Re: [UC] BIDs in the news - Why Stop Savaging John

[Craigsolve]

 
In a message dated 7/19/2007 7:37:24 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

The fact  is, John did cooperate in the beginning, I don't know what 
happened later,  maybe an attorney told him to stop talking or due to 
some unreasonable  pressure by UCD, but something transpired to cause 
the negotiations to  shut down and John to be perceived as "no  longer"
cooperating.



Thanks for speaking up, SAli. Several things should be are apparent through  
inference and observing industry standard patterns of behavior.
 
1) The continuing payout of John's, reported in the press, severance  package 
is predicated upon his non-disclosure of any matter associated with  his 
employment with UCD. Even matters where he might contend they have  libeled 
him, 
would need to be contested in a court of law, not the court of  public opinion.
 
2) Philadelphia's summers of slow political news means even the usual sharp  
minds of our political reporters become undisciplined as they find it 
necessary  to spin unpersuasive arguments to create better work product  
acceptance.
 
3) Some guys will gladly become UCD water-boys to get premium seating for  
the next Big Philly O concert in the Bowl.
 
I fear, locally, some people find a morose satisfaction in savaging  John and 
his family, while attempting to save their presumed self-serving  beneficence 
of the decrepit UCD/NID model of operation.
 
Ciao,
 
Craig



** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at 
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour

RE: [UC] BIDs in the news - Why Stop Savaging John

[S. Sharrieff Ali]

Yeah..and I have been told everything dies the death of a thousand
stab wounds on this listserv!
 
;-)
 
S
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 8:09 AM
To: UnivCity@list.purple.com
Subject: Re: [UC] BIDs in the news - Why Stop Savaging John
 
In a message dated 7/19/2007 7:37:24 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The fact is, John did cooperate in the beginning, I don't know what 
happened later, maybe an attorney told him to stop talking or due to 
some unreasonable pressure by UCD, but something transpired to cause 
the negotiations to shut down and John to be perceived as "no longer"
cooperating.
Thanks for speaking up, SAli. Several things should be are apparent
through inference and observing industry standard patterns of behavior.
 
1) The continuing payout of John's, reported in the press, severance
package is predicated upon his non-disclosure of any matter associated
with his employment with UCD. Even matters where he might contend they
have libeled him, would need to be contested in a court of law, not the
court of public opinion.
 
2) Philadelphia's summers of slow political news means even the usual
sharp minds of our political reporters become undisciplined as they find
it necessary to spin unpersuasive arguments to create better work
product acceptance.
 
3) Some guys will gladly become UCD water-boys to get premium seating
for the next Big Philly O concert in the Bowl.
 
I fear, locally, some people find a morose satisfaction in savaging John
and his family, while attempting to save their presumed self-serving
beneficence of the decrepit UCD/NID model of operation.
 
Ciao,
 
Craig



  _  

Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com
<http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour/?ncid=AOLAOF0002000982>
.