[Bug 1993969] Re: "pbuilder-dist create ..." fails unless I create the "Packages" file ahead of call
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1993969 Title: "pbuilder-dist create ..." fails unless I create the "Packages" file ahead of call To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1993969/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1959115] Re: update backportpackage and requestbackport scripts to behave according to new backport process
I just committed 0f3d2fed2a4ed67b90b5d49aab25ca2bda5d9d37 updating requestbackport. ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959115 Title: update backportpackage and requestbackport scripts to behave according to new backport process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1959115/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1955116] Re: mk-sbuild create error due to bullseye security move
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~myamada/ubuntu-dev-tools/+git/ubuntu-dev-tools/+merge/435734 ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955116 Title: mk-sbuild create error due to bullseye security move To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1955116/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1991828] Re: backportpackage fails when the lsb_release Python module is not available
This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-dev-tools - 0.191 --- ubuntu-dev-tools (0.191) unstable; urgency=medium [ Dan Streetman ] * lpapicache: + Make sure that login() actually logins and doesn't use cached credentials. * ubuntu-build: + Fix crash caused by a change in lpapicache that changed the default operation mode from authenticated to anonymous. LP: #1984113 [ Stefano Rivera ] * backportpackage: + Add support for lsb-release-minimal, which doesn't have a Python module. Thanks to Gioele Barabucci for the patch. Closes: #1020901 [ Mattia Rizzolo ] * ubuntutools/archive.py: + Fix operation of SourcePackage._source_urls() (as used, for example, in SourcePackage.pull() called by backportpackage) to also work when the class is instantiated with a URL as .dsc. Fixes regression from v0.184. Thanks to Unit 193 for the initial patch. -- Mattia Rizzolo Tue, 11 Oct 2022 13:56:03 +0200 ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991828 Title: backportpackage fails when the lsb_release Python module is not available To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1991828/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1991828] Re: backportpackage fails when the lsb_release Python module is not available
I uploaded a fix to debian, though I forgot to include this LP bug number in the changelog. since 0.191 is only bugfix I plan to sync it once it's possible. ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri) ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991828 Title: backportpackage fails when the lsb_release Python module is not available To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1991828/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
Re: [Bug 1959115] Re: update backportpackage and requestbackport scripts to behave according to new backport process
Which version have you tested? backportpackge in u-d-t 0.187+ should already be using the ~bp suffix. Notably, note that 0.187 is available in focal-bpo. On Sun, 13 Feb 2022, 8:35 pm Ross Gammon, <1959...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Regarding the requestbackport package, it is really only the template > for the bug report that needs to change from memory. I don't think it > had any other workflow related information. Once that is fixed, it just > needs a reference from the backports process wiki again (like it used to > have). > > Regarding the backportpackage script, I just tried it, and it is fine for > testing in a ppa. I think we could already recommend using this on the wiki > with a ppa specified in the -u option. Perhaps a warning not to upload to > the archive with it yet would be required though. I had hoped I could > specify the new "bpo" version string with the suffix option, but according > to the manpage, the "~ubuntu" bit is hardwired: > -S SUFFIX, --suffix=SUFFIX > Add the specified suffix to the version number when > backporting. > backportpackage will always append ~ubuntuDESTINATION.1 to > the > original version number, and if SUFFIX is specified, it is > ap‐ > pended to that, to get version numbers of the form > ORIGINAL_VER‐ > SION~ubuntuDESTINATION.1SUFFIX. If the backported package is > be‐ > ing uploaded to a PPA, then SUFFIX defaults to ~ppa1, > otherwise > the default is blank. > > Now that a bug is always required, I suppose the script should prompt > for that, and the "-c/--close" options be taken away. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu > Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959115 > > Title: > update backportpackage and requestbackport scripts to behave according > to new backport process > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1959115/+subscriptions > > > -- > ubuntu-backports mailing list > ubuntu-backpo...@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959115 Title: update backportpackage and requestbackport scripts to behave according to new backport process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1959115/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1959541] Re: pull-lp-source crashed with AttributeError in __new__(): module 'collections' has no attribute 'Callable'
"right now" thanks for the ping :) ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959541 Title: pull-lp-source crashed with AttributeError in __new__(): module 'collections' has no attribute 'Callable' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1959541/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1959115] Re: update backportpackage and requestbackport scripts to behave according to new backport process
** Summary changed: - update backportpackage script to behave according to new backport process + update backportpackage and requestbackport scripts to behave according to new backport process ** Description changed: - The 'backportpackage' script needs to be updated to work according to the new backport process: + The 'requestbackport' script needs to be updated to the new workflow. + The Backporters team doesn't take on *requests* to do backports anymore, so most likely this script should be turned into a simpler pointer to the wiki page, rather than actually do anything. + + The 'backportpackage' script needs to be checked if the latest update + covered all the differences from the previous workflow. + + https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports + This bug is to track that work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959115 Title: update backportpackage and requestbackport scripts to behave according to new backport process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1959115/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1004579] Re: [pbuilder-dist] overwrite OTHERMIRROR set in ~/.pbuilderrc
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004579 Title: [pbuilder-dist] overwrite OTHERMIRROR set in ~/.pbuilderrc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1004579/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1862372] Re: [SRU] ubuntu-upload-permission TypeError crash
root@warren:/# apt install ubuntu-dev-tools/focal-proposed ... Selected version '0.176ubuntu20.04.1' (Ubuntu:20.04/focal-proposed [all]) for 'ubuntu-dev-tools' ... Setting up ubuntu-dev-tools (0.176ubuntu20.04.1) ... ... root@warren:/# ubuntu-upload-permission --list-uploaders cloud-init Please open this authorization page: (https://launchpad.net/+authorize-token?oauth_token=QnZKJWv48DK5RZ65Dtl3_permission=DESKTOP_INTEGRATION) in your browser. Use your browser to authorize this program to access Launchpad on your behalf. Press Enter after authorizing in your browser. All upload permissions for cloud-init: Component (main) * Ubuntu Core Development Team (ubuntu-core-dev) [team] Packagesets === core: ubuntu-cloud: * Ubuntu Cloud Uploaders (ubuntu-cloud-uploaders) [team] Per-Package-Uploaders = * Chad Smith (chad.smith) * Ryan Harper (raharper) You can not upload cloud-init to jammy, yourself. But you can still contribute to it via the sponsorship process: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess root@warren:/# All good! :) ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862372 Title: [SRU] ubuntu-upload-permission TypeError crash To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1862372/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1947192] Re: [BPO] ubuntu-dev-tools/0.187
note that the team wasn't subscribed, so this bug fell off, at least, my radar. anyhow, I'm reusing this bug very badly since it wasn't yet fully closed; in hindsight 2 minutes after I made the change I figured I was better opening a new one, but well.. I've now uploaded 0.187 everywhere, bionic, focal, hirsute, impish. Note that bionic and focal require the new debhelper that is also in the queue, see the related bug. ** Summary changed: - [BPO] version 0.185 + [BPO] ubuntu-dev-tools/0.187 ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri) ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri) ** Also affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Impish) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Impish) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri) ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Hirsute) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri) ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Impish) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947192 Title: [BPO] ubuntu-dev-tools/0.187 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1947192/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1862372] Re: ubuntu-upload-permission TypeError crash
I uploaded the said fix to focal. After all it's a crash, so it should be fixed as such :) ** Patch added: "debdiff.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1862372/+attachment/5545461/+files/debdiff.patch ** Summary changed: - ubuntu-upload-permission TypeError crash + [SRU] ubuntu-upload-permission TypeError crash -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862372 Title: [SRU] ubuntu-upload-permission TypeError crash To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1862372/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1862372] Re: ubuntu-upload-permission TypeError crash
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + * ubuntu-upload-permission sometimes crashes. + + [Test Plan] + + * `ubuntu-upload-permission --list-uploaders cloud-init` + + [Where problems could occur] + + * This is a targeted fix that has been in other releases for more than a year. + * At most ubuntu-upload-permissions will start erroring out elsewhere (it won't) + + [Original text] + (note that what was reported here is already fixed in focal, but there is followup fix for a different case) + focal ubuntu-dev-tools 0.175 $ ubuntu-upload-permission -a procps Loading KWallet Loading SecretService Loading Windows Loading chainer Loading macOS All upload permissions for procps: Component (main) * Ubuntu Core Development Team (ubuntu-core-dev) [team] Traceback (most recent call last): - File "/usr/bin/ubuntu-upload-permission", line 144, in - main() - File "/usr/bin/ubuntu-upload-permission", line 90, in main - sourcepackagename=package)) + File "/usr/bin/ubuntu-upload-permission", line 144, in + main() + File "/usr/bin/ubuntu-upload-permission", line 90, in main + sourcepackagename=package)) TypeError: '<' not supported between instances of 'Packageset' and 'Packageset' ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862372 Title: ubuntu-upload-permission TypeError crash To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1862372/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1945349] Re: mk-sbuild has no support for type=zfs-snapshot schroots
actually it is, sorry for the noise. ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945349 Title: mk-sbuild has no support for type=zfs-snapshot schroots To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1945349/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1945349] Re: mk-sbuild has no support for type=zfs-snapshot schroots
it's not "fix committed" if you are talking about a repository that is not the main one… ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945349 Title: mk-sbuild has no support for type=zfs-snapshot schroots To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1945349/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1947192] Re: [SRU] version 0.185
please also consider that we backports team also have in mind to keep u-d-t (and others) fully up-to-date in the backports suites (this should happen within a few weeks). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947192 Title: [SRU] version 0.185 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1947192/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
Re: [Bug 1756748] Re: [syncpackage] Allow me to sync multiple packages at one time
@Dan: i don't think it's proper to close 3-years old bugs as "the bug is old" - especially not when the request looks very fine and senseful to me. ? On Thu, 14 Oct 2021, 12:16 am Dan Streetman, <1756...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > as this is years old, closing as wontfix > > ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) >Status: Triaged => Won't Fix > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to Ubuntu. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756748 > > Title: > [syncpackage] Allow me to sync multiple packages at one time > > Status in ubuntu-dev-tools package in Ubuntu: > Won't Fix > > Bug description: > $ syncpackage botan vc > Usage: syncpackage [options] <.dsc URL/path or package name> > > syncpackage: error: Multiple .dsc URLs/paths or package names > specified: botan, vc > > I should be able to do both at the same time. > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1756748/+subscriptions > > > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756748 Title: [syncpackage] Allow me to sync multiple packages at one time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1756748/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1862372] Re: ubuntu-upload-permission TypeError crash
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-dev- tools/commit/?id=ceb020d0fae34549a3f21c6900c12c09e53eff5d + parent commit with a bit of code reflow. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862372 Title: ubuntu-upload-permission TypeError crash To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1862372/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1862372] Re: ubuntu-upload-permission TypeError crash
I don't plan to backport this to focal fwiw, so somebody should feel free to pick that piece up if they want to. ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862372 Title: ubuntu-upload-permission TypeError crash To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1862372/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1938659] Re: pull-ppa-source crashed with ubuntutools.misc.DownloadError in _download_file_from_urls(): Failed to download /tmp/tmpwwavfcfx/openssl_1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20.dsc
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Alex Murray (alexmurray) ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938659 Title: pull-ppa-source crashed with ubuntutools.misc.DownloadError in _download_file_from_urls(): Failed to download /tmp/tmpwwavfcfx/openssl_1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20.dsc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1938659/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1936697] Re: Unlisted dependency
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1936697 Title: Unlisted dependency To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1936697/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1936697] Re: Unlisted dependency
because pbuilder is not "a necessary tool": there are several other alternatives to it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1936697 Title: Unlisted dependency To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1936697/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1928946] [NEW] syncpackage: downloads .dsc when it really isn't needed
Public bug reported: It seems that starting from a few versions, syncpackage downloads .dscs, stores them in ~, and leaves them there. AFAIK there is no need to download anything to sync a package, as launchpad should be able to handle everything through its API, so I'd say the bug is threefold: 1) shouldn't download anything if not needed (when is it needed?!) 2) shouldn't store things in ~ at all, use a tempdir in TMPDIR instead 3) shouldn't leave temporary files around Currently running version 0.181 under Debian unstable. ** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Dan Streetman (ddstreet) Status: Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928946 Title: syncpackage: downloads .dsc when it really isn't needed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1928946/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1916633] Re: pbuilder-dist bullseye create fails
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Streetman (ddstreet) ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916633 Title: pbuilder-dist bullseye create fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1916633/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1916633] Re: pbuilder-dist bullseye create fails
that's because starting with bullseye the security suite is named bullseye-security instead of bullseye/updates. (not planning to write a patch myself in the short time, hopefully somebody else will…) ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916633 Title: pbuilder-dist bullseye create fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1916633/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1193941] Re: import-bug-from-debian crashed with --- in _request()
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1193941 Title: import-bug-from-debian crashed with --- in _request() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1193941/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1885233] Re: [update-maintainer] Can't find control when under ./debian
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Bryce Harrington (bryce) ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1885233 Title: [update-maintainer] Can't find control when under ./debian To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1885233/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1864571] Re: SRU ubuntu-dev-tools
This is the kind of things backports should be used for. Are there no chances for a new backports team to appear and maintain those pockets? Or, have the backports work like in debian when regular maintainers/developers upload and the team just checks the versioning is correct… -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864571 Title: SRU ubuntu-dev-tools To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1864571/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1860456] Re: ubuntutools.archive.UbuntuSourcePackage().pull() fails
Sure, having reviewed now what was merged I'd say I have nothing to complain about :) Thank you for your work, and sorry for lagging behind! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860456 Title: ubuntutools.archive.UbuntuSourcePackage().pull() fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1860456/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
Re: [Bug 1860456] Re: ubuntutools.archive.UbuntuSourcePackage().pull() fails
just busy due to pre/post FOSDEM + FOSDEM fringe + family event right after
that; TBH I haven't had the chance to look at this at all, but it has been
not even 2 weeks since Colin's MR…
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 8:30 PM Dan Streetman
wrote:
> @mapreri @cjwatson any decision on this? My ubuntu-dev-tools delta is
> growing again...
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to Ubuntu.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860456
>
> Title:
> ubuntutools.archive.UbuntuSourcePackage().pull() fails
>
> Status in ubuntu-dev-tools package in Ubuntu:
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> Steps to reproduce:
>
> import ubuntutools.archive
> ubuntutools.archive.UbuntuSourcePackage('akonadi',
> '1.1.2-0ubuntu1~jaunty1').pull()
>
> This fails with an ubuntutools.archive.DownloadError.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1860456/+subscriptions
>
>
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860456
Title:
ubuntutools.archive.UbuntuSourcePackage().pull() fails
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1860456/+subscriptions
--
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
Re: [Bug 1860456] Re: ubuntutools.archive.UbuntuSourcePackage().pull() fails
On Wed, 22 Jan 2020, 1:55 pm Dan Streetman, wrote: > > I've seen such packages uploaded last year too > > that's unfortunate and quite bad. > Well, it's a feature, although one that does create confusion in many situations. So it's probably good that very few people know of it ^^ I'd still wait to see what Colin has to share. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860456 Title: ubuntutools.archive.UbuntuSourcePackage().pull() fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1860456/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1860456] Re: ubuntutools.archive.UbuntuSourcePackage().pull() fails
It's not just jaunty. I've seen such packages uploaded last year too. Though I must say it's so rare that I forgot such packages existed… And a flag such as `--no-verify-checksums` sounds a very bad idea to have to me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860456 Title: ubuntutools.archive.UbuntuSourcePackage().pull() fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1860456/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1860456] Re: ubuntutools.archive.UbuntuSourcePackage().pull() fails
more specifically, it says Checksum for akonadi_1.1.2.orig.tar.gz does not match. DownloadError: File akonadi_1.1.2.orig.tar.gz could not be found -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860456 Title: ubuntutools.archive.UbuntuSourcePackage().pull() fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1860456/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1859277] Re: Please support riscv64 with {cow,p}builder-dist
committed. https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-dev-
tools/commit/?id=f8fa865ab2a44e24260f889a3ada8a71421635be
** No longer affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Debian)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859277
Title:
Please support riscv64 with {cow,p}builder-dist
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1859277/+subscriptions
--
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1852901] Re: Unable to requestbackport in 19.10: KeyError: 'eoan-backports'
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-dev- tools/commit/?id=463d1f63a8d9784f6df072abce5af773ddad1c0c ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri) ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852901 Title: Unable to requestbackport in 19.10: KeyError: 'eoan-backports' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1852901/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1852901] Re: Unable to requestbackport in 19.10: KeyError: 'eoan-backports'
The backports project in ubuntu is basically in a state where nobody is working on it anymore. I can fix `requestbackport` to error out more nicely in this case, but don't expect anything more. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852901 Title: Unable to requestbackport in 19.10: KeyError: 'eoan-backports' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1852901/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1848603] Re: Drop bzr and other python2 depends/suggests
It only *recommends* bzr, it doesn't depend on it. However, what if I swap the recommends from "bzr | brz" to "brz | bzr"? That way, it will pick bzr first. Anyway, regardless of this, the latest version of bzr in debian is a transitional package to brz, so it shouldn't really matter much anymore. As soon as somebody force-syncs bzr everything will just work out. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848603 Title: Drop bzr and other python2 depends/suggests To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1848603/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
Re: [Bug 1099537] Re: ubuntu-dev-scripts should be ported to Python 3
@jbicha: this very much required a FFe, which was rejected in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843543 ... On Fri, 20 Sep 2019, 2:21 am Launchpad Bug Tracker, < 1099...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-dev-tools - 0.173 > > --- > ubuntu-dev-tools (0.173) unstable; urgency=medium > > [ Stefano Rivera ] > * pull-debian-debdiff: > + Don't unpack the older source package, it will often use the same > directory as the newer one, and break. > * merge-changelog: > + Use ubuntutools.version.Version, to support Python 3. > * Drop 404main, it's been totally broken for years. > * Port all the Python scripts to Python 3, and remove Python 2 support. > Closes: #938740, LP: #1099537 > > [ Dan Streetman ] > * pull-pkg: > + Use ubuntutools.version.Version which has strip_epoch() instead > of debian.debian_support.Version. > * Have ubuntu-dev-tools depend on the matching version of > python3-ubuntutools. > > [ Scott Kitterman ] > * Update requestsync to python3. Closes: #927147 > > [ Mattia Rizzolo ] > * Explicitly require Python3 >= 3.6. > > -- Mattia Rizzolo Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:35:06 +0200 > > ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) >Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to Ubuntu. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1099537 > > Title: > ubuntu-dev-scripts should be ported to Python 3 > > Status in ubuntu-dev-tools package in Ubuntu: > Fix Released > Status in ubuntu-dev-tools package in Debian: > Fix Released > > Bug description: > ubuntu-dev-scripts is mostly python2, but should be ported to python3 > eventually. There was a brief scare during raring when devscripts > went python3-only to remind us that we still have this large body of > python2 code that we own. (this bug was originally a crash report > from that) > > Not all dependencies are ported to python3 yet. As of this writing > (2013-01-14), the following are only-python2: >python-launchpadlib (LP: #1060734) >python-lazr.restfulclient (LP: #1000801) >python-mox >python-soappy > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1099537/+subscriptions > > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1099537 Title: ubuntu-dev-scripts should be ported to Python 3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1099537/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1843543] Re: [FFe] ubuntu-dev-tools
I also disagree with this FFe. Despite it seems to be working for now I would be suprised if no regressions pop up in a few days/weeks in unstable. @ddstreet: I'm still waiting on your MR(s)! The more you wait it's obvios the more it gets harder to rebase… Can't you start with a few changes at least? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843543 Title: [FFe] ubuntu-dev-tools To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1843543/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1099537] Re: ubuntu-dev-scripts should be ported to Python 3
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #938740 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=938740 ** Also affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=938740 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1099537 Title: ubuntu-dev-scripts should be ported to Python 3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1099537/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1841127] Re: pull-debian-source fails with "ImportError: No module named request"
Thank you indeed! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1841127 Title: pull-debian-source fails with "ImportError: No module named request" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1841127/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1841127] Re: pull-debian-source fails with "ImportError: No module named request"
@ddstreet, yes please. Also, the solution here is to port everything to py3-only, btw. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1841127 Title: pull-debian-source fails with "ImportError: No module named request" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1841127/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1625481] Re: reverse-depends: figure an alternative to qa.ubuntuwire.org/rdepends
** Summary changed: - reverse-depends does not work + reverse-depends: figure an alternative to qa.ubuntuwire.org/rdepends -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1625481 Title: reverse-depends: figure an alternative to qa.ubuntuwire.org/rdepends To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1625481/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
Re: [Bug 1827576] [NEW] should stop passing --force-yes to apt
Then why is this against ubuntu-dev-tools? Maybe it should have been against debootstrap? You also didn't specify what you are using to create said chroot. On Fri, 3 May 2019, 6:41 pm Brian Murray, wrote: > Public bug reported: > > Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.29-0ubuntu2) ... > W: --force-yes is deprecated, use one of the options starting with --allow > instead. > > This is when I was creating an eoan chroot. I'm not aware of for which > versions of apt --force-yes is deprecated but it needs fixing for some > of them! > > ** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) > Importance: Undecided > Status: New > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to Ubuntu. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1827576 > > Title: > should stop passing --force-yes to apt > > Status in ubuntu-dev-tools package in Ubuntu: > New > > Bug description: > Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.29-0ubuntu2) ... > W: --force-yes is deprecated, use one of the options starting with > --allow instead. > > This is when I was creating an eoan chroot. I'm not aware of for which > versions of apt --force-yes is deprecated but it needs fixing for some > of them! > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1827576/+subscriptions > > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1827576 Title: should stop passing --force-yes to apt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1827576/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1799568] [NEW] [ubuntu-archive-assistant] not installed
Public bug reported: Hi So I'm now releasing version 0.166, since there is an RC bug. ubuntu-archive-assistant is not being installed, and after I looked at why, I saw you: * didn't add the required build-deps (I fixed this myself) * didn't add the script to setup.py * the new module is not within ubuntutools/ - this is actually a bothersome issue, since adding a separate top-level module would require a new binary package to comply with the debian python policy. These are some of the issues I would have expected to catch if you had used a MR instead of pushing straight to master. So please now actually integrate your work within the rest of the package, instead of just dumping it there. In the meantime, the new script is not installed. ** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Low Assignee: Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (cyphermox) Status: Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799568 Title: [ubuntu-archive-assistant] not installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1799568/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1797290] Re: no bash-completion for pull-lp-source (and probably others)
I recommend you look at python3-argcomplete for this :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1797290 Title: no bash-completion for pull-lp-source (and probably others) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1797290/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1790574] Re: pull-lp-source fails due to SSL error - pull-lp-source: Error: Failed to download: [SSL] unknown error (_ssl.c:726)
"pip install httplib2" is no workaround for a bug in a debian package anyway. And if you already know it's something that has to do with httplib2, why did you assign this bug to ubuntu-dev-tools instead of python-httplib2 (which will be updated at some point, a contributor contacted me to update the library in Debian just a few days ago :)) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790574 Title: pull-lp-source fails due to SSL error - pull-lp-source: Error: Failed to download: [SSL] unknown error (_ssl.c:726) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1790574/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1779963] Re: create pull-ppa-* functionality
Any chance you could finish up that MR you did in the past, so I could do that blind merge I was talking about? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779963 Title: create pull-ppa-* functionality To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1779963/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1314076] Re: pbuilder-dist: Local archives othermirror overridden by later othermirror
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314076 Title: pbuilder-dist: Local archives othermirror overridden by later othermirror To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1314076/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1453330] Re: rewrite pull-[lp|debian|uca]-source
I am serious: you are right on being tired of waiting, so I'm asking you to give me something I can straight merge and upload as-is to unstable. It's clear I'm not going to review it as I hoped I would, so there is little point in trying to defer it any more (and I kind of doubt you'll find many other people willing to seriously review that). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453330 Title: rewrite pull-[lp|debian|uca]-source To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1453330/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1453330] Re: rewrite pull-[lp|debian|uca]-source
Well, now that bionic is done, and buster has still about an year to come, let me just merge it and have you deal with whatever happens.. :) ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Streetman (ddstreet) ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: High => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453330 Title: rewrite pull-[lp|debian|uca]-source To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1453330/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1453330] Re: pull-{lp, debian}-source not getting source for binary because DDE is dead
Most probably I can, yes. But it's not a quick thing, I need to find
some appropriate time to review.
BTW, even after merging some thing I'd prefer if you could stick around
and deal with upcoming bugs in pull-pkg in the next months.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453330
Title:
pull-{lp,debian}-source not getting source for binary because DDE is
dead
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1453330/+subscriptions
--
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 567629] Re: [update-maintainer] should adjust Vcs-foo fields too
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Nish Aravamudan (nacc) ** Branch linked: lp:~nacc/ubuntu-dev-tools/update-vcs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567629 Title: [update-maintainer] should adjust Vcs-foo fields too To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/567629/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1661324] Re: add pull-ca-source to ubuntu-dev-tools
ah, so this bug wasn't added to the changelog, and I noticed only now. Pity, so I'm marking as released now already, I just synced it, so it's now sitting in proposed, package version 0.158. Thanks everybody who contributed! ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1661324 Title: add pull-ca-source to ubuntu-dev-tools To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1661324/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1661324] Re: add pull-ca-source to ubuntu-dev-tools
So let's do this, then. I'm going to upload to experimental, then sync it Although I have a question: I am totally unable to work with bzr behind very basic stuff. Would anyone feel particularly sorry if I/we were to move it to git? Now that launchpad supports it and so we could keep the same ACL it currently has (where all of ~ubuntu-dev can push) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1661324 Title: add pull-ca-source to ubuntu-dev-tools To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1661324/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 915876] Re: pbuilder-dist does not build foreign architecture
this is not a pbuilder bug: pbuilder does not check if he should build the package or not at all, it just hands the .dsc to dpkg-buildpackage after satisfying build-deps. Interestingly enough, I trying to look up "in arch list or does not match any arch wildcards" in codesearch.d.n, and the only results have been from sbuild and xbuilder. Since I'm confused, I'm reassigning this back to ubuntu-dev-tools. ** Package changed: pbuilder (Ubuntu) => ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915876 Title: pbuilder-dist does not build foreign architecture To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/915876/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 28906] Re: init script starts before NFS, NIS, DNS (need two stages)
since the were no reply in more than one year I'm closing the bug report (even to drop the bug from the list) ** Changed in: firehol (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid ** Changed in: firehol (Ubuntu) Assignee: MOTU (motu) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is a bug assignee. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/28906 Title: init script starts before NFS, NIS, DNS (need two stages) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firehol/+bug/28906/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
