[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 212206] Re: [i965] [Hardy] digital output driver (SDVO) sets wrong resolution on GM965
This bug is still a regression in 11.04 Natty as well as 11.10 Oneiric. The current upstream bugreport is this one: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38934 Meanwhile a fix has been released: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2012-January/014257.html And this fix made it into the mainline kernel 3.0.19 "drm/i915/sdvo: always set positive sync polarity": http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/ChangeLog-3.0.19 The "Oneiric update to 3.0.19 stable release" has been posted. Please consider the patch "drm/i915/sdvo: always set positive sync polarity" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/926309 for inclusion into next ubuntu Oneiric stable kernel. ** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #38934 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38934 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212206 Title: [i965] [Hardy] digital output driver (SDVO) sets wrong resolution on GM965 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/212206/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 212206] Re: [i965] [Hardy] digital output driver (SDVO) sets wrong resolution on GM965
Bug is a regression in 11.04 Natty. Waiting for upstream fix: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15370#c23 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212206 Title: [i965] [Hardy] digital output driver (SDVO) sets wrong resolution on GM965 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 351186] Re: [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] [ubuntu 9.10] [ubuntu 10.04] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled
In response to #420: Last time I installed the backclear.patch on ATI Mobility HD3400 hardware I noticed distorted and weird pixels when opening new windows. They disappeared as soon as contents was painted into the window. However it suggests what the source code comments say: +- /* +- * Copy bits from the parent into the new pixmap so that it will +- * have "reasonable" contents in case for background None areas. +- */ Without this patch- there are NO distorted and arbitrary colored pixels when opening new windows. I would all this a regression (besides the performance improvement) within ATI hardware already. -- What I just did is install the patch on -intel hardware (GM965 to be more specific) and expected to see those weird colored pixels when opening new windows. However windows look fine upon creation. -- [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] [ubuntu 9.10] [ubuntu 10.04] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 351186] Re: [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] [ubuntu 9.10] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled
Anybody tried fglrx-installer (2:8.721-0ubuntu1) lucid: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/fglrx-installer/2:8.721-0ubuntu1 -- [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] [ubuntu 9.10] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 351186] Re: [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] [ubuntu 9.10] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled
bug ix NOT fixed in Catalyst fglrx 10.1. (and also not in 9.12). Catalyst 10.1 installation will fail on x86_64 in first place: http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?p=109862#post109862 But a walkaround for broken library references is known: http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?p=110091#post110091 -- [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] [ubuntu 9.10] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 351186] Re: [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] [ubuntu 9.10] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled
One of the recent Karmic 9.10 xorg security patches have overridden: http://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/xserver-no-backfill Don't know which one though and don't know how to force reverting and modifying /etc/apt/apt.conf to stick with nobackfill version. -- [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] [ubuntu 9.10] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 295743] Re: kdm does not restart on LOGOUT
Looks like SiS X-Server crashed upon logout: [ 1096.753217] (EE) SIS(0): Unable to map IO aperture. Invalid argument (22) [ 1096.753255] (EE) SIS(0): ** [ 1096.753276] (EE) SIS(0): ERROR: [ 1096.753299] (EE) SIS(0): Could not map MMIO area [ 1096.753319] (EE) SIS(0): END OF MESSAGE [ 1096.753339] (EE) SIS(0): ** [ 1096.753360] (EE) SIS(0): ** [ 1096.753380] (EE) SIS(0): ERROR: [ 1096.753399] (EE) SIS(0): SiSMapMem() failed [ 1096.753418] (EE) SIS(0): END OF MESSAGE [ 1096.753437] (EE) SIS(0): ** Respawning kdm as requested here might fix the problem: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/432521 Or find the reason for SiS driver crash and fix it in the first place. -- kdm does not restart on LOGOUT https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295743 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-sis in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 135557] Re: [i965gm] Kubuntu: Screen dimensions of external monitor not correct on X server startup (intel driver)
The external and internal display agree on a resolution, which both displays support. The motivation behind this algorithm for Initial Mode Selection Keith Packard explaines in this blog: http://keithp.com/blogs/X_output_status_july_2008/ This explains your observation of the "wrong" initial mode resolution. The second observation about the DPI stems from the same I assume: The system gets the DPI of ONE of the displays and in your case it seems to be the wrong one. This has quiet some implication e.g. to Firefox font rendering. Anyway for the second issue there's at least a workaround: KDE System Settings / Appearance / Fonts / Force DPI for Fonts. Or use some xserverrc to override the hard way. -- [i965gm] Kubuntu: Screen dimensions of external monitor not correct on X server startup (intel driver) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135557 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 437173] Re: [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays
The original algorithm and motivation for Initial Mode Selection Keith Packard explained in this blog: http://keithp.com/blogs/X_output_status_july_2008/ I agree your solution is better. -- [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437173 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
