[Bug 1960851] Re: [pull-debian-source] Pull from Debian 'new'

2022-02-14 Thread Stefano Rivera
NEW isn't currently public, you can see what is in the NEW queue, but
you can't download them.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960851

Title:
  [pull-debian-source] Pull from Debian 'new'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1960851/+subscriptions


-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1913330] Re: pull-debian-source fails with AttributeError: 'filter' object has no attribute 'append'

2021-02-01 Thread Stefano Rivera
Already fixed in 90cb51becb0129cb17584c136f9e015d64086c34

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913330

Title:
  pull-debian-source fails with AttributeError: 'filter' object has no
  attribute 'append'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1913330/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1843543] Re: [FFe] ubuntu-dev-tools

2019-09-11 Thread Stefano Rivera
I don't think the python3 port really brings anything to users of eoan.
The advantage is to us, in being able to pull out python2 libraries from
source packages. And that won't be FFed.

I'd also be very surprised if I didn't break *something* in the port.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843543

Title:
  [FFe] ubuntu-dev-tools

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1843543/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1841127] Re: pull-debian-source fails with "ImportError: No module named request"

2019-09-03 Thread Stefano Rivera
Committed fix in: https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-dev-
tools/commit/?id=7fd1a6a766f4ff52cc3a576faaed11e17773274e

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1841127

Title:
  pull-debian-source fails with "ImportError: No module named request"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1841127/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1189260] Re: pull-debian-source crashed with ValueError in rmadison(): need more than 1 value to unpack

2013-06-10 Thread Stefano Rivera
Debian's madison service was broken for a while yesterday. It's fixed
now.

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1189260

Title:
  pull-debian-source crashed with ValueError in rmadison(): need more
  than 1 value to unpack

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1189260/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1188036] Re: debian-keyring is a rather heavyweight Recommends for ubuntu-dev-tools, perhaps demote to Suggests?

2013-06-09 Thread Stefano Rivera
Arguably cryptographic verification isn't an optional feature.

I'd be happy to lower this to Suggests, if we printed an explanation in
pull-debian-source, when the keyring isn't available

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1188036

Title:
  debian-keyring is a rather heavyweight Recommends for ubuntu-dev-
  tools, perhaps demote to Suggests?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1188036/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


Re: [Bug 936014] Re: [sponsor-patch] crashed with AssertionError in get_open_ubuntu_bug_task()

2013-03-11 Thread Stefano Rivera
 Benjamin, you can sponsor my patch from bug #1153121

It's targetted at S-series, not raring.

/me re-targets.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936014

Title:
  [sponsor-patch] crashed with AssertionError in
  get_open_ubuntu_bug_task()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/936014/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1132929] Re: requestsync should redirect users to syncpackage if they have upload rights

2013-02-27 Thread Stefano Rivera
I wasn't talking about manpages either.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132929

Title:
  requestsync should redirect users to syncpackage if they have upload
  rights

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1132929/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1106429] Re: [backportpackage] -sa detection does not work with private PPAs

2013-02-27 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Summary changed:

- [backportpackage] -sa detection does not worth with private PPAs
+ [backportpackage] -sa detection does not work with private PPAs

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1106429

Title:
  [backportpackage] -sa detection does not work with private PPAs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1106429/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


Re: [Bug 1132929] [NEW] requestsync should redirect users to syncpackage if they have upload rights

2013-02-25 Thread Stefano Rivera
 requestsync should redirect users to syncpackage if they have upload
 rights

It does say: Consider using syncpackage(1) for syncs that do not require
feature freeze exceptions.

I guess it could be louder.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132929

Title:
  requestsync should redirect users to syncpackage if they have upload
  rights

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1132929/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1100660] Re: requestsync fails

2013-01-17 Thread Stefano Rivera
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1099091 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1099091

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1099091
   pull-debian-source crashed with ImportError in __main__: No module named 
devscripts.logger

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1100660

Title:
  requestsync fails

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1100660/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1099537] Re: ubuntu-dev-scripts needs to be ported to Python 3

2013-01-14 Thread Stefano Rivera
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1099091 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1099091

It can't fallow suit, lanuchpadlib doesn't support python3

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1099091
   pull-debian-source crashed with ImportError in __main__: No module named 
devscripts.logger

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1099537

Title:
  ubuntu-dev-scripts needs to be ported to Python 3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1099537/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1055325] Re: submittodebian crashed with TypeError in _execute_child(): coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer, NoneType found

2013-01-12 Thread Stefano Rivera
I need more specific steps than that. Also, what editor do you use?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1055325

Title:
  submittodebian crashed with TypeError in _execute_child(): coercing to
  Unicode: need string or buffer, NoneType found

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1055325/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1058913] Re: requestbackport crashed with CalledProcessError in check_call(): Command '['sensible-editor', '/tmp/requestbackport_YCAzGH.txt']' returned non-zero exit status 1

2013-01-12 Thread Stefano Rivera
It was your editor that crashed, causing requestbackport to crash. I'm
going to mark this as invalid. I suggest you file a bug against your
editor.

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1058913

Title:
  requestbackport crashed with CalledProcessError in check_call():
  Command '['sensible-editor', '/tmp/requestbackport_YCAzGH.txt']'
  returned non-zero exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1058913/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1029620] Re: [seeded-in-ubuntu] lies about non existing binary package

2013-01-12 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029620

Title:
  [seeded-in-ubuntu] lies about non existing binary package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1029620/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1009758] Re: [requestsync] crashed with SSLError in do_handshake(): [Errno 8] _ssl.c:504: EOF occurred in violation of protocol

2013-01-12 Thread Stefano Rivera
Closing this, as I don't see anything useful we could do

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009758

Title:
  [requestsync] crashed with SSLError in do_handshake(): [Errno 8]
  _ssl.c:504: EOF occurred in violation of protocol

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1009758/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1093008] Re: [backportpackage] package failure warning should warn properly if the package argument is not a source package

2013-01-12 Thread Stefano Rivera
The error in the description doesn't seem accurate, the current error
generated is:

backportpackage: Error: The source package 'kleopatra' does not exist in
the Ubuntu primary archive in quantal, quantal-security, quantal-updates
or quantal-proposed

That clearly says source package, as Benjamin suggested it should. So,
I'm going to mark this bug as invalid.

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1093008

Title:
  [backportpackage] package failure warning should warn properly if the
  package argument is not a source package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1093008/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1022472] Re: submittodebian crashed with CalledProcessError in check_call(): Command '['bzr', 'bd', '-S', '--', '-uc', '-us', '-nc']' returned non-zero exit status 3

2013-01-12 Thread Stefano Rivera
How is it acceptable for bzr bd -S to crash?

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022472

Title:
  submittodebian crashed with CalledProcessError in check_call():
  Command '['bzr', 'bd', '-S', '--', '-uc', '-us', '-nc']' returned non-
  zero exit status 3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1022472/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1022193] Re: pull-lp-source crashed with SSLError in do_handshake(): [Errno 8] _ssl.c:504: EOF occurred in violation of protocol

2013-01-12 Thread Stefano Rivera
Can't reproduce it

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022193

Title:
  pull-lp-source crashed with SSLError in do_handshake(): [Errno 8]
  _ssl.c:504: EOF occurred in violation of protocol

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1022193/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1068390] Re: pbuilder-dist dies when there is no development release

2013-01-12 Thread Stefano Rivera
Looks like we already dealt with this, closing.

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #673957
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673957

** Also affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673957
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068390

Title:
  pbuilder-dist dies when there is no development release

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1068390/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1068390] Re: pbuilder-dist dies when there is no development release

2013-01-12 Thread Stefano Rivera
(in 0.142)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068390

Title:
  pbuilder-dist dies when there is no development release

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1068390/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1087194] Re: [mk-sbuild] names cross chroots after build architecture, not target

2013-01-12 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087194

Title:
  [mk-sbuild] names cross chroots after build architecture, not target

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1087194/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1088010] Re: [ubuntu-build] Should default to -proposed

2012-12-12 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088010

Title:
  [ubuntu-build] Should default to -proposed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1088010/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


Re: [Bug 1088010] [NEW] [ubuntu-build] Should default to -proposed

2012-12-08 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Scott (2012.12.08_18:57:42_+0200)
 All the actions that ubuntu-build does should now happen in -proposed of
 the development release, so that should be the default.

A release has to be specified, so is it not reasonable to qualify that
with a pocket? e.g. ubuntu-build foo raring-proposed retry?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088010

Title:
  [ubuntu-build] Should default to -proposed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1088010/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1086342] Re: ubuntu-dev-tools needs to declare dependency to dput

2012-12-04 Thread Stefano Rivera
There is actually a Recommends on dput, and recommends are installed by
default. Still, this should display a more useful error message.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086342

Title:
  ubuntu-dev-tools needs to declare dependency to dput

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1086342/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1086342] Re: ubuntu-dev-tools needs to declare dependency to dput

2012-12-04 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Committed

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086342

Title:
  ubuntu-dev-tools needs to declare dependency to dput

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1086342/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1083688] Re: -k option doesn't work: gpg: skipped Oibaf oi...@oibaf.com: secret key not available

2012-12-03 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1083688

Title:
  -k option doesn't work: gpg: skipped Oibaf oi...@oibaf.com: secret
  key not available

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1083688/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1082452] Re: [pbuilder-dist] should include -proposed on the development release now

2012-12-02 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082452

Title:
  [pbuilder-dist] should include -proposed on the development release
  now

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1082452/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


Re: [Bug 1082452] [NEW] [pbuilder-dist] should include -proposed on the development release now

2012-11-23 Thread Stefano Rivera
 mk-sbuild should be fixed in the same way too

It already is, just forgot about pbuilder-dist.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082452

Title:
  [pbuilder-dist] should include -proposed on the development release
  now

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1082452/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1073060] Re: Inconsistent behavior between syncpackage and requestsync in 0.143ubuntu0.1

2012-11-07 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Also affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073060

Title:
  Inconsistent behavior between syncpackage and requestsync in
  0.143ubuntu0.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1073060/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1069867] Re: syncpackage picks up too many changelog versions when the target is -proposed

2012-11-07 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Also affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069867

Title:
  syncpackage picks up too many changelog versions when the target is
  -proposed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1069867/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1059848] Re: pull-lp-source crashed with ValueError in raw_decode(): Expecting object: line 1 column 5 (char 5)

2012-11-07 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Also affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059848

Title:
  pull-lp-source crashed with ValueError in raw_decode(): Expecting
  object: line 1 column 5 (char 5)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1059848/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 936014] Re: [sponsor-patch] crashed with AssertionError in get_open_ubuntu_bug_task()

2012-11-07 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Also affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936014

Title:
  [sponsor-patch] crashed with AssertionError in
  get_open_ubuntu_bug_task()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/936014/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1073060] Re: Inconsistent behavior between syncpackage and requestsync in 0.143ubuntu0.1

2012-11-06 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Description changed:

- If a package exists in ${DEVELOPMENT_RELEASE}-proposed and
- ${DEVELOPMENT_RELEASE}, syncpackage and requestsync give different
- results.  Syncpackage checks against -proposed be default, while
- requestsync checks against proposed only if a package doesn't exist in
- -release.  At the time I did these requests, 1.1.2-1 was in raring-
- proposed:
+ == SRU ==
+ [IMPACT]
+ requestsync doesn't check proposed, and will include too many changelog 
entries in the bug
+ 
+ [TEST CASE]
+ Find a package like the one in the report, by running this UDD query:
+ 
+ SELECT rp.source, r.version, rp.version, d.release, d.version
+ FROM ubuntu_sources AS rp
+ INNER JOIN ubuntu_sources AS r
+   ON (rp.source = r.source
+   AND rp.version != r.version
+   AND r.release='raring')
+ INNER JOIN sources AS d
+   ON (rp.source = d.source
+   AND rp.version  d.version
+   AND r.version != d.version
+   AND d.release IN ('sid', 'experimental'))
+ WHERE rp.release='raring-proposed';
+ 
+ Run syncpackage and requestsync on it (without actually doing anything).
+ See that the changelogs differ.
+ 
+ == Original Report ==
+ If a package exists in ${DEVELOPMENT_RELEASE}-proposed and 
${DEVELOPMENT_RELEASE}, syncpackage and requestsync give different results.  
Syncpackage checks against -proposed be default, while requestsync checks 
against proposed only if a package doesn't exist in -release.  At the time I 
did these requests, 1.1.2-1 was in raring-proposed:
  
  $ requestsync -d experimental shiboken
  W: Target release missing - assuming raring
  Consider using syncpackage(1) for syncs that do not require feature freeze 
exceptions.
  Currently the bug report looks like:
  Summary (one line):
  Sync shiboken 1.1.2-2 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)
  
  Description:
  Please sync shiboken 1.1.2-2 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)
  
  Changelog entries since current raring version 1.1.1-1:
  
  shiboken (1.1.2-2) experimental; urgency=low
  
-   * Add python{,3}-numpy-dbg to Build-Depends to have all tests pass.
-   * Make dbg tests build-critical.
+   * Add python{,3}-numpy-dbg to Build-Depends to have all tests pass.
+   * Make dbg tests build-critical.
  
