Re: commit c697912b3a9 breaks linuxthreads build
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:36:11AM +0800, Tony Wu wrote: >Carmelo, > >Commit c697912b3a9 'inet:rpc: fix authnone_marshal in multithreading >context' breaks linuxthreads build, LT as in LT.old or LT.new? Seems it doesn't matter. What arch are you using so that you don't use NPTL? >__libc_once_define is not defined. Carmelo, can you please have a look please? You broke LT.old, LT.new _and_ !threads.. ___ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
Re: commit c697912b3a9 breaks linuxthreads build
On 23/02/2012 21.28, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:36:11AM +0800, Tony Wu wrote: >> Carmelo, >> >> Commit c697912b3a9 'inet:rpc: fix authnone_marshal in multithreading >> context' breaks linuxthreads build, > > LT as in LT.old or LT.new? Seems it doesn't matter. > > What arch are you using so that you don't use NPTL? > >> __libc_once_define is not defined. > > Carmelo, can you please have a look please? > You broke LT.old, LT.new _and_ !threads.. > My fault. I'll look on this end of this week. I'm currently on business trip. I'm sorry for the inconvenient. Carmelo ___ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
Re: commit c697912b3a9 breaks linuxthreads build
On 27/02/2012 18.44, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > On 23/02/2012 21.28, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:36:11AM +0800, Tony Wu wrote: >>> Carmelo, >>> >>> Commit c697912b3a9 'inet:rpc: fix authnone_marshal in multithreading >>> context' breaks linuxthreads build, >> >> LT as in LT.old or LT.new? Seems it doesn't matter. >> >> What arch are you using so that you don't use NPTL? >> >>> __libc_once_define is not defined. >> >> Carmelo, can you please have a look please? >> You broke LT.old, LT.new _and_ !threads.. >> > My fault. I'll look on this end of this week. I'm currently on business > trip. I'm sorry for the inconvenient. > > Carmelo Folks, I've fixed it now... sorry for my delay. I'm going to post a fix (build tested in !threads case). Carmelo > ___ > uClibc mailing list > uClibc@uclibc.org > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc > ___ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
Re: commit c697912b3a9 breaks linuxthreads build
On 23/02/2012 21.28, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:36:11AM +0800, Tony Wu wrote: >> Carmelo, >> >> Commit c697912b3a9 'inet:rpc: fix authnone_marshal in multithreading >> context' breaks linuxthreads build, > > LT as in LT.old or LT.new? Seems it doesn't matter. > > What arch are you using so that you don't use NPTL? > >> __libc_once_define is not defined. > > Carmelo, can you please have a look please? > You broke LT.old, LT.new _and_ !threads.. > ok for !threads case where __libc_once is missing at all, but LT.{old,new} has __libc_once defined in libc-lock.h (as NPTL), so likely in this case it needs to include explicitly the header file (that some some side effect is get included in NPTL case). I've fixed the case !threads now. Carmelo ___ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc