[ot] Re: Wachstube
Am Sonntag, 4. April 2004 12:39 schrieb Chris Jacobs: By the way, am I correct in assuming that a Wachstube is a big transparant perspex tube used as a greenhouse? Wachs|tube: collapsible tube containing wax Wach|stube: guard parlour or a tiny police station with a single room
Re: vertical direction control
Am 2004-03-23 21:57 schrieb Ernest Cline: I suppose one could use the ECMA-48 / ISO 6429 SPD (Select Presentation Direction) control sequence, but that is hardly plain text, altho it isn't quite markup either. After having a glimpse on ECMA-48(Control Functions for Coded Character Sets) I am not sure how this concept would interact with the bidi algorithm - especially if glyphs should be mirrored, rotated or simply reordered. Thomas Kuehne
Re: vertical direction control
Am 2004-03-23 20:23 schrieb Asmus Freytag: I don't think I know of a scenario where it is crtical for a resource limited device to display the kinds of texts you list below. Reading the font data and processing it into a display representation poses the same resource costs for mirrored, rotated and normal glyphs. The limitations are mainly processing speed and memory/storage. On the display side there are few potential problems. Thomas Kuehne
vertical direction control
Is somebody already using a PUA assignment for vertical text direction controls? from http://www.unicode.org/faq/bidi.html#1 [...] the choice of vertical layout is usually treated as a formatting style; therefore, the Unicode Standard does not define default rendering behavior for vertical text nor provide directionality controls designed to override such behavior. Thanks in advance for any hints, Thomas Kuehne
Re: vertical direction control
Am Mittwoch 24 März 2004 00:09 schrieb Asmus Freytag: Is somebody already using a PUA assignment for vertical text direction controls? I think the idea was that these don't belong in plain text. Markup languages have had vertical layout controls forever. The problem arose at very resource limited devices, thus no HTML nor RTF etc.. In fact there is no higher level protocol other than plain strings/text. While crawling through the Pango and SilGraphite rendering engines I noticed that they provide(or are planning to) an interface for vertical text. For CJK, old European in-scripts and especially Egyptian hieroglyphs it would be good to have a common control set - otherwise plain text can't be used for data exchange. Thomas Kuehne