-  -- Didier Raboud o...@debian.org  Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:06:19 +0100
+  -- Didier Raboud o...@debian.org  Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:06:19 +0100
  
  shiboken (1.1.2-1) experimental; urgency=low
  
-   * New 1.1.2 Alaursa release.
- - Add 6 1.1.2-specific symbols;
+   * New 1.1.2 Alaursa release.
+ - Add 6 1.1.2-specific symbols;
  
-   * Update B-Ds:
- - add python{,3}-numpy to succeed all tests.
+   * Update B-Ds:
+ - add python{,3}-numpy to succeed all tests.
  
-  -- Didier Raboud o...@debian.org  Tue, 04 Sep 2012 08:47:15 +0200
- 
+  -- Didier Raboud o...@debian.org  Tue, 04 Sep 2012 08:47:15 +0200
  
  Edit [y|N]? ^C
  User abort.
  $ syncpackage -d experimental shiboken
  syncpackage: Source shiboken - raring/Proposed: current version 1.1.2-1, new 
version 1.1.2-2
  syncpackage: New changes:
  shiboken (1.1.2-2) experimental; urgency=low
  
-   * Add python{,3}-numpy-dbg to Build-Depends to have all tests pass.
-   * Make dbg tests build-critical.
+   * Add python{,3}-numpy-dbg to Build-Depends to have all tests pass.
+   * Make dbg tests build-critical.
  
-  -- Didier Raboud o...@debian.org  Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:06:19 +0100
+  -- Didier Raboud o...@debian.org  Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:06:19 +0100
  Sync this package [y|N]? y
  syncpackage: Request succeeded; you should get an e-mail once it is processed.
  
  The syncpackage behavior is the one we want.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073060

Title:
  Inconsistent behavior between syncpackage and requestsync in
  0.143ubuntu0.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1073060/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1059848] Re: pull-lp-source crashed with ValueError in raw_decode(): Expecting object: line 1 column 5 (char 5)

2012-11-06 Thread Stefano Rivera
Verified that pull-lp-source works. This bug currently isn't manifesting
server-side, so that's enough for me.

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059848

Title:
  pull-lp-source crashed with ValueError in raw_decode(): Expecting
  object: line 1 column 5 (char 5)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1059848/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 936014] Re: [sponsor-patch] crashed with AssertionError in get_open_ubuntu_bug_task()

2012-11-06 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936014

Title:
  [sponsor-patch] crashed with AssertionError in
  get_open_ubuntu_bug_task()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/936014/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1073995] Re: requestbackport crashed with HTTPError in __negotiatehttp(): (403, 'Forbidden')

2012-11-01 Thread Stefano Rivera
Can't reproduce this. Looks like it was a transient issue. Please try
again.

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073995

Title:
  requestbackport crashed with HTTPError in __negotiatehttp(): (403,
  'Forbidden')

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1073995/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1069867] Re: syncpackage picks up too many changelog versions when the target is -proposed

2012-10-30 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Description changed:

- raring is likely to start requiring that packages be uploaded to
- -proposed by default.  When syncpackage is used with -r raring-
- proposed, it picks up far too many changelog versions:
+ == SRU ==
+ 
+ [IMPACT]
+ Synpackage didn't understand that the proposed pocket was partial archive on 
top of release, and generated incorrect changelogs.
+ Syncing to -proposed is now the default, so we should handle it correctly.
+ 
+ [Test Case]
+ File syncs against an existing package. It should correlctly report the new 
changelog entries, rather than displaying the entire history.
+ 
+ [Regression Potential]
+ Fairly simple patch, affecting syncpackage and requestsync.
+ 
+ == Bug Report ==
+ raring is likely to start requiring that packages be uploaded to -proposed by 
default.  When syncpackage is used with -r raring-proposed, it picks up far 
too many changelog versions:
  
  syncpackage: Source abcde - raring/Proposed: not in Ubuntu, new version 
2.5.4-1
  syncpackage: New changes:
  abcde (2.5.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
  
