Re: [Unattended] could the "z:" drive be made customiseable per site please?
Urs Rau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I had sent a question at the beginning of August which coincided > with the holidays, bad timing, and have never heard back andy > feedback. I apologize for this. This project is a hobby, and "real life" has a habit of intervening. Also, you are the first person to make this request :-). > But since it is quite important to me. Could you let me know your > ideas even if it is just, "do it yourself and submit the patches". I > would like to know in advance, if possible, if "in-principle" you > might be willing to integrate the change or not. I would absoultely be willing to integrate the change. I even wrote "mapznrun.bat" with your request in mind... But there is a lot more work to do, even if most of it is routine (replacing Z: with a variable everywhere it appears). > Presuming the answer might be yes. Are there any volunters for > implementing the change? Maybe somebody has already done it all in > an automated way? We should probably work together on this. I can make a first pass, but I need someone (e.g., you) to help test. Ever use CVS? > It would be great to keep some of these local settings in a "*.ini" > text file on the share or even at the end of the "unattend.txt" file > itself along with other unattended settings? We can add a new setting to the [_meta] section, which you can then configure from %Z%\site\unattend.txt. - Pat --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ unattended-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info
[Unattended] could the "z:" drive be made customiseable per site please?
Friends, I had sent a question at the beginning of August which coincided with the holidays, bad timing, and have never heard back andy feedback. But since it is quite important to me. Could you let me know your ideas even if it is just, "do it yourself and submit the patches". I would like to know in advance, if possible, if "in-principle" you might be willing to integrate the change or not. I am trying to integrate the unattended setup with our existing networks and we already have the "z:" drive mapped on all clients at all times. Now I can keep changing the unattended files every time I receive a new update for them, but would the ability to choose a locally appropriate drive letter instead of the current default "z:" be something that others would like to have as well? Presuming the answer might be yes. Are there any volunters for implementing the change? Maybe somebody has already done it all in an automated way? Are there any special comments or circumstances to consider when one embarks on implementing this particular change? It would be great to keep some of these local settings in a "*.ini" text file on the share or even at the end of the "unattend.txt" file itself along with other unattended settings? Reactions? Thanks for the great work, keep it up. Urs Rau PS: Apologies for re-sending the query to the list, I don't like users re-sending their questions if they get no answer, normally, I guess standards slip when it involves myself. ;-) Sorry. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ unattended-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info
