[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949606] Re: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file
nope, libraries should just be migrated to support multiarch, like libglu 9.0.0-2.1 ** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/949606 Title: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/949606/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949606] Re: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file
The second workaround does not work with apt-get; e.g.: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libglu1-mesa-dev : Conflicts: libglu1-mesa-dev:i386 but 9.0.0-2 is to be installed libglu1-mesa-dev:i386 : Conflicts: libglu1-mesa-dev but 9.0.0-2 is to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/949606 Title: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/949606/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949606] Re: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1246013 Would be nice for libgl1-mesa-dev to be multiarched -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/949606 Title: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/949606/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949606] Re: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1246013 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246013 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1246013 Whould be nice for libgl1-mesa-dev to be multiarched -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/949606 Title: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/949606/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949606] Re: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file
Even in the press already:, as this regards trusty too: http://www.webupd8.org/2014/04/install-google-earth-in-ubuntu-1404.html Also we can find quite a few people who suffered this with the LTS- Enablement-Stacks-Support... and Installations of any offcial flavour 12.04.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/949606 Title: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/949606/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949606] Re: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file
Want to install Wine on my 64bit Ubuntu and get the error: The following packages have unmet dependencies: wine1.4: PreDepends: dpkg (= 1.15.7.2~) but 1.16.1.2ubuntu7 is to be installed Depends: libc6 (= 2.14) but 2.15-0ubuntu10.2 is to be installed Depends: wine1.4-amd64 (= 1.4-0ubuntu4.1) but 1.4-0ubuntu4.1 is to be installed Depends: wine1.4-i386 (= 1.4-0ubuntu4.1) but it is a virtual package -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/949606 Title: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/949606/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949606] Re: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file
we have similar situation here in CERN where some legacy software requires 32 bit compiling and it is impossible to keep dependencies needed by ROOT in 32 bit installed alongside the 64 bit libraries. just to name a few library and -dev packages that are broken in such a way: libcppunit, libxft, libxext, libxmu etc... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/949606 Title: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/949606/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949606] Re: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file
the same also with libpng... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/949606 Title: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/949606/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949606] Re: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file
Wine can not be properly built on amd64 by end-users until this bug is fixed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/949606 Title: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/949606/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949606] Re: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file
the conflicts just need to be fixed ** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/949606 Title: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/949606/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949606] Re: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file
So the conflicts with have just been incorrectly set - it's not just because the i386 and amd64 packages supply the same files and therefore overwrite each other (and purging one of them will affect the other)? There are a number of packages that fall into this category: is it something that can be automatically detected and fixed, or do we have to log a separate bug for each package? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/949606 Title: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/949606/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949606] Re: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/949606 Title: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/949606/+subscriptions ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp