[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 778758] Re: The apport hook discourages new bug reports

2011-06-28 Thread Bryce Harrington
(For clarification I mean roll out to natty, since the natty task is
still only at Fix Committed.)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778758

Title:
  The apport hook discourages new bug reports

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/778758/+subscriptions

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 778758] Re: The apport hook discourages new bug reports

2011-06-28 Thread Martin Pitt
We didn't get any feedback about I installed this and it still works,
but as this is only an arch:all data package it's probably safe enough.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778758

Title:
  The apport hook discourages new bug reports

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/778758/+subscriptions

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 778758] Re: The apport hook discourages new bug reports

2011-06-28 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package xorg - 1:7.6+4ubuntu3.1

---
xorg (1:7.6+4ubuntu3.1) natty-proposed; urgency=low

  * apport/source_xorg.py:
- Simplify answers for bug reporters filing post-release reports.
  (LP: #778758)
- Remove attach_drm_info().  This is useful info but we use it very
  infrequently, and it is already available in other log files.  But the
  call makes bug reports a bit cluttered since it adds a lot of lines to
  the report itself.
 -- Bryce Harrington br...@ubuntu.com   Thu, 07 Apr 2011 14:02:40 -0700

** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu Natty)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778758

Title:
  The apport hook discourages new bug reports

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/778758/+subscriptions

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 778758] Re: The apport hook discourages new bug reports

2011-06-27 Thread Bryce Harrington
Any reason not to roll this out?  It's an obviously safe fix to non-
infrastructure code (just the apport hook; has no effect on X.org
itself).

Jorge had requested this change originally; I'd asked him to do the
verification testing and provide feedback, but guess it slipped his
mind.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778758

Title:
  The apport hook discourages new bug reports

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/778758/+subscriptions

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 778758] Re: The apport hook discourages new bug reports

2011-06-14 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package xorg - 1:7.6+7ubuntu1

---
xorg (1:7.6+7ubuntu1) oneiric; urgency=low

  * Merge from Debian unstable, remaining changes:
- Add apport hook
- Demote xfonts-{75DPI,100DPI} to Suggests. Demote xfonts-scalable to
  Recommends.
- debian/local/Xsession:
  Truncate xsession-errors on startup if too big
- debian/local/Xsession.d/20x11-common_process-args:
  Add support for session command containing args.
- debian/local/Xsession.d/60x11-common_localhost:
  Authorise all processes running with the user's credentials to connect
  to the server.
- debian/rules, debian/control:
  Add dependencies on x11-common, and symlink /usr/share/doc directories
  of all packages to x11-common's.
- debian/scripts/vars.*:
  + Don't drop wacom from input-all.
  + Add -vmmouse to input-all for amd64 and i386.
  + Add -qxl to video-all for amd64 and i386.
  + Add -geode to video-all for i386.
  + Drop video drivers that are likely irrelevant for ARM.
- debian/xserver-xorg.postinst.in: Also migrate users from psb → vesa.

  [ Bryce Harrington ]
  * apport/source_xorg.py:
- Move Failsafe-X out of the xorg package to xdiagnose
  (LP: #480744)
- Simplify answers for bug reporters filing post-release reports.
  (LP: #778758)
- Remove attach_drm_info().  This is useful info but we use it very
  infrequently, and it is already available in other log files.  But the
  call makes bug reports a bit cluttered since it adds a lot of lines to
  the report itself.

  [ Timo Aaltonen ]
  * rules: A stampfile generation was commented out by mistake, uncomment
it.
  * Rework the x11-common.{postinst,postrm,preinst} failsafe conffile
handling, the previous ones added in 1:7.6+4ubuntu1 were wrong too.
  * scripts/vars.{amd64,i386,powerpc}: Remove apm, ark, chips, i128, i740,
rendition, s3virge, tseng, voodoo from xserver-xorg-video-all
dependencies. They are unmaintained and obsolete.

xorg (1:7.6+7) unstable; urgency=low

  * Remove long obsolete XF86Config-4 on purge (Closes: #610450). Thanks,
Bernhard R. Link!
  * Add support for armhf (Closes: #605841), Thanks, Konstantinos
Margaritis! Keep wacom in Recommends rather than in Depends, though.
  * Set the same permissions on all debian/scripts/vars.* files: no need
to have them +x.
  * Remove debian/scripts/validate-posix-sh, unused.
  * Address description-synopsis-starts-with-article lintian tag.
  * Bump Standards-Version (no changes needed).
  * Merge xsf-docs up to the f920810e8f commit:
- Add: reference/experimental
- Add: reference/git-usage
- Update: faq/general (firmware for ATI)
- and other minor updates.

