Re: commit c697912b3a9 breaks linuxthreads build
On 27/02/2012 18.44, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: On 23/02/2012 21.28, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:36:11AM +0800, Tony Wu wrote: Carmelo, Commit c697912b3a9 'inet:rpc: fix authnone_marshal in multithreading context' breaks linuxthreads build, LT as in LT.old or LT.new? Seems it doesn't matter. What arch are you using so that you don't use NPTL? __libc_once_define is not defined. Carmelo, can you please have a look please? You broke LT.old, LT.new _and_ !threads.. My fault. I'll look on this end of this week. I'm currently on business trip. I'm sorry for the inconvenient. Carmelo Folks, I've fixed it now... sorry for my delay. I'm going to post a fix (build tested in !threads case). Carmelo ___ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc ___ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
Re: commit c697912b3a9 breaks linuxthreads build
On 23/02/2012 21.28, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:36:11AM +0800, Tony Wu wrote:
Carmelo,
Commit c697912b3a9 'inet:rpc: fix authnone_marshal in multithreading
context' breaks linuxthreads build,
LT as in LT.old or LT.new? Seems it doesn't matter.
What arch are you using so that you don't use NPTL?
__libc_once_define is not defined.
Carmelo, can you please have a look please?
You broke LT.old, LT.new _and_ !threads..
ok for !threads case where __libc_once is missing at all, but
LT.{old,new} has __libc_once defined in libc-lock.h (as NPTL), so likely
in this case it needs to include explicitly the header file (that some
some side effect is get included in NPTL case).
I've fixed the case !threads now.
Carmelo
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
Re: commit c697912b3a9 breaks linuxthreads build
On 23/02/2012 21.28, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:36:11AM +0800, Tony Wu wrote: Carmelo, Commit c697912b3a9 'inet:rpc: fix authnone_marshal in multithreading context' breaks linuxthreads build, LT as in LT.old or LT.new? Seems it doesn't matter. What arch are you using so that you don't use NPTL? __libc_once_define is not defined. Carmelo, can you please have a look please? You broke LT.old, LT.new _and_ !threads.. My fault. I'll look on this end of this week. I'm currently on business trip. I'm sorry for the inconvenient. Carmelo ___ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
Re: commit c697912b3a9 breaks linuxthreads build
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:36:11AM +0800, Tony Wu wrote: Carmelo, Commit c697912b3a9 'inet:rpc: fix authnone_marshal in multithreading context' breaks linuxthreads build, LT as in LT.old or LT.new? Seems it doesn't matter. What arch are you using so that you don't use NPTL? __libc_once_define is not defined. Carmelo, can you please have a look please? You broke LT.old, LT.new _and_ !threads.. ___ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
commit c697912b3a9 breaks linuxthreads build
Carmelo, Commit c697912b3a9 'inet:rpc: fix authnone_marshal in multithreading context' breaks linuxthreads build, __libc_once_define is not defined. libc/inet/rpc/auth_none.c:69: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'type name' libc/inet/rpc/auth_none.c:69: error: storage class specified for parameter 'type name' libc/inet/rpc/auth_none.c:69: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'authnone_private_guard' libc/inet/rpc/auth_none.c:69: warning: data definition has no type or storage class libc/inet/rpc/auth_none.c:69: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of '__libc_once_define' libc/inet/rpc/auth_none.c: In function 'authnone_create': libc/inet/rpc/auth_none.c:96: warning: implicit declaration of function '__libc_once' libc/inet/rpc/auth_none.c:96: error: 'authnone_private_guard' undeclared (first use in this function) Tony ___ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
