Re: [uknof] Fwd: [IP] COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)

2020-04-20 Thread Keith Mitchell
On 4/20/20 4:22 AM, Chris Russell wrote:

> requiring a level of explicitness (mandating not asking, killing the
> 5G myths dead immediately when first raised) when given the
> opportunity to do so (daily briefings).

> What we can do is consistently try to put those to bed whenever we
> see them, which I believe we’ve all been doing both as individuals
> and collectively publicly and I’m very sure not so publicly.

This was fairly widely posted already, but in case you missed it, some
actual measurement-based evidence from Ofcom on this topic:


https://www.ofcom.org.uk/about-ofcom/latest/features-and-news/clearing-up-myths-5g-and-coronavirus

..along with (pivoting back on-topic :) a general exhortation to all
operators to gather data and /measure/ and /share/ things during this
period - even if it does not give direct operational benefits today,
future researchers will thank you.

Keith



Re: [uknof] Fwd: [IP] COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)

2020-04-20 Thread Chris Russell
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 11:27 AM Neil J. McRae  wrote:

> In my engagement with the government - their focus has been all about
> saving lives and minimising the impact of lockdown - I see zero evidence of
> what you claim.
>


I have absolutely no doubt this is the case at lower levels, however  a
level scepticism when higher level UK.gov appeared to do very little
comparatively other than suggest a stiff  upper lip and taking it on the
chin initially is also understandable.  We also appear not to have learned
from the Brexit arguments about a percentage of the population will blindly
believe what they read on the internet without question, requiring a level
of explicitness (mandating not asking, killing the 5G myths dead
immediately when first raised) when given the opportunity to do so (daily
briefings).



 We cannot cite uk.gov for the proliferation across individual platforms or
from public individuals, we can for woolly advice when given the platform
to nip that in the bud in the first instance which then puts folks in our
community on the ground in dangerous situations.



 What we can do is consistently try to put those to bed whenever we see
them, which I believe we’ve all been doing both as individuals and
collectively publicly and I’m very sure not so publicly.



 But all the above isn’t really network ops, although does impact network
ops, so I digress.



/ontopic:



 Respect to all those having to take abuse on the front lines and those
working in the background to keep the lights on.  Thoughts and love with
all those (and at least 1 UKNOF attendee is part of the former)



.. and as a reminder, we have a virtual UKNOF planned whereas we hope to
try and pull together everyones stories, the good, the bad and the lessons
learned - expect a CFP with an expedited process this week working in
partnership with other orgs.



Thoughts thus far for submissions:



   - Impacts (more than just bandwidth graphs) -  people, supply chain,
   availability, voip, etc
   - How we ...
   - An ultimate  5G myth compilation/rebuttal
   - Highlighting some of the individual stores we've seen about engineer
   abuse.


Chris

>


Re: [uknof] Fwd: [IP] COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)

2020-04-18 Thread Christian de Larrinaga
I suppose if those idiots were driving the Internet rather than being 
poorly educated consumers (addicted to twatish fantasies).


Do you need a license to go to the library or write a letter?

C

On 18 April 2020 18:31:27 Stephen Wilcox  wrote:
Time to need a license to use the internet the same way you need one to 
drive a car it seems...


One problem is lack of regulation on propagating as news what is actually 
opinion or speculation or just click bait story telling... I've never been 
a fan of things that look like censorship but when things become dangerous 
and the average person can't tell fact from fiction it seems we're the 
wrong side of the line


Steve

On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 at 17:13, Catalin Dominte  wrote:
Yeah, explain to them idiots out there that 70Ghz is not the same as X-Ray 
or Gamma Rays… Absolutely ridiculous! How did that even gain momentum to 
the point of burning down masts and abusing engineers like that?


I really feel for them engineers on this one!

--
Catalin

From: uknof  on behalf of "Neil J. McRae" 


Date: Saturday, 18 April 2020 at 16:06
To: "uknof@lists.uknof.org.uk" 
Subject: Re: [uknof] Fwd: [IP] COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)

What needs study is how this totally unacceptable madness has happened.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coronavirus-5g-conspiracy-theory-news-latest-bt-openreach-ee-engineers-attack-abuse-a9468031.html



Sent from my iPhone



On 17 Apr 2020, at 15:25, Neil J. McRae  wrote:

Agree with Steve on spam, and I can’t believe  the number of asshat 
companies that think using covid19  to sell their snakeoil is going to be 
any more effective than the last stupid idea they had.





Spam is up, lots of unsolicited direct messages.. in particular a Claire 
Durber of Stratus keeps emailing our staff addresses selling leased lines 
etc, and ignores responses to cease...


We're seeing up to 50% increase in the last month on backbone circuits, 
this is mostly private capacity but also ixp and cloud direct connect. It 
seems to be continuing to increase rather than a one time shift too.


Steve

Mark.




Re: [uknof] Fwd: [IP] COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)

2020-04-18 Thread Stephen Wilcox
Time to need a license to use the internet the same way you need one to
drive a car it seems...

One problem is lack of regulation on propagating as news what is actually
opinion or speculation or just click bait story telling... I've never been
a fan of things that look like censorship but when things become dangerous
and the average person can't tell fact from fiction it seems we're the
wrong side of the line

Steve

On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 at 17:13, Catalin Dominte  wrote:

> Yeah, explain to them idiots out there that 70Ghz is not the same as X-Ray
> or Gamma Rays… Absolutely ridiculous! How did that even gain momentum to
> the point of burning down masts and abusing engineers like that?
>
>
>
> I really feel for them engineers on this one!
>
>
>
> --
>
> Catalin
>
>
>
> *From: *uknof  on behalf of "Neil J.
> McRae" 
> *Date: *Saturday, 18 April 2020 at 16:06
> *To: *"uknof@lists.uknof.org.uk" 
> *Subject: *Re: [uknof] Fwd: [IP] COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)
>
>
>
> What needs study is how this totally unacceptable madness has happened.
>
>
>
>
> https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coronavirus-5g-conspiracy-theory-news-latest-bt-openreach-ee-engineers-attack-abuse-a9468031.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
>
> On 17 Apr 2020, at 15:25, Neil J. McRae  wrote:
>
> 
>
> Agree with Steve on spam, and I can’t believe  the number of asshat
> companies that think using covid19  to sell their snakeoil is going to be
> any more effective than the last stupid idea they had.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
> Spam is up, lots of unsolicited direct messages.. in particular a Claire
> Durber of Stratus keeps emailing our staff addresses selling leased lines
> etc, and ignores responses to cease...
>
>
>
> We're seeing up to 50% increase in the last month on backbone circuits,
> this is mostly private capacity but also ixp and cloud direct connect. It
> seems to be continuing to increase rather than a one time shift too.
>
>
>
> Steve
>
>
> Mark.
>
>


Re: [uknof] Fwd: [IP] COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)

2020-04-18 Thread Catalin Dominte
Yeah, explain to them idiots out there that 70Ghz is not the same as X-Ray or 
Gamma Rays… Absolutely ridiculous! How did that even gain momentum to the point 
of burning down masts and abusing engineers like that?

I really feel for them engineers on this one!

--
Catalin

From: uknof  on behalf of "Neil J. McRae" 

Date: Saturday, 18 April 2020 at 16:06
To: "uknof@lists.uknof.org.uk" 
Subject: Re: [uknof] Fwd: [IP] COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)

What needs study is how this totally unacceptable madness has happened.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coronavirus-5g-conspiracy-theory-news-latest-bt-openreach-ee-engineers-attack-abuse-a9468031.html



Sent from my iPhone


On 17 Apr 2020, at 15:25, Neil J. McRae  wrote:

Agree with Steve on spam, and I can’t believe  the number of asshat companies 
that think using covid19  to sell their snakeoil is going to be any more 
effective than the last stupid idea they had.




Spam is up, lots of unsolicited direct messages.. in particular a Claire Durber 
of Stratus keeps emailing our staff addresses selling leased lines etc, and 
ignores responses to cease...

We're seeing up to 50% increase in the last month on backbone circuits, this is 
mostly private capacity but also ixp and cloud direct connect. It seems to be 
continuing to increase rather than a one time shift too.

Steve

Mark.


Re: [uknof] Fwd: [IP] COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)

2020-04-18 Thread Neil J. McRae
What needs study is how this totally unacceptable madness has happened.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coronavirus-5g-conspiracy-theory-news-latest-bt-openreach-ee-engineers-attack-abuse-a9468031.html




Sent from my iPhone

On 17 Apr 2020, at 15:25, Neil J. McRae  wrote:


Agree with Steve on spam, and I can’t believe  the number of asshat companies 
that think using covid19  to sell their snakeoil is going to be any more 
effective than the last stupid idea they had.




Spam is up, lots of unsolicited direct messages.. in particular a Claire Durber 
of Stratus keeps emailing our staff addresses selling leased lines etc, and 
ignores responses to cease...

We're seeing up to 50% increase in the last month on backbone circuits, this is 
mostly private capacity but also ixp and cloud direct connect. It seems to be 
continuing to increase rather than a one time shift too.

Steve

Mark.


Re: [uknof] Fwd: [IP] COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)

2020-04-18 Thread Neil J. McRae
In my engagement with the government - their focus has been all about saving 
lives and minimising the impact of lockdown - I see zero evidence of what you 
claim.

They are also super focused on the law of the land, competition, data & privacy 
and net-neutrality amongst others.

Maybe the duck suffers from paranoia, if the duck thinks people are out to get 
it? And of course if the duck wasn't so paranoid it would realise you can turn 
your phone off.

I do agree with you that there are ways to collect this information that are 
better than others.

Of course for those with quantum computing...


On 18 Apr 2020, at 10:37, Paul Webb  wrote:


Hi Neil ☺

No, not at all. My point isn’t really about the virus. Several academics and 
developers have shown workable designs using public/private key cryptography 
which share no data but do report proximity risks (a point I made to Jeremy 
Hunt Chair of the Health Select Committee this week).
(see 
https://news.stanford.edu/2020/04/09/stanford-researchers-help-develop-privacy-focused-coronavirus-alert-app/
 for one)

The proposed app design aggressively collects and shares data, but with minimal 
data protection (storage outside of GDPR Zone, shared with all agencies etc. 
etc. plus of course the NHS’s prior poor record on data security).

So is the objective of the app to warn of virus risk, or is it using best use 
of a crisis to implement tracking tech??  I think if it looks like a duck, 
walks like a duck and sounds like a duck…..it’s rarely just a coronavirus 
tracking app.

Regards.
Paul.

P.S. but on the virus, a combination of asymptomatic carriers, lack of a 
reliable antibody test and a high probability it’ll mutate each year anyway 
like other coronaviruses, kinda suggests it won’t help anyway.


From: Neil J. McRae [mailto:n...@domino.org]
Sent: 18 April 2020 10:00
To: Paul Webb mailto:paul.w...@clearstreamgroup.co.uk>> 
wrote:



Well HMG are using COVID19 to sell Smartphone Tracking apps.  The “lack of 
privacy notice” for the personal data is quite shocking!

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/privacy-notice-for-covid-19-response-activity/privacy-notice-for-covid-19-response-activity


Disclaimer: Views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Clearstream Technology Ltd or Clearstream 
Technology Group Ltd (Clearstream). Confidentiality: This email and any 
attached files are confidential and intended solely for the use of the 
individual(s) to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, 
you have received this email in error and any use, dissemination, forwarding, 
printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
this email in error please contact the sender. Security: This e-mail has been 
created in the knowledge that Internet e-mail is not a 100% secure 
communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of 
security when e-mailing us. Although this email and any attachments are 
believed to be free of any virus or other defects which might affect any 
computer or IT system into which they are received, no responsibility is 
accepted by Clearstream or any of its associated companies for any loss or 
damage arising in any way from the receipt or use thereof.


Re: [uknof] Fwd: [IP] COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)

2020-04-18 Thread Neil J. McRae

I’ve been playing a lot of old text based RPG’s and your reply made me chuckle:

“In the desert of good ideas you see in the horizon ahead, it’s looks like an 
ideas oasis, your party becomes excited! They run towards it, +1exp but sadly 
the oasis is but a mirage and all you find is Paul Webb (-50exp) and you 
realise that you are hallucinating and you are still stuck in the vast desert 
of good ideas.”

I don’t think they are selling anything - frankly they don’t have to but I 
suspect given a choice of more of this and your family dying that selling this 
won’t be too hard.

HMG are trying to use whats probably our best chance of getting back to some 
sort of normal quickly, and what is being used successfully in many parts of 
the world. If I look at the death rate in South Korea it’s hard to ignore the 
success they have had considering they have 20% less people in the UK but they 
population density in major cities is _significantly_ higher than the UK.

Confirmed
10,653
Recovered
7,937
Deaths
232



Our death count 14K (and probably more like 20k)

Maybe they know something we don’t? “Your Party is excited” +75exp

Regards,
Neil.

On 17 Apr 2020, at 16:08, Paul Webb  wrote:


Well HMG are using COVID19 to sell Smartphone Tracking apps.  The “lack of 
privacy notice” for the personal data is quite shocking!

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/privacy-notice-for-covid-19-response-activity/privacy-notice-for-covid-19-response-activity




Re: [uknof] Fwd: [IP] COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)

2020-04-18 Thread Christian
Speaking as just another fellow Internaut out on the edge. Thank you 
ISPs networks and service providers and all the partners and supply 
chains for keeping things going so well over the last month in particular.


It's great UKNOF is here. Can I encourage stats be published openly so 
researchers can delve in as the dust settles to see if they can pick up 
patterns across the Internet that can provide clue for future evolution 
of networks and connectivity? As well as for presentations at UKNOF of 
course!


best


Christian

On 17/04/2020 15:13, Neil J. McRae wrote:


Across _/all/_ flows there is a reduction in bandwidth usage, not just 
VoD but also delivery by CDN’s in general.


In hindsight on the VoD side it was probably not needed from BT 
network POV; however, the data we have as service providers is 
limited, in the last three years there was only one big work from home 
day in the UK in 2018. The traffic pretty much followed the same 
profile but was twice the size.  I was never concerned about home 
working, but when the schools closed – that I knew would instantly 
double the traffic we were seeing.


Personally speaking, after some idiots stated that the network 
wouldn’t cope and other idiots reported on it without asking the 
people who knew what they were talking about, so we as service 
providers had to build confidence that the network would perform. I 
had to talk to HMG many times to give them updates as they wanted 
assurance (and rightly so). One of our big concerns was some of the 
big videogames doing updates all on the same day and again the 
videogame industry responded well.


On VOD, we’ve had our biggest VOD days in the last three weeks, lots 
more flows using less bandwidth.


I doth my cap to OFCOM, DCMS, cabinet office and the department of 
health whom have all, in my view, shown outstanding performance in my 
personal engagement with them. Also our key suppliers Nokia, Huawei, 
Adva, Ericsson, and Ciena have all knocked it out the park. 
Netflix/Disney/Google/Youtube/Akamai/Limelight/L3/Activision/EA/EPIC 
infact pretty much all of the CDNS and video gaming companies did a 
fantastic job also and showed fantastic co-op.


Building that confidence was crucial and successful and we as an 
industry have a huge amount to be proud about.


Regards,

Neil.

*From: *uknof  on behalf of Mark 
Tinka 

*Date: *Friday, 17 April 2020 at 14:35
*To: *"uknof@lists.uknof.org.uk" 
*Subject: *Re: [uknof] Fwd: [IP] COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)

On 17/Apr/20 14:51, Neil J. McRae wrote:

Yes I’ve been updating network stats for BT on my twitter page
almost daily although less so now as there isn’t a lot to say!

It’s mostly a non-event though. Our record for traffic is still
last year. We will do a full presentation on this but it’s
basically people connected, network worked.

Fixed network daytime usage much wider peak stays the same at
around 15Tb/sec, NHS claps causes at 15% reduction, mobile traffic
down 15%.


What I'm still most curious about is whether there has been an 
appreciable decline in VoD streaming traffic for those providers 
who've had to clamp down on resolution.


Mark.



Re: [uknof] Fwd: [IP] COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)

2020-04-17 Thread Paul Webb
Well HMG are using COVID19 to sell Smartphone Tracking apps.  The "lack of 
privacy notice" for the personal data is quite shocking!

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/privacy-notice-for-covid-19-response-activity/privacy-notice-for-covid-19-response-activity




Agree with Steve on spam, and I can't believe  the number of asshat companies 
that think using covid19  to sell their snakeoil is going to be any more 
effective than the last stupid idea they had.




Spam is up, lots of unsolicited direct messages.. in particular a Claire Durber 
of Stratus keeps emailing our staff addresses selling leased lines etc, and 
ignores responses to cease...

We're seeing up to 50% increase in the last month on backbone circuits, this is 
mostly private capacity but also ixp and cloud direct connect. It seems to be 
continuing to increase rather than a one time shift too.

Steve

Mark.



Re: [uknof] Fwd: [IP] COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)

2020-04-17 Thread Mark Tinka


On 17/Apr/20 16:22, Neil J. McRae wrote:
>
> Agree with Steve on spam, and I can’t believe  the number of asshat
> companies that think using covid19  to sell their snakeoil is going to
> be any more effective than the last stupid idea they had.
>

Actually, it has been only marginally welcome on my part for companies
that subscribed me to their mailing lists in recent years without my
knowledge. As soon as I get such e-mails, the first and only thing I do
is hit the "Unsubscribe" button, and we are done with that.

Mark.


Re: [uknof] Fwd: [IP] COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)

2020-04-17 Thread Chris Russell
Hi All,

  More than likely we'll (UKNOF)  be running a virtual event comprising a
series of 10 min or so talks on COVID on the 11th May.

  CFP will be coming shortly, but as per Neil - we'll be looking for
people/org/ops/logistics stories rather than just pretty traffic graphs :)

 ... a$$hats excluded.


 Watch this space 


Thanks

Chris


On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 3:23 PM Neil J. McRae  wrote:

> Agree with Steve on spam, and I can’t believe  the number of asshat
> companies that think using covid19  to sell their snakeoil is going to be
> any more effective than the last stupid idea they had.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
> Spam is up, lots of unsolicited direct messages.. in particular a Claire
> Durber of Stratus keeps emailing our staff addresses selling leased lines
> etc, and ignores responses to cease...
>
>
>
> We're seeing up to 50% increase in the last month on backbone circuits,
> this is mostly private capacity but also ixp and cloud direct connect. It
> seems to be continuing to increase rather than a one time shift too.
>
>
>
> Steve
>
>
> Mark.
>
>


Re: [uknof] Fwd: [IP] COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)

2020-04-17 Thread Neil J. McRae
Agree with Steve on spam, and I can’t believe  the number of asshat companies 
that think using covid19  to sell their snakeoil is going to be any more 
effective than the last stupid idea they had.




Spam is up, lots of unsolicited direct messages.. in particular a Claire Durber 
of Stratus keeps emailing our staff addresses selling leased lines etc, and 
ignores responses to cease...

We're seeing up to 50% increase in the last month on backbone circuits, this is 
mostly private capacity but also ixp and cloud direct connect. It seems to be 
continuing to increase rather than a one time shift too.

Steve

Mark.


Re: [uknof] Fwd: [IP] COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)

2020-04-17 Thread Neil J. McRae
Across _all_ flows there is a reduction in bandwidth usage, not just VoD but 
also delivery by CDN’s in general.

In hindsight on the VoD side it was probably not needed from BT network POV; 
however, the data we have as service providers is limited, in the last three 
years there was only one big work from home day in the UK in 2018. The traffic 
pretty much followed the same profile but was twice the size.  I was never 
concerned about home working, but when the schools closed – that I knew would 
instantly double the traffic we were seeing.

Personally speaking, after some idiots stated that the network wouldn’t cope 
and other idiots reported on it without asking the people who knew what they 
were talking about, so we as service providers had to build confidence that the 
network would perform. I had to talk to HMG many times to give them updates as 
they wanted assurance (and rightly so). One of our big concerns was some of the 
big videogames doing updates all on the same day and again the videogame 
industry responded well.


On VOD, we’ve had our biggest VOD days in the last three weeks, lots more flows 
using less bandwidth.

I doth my cap to OFCOM, DCMS, cabinet office and the department of health whom 
have all, in my view, shown outstanding performance in my personal engagement 
with them. Also our key suppliers Nokia, Huawei, Adva, Ericsson, and Ciena have 
all knocked it out the park. 
Netflix/Disney/Google/Youtube/Akamai/Limelight/L3/Activision/EA/EPIC  infact 
pretty much all of the CDNS and video gaming companies did a fantastic job also 
and showed fantastic co-op.

Building that confidence was crucial and successful and we as an industry have 
a huge amount to be proud about.

Regards,
Neil.


From: uknof  on behalf of Mark Tinka 

Date: Friday, 17 April 2020 at 14:35
To: "uknof@lists.uknof.org.uk" 
Subject: Re: [uknof] Fwd: [IP] COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)


On 17/Apr/20 14:51, Neil J. McRae wrote:
Yes I’ve been updating network stats for BT on my twitter page almost daily 
although less so now as there isn’t a lot to say!

It’s mostly a non-event though. Our record for traffic is still last year. We 
will do a full presentation on this but it’s basically people connected, 
network worked.

Fixed network daytime usage much wider peak stays the same at around 15Tb/sec, 
NHS claps causes at 15% reduction, mobile traffic down 15%.

What I'm still most curious about is whether there has been an appreciable 
decline in VoD streaming traffic for those providers who've had to clamp down 
on resolution.

Mark.



Re: [uknof] Fwd: [IP] COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)

2020-04-17 Thread Stephen Wilcox
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020, 14:35 Mark Tinka,  wrote:

>
>
> On 17/Apr/20 14:51, Neil J. McRae wrote:
>
> Yes I’ve been updating network stats for BT on my twitter page almost
> daily although less so now as there isn’t a lot to say!
>
>
>
> It’s mostly a non-event though. Our record for traffic is still last year.
> We will do a full presentation on this but it’s basically people connected,
> network worked.
>
>
>
> Fixed network daytime usage much wider peak stays the same at around
> 15Tb/sec, NHS claps causes at 15% reduction, mobile traffic down 15%.
>
>
> What I'm still most curious about is whether there has been an appreciable
> decline in VoD streaming traffic for those providers who've had to clamp
> down on resolution.
>

Spam is up, lots of unsolicited direct messages.. in particular a Claire
Durber of Stratus keeps emailing our staff addresses selling leased lines
etc, and ignores responses to cease...

We're seeing up to 50% increase in the last month on backbone circuits,
this is mostly private capacity but also ixp and cloud direct connect. It
seems to be continuing to increase rather than a one time shift too.

Steve

>
> Mark.
>


Re: [uknof] Fwd: [IP] COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)

2020-04-17 Thread Mark Tinka


On 17/Apr/20 14:51, Neil J. McRae wrote:
>
> Yes I’ve been updating network stats for BT on my twitter page almost
> daily although less so now as there isn’t a lot to say!
>
>  
>
> It’s mostly a non-event though. Our record for traffic is still last
> year. We will do a full presentation on this but it’s basically people
> connected, network worked.
>
>  
>
> Fixed network daytime usage much wider peak stays the same at around
> 15Tb/sec, NHS claps causes at 15% reduction, mobile traffic down 15%.
>

What I'm still most curious about is whether there has been an
appreciable decline in VoD streaming traffic for those providers who've
had to clamp down on resolution.

Mark.


Re: [uknof] Fwd: [IP] COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)

2020-04-17 Thread Geoff Bennett
Sorry – I think we saw the same article!

From: Geoff Bennett
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 2:11 PM
To: Christian ; uk...@uknof.org.uk
Subject: RE: [uknof] Fwd: [IP] COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)

I think BT did a press release saying how traffic was  increasing after the 
lockdown.

But here’s another view.  JANET is the UK NREN so university and R traffic.

https://shapingthefutureofjanet.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2020/04/15/more-observations-on-janet-traffic-during-lockdown/<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fshapingthefutureofjanet.jiscinvolve.org%2Fwp%2F2020%2F04%2F15%2Fmore-observations-on-janet-traffic-during-lockdown%2F=02%7C01%7Cgbennett%40infinera.com%7Cc43a6a35bfa0480be39d08d7e2cf93bd%7C285643de5f5b4b03a1530ae2dc8aaf77%7C1%7C0%7C637227253476001603=cv5CqkR6LD8akJ%2BPOvB%2FzFVGdCYPDVPlxlKVkhvYXeQ%3D=0>


From: uknof 
mailto:uknof-boun...@lists.uknof.org.uk>> On 
Behalf Of Christian
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 9:26 AM
To: uk...@uknof.org.uk<mailto:uk...@uknof.org.uk>
Subject: [uknof] Fwd: [IP] COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 
is safe.


Are UK ISPs / networks, IXPs publishing traffic stats / reports openly?


Christian de Larrinaga


Begin forwarded message:
From: "Livingood, Jason" 
<mailto:jason_living...@comcast.com>
Date: April 17, 2020 at 4:47:37 AM GMT+9
To: Dave Farber <mailto:far...@gmail.com>
Subject: COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)

For IP –

FYI – We (at Comcast) just updated our COVID19 network update page at 
https://corporate.comcast.com/covid-19/network<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcorporate.comcast.com%2Fcovid-19%2Fnetwork=02%7C01%7Cgbennett%40infinera.com%7C1d696ddfd4484a7bda9608d7e2cc1c91%7C285643de5f5b4b03a1530ae2dc8aaf77%7C1%7C0%7C637227238643071942=TlEo1BgQ2D95hc%2BVPwVGmcTTi0OHtLk9SgCyNTMg7aI%3D=0>.
 Some data points of note:

  *   Network growth has slowed substantially and in many areas has plateaued, 
especially in the cities that started stay-at-home orders earlier. This is 
likely an indicator that, given currently available apps, all the people that 
can work/study from home are and they are at their maximum daily usage of 
screens/devices.
  *   Peak has increased since March 1, +32% in upstream traffic & +18% in 
downstream.
  *   Downstream peak used to start at 9 PM, now starts earlier - between 7 PM 
– 8 PM
  *   Upstream peak used to start 9 PM, now starts between 8 AM and 6 PM in 
most cities. (This is a significant change, driven by video conferencing and 
work VPN usage.)
  *   Video/voice conferencing +228%
  *   VPN +40%
  *   Video streaming +77%
  *   For our MVNO: -19% LTE usage, +49% WiFi usage

Also NCTA (cable-based ISPs) updated their page at 
https://www.ncta.com/whats-new/peak-broadband-traffic-continues-remain-steady<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ncta.com%2Fwhats-new%2Fpeak-broadband-traffic-continues-remain-steady=02%7C01%7Cgbennett%40infinera.com%7C1d696ddfd4484a7bda9608d7e2cc1c91%7C285643de5f5b4b03a1530ae2dc8aaf77%7C1%7C0%7C637227238643081928=uUxMbobyJqApCGRsqy3KSGkBqje9u9rlI5Jy9te0F4A%3D=0>

  *   Network Augmentation: Once engineers identify areas that need attention, 
technicians install additional hardware, extend fiber and more to ensure the 
network is performing well. For some cable providers, these efforts are up as 
much as 300% in a given week.
  *   Downstream & upstream peak growth flat for 2nd consecutive week.

[Graph]


Jason Livingood
Comcast
ip<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fip.topicbox.com%2Flatest=02%7C01%7Cgbennett%40infinera.com%7C1d696ddfd4484a7bda9608d7e2cc1c91%7C285643de5f5b4b03a1530ae2dc8aaf77%7C1%7C0%7C637227238643081928=UPA0r5eGulEqcw7dsKXJGwFyGri2GVbSR8dWAuxQpaw%3D=0>
 / ip / see 
discussions<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fip.topicbox.com%2Fgroups%2Fip=02%7C01%7Cgbennett%40infinera.com%7C1d696ddfd4484a7bda9608d7e2cc1c91%7C285643de5f5b4b03a1530ae2dc8aaf77%7C1%7C0%7C637227238643091931=EHAdS1bbk4gzbdhL05DRKeathCmfrZ6ekH9gkDt31K8%3D=0>
 + 
participants<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fip.topicbox.com%2Fgroups%2Fip%2Fmembers=02%7C01%7Cgbennett%40infinera.com%7C1d696ddfd4484a7bda9608d7e2cc1c91%7C285643de5f5b4b03a1530ae2dc8aaf77%7C1%7C0%7C637227238643091931=MLbo7eti6ingSUE9pz1Ip8TW8xDCADNlMmY5IlV0xkQ%3D=0>
 + delivery 
options<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fip.topicbox.com%2Fgroups%2Fip%2Fsubscription=02%7C01%7Cgbennett%40infinera.com%7C1d696ddfd4484a7bda9608d7e2cc1c91%7C285643de5f5b4b03a1530ae2dc8aaf77%7C1%7C0%7C637227238643101924=v8p0WfK5YyhdKMk7EhNe4Ad6avMU55rC7fnTEzOp8nI%3D=0>
 
Permalink<https://nam03.safelinks.prot