Chris

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu Server Install

2010-06-07 Thread Alan Pope
On 7 June 2010 20:49, Chris Rowson christopherrow...@gmail.com wrote:
 It is running the linux-generic-pae kernel. I wanted the server kernel
 as I was worried that the generic one might have kernel preemption
 turned on.


a...@wopr:~$ grep CONFIG_PREEMPT /boot/config-2.6.32-22-generic
CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS=y
# CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE is not set
CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y
# CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set

Cheers,
Al.

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu Server Install

2010-06-07 Thread Chris Rowson
 It is running the linux-generic-pae kernel. I wanted the server kernel
 as I was worried that the generic one might have kernel preemption
 turned on.


 a...@wopr:~$ grep CONFIG_PREEMPT /boot/config-2.6.32-22-generic
 CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS=y
 # CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE is not set
 CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y
 # CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set

 Cheers,
 Al.


Ah, not good for a server then! I wonder why this has been installed
when I selected a server install then ?!

Chris

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu Server Install

2010-06-07 Thread Chris Rowson
 It is running the linux-generic-pae kernel. I wanted the server kernel
 as I was worried that the generic one might have kernel preemption
 turned on.


 a...@wopr:~$ grep CONFIG_PREEMPT /boot/config-2.6.32-22-generic
 CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS=y
 # CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE is not set
 CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y
 # CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set

 Cheers,
 Al.


 Ah, not good for a server then! I wonder why this has been installed
 when I selected a server install then ?!

 Chris


Ah. In answer to my own question, it looks like the i386 server kernel
was 'dropped' in Karmic.

Note that the i386-server flavour is being dropped. I can think of no
good reason to continue to support a 32 bit server. The 32 bit
-generic kernel ought to suffice for those headless implementations
that have used the -server flavour in the past, such as home gateways.
All of the -server unique settings can be made at runtime to a
-generic{-pae} kernel, the most important of which are I/O and process
scheduler settings.

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Specs/KarmicKernelFlavours

Chris

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu Server Install

2010-06-07 Thread Rob Beard
On 07/06/10 21:09, Chris Rowson wrote:
 It is running the linux-generic-pae kernel. I wanted the server kernel
 as I was worried that the generic one might have kernel preemption
 turned on.


 a...@wopr:~$ grep CONFIG_PREEMPT /boot/config-2.6.32-22-generic
 CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS=y
 # CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE is not set
 CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y
 # CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set

 Cheers,
 Al.


 Ah, not good for a server then! I wonder why this has been installed
 when I selected a server install then ?!

 Chris


 Ah. In answer to my own question, it looks like the i386 server kernel
 was 'dropped' in Karmic.

 Note that the i386-server flavour is being dropped. I can think of no
 good reason to continue to support a 32 bit server. The 32 bit
 -generic kernel ought to suffice for those headless implementations
 that have used the -server flavour in the past, such as home gateways.
 All of the -server unique settings can be made at runtime to a
 -generic{-pae} kernel, the most important of which are I/O and process
 scheduler settings.

 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Specs/KarmicKernelFlavours

 Chris


I guess that would make a bit of sense since pretty much all CPUs (if 
not all new CPUs) are 64-Bit capable.  Presumably if it's mission 
critical then it's always an option to stick with Ubuntu 8.04 LTS on the 
server for another couple of years (by which time I presume the hardware 
would have been replaced with something newer or virtualised maybe?).

Rob

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu Server Install

2010-06-07 Thread Tyler J. Wagner
On Monday 07 June 2010 21:09:46 Chris Rowson wrote:
 Ah. In answer to my own question, it looks like the i386 server kernel
 was 'dropped' in Karmic.

Yep. You can see it here:

http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/linux-server

This metapackage depends on:

* dep: linux-generic-pae [i386]
* dep: linux-image-server (= 2.6.31.22.35) [amd64]

So on i386 you get linux-generic-pae now.

Tyler

-- 
An ambassador is an honest man sent to lie abroad for the good of
his country.
   -- Sir Henry Wotton

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/