'Hotso, BoNtate' Cindi, Francis and Gerald,
It is open season for sexual predators against our dear ones - not only in the Rustenburg Diocese of SA.
Please find two reports about this, and both seem to involve Ugandans.
First, a quasi-elite 'mukwerekwere' and so-called priest, leaving Uganda to go and rape our mothers and sisters in Azania.
Why he thinks that the best thing needed by the oppressed in SA is more indoctrination in these Arab religions, leaves me defeated.
It is all nonsensical.
Anyway he will have 10 years in the slammer. Good for him. I hope he meets some 'tsotsi' in prison to teach him a lesson.
You, of course, remember Irish Nun and Medical Doctor, Sister McDonald, who wrote a report about some African sexual predator Bishops involved in this kind of criminality. One of those so-called Bishops had up to that time, impregnated 23 teenage nuns. And one of those nuns had died in some dark alley abortion attempt, and the criminal Bishop had the temerity to bring her body to the 'Alter' for a requiem mass.
One does not wish to malign all the good priests, but where does one turn when the Vatican itself decides to shelve and hide this explosive Sr. McDonald report. Indeed, the church in Africa should insist at openess and exposure of these criminals, otherwise the institution's and everybody's name become soiled. ( Some of us continue to be inspired by people like the Rev. Fr. Roy Bourgeois, of the 'School of the America's Watch'. see http://www.erieindymedia.org/news/2003/04/13.php He indeed is a man of God. )
The second article is also self explanatory. Pedophiles are being recycled left and right. From UK to USA to Africa.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ugandan priest jailed for ‘rape’ By Alex B. Atuhaire
June 17, 2003 ; The MonitorA Ugandan priest working in South Africa was on Friday sentenced to 10 years in
prison for rape.
A court in the Rustenburg province convicted Fr. Joseph Mugera, 33, of the
Rustenburg Diocese in the northwest of South Africa.
He was reportedly found guilty of raping a South African woman, Ms Agnes Moteni.
Another Ugandan priest, Fr. Kizito Kaganda, also serving in South Africa, told The
Monitor yesterday that Fr. Mugera had appealed against the sentence.
Fr. Kaganda dismissed the rape accusations against his colleague as “xenophobia”
aimed at discrediting the young priest before his bishop and the laity.
“He has been a threat to most of his colleagues because of his stand on celibacy.
They envied him. He was the most loved priest in Rustenburg,” Fr. Kaganda said by
telephone from South Africa.
Fr. Kaganda said that Fr. Mugera was another victim of xenophobia – being targeted
like many of the other foreigners (the so-called makwelekwele) living and working in
South Africa.
He said that there is a campaign by local priests to target colleagues from other
African countries including those from Nigeria, Ghana and Uganda.
He blamed the unholy campaign on rivalry for positions and promotions.
“This was not a shock. Something like this was expected anytime,” he said.
Fr. Kaganda said that there are about 20 Ugandan missionaries working in South
Africa.
Fr. Mugera was born in Lwagulu village in Masaka district.
He left Uganda for South Africa in 1993 as a missionary and enrolled at St Joseph’s
Kidala Major Seminary in Natal Province.
He was ordained in October 2000 and posted to Rustenburg Diocese where he was
appointed the parish priest early this year.
© 2003 The Monitor Publications
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Bishop Unravels History of Accused Priest
Sunday Times (Johannesburg)
25 Mai 2003 Publié sur le web le 24 Mai 2003
Johannesburg
Bishop Kevin Dowling, left, is the head of the Diocese of Rustenburg, where Adam Okot alleged that he was raped by a Catholic priest. The Sunday Times sent the following questions to Dowling. This is his response
Q. As the Bishop of the Diocese of Rustenburg, when did you find out that Father McCauley had been accused of raping Adam Okot?
A. Father McCauley himself informed me, and I also was informed by Father Sean Wales, the Provincial Superior. I cannot remember the exact month, but it may have been some time in August 2002 or soon after that.
Q. Were you kept fully informed about the Okot protocol proceedings ?
A. I was not involved in the protocol proceedings, as I was not the person ultimately responsible for Father McCauley, but I was informed of the outcomes of both the first and second hearings.
Q. We were told by a Catholic priest in Cape Town this week that Father McCauley was sent to Jemez Springs in New Mexico, US, to be rehabilitated because he had sexual problems. Did you know about this?
A. When Father McCauley joined the diocese, I was told that he had sexual
or sexuality problems, for which he had received therapy. This had resulted
in the judgment of those dealing with him that he was fit to return to normal
pastoral work.
In view of these assurances, I agreed to take him on as a priest in the parish,
because I presumed that the careful judgments given at such places would
have indicated any doubts to those responsible for Father McCauley - that
is, doubts which would have demanded that he not be placed in a position of
trust in a parish community. No such doubts were ever communicated to me.
Q. What guarantee did you have that Father McCauley was "cured" at Jemez Springs and that he would not commit an illegal sex act ?
A. From the information I was given by those in authority, I was assured that
the highly professional staff who had been with him during his therapy
course in the US had judged him to be fit to continue with normal pastoral
work and that it was extremely unlikely that any further problem would occur.
No doubts concerning this were ever expressed to me. On that basis, I
agreed to take him into the diocese.
Q. When did Father McCauley join the church in Rustenburg?
If he joined in 1999, was this not after he had spent time at Jemez Springs in
1997?
A. He began his work in Rustenburg in January 1999 and concluded the normal three-year period of his appointment in January 2002. If he went to Jemez Springs in 1997, as stated here, then indeed he came to Rustenburg after he had been there.
Q. We have been told that Father McCauley arrived in Rustenburg after further "treatment" for his problems in the United Kingdom. Were you made aware of this treatment in the UK and what was it for?
A. Yes, I was informed about this. I understood that this was follow-up
counselling in order to further strengthen what had been achieved in Jemez
Springs, and also to allow further evaluation in a different setting and with
different personnel. This, I was informed, confirmed that he could return to
normal pastoral work as a priest.
Mitayo Potosi
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
