HI Philippe,
Philippe De Muyter wrote:
Hello list,
The good definition of CLOCK_TICK_RATE for coldfires has been lost in the
merge of m68k and m68knommu include files. Restore it. Culprit :
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=ebafc17468d58bd903c886175ca84a4edc69ae1d;hp=34055b806a6334624e7e8af6eefc3aee42372a85
Signed-off-by: Philippe De Muyter
Is it needed?
What is broken with the existing value?
Regards
Greg
diff -r 8dcc271a81a8 arch/m68k/include/asm/timex.h
--- a/arch/m68k/include/asm/timex.h Thu Jun 18 14:07:46 2009 -0700
+++ b/arch/m68k/include/asm/timex.h Sat Jun 20 21:46:25 2009 +0200
@@ -3,10 +3,23 @@
*
* m68k architecture timex specifications
*/
-#ifndef _ASMm68k_TIMEX_H
-#define _ASMm68k_TIMEX_H
+#ifndef _ASMm68K_TIMEX_H
+#define _ASMm68K_TIMEX_H
+#ifdef CONFIG_COLDFIRE
+/*
+ * CLOCK_TICK_RATE should give the underlying frequency of the tick timer
+ * to make ntp work best. For Coldfires, that's the main clock.
+ */
+#include
+#define CLOCK_TICK_RATEMCF_CLK
+#else
+/*
+ * This default CLOCK_TICK_RATE is probably wrong for many 68k boards
+ * Users of those boards will need to check and modify accordingly
+ */
#define CLOCK_TICK_RATE1193180 /* Underlying HZ */
+#endif
typedef unsigned long cycles_t;
___
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
--
Greg Ungerer -- Principal EngineerEMAIL: g...@snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
825 Stanley St, FAX: +61 7 3891 3630
Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
___
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
