Re: N'Ko - which character? 02BC vs. 2019

2015-02-02 Thread Kent Karlsson

Den 2015-02-02 19:36, skrev Michael Everson ever...@evertype.com:

 Hawaiian Hobbit, U+02BB has been drawn 133% taller, but of the same width, as
 U+2018. I believe this really must be considered good practice. In these

I think you mean 33 % taller, i.e. height 133 % relative to its normal
height. 133 % taller would be more than double its normal height, making
it about as tall as an uppercase letter... That would be excessive...

/Kent K


___
Unicode mailing list
Unicode@unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode


Re: N'Ko - which character? 02BC vs. 2019

2015-02-02 Thread Michael Everson
On 2 Feb 2015, at 23:31, Kent Karlsson kent.karlsso...@telia.com wrote:

 Hawaiian Hobbit, U+02BB has been drawn 133% taller, but of the same width, as
 U+2018. I believe this really must be considered good practice. In these
 
 I think you mean 33 % taller, i.e. height 133 % relative to its normal
 height. 133 % taller would be more than double its normal height, making
 it about as tall as an uppercase letter... That would be excessive…

Yes, that’s right. I just type “133” into the font editor.

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/


___
Unicode mailing list
Unicode@unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode


RE: N'Ko - which character? 02BC vs. 2019

2015-02-02 Thread Andrew Glass (WINDOWS)
For what it's worth, the N'ko Institute of America uses U+2019. But that is 
probably a reflection of the font situation and the fact that U+2019 is often 
more accessible in word processors.

http://nkoinstitute.com/the-n-character/


-Original Message-
From: Unicode [mailto:unicode-boun...@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Fynn
Sent: Sunday, February 1, 2015 10:13 PM
To: Doug Ewell
Cc: Markus Scherer; unicode@unicode.org
Subject: Re: N'Ko - which character? 02BC vs. 2019

If used as characters that are part of a word, especially when they occur at 
the beginning or end of a word, ASCII apostrophes and and both right and left 
quotation marks easily get changed to something else by the auto quotes 
features of word-processors.
___
Unicode mailing list
Unicode@unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode

___
Unicode mailing list
Unicode@unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode


Re: N'Ko - which character? 02BC vs. 2019

2015-02-02 Thread Michael Everson
On 31 Jan 2015, at 22:04, Markus Scherer markus@gmail.com wrote:

 Dear Unicoders, which is the proper second character in N'Ko?
 See below for details.

U+2019. It is not a letter in N’Ko. Moreover, the reference fonts for N’Ko 
didn’t even have U+02BC.

For N’Ko, this is not arguable.

I would like to point out (perhaps again) that in my Hawaiian, Samoan, and 
Tongan, editions of Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, and in the forthcoming 
Hawaiian Hobbit, U+02BB has been drawn 133% taller, but of the same width, as 
U+2018. I believe this really must be considered good practice. In these 
novels, with “quotation marks ‘and nested quotation marks’,” making this 
distinction is really rather essential. 

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/


___
Unicode mailing list
Unicode@unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode


Re: N'Ko - which character? 02BC vs. 2019

2015-02-02 Thread Philippe Verdy
The link did not pass :

http://nkoinstitute.com/nko-alphabet/

2015-02-02 19:54 GMT+01:00 Philippe Verdy verd...@wanadoo.fr:

 On this page

 the N'ko Institute hesitates ans uses U+2018 (‘) in English i.e. the
 reverse direction.
 It has advantages that it is used immediately after letter N/n and if ever
 it appears at end of words, it won't match a pair of single quotation marks
 (U+2018 is a punctuation only at start of lines, or after whitespaces and
 punctuations; U+2019 is not always a quotation punctuation after a letter,
 even if it's followed by whitespace or punctuation, it may also be an
 orthographic apostrophe).


 2015-02-02 19:14 GMT+01:00 Andrew Glass (WINDOWS) 
 andrew.gl...@microsoft.com:

 For what it's worth, the N'ko Institute of America uses U+2019. But that
 is probably a reflection of the font situation and the fact that U+2019 is
 often more accessible in word processors.

 http://nkoinstitute.com/the-n-character/


 -Original Message-
 From: Unicode [mailto:unicode-boun...@unicode.org] On Behalf Of
 Christopher Fynn
 Sent: Sunday, February 1, 2015 10:13 PM
 To: Doug Ewell
 Cc: Markus Scherer; unicode@unicode.org
 Subject: Re: N'Ko - which character? 02BC vs. 2019

 If used as characters that are part of a word, especially when they occur
 at the beginning or end of a word, ASCII apostrophes and and both right and
 left quotation marks easily get changed to something else by the auto
 quotes features of word-processors.
 ___
 Unicode mailing list
 Unicode@unicode.org
 http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode

 ___
 Unicode mailing list
 Unicode@unicode.org
 http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode



___
Unicode mailing list
Unicode@unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode


Re: N'Ko - which character? 02BC vs. 2019

2015-02-02 Thread Philippe Verdy
On this page

the N'ko Institute hesitates ans uses U+2018 (‘) in English i.e. the
reverse direction.
It has advantages that it is used immediately after letter N/n and if ever
it appears at end of words, it won't match a pair of single quotation marks
(U+2018 is a punctuation only at start of lines, or after whitespaces and
punctuations; U+2019 is not always a quotation punctuation after a letter,
even if it's followed by whitespace or punctuation, it may also be an
orthographic apostrophe).


2015-02-02 19:14 GMT+01:00 Andrew Glass (WINDOWS) 
andrew.gl...@microsoft.com:

 For what it's worth, the N'ko Institute of America uses U+2019. But that
 is probably a reflection of the font situation and the fact that U+2019 is
 often more accessible in word processors.

 http://nkoinstitute.com/the-n-character/


 -Original Message-
 From: Unicode [mailto:unicode-boun...@unicode.org] On Behalf Of
 Christopher Fynn
 Sent: Sunday, February 1, 2015 10:13 PM
 To: Doug Ewell
 Cc: Markus Scherer; unicode@unicode.org
 Subject: Re: N'Ko - which character? 02BC vs. 2019

 If used as characters that are part of a word, especially when they occur
 at the beginning or end of a word, ASCII apostrophes and and both right and
 left quotation marks easily get changed to something else by the auto
 quotes features of word-processors.
 ___
 Unicode mailing list
 Unicode@unicode.org
 http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode

 ___
 Unicode mailing list
 Unicode@unicode.org
 http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode

___
Unicode mailing list
Unicode@unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode


Re: N'Ko - which character? 02BC vs. 2019

2015-02-01 Thread Doug Ewell

Markus Scherer markus dot icu at gmail dot com wrote:


Dear Unicoders, which is the proper second character in N'Ko?
See below for details.

-- Forwarded message --
From: Doug Ewell d...@ewellic.org


For the record, I did not ask on ietf-languages for any re-evaluation of 
the apostrophe character used in the name N'Ko. My question, and that of 
the group, was about the apostrophes used in the names of Khoisan and 
Bantu languages.


--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, USA | http://ewellic.org ­ 


___
Unicode mailing list
Unicode@unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode


Re: N'Ko - which character? 02BC vs. 2019

2015-02-01 Thread Christopher Fynn
If used as characters that are part of a word, especially when they
occur at the beginning or end of a word, ASCII apostrophes and and
both right and left quotation marks easily get changed to something
else by the auto quotes features of word-processors.
___
Unicode mailing list
Unicode@unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode