Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Accept ConceptMapper into the Sandbox
Initial project setup is done. See issue UIMA-1033 for details https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1033 Michael T. please check the readme.txt and add updates about the Software Grant if necessary. -- Michael Michael Baessler wrote: OK, I will try to set up an initial project with a Maven build and with pointers where the documentation should be added. Let you know when it's done. -- Michael B. Michael Tanenblatt wrote: My personal preference is to put ConceptMapper out as a separate project for now, then merge the two over time. Realistically, I am not sure I have a huge amount of time to figure out how to merge these things right now (I am going to be on vacation starting Wednesday for 2 1/2 weeks, then I'll have to catch up with all the things that piled up over that time...). Ultimately, I agree that there should be one annotator that does this job, not two. On Jun 20, 2008, at 3:30 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote: Michael Baessler wrote: When looking at issue UIMA-1033 the software grant for ConceptMapper has been received and recorded. This means we can put the code to SVN. So what is our strategy, do we create a new project in the Sandbox for ConceptMapper and treat it as new annotator or do we want to use concepts of both dictionary annotator components and create one new component? -- Michael Since Michael T and you are doing all the work, I would just follow along with whatever you two think is best. --Thilo
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Accept ConceptMapper into the Sandbox
Michael Baessler wrote: Initial project setup is done. See issue UIMA-1033 for details https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1033 Michael T. please check the readme.txt and add updates about the Software Grant if necessary. I think we need an IP Clearance Form done for this. Any volunteers? The basic process is to read up on any incubator list discussion to see if this process has changed recently ;-) and then follow the process outlined in incubator.a.o (click the ip clearance link on the left). For convenience, I put the previous IP clearance forms in SVN under the site (uima-website) project. The forms for this use the same Anakia process that we use to generate the web site - so put the new form you're creating under uima-website/xdocs/ip-clearances/x.xml Build it running ant using the build-ip-clearances.xml build file (this has different macros that the incubator page for this uses) to check that it builds OK. After doing all this, you have to get an Apache officer to fill in the parts only they can do (like verifying the software grant is recorded), and updating the official ip-clearances list on the incubator site page. -Marshall -- Michael Michael Baessler wrote: OK, I will try to set up an initial project with a Maven build and with pointers where the documentation should be added. Let you know when it's done. -- Michael B. Michael Tanenblatt wrote: My personal preference is to put ConceptMapper out as a separate project for now, then merge the two over time. Realistically, I am not sure I have a huge amount of time to figure out how to merge these things right now (I am going to be on vacation starting Wednesday for 2 1/2 weeks, then I'll have to catch up with all the things that piled up over that time...). Ultimately, I agree that there should be one annotator that does this job, not two. On Jun 20, 2008, at 3:30 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote: Michael Baessler wrote: When looking at issue UIMA-1033 the software grant for ConceptMapper has been received and recorded. This means we can put the code to SVN. So what is our strategy, do we create a new project in the Sandbox for ConceptMapper and treat it as new annotator or do we want to use concepts of both dictionary annotator components and create one new component? -- Michael Since Michael T and you are doing all the work, I would just follow along with whatever you two think is best. --Thilo
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Accept ConceptMapper into the Sandbox
When looking at issue UIMA-1033 the software grant for ConceptMapper has been received and recorded. This means we can put the code to SVN. So what is our strategy, do we create a new project in the Sandbox for ConceptMapper and treat it as new annotator or do we want to use concepts of both dictionary annotator components and create one new component? -- Michael Marshall Schor wrote: All committers have voted +1 to accept this. Voting +1 Joern Kottmann Marshall Schor Thilo Goetz Michael Baessler Eddie Epstein Adam Lally Voting 0 - none Voting -1 - none The vote passes. As soon as we get a software grant recorded by the secretary, we can put the code into SVN. -Marshall Marshall Schor wrote: Michael Tanenblatt has offered to donate ConceptMapper to Apache UIMA. There was some discussion on the uima-users list about this. Thread: http://markmail.org/message/mfuubh5are7vs5ua Please vote on whether or not to accept this donation (conditional on receiving a software grant for it, of course) [ ] +1Accept the donation of ConceptMapper into the Apache UIMA sandbox [ ] 0Don't care [ ] -1Don't accept this donation - because ... -Marshall
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Accept ConceptMapper into the Sandbox
Michael Baessler wrote: When looking at issue UIMA-1033 the software grant for ConceptMapper has been received and recorded. This means we can put the code to SVN. So what is our strategy, do we create a new project in the Sandbox for ConceptMapper and treat it as new annotator or do we want to use concepts of both dictionary annotator components and create one new component? -- Michael Since Michael T and you are doing all the work, I would just follow along with whatever you two think is best. --Thilo
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Accept ConceptMapper into the Sandbox
Thilo Goetz wrote: Michael Baessler wrote: When looking at issue UIMA-1033 the software grant for ConceptMapper has been received and recorded. This means we can put the code to SVN. So what is our strategy, do we create a new project in the Sandbox for ConceptMapper and treat it as new annotator or do we want to use concepts of both dictionary annotator components and create one new component? -- Michael Since Michael T and you are doing all the work, I would just follow along with whatever you two think is best. In addition to that principle, I would encourage the community to move in the direction of convergence to fewer, well-thought-out components, over time. This has to be carefully balanced with the let a 1000 flowers bloom principle, which permits new things to have room to develop. -Marshall
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Accept ConceptMapper into the Sandbox
My personal preference is to put ConceptMapper out as a separate project for now, then merge the two over time. Realistically, I am not sure I have a huge amount of time to figure out how to merge these things right now (I am going to be on vacation starting Wednesday for 2 1/2 weeks, then I'll have to catch up with all the things that piled up over that time...). Ultimately, I agree that there should be one annotator that does this job, not two. On Jun 20, 2008, at 3:30 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote: Michael Baessler wrote: When looking at issue UIMA-1033 the software grant for ConceptMapper has been received and recorded. This means we can put the code to SVN. So what is our strategy, do we create a new project in the Sandbox for ConceptMapper and treat it as new annotator or do we want to use concepts of both dictionary annotator components and create one new component? -- Michael Since Michael T and you are doing all the work, I would just follow along with whatever you two think is best. --Thilo
[VOTE] [RESULT] Accept ConceptMapper into the Sandbox
All committers have voted +1 to accept this. Voting +1 Joern Kottmann Marshall Schor Thilo Goetz Michael Baessler Eddie Epstein Adam Lally Voting 0 - none Voting -1 - none The vote passes. As soon as we get a software grant recorded by the secretary, we can put the code into SVN. -Marshall Marshall Schor wrote: Michael Tanenblatt has offered to donate ConceptMapper to Apache UIMA. There was some discussion on the uima-users list about this. Thread: http://markmail.org/message/mfuubh5are7vs5ua Please vote on whether or not to accept this donation (conditional on receiving a software grant for it, of course) [ ] +1Accept the donation of ConceptMapper into the Apache UIMA sandbox [ ] 0Don't care [ ] -1Don't accept this donation - because ... -Marshall
