Re: [ubuntu-uk] website backup
On 30/06/09 21:33, Dean Sas wrote: alan c wrote: After reading the horror stories about 'website hacked' and the like I wanted to check my understanding about backing up. I am aware of simple methods such as Copying files directly presumably with say, filezilla , after logging in as admin is what first come to mind. But what about httrack? This can mirror a site. Can this be regarded as a backup? Any website backup should also include the backup of any databases used for it and any files that are above the web root. httrack looks as if it'll work only if the website is completely static, any pages using e.g. php will only have the output backed up by httrack and not the .php file itself. Also it'll only back up files you tell it about or files that are linked from other pages on your site. I use rsnapshot (there are plenty of similar tools) and have it configured to make a database backup file before it runs the back-up. Unfortunately it's not the easiest thing to configure and it does require that you have shell access to the server (I wouldn't consider hosting that doesn't have shell access to be honest) That's good advice, I tend to write a simple bash script with a little mysql command-line-fu to dump the db and zip it, then send the lot using either rsync or rdiff-backup to your destination of choice based on a suitable cron schedule. Al -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
[ubuntu-uk] website backup
After reading the horror stories about 'website hacked' and the like I wanted to check my understanding about backing up. I am aware of simple methods such as Copying files directly presumably with say, filezilla , after logging in as admin is what first come to mind. But what about httrack? This can mirror a site. Can this be regarded as a backup? -- alan cocks Ubuntu user -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Re: [ubuntu-uk] website backup
alan c wrote: After reading the horror stories about 'website hacked' and the like I wanted to check my understanding about backing up. I am aware of simple methods such as Copying files directly presumably with say, filezilla , after logging in as admin is what first come to mind. But what about httrack? This can mirror a site. Can this be regarded as a backup? Any website backup should also include the backup of any databases used for it and any files that are above the web root. httrack looks as if it'll work only if the website is completely static, any pages using e.g. php will only have the output backed up by httrack and not the .php file itself. Also it'll only back up files you tell it about or files that are linked from other pages on your site. I use rsnapshot (there are plenty of similar tools) and have it configured to make a database backup file before it runs the back-up. Unfortunately it's not the easiest thing to configure and it does require that you have shell access to the server (I wouldn't consider hosting that doesn't have shell access to be honest) -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