xorg (1:7.6+6) unstable; urgency=low

  * Merge xsf-docs up to the bd39472b0c commit:
- Conversion from markdown to asciidoc.
  * Tweak the Makefile accordingly to stop trying to build and install PDF
documents, since wkhtmltopdf fails on several architectures. Let's
enable them again later, once bugs are fixed.
  * Adjust build system and build-dependencies accordingly:
- Add asciidoc build-dep.
- Remove markdown build-dep.
- Remove wkhtmltopdf, xauth, xvfb build-dep.
- Stop wrapping make with xvfb-run.
- Get rid of the sparc-specific workaround.

xorg (1:7.6+5) unstable; urgency=low

  * Drop ati and sisusb from video-all on hurd-i386, thanks to Samuel
Thibault (Closes: #619862).
  * Add Vcs-* fields.
 -- Timo Aaltonen tjaal...@ubuntu.com   Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:39:40 +0300

** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Status: In Progress = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778758

Title:
  The apport hook discourages new bug reports

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/778758/+subscriptions

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 778758] Re: The apport hook discourages new bug reports

2011-06-14 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/xorg

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778758

Title:
  The apport hook discourages new bug reports

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/778758/+subscriptions

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 778758] Re: The apport hook discourages new bug reports

2011-05-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/natty-proposed/xorg

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778758

Title:
  The apport hook discourages new bug reports

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 778758] Re: The apport hook discourages new bug reports

2011-05-17 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Description changed:

- Binary package hint: xorg
+ [Impact]
+ Message for the apport hook causes some confusion for X and compiz bug 
reporters that are trying to report bugs post-release.
  
- When I use ubuntu-bug to report bugs on xorg-related packages (unity,
- compiz, xorg), I'm presented with this question:
+ [Development Fix]
+ The same change was applied to the ubuntu xorg git tree and will be uploaded 
shortly.
+ 
+ [Stable Fix]
+ The user is presented with a choice of three 'yes' options:  One to flag 
regressions, one to flag bugs with patches, and one for everything else.  For 
the last option we simplify the wording to just say 'Yes'.  Ideally we'd like 
people to exhaust technical support options before filing bug reports, but 
recommending they do so is causing confusion.  
+ 
+ [Test Case]
+ Running 'ubuntu-bug xorg' on natty will show the dialog.
+ 
+ [Regression Potential]
+ The worst thing that can happen from this change would be that the xorg 
apport hook no longer works for attaching info to bug reports.
+ 
+ [Original Report]
+ When I use ubuntu-bug to report bugs on xorg-related packages (unity, compiz, 
xorg), I'm presented with this question:
  
  Development is completed for the 'natty' version of Ubuntu, so you
  should use technical support channels unless you know for certain it
  should be reported here?
  
  If I found a bug that I want to report, the only applicable yes option
  is Yes, The problem began after doing a system software update. This
  implies that the developers are interested in regressions, but not new
  bugs.
  
  More information on the askubuntu question here:
  http://askubuntu.com/questions/39358/why-does-ubuntu-bug-imply-that-i
  -shouldnt-report-bugs-for-compiz-and-unity
  
  Brian Murray said it's due to xorg's apport hook and I was asked to
  report this bug.
- 
  
  It's frustrating as a user to run ubuntu-bug to report a bug, then be
  told to go to askubuntu, then be told there that it's a bug and you
  should report it. However, I also want developers to spend their
  available time fixing real bugs.
  
  Perhaps if the hook added a tech-supported tag to bugs that had
  already gone through tech support so that those bugs can rise to the
  top?
  
  Or if you could import an AskUbuntu question into a bug report so it
  feels like asking on AskUbuntu is an important step in the bug reporting
  process. (Yes, copy-paste does most of that, but I think psychologically
  it's very different.)
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.6+4ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
  Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: wl
  Architecture: amd64
  CompizPlugins: 
[core,bailer,detection,composite,opengl,decor,gnomecompat,snap,mousepoll,vpswitch,regex,extrawm,grid,imgpng,compiztoolbox,text,move,place,resize,wall,session,animation,unitymtgrabhandles,expo,workarounds,ezoom,staticswitcher,fade,scale,unityshell,scaleaddon,scalefilter]
  CompositorRunning: compiz
  DRM.card0.DP.1:
-  status: disconnected
-  enabled: disabled
-  dpms: Off
-  modes: 
-  edid-base64:
+  status: disconnected
+  enabled: disabled
+  dpms: Off
+  modes:
+  edid-base64:
  DRM.card0.LVDS.1:
-  status: connected
-  enabled: enabled
-  dpms: On
-  modes: 1366x768
-  edid-base64: 
AP///wAw5AFwAAASAQOAIhN4Ck6FnltVlSYaUFQBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBPhxWoFAAFjAwIDUAWMIQAAAZPhxWoFAAFjAwIDUAWMIQAAAZ/gBENjY5SoExNTZXSDIKAAD//wEBCiAgAME=
+  status: connected
+  enabled: enabled
+  dpms: On
+  modes: 1366x768
+  edid-base64: 
AP///wAw5AFwAAASAQOAIhN4Ck6FnltVlSYaUFQBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBPhxWoFAAFjAwIDUAWMIQAAAZPhxWoFAAFjAwIDUAWMIQAAAZ/gBENjY5SoExNTZXSDIKAAD//wEBCiAgAME=
  DRM.card0.VGA.1:
-  status: disconnected
-  enabled: disabled
-  dpms: Off
-  modes: 
-  edid-base64:
+  status: disconnected
+  enabled: disabled
+  dpms: Off
+  modes:
+  edid-base64:
  Date: Fri May  6 13:57:18 2011
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: natty
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  DkmsStatus: bcmwl, 5.100.82.38+bdcom, 2.6.38-8-generic, x86_64: installed
  GraphicsCard:
-  Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller 
[8086:2a42] (rev 07) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
-Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:02aa]
-Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:02aa]
+  Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller 
[8086:2a42] (rev 07) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
+    Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:02aa]
+    Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:02aa]
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release amd64 (20110427.1)
  MachineType: Dell Inc. Inspiron 1545
  ProcEnviron:
-  LANGUAGE=en_CA:en
-  LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  LANGUAGE=en_CA:en
+  LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-8-generic 
root=UUID=19e6b2b5-cf83-4ea1-9103-e65b2b680694 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  Renderer: Unknown
  

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 778758] Re: The apport hook discourages new bug reports

2011-05-17 Thread Martin Pitt
Accepted xorg into natty-proposed, the package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!

** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu Natty)
   Status: In Progress = Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778758

Title:
  The apport hook discourages new bug reports

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 778758] Re: The apport hook discourages new bug reports

2011-05-13 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Also affects: xorg (Ubuntu Natty)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: xorg (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Bryce Harrington (bryce)
   Status: New

** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu Natty)
   Status: New = In Progress

** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Status: New = In Progress

** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu Natty)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Bryce Harrington (bryce)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778758

Title:
  The apport hook discourages new bug reports

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 778758] Re: The apport hook discourages new bug reports

2011-05-07 Thread Bryce Harrington
Perhaps if the hook added a tech-supported tag to bugs that had
already gone through tech support so that those bugs can rise to the
top?  Or if you could import an AskUbuntu question into a bug report so
it feels like asking on AskUbuntu is an important step in the bug
reporting process. (Yes, copy-paste does most of that, but I think
psychologically it's very different.)

I'm not sure how that all would be implemented, but it's not a bad idea.

It's frustrating as a user to run ubuntu-bug to report a bug, then be
told to go to askubuntu, then be told there that it's a bug and you
should report it. However, I also want developers to spend their
available time fixing real bugs.

Right, this came out of a discussion I had with Jorge in Dallas.  A huge
proportion of the people filing bugs against X post-release are more
motivated to get a quick workaround to get their machine working.  Once
they have a workaround they're less interested in expending time with
the additional testing, git-bisecting, and diagnostics needed to root
cause a problem.  So... we get into the situation of fixing hardware
one machine at a time, which doesn't scale that well.

Further, these users get annoyed because pretty much only developers
answer X bug reports on launchpad, and there are very few developers and
they're very busy so it's common that users report a bug and not get a
response for a long time (if ever).  By the time a developer does cycle
through to them, the user has either found some other way to work around
the problem or given up, and so the bug is unworkable.  I believe we
serve these types of users better by directing them out of launchpad to
forums or support sites where they're more likely to get a timely
response and guidance to published workarounds... or yeah, it's a bug,
file it in launchpad.

If we can leverage askubuntu.com better, we can solve both needs - users
get faster replies and quicker help working around problems, and
developers don't have to dig through as much noise to find the bugs that
really need fixing.

Although, I'll admit I hadn't considered that the compiz folks might
prefer to have all bug reports filed, even support requests and such.
It would be pretty trivial to conditionalize this dialog to not run for
compiz/unity bugs.

** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Bryce Harrington (bryce)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778758

Title:
  The apport hook discourages new bug reports

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 778758] Re: The apport hook discourages new bug reports

2011-05-07 Thread bugbot
** Tags added: kubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778758

Title:
  The apport hook discourages new bug reports

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 778758] Re: The apport hook discourages new bug reports

2011-05-06 Thread DavidBriscoe
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778758

Title:
  The apport hook discourages new bug reports

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp