Re: Sandbox OSGi runtime

[Marshall Schor]

On 3/4/2010 3:00 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> Hi Marshall
>
> 2010/3/3 Marshall Schor 
>
>   
>> would it make sense to have individual osgi packaging of sandbox
>> annotators?
>>
>> 
> Do you mean you prefer not to have a single module aggregating all
> annotators in a single bundle and you'd prefer each annotator having its own
> individual OSGi bundle?
>   

Yes.  Some of the annotators have very large (could be 100's of
megabytes, for instance) statistical models.

-Marshall
>
>   
>> (I'm assuming you're thinking about annotators, not about other things,
>> right?)
>>
>> 
> Yes, right.
>
> Cheers.
> Tommaso
>
>   

Re: Sandbox OSGi runtime

[Jörn Kottmann]

Tommaso Teofili wrote:

Hi all,
what do you think of a uimaj module similar to uimaj-ep-runtime just for
sandbox components (something like sanxbox-osgi-runtime)?
This is useful when you want to use Sandbox components in an OSGi
environment.
  


Not sure how this can be done, since UIMA must be able to load
the AEs from an OSGi bundle, but then we have all the issues we
discussed a while back.

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-uima-dev/201001.mbox/

Jörn