Re: commit c697912b3a9 breaks linuxthreads build

2012-02-23 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:36:11AM +0800, Tony Wu wrote:
>Carmelo,
>
>Commit  c697912b3a9 'inet:rpc: fix authnone_marshal in multithreading
>context' breaks linuxthreads build,

LT as in LT.old or LT.new? Seems it doesn't matter.

What arch are you using so that you don't use NPTL?

>__libc_once_define is not defined.

Carmelo, can you please have a look please?
You broke LT.old, LT.new _and_ !threads..
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc


Re: commit c697912b3a9 breaks linuxthreads build

2012-03-06 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 23/02/2012 21.28, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:36:11AM +0800, Tony Wu wrote:
>> Carmelo,
>>
>> Commit  c697912b3a9 'inet:rpc: fix authnone_marshal in multithreading
>> context' breaks linuxthreads build,
> 
> LT as in LT.old or LT.new? Seems it doesn't matter.
> 
> What arch are you using so that you don't use NPTL?
> 
>> __libc_once_define is not defined.
> 
> Carmelo, can you please have a look please?
> You broke LT.old, LT.new _and_ !threads..
> 
My fault. I'll look on this end of this week. I'm currently on business
trip. I'm sorry for the inconvenient.

Carmelo
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc


Re: commit c697912b3a9 breaks linuxthreads build

2012-03-14 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 27/02/2012 18.44, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> On 23/02/2012 21.28, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:36:11AM +0800, Tony Wu wrote:
>>> Carmelo,
>>>
>>> Commit  c697912b3a9 'inet:rpc: fix authnone_marshal in multithreading
>>> context' breaks linuxthreads build,
>>
>> LT as in LT.old or LT.new? Seems it doesn't matter.
>>
>> What arch are you using so that you don't use NPTL?
>>
>>> __libc_once_define is not defined.
>>
>> Carmelo, can you please have a look please?
>> You broke LT.old, LT.new _and_ !threads..
>>
> My fault. I'll look on this end of this week. I'm currently on business
> trip. I'm sorry for the inconvenient.
> 
> Carmelo

Folks,
I've fixed it now... sorry for my delay.

I'm going to post a fix (build tested in !threads case).

Carmelo

> ___
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc@uclibc.org
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
> 

___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc


Re: commit c697912b3a9 breaks linuxthreads build

2012-03-14 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 23/02/2012 21.28, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:36:11AM +0800, Tony Wu wrote:
>> Carmelo,
>>
>> Commit  c697912b3a9 'inet:rpc: fix authnone_marshal in multithreading
>> context' breaks linuxthreads build,
> 
> LT as in LT.old or LT.new? Seems it doesn't matter.
> 
> What arch are you using so that you don't use NPTL?
> 
>> __libc_once_define is not defined.
> 
> Carmelo, can you please have a look please?
> You broke LT.old, LT.new _and_ !threads..
> 

ok for !threads case where __libc_once is missing at all, but
LT.{old,new} has __libc_once defined in libc-lock.h (as NPTL), so likely
in this case it needs to include explicitly the header file (that some
some side effect is get included in NPTL case).

I've fixed the case !threads now.

Carmelo


___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc