Re: [ubuntu-uk] windows 7 features comparison

2009-09-20 Thread Vinothan Shankar
Jonathon Fernyhough wrote:
> 2009/9/19 Vinothan Shankar :
>> Maximum CPU chips: probably 64 (standard in Linux kernel, I believe)
> 
> I thought it could scale to 4096 now? (Or was that just an xkcd comic?
> I forget...)
> 
I'm pretty sure that's just XKCD.
And it's certainly not in 2.6.28, which is what we're using in Ubuntu.
Not that it wasn't a good XKCD!

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] windows 7 features comparison

2009-09-19 Thread Paul Sutton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Vinothan Shankar wrote:
> Paul Sutton wrote:
>> Hi
> 
>> the following wiki pedia page
> 
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_7_editions
> 
>> there is a comparison of windows 7 versions, just wondered if anyone
>> could imagine there was a column for ubuntu which features (or equilvent
>> ) would be ticked,  for example,  ubuntu would have compiz for aero sort
>> of thing,
> 
>> i guess multilingual is covered in ubuntu anyway,  but just to make
>> rough comparison.
> 
>> This is not about bashing microsoft,  i want to try and make a fair
>> comparison based on those features, to help our argument for open source
>> / ubuntu


Thanks for the list below.  I have added one or two comments.
> 
>> Paul
> 
> Apologies for the not-quite-complete list.
> Right, let's see (below is just for Ubuntu):
> 32- and 64-bit versions: both
> Maximum physical memory (64-bit mode): Approx 64TiB
> Maximum CPU chips: probably 64 (standard in Linux kernel, I believe)
> Home Group (create and join): Must be a windows concept - I don't know
>   what the equivalent would be.
Well Linux systems do have groups,  so this could be a sort of
equivalent, to this.

> Backup and restore center: Equivalent not installed by default but
>   available
> Multiple monitors: Yes (hardware dependent)
> Fast user switching: yes
> Desktop Window Manager: Compiz (hardware dependent) or Metacity
> Windows Mobility Center: no equivalent centraliser.
> Windows Aero: Compiz (+emerald, maybe)
> Multi-touch: unknown (anyone?)
> Premium Games Included: N/A (no premium games!) but linux does have a lot of 
> games available, 

> Windows Media Center: Not immediately after install but MythTV in repos.
> Windows Media Player Remote Media Experience:  ...say wha?
> Encrypting File System: If you use the alternate CD, with encrypted LVM
> Location Aware Printing: Not AFAIK

Info on this is provided below
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/products/features/location-aware-printing

so i would guess if both locations are using dhcp,  then it would be a
question if weather ubuntu can figure out from your ip address range,
which printer to use.

> Remote Desktop Host: not as standard; in repos (for RDP as it's what the
>   system we're comparing to uses)
> Presentation Mode: No?
> Windows Server Domain Joining: Yes
> Windows XP Mode: No - though VM's are possible
> Aero glass remoting: I don't know what's meant by this!
> AppLocker: no
> BitLocker: Encrypted LVM again
> BranchCache: no (AFAIK)
> Subsystem for UNIX-Based Applications: N/A - _IS_ a *nix system

I would guess you could replace this as subsystem for Windows based
systems e.g wine, cedega, cross over.
> Multilingual User Interface: yes
> Virtual Hard Disk booting: I believe so.

I wonder if we could have ability to spell centre properly - microsoft
NO - ubuntu YES. lol,  ok joking a side i think the above would suggest
that feature for feature,  that what ever windows can do, so can ubuntu
/ linux,

I just wondered if the community could make use of this somehow,  after
all microsoft where kind enough to issue fud to pc world et al regarding
windows vs linux

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/09/09/ms_linux_pitch/

I think its only fair we do something similar only erm lets say tell the
truth as best we can, rather than spread FUD.

of course if MS want to play dirty we can do,

Paul






- --
Paul Sutton
www.zleap.net
Support Open and ISO standard file formats ISO 26300 odf
http://www.odfalliance.org
Meetings 1st Saturday of the month - Shoreline, Paignton from 3pm
Software freedom day 2009 - Saturday 19th September 2009
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkq1MncACgkQaggq1k2FJq3jhQCcCfl5fSuVe3ra+QScZQvOLhKv
r9MAn1sEgfowlpFwvIL94RTVvqjz7Lcm
=P1Gd
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] windows 7 features comparison

2009-09-19 Thread Jonathon Fernyhough
2009/9/19 Vinothan Shankar :
> Maximum CPU chips: probably 64 (standard in Linux kernel, I believe)

I thought it could scale to 4096 now? (Or was that just an xkcd comic?
I forget...)

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] windows 7 features comparison

2009-09-19 Thread Vinothan Shankar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Paul Sutton wrote:
> Hi
> 
> the following wiki pedia page
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_7_editions
> 
> there is a comparison of windows 7 versions, just wondered if anyone
> could imagine there was a column for ubuntu which features (or equilvent
> ) would be ticked,  for example,  ubuntu would have compiz for aero sort
> of thing,
> 
> i guess multilingual is covered in ubuntu anyway,  but just to make
> rough comparison.
> 
> This is not about bashing microsoft,  i want to try and make a fair
> comparison based on those features, to help our argument for open source
> / ubuntu
> 
> Paul

Apologies for the not-quite-complete list.
Right, let's see (below is just for Ubuntu):
32- and 64-bit versions: both
Maximum physical memory (64-bit mode): Approx 64TiB
Maximum CPU chips: probably 64 (standard in Linux kernel, I believe)
Home Group (create and join): Must be a windows concept - I don't know
what the equivalent would be.
Backup and restore center: Equivalent not installed by default but
available
Multiple monitors: Yes (hardware dependent)
Fast user switching: yes
Desktop Window Manager: Compiz (hardware dependent) or Metacity
Windows Mobility Center: no equivalent centraliser.
Windows Aero: Compiz (+emerald, maybe)
Multi-touch: unknown (anyone?)
Premium Games Included: N/A (no premium games!)
Windows Media Center: Not immediately after install but MythTV in repos.
Windows Media Player Remote Media Experience:  ...say wha?
Encrypting File System: If you use the alternate CD, with encrypted LVM
Location Aware Printing: Not AFAIK
Remote Desktop Host: not as standard; in repos (for RDP as it's what the
system we're comparing to uses)
Presentation Mode: No?
Windows Server Domain Joining: Yes
Windows XP Mode: No - though VM's are possible
Aero glass remoting: I don't know what's meant by this!
AppLocker: no
BitLocker: Encrypted LVM again
BranchCache: no (AFAIK)
Subsystem for UNIX-Based Applications: N/A - _IS_ a *nix system
Multilingual User Interface: yes
Virtual Hard Disk booting: I believe so.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkq05r4ACgkQKYNUyjOGQGT+ZwCeOcyOXYr+C5RSf5cLkr6LpX0g
6bAAn1IVR++rb1VsYdlkbfJgDFSzAXYc
=YKd6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


[ubuntu-uk] windows 7 features comparison

2009-09-18 Thread Paul Sutton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi

the following wiki pedia page

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_7_editions

there is a comparison of windows 7 versions, just wondered if anyone
could imagine there was a column for ubuntu which features (or equilvent
) would be ticked,  for example,  ubuntu would have compiz for aero sort
of thing,

i guess multilingual is covered in ubuntu anyway,  but just to make
rough comparison.

This is not about bashing microsoft,  i want to try and make a fair
comparison based on those features, to help our argument for open source
/ ubuntu

Paul
- --
Paul Sutton
www.zleap.net
Support Open and ISO standard file formats ISO 26300 odf
http://www.odfalliance.org
Meetings 1st Saturday of the month - Shoreline, Paignton from 3pm
Software freedom day 2009 - Saturday 19th September 2009
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkq0AuAACgkQaggq1k2FJq0kcACfUyIYofzZQFhQiKZwK0BDtwoN
EBgAmwVIn9IxGEQhFfllFdXQ/foOjX9A
=8FL6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/