Hi, Stephen,
If Lussenhop was interested in the concerns of this community, he would not 
propose a 10-story building on that lot. He's not interested in "responding" to 
criticisms; he's just going to repeat the same talking points as if we're too 
stupid to understand how important what he's going to try to shove down our 
throats is, and we'll come around to his point of view if he exlains it to us  
v-e-r-y   s-l-o-o-o-w-l-y. 
 
He tries to come off as "your friendly neighborhood hotel developer" and makes 
a transparent effort to make himself look like just a regular, friendly  guy 
from the neighborhood:  "Tom", and even gives his address.
 
Tom Lussenhop is no friend of this neighborhood.  He may be IN this 
neighborhood, but he is not OF this neighhorhood, and the only best interests 
he is concerned about are his own and those of his cronies. 
 
Karen
 
"Friends Don't Let Friends Put Up Ten-Story Hotels In Three-Story Residential 
Neighborhoods"
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
> Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:46:24 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [UC] 40th Street Hotel letter - an interesting 
> reply> CC: univcity@list.purple.com> > Hi Karen,> > > I don't think that it's 
> appropriate for the PHC to forward letters from residents to Mr. Lussenhop> > 
> prior to the hearing - isn't that giving him advance opportunity to respond> 
> > to any comments we may have?> > Hopefully without taking sides in this 
> issue.....I'm curious about> your concern. Why is it better to surprise the 
> developer with your> concerns? It seems to me that providing the developer 
> with time to> consider your concerns allows him to more thoughtfully take 
> them into> consideration.> > Best,> Stephen

Reply via email to