[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 881046] Re: Panning in a virtual monitor is not possible after upgrade to Ubuntu 11.10
Looks like the regression was introduced when trying to fix a problem with the mouse going into space outside of the display, when you have two displays of different sizes joined together. Here's the bug I think Bryce referred to, and it looks like that broke panning. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20334 As Bryce says there are three proposed patches (!), so the best thing we can do is try and get upstream to prioritise it. Sounds like some of the patches only fixing panning or only fix scaling. I just moved another bug from compiz to xorg - actually I now think it's just a dupe of this one, I will go and mark it. Bryce - if one of them fixes both problems and looks fairly simple is there any chance of a cherry-pick? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881046 Title: Panning in a virtual monitor is not possible after upgrade to Ubuntu 11.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/881046/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 878454] Re: --scale and --panning options do not resize the mouse area accordingly
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 881046 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881046 hlb: Marking as dupe of bug 881046 which is confirmed, assigned, and has an upstream bug. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 881046 Panning in a virtual monitor is not possible after upgrade to Ubuntu 11.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libxrandr in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878454 Title: --scale and --panning options do not resize the mouse area accordingly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libxrandr/+bug/878454/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 878454] Re: --scale and --panning options do not resize the mouse area accordingly
Confirmed on Kubuntu oneiric. ** Tags added: kubuntu panning xrandr -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libxrandr in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878454 Title: --scale and --panning options do not resize the mouse area accordingly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libxrandr/+bug/878454/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 866065] Re: Cursor limited after XRANDR with option --scale
Fundamental issue at X Server level ** Package changed: compiz (Ubuntu) = xorg (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/866065 Title: Cursor limited after XRANDR with option --scale To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/866065/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 866065] Re: Cursor limited after XRANDR with option --scale
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 881046 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881046 Marking as duplicate of #881046 which has links to the upstream bugs and is confirmed and assigned. This is a bug in xserver upstream and will affect compiz, GNOME, Unity, KDE, Kubuntu and probably XFCE / Xubuntu as well... It's a regression bug upstream and at time of writing there are three patches suggested to fix it, so there is hope! ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 881046 Panning in a virtual monitor is not possible after upgrade to Ubuntu 11.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/866065 Title: Cursor limited after XRANDR with option --scale To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/866065/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 877878] Re: randr panning not working
Bug 881046 is about the same xrandr panning and scaling issue in general - it's not just an Intel server problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877878 Title: randr panning not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/877878/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 377090] Re: [i945gm] (Needs kernel 2.6.32) DRI2 swapbuffers and page flipping
For clarity - is this fixed in Lucid's kernel? Or is there still farther to go? I'd like to help you keep a lid on Intel-driver-bashing in the forum when Lucid is out, but can't figure out if you're expecting this to work or not. -- [i945gm] (Needs kernel 2.6.32) DRI2 swapbuffers and page flipping https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377090 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is the registrant for xf86-video-intel. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 382017] Re: [i845] xorg intel driver 2.7.99 36% slower than 2.7.0 on i845
Jerry, think Bryce realises that, he's saying can we have a hang bug reported seperately, get that fixed, and then come back to this bug. Does that make sense? Alternate theory meanwhile: kernel 31-RC8 hangs on boot for me, 6 and 7 were fine. So if you've moved forward to a later RC since your original report, it could be the kernel piece that's causing the problem. -- [i845] xorg intel driver 2.7.99 36% slower than 2.7.0 on i845 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382017 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is the registrant for xf86-video-intel. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 367377] Re: High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 376092 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376092 Bryce: Yep, I think this is now effectively a dupe, and I'd forgotten this only affected EXA. Thanks, another one off the list! -- High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367377 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 367377] Re: High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 376092 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376092 Bryce: Yep, I think this is now effectively a dupe, and I'd forgotten this only affected UXA. Thanks, another one off the list! -- High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367377 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 367377] Re: High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11
Been looking through changelogs for the version Bob Manners and I have been going through... I can see there are several memory leaks that might have been the culprit that have been fixed recently, or that had been fixed in drivers way in advance of what I was running. Bob: your bug, but suggest we close this one and if we find more leaks, open another one? Nizamov: UXA works reasonably well for me now in Jaunty as long as I use xorg-edgers stuff - any particular reason you went back to EXA - did you have other problems? -- High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367377 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry gets removed when restarting xorg - causes corruption on ttys
I ran your patched kernel for quite some time and it was perfectly stable. I moved X on to xorg-edgers version because I was curious about a few other bugs... I've just been looking into going back a few versions and doing the testing as you suggest. However my .28 kernel is now linux-image-2.6.28-13-generic 2.6.28-13.44 which has come from -updates, and dpkg is therefore moaning about older versions. So does this already have the patch in, or should I force the downgrade to your kernel for testing, with the hope of turning your patch into the .45 release? -- [i915GM] MTRR entry gets removed when restarting xorg - causes corruption on ttys https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314928 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is the registrant for xf86-video-intel. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 367377] Re: High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11
There were lots of changes to this area of DRM in 2.6.30rc7 and rc8 - could be worth trying this kernel and seeing if the problem goes away? If it does I don't think it will be too hard to identify the exact changes which fixed it... -- High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367377 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
OK. Can't try the current (20090603) xorg-edgers build for performance because it just plain won't run games, but I believe this is a known problem. Meanwhile, on the latest Jaunty proposed versions UXA is about half the speed of EXA on a couple of games. Which bug are you using to track UXA performance regression - I'd like to test the versions recommended there and see how far off the best EXA performance we are now... In other words if this is now an invalid bug, where's the valid one, or would you like me to file a more structured bug report anew? -- MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is the registrant for xf86-video-intel. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 339091] Re: [i945] (Needs UXA) X freezes a few minutes after resuming
There absoutely are freeze bugs in UXA and EXA both in the default Jaunty configuration, so we need an SRU of some type, even if it's a bug that affects performance. The good news is that a whole bunch of them are fixed, either in kernel updates or in updates in -proposed - so with a little time devoted to packaging the smallest possible SRU (I'd suggest 2.7.1, the MTRR fixes, and some sort of fix for the tiling stuff, maybe a cherry-pick), we can at least make Jaunty work out of the box, probably using EXA and Greedy migration, since that seems to work for most people I've seen posting on these bugs, at a reasonable level of performance. Anyhoo, the even better news is that EXA and UXA are BOTH rock solid for me under .30rc7, or a patched kernel (from one of these bugs), and desktop performance is acceptable. Game performance isn't what it should be but I now realise that UXA and DRI2 is the way to go, and bleeding- edge gamers will have to wait for Karma and we can't fix the Intel issues from where we are standing. That's life! So in summary - I think 2.7.1 really does fix this bug - it did for me. UXA has all sorts of cosmetic problems and the font-corruption bug comes and goes, but I guess I'll need to upgrade to Karmic before there's any point in reporting bugs against UXA. UXA is about half the speed of EXA for 3d apps (but MIGHT be slightly quicker in 2d.) -- [i945] (Needs UXA) X freezes a few minutes after resuming https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339091 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is the registrant for xf86-video-intel. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
