[jira] Commented: (UIMA-927) Provide a way to drain Dead Letter Queue
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854923#action_12854923 ] Marshall Schor commented on UIMA-927: - Jerry - do we need to update some documentation about this, somewhere? Provide a way to drain Dead Letter Queue - Key: UIMA-927 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-927 Project: UIMA Issue Type: Improvement Components: Async Scaleout Affects Versions: 2.3AS Reporter: Jerry Cwiklik Priority: Minor ActiveMQ currently doesnt evict expried messages from the Dead Letter Queue. This can potentially lead to Out Of Memory situation as by default the broker keeps all messages in memory. One possible strategy is to modify ActiveMQ broker configuration to spool messages from the DLQ to disk when memory is tight. Other strategy may involve creating a custom DLQ Consumer to drain messages. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[Result] [Informal Vote] please express your opinion on using Nexus and Hudson: see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1717
after some discussion, 3 people voted +1: Marshall Schor Jörn Kottmann Tommaso Teofili No other votes were received, and I think this is not controversial, so I'll go ahead and start by requesting to get set up on Nexus, at least, by doing a Jira subtask of http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1896 *AFTER WE GET SET UP* as a top level project, because that Jira requests things like the official group name, and the svn location (which will be changing). Thanks for voting... -Marshall On 3/27/2010 3:20 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: I'm +1 for doing this, and offer to do some/most of the legwork to get this to happen. Other opinions? If we get a concensus, I'll ask to get the setups done, so we can start doing the needed changes. -Marshall