-   * New upstream release with bug fixes.
- + Update GPL/FSF headers to match current versions. Thanks to vskytta
-   for the patch. (Closes issue 69).
- + Fix the command line for ID3SYNTAX=eyed3. Thanks to neil.gm.richards
-   for the patch. Closes issue 50.
- + Switch to eyed3 by default for MP3 tagging, as it looks to do UTF-8
-   tagging better. Closes issue 22 (hopefully)
-   * Remove the A  from the beginning of the description to fix a
- lintian warning
+   * New upstream release with bug fixes.
+ + Update GPL/FSF headers to match current versions. Thanks to vskytta
+   for the patch. (Closes issue 69).
+ + Fix the command line for ID3SYNTAX=eyed3. Thanks to neil.gm.richards
+   for the patch. Closes issue 50.
+ + Switch to eyed3 by default for MP3 tagging, as it looks to do UTF-8
+   tagging better. Closes issue 22 (hopefully)
+   * Remove the A  from the beginning of the description to fix a
+ lintian warning
  
-  -- Steve McIntyre 93...@debian.org  Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:22:28 +0100
+  -- Steve McIntyre 93...@debian.org  Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:22:28 +0100
  
  abcde (2.5.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
  
-   * New upstream release with lots of bug fixes.
+   * New upstream release with lots of bug fixes.
  [...]
  
  The previous version in raring was 2.5.3-1.  syncpackage should look in
  the release pocket if there isn't anything in proposed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069867

Title:
  syncpackage picks up too many changelog versions when the target is
  -proposed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1069867/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 936014] Re: [sponsor-patch] crashed with AssertionError in get_open_ubuntu_bug_task()

2012-10-30 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Description changed:

- Tried to sponsor bug 935237, apparently it won't work if there is only
- one task targeted at a specific release.
+ = SRU =
+ [IMPACT]
+ Cannot sponsor uploads for bugs that have been targetted at the development 
release.
+ 
+ [Test Case]
+ Target a bug with a debdiff/branch for raring, at raring, and try to use 
sponsor-patch to sponsor it.
+ 
+ [Regression potential]
+ This code path is only used when sponsor-patch is already confused about 
tasks :)
+ 
+ = Bug Report =
+ Tried to sponsor bug 935237, apparently it won't work if there is only one 
task targeted at a specific release.
  
  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
  Package: ubuntu-dev-tools 0.139
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-16.25-generic 3.2.6
  Uname: Linux 3.2.0-16-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
  ApportVersion: 1.91-0ubuntu1
  Architecture: amd64
  CrashCounter: 1
  Date: Sun Feb 19 09:50:38 2012
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/sponsor-patch
  InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release amd64 (20110426.1)
  InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.7
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/sponsor-patch -B sbuild -k 74DE6624 -s 
-v -w . 935237
  PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/sponsor-patch', '-B', 'sbuild', '-k', '74DE6624', 
'-s', '-v', '-w', '.', '935237']
  SourcePackage: ubuntu-dev-tools
  Title: sponsor-patch crashed with AssertionError in get_open_ubuntu_bug_task()
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2011-11-18 (92 days ago)
  UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare sbuild sudo

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936014

Title:
  [sponsor-patch] crashed with AssertionError in
  get_open_ubuntu_bug_task()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/936014/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1059848] Re: pull-lp-source crashed with ValueError in raw_decode(): Expecting object: line 1 column 5 (char 5)

2012-10-30 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Description changed:

- trying to download mysql-5.5, but mistakenly typed mysql-server I got
- this crash.
+ === SRU ===
+ [IMPACT]
+ We use Debian's DDE service to resolve binary - source packages. 
Occasionally it returns invalid data. We were already protecting against that 
in the almost-identical pull-debian-source, so this simply makes the same 
changes to pull-lp-source.
+ 
+ [Test case]
+ It's currently returning sane data, so this can't be tested. But 
pull-lp-source should still work.
+ 
+ [Regression potential]
+ This code path is only used when the user provided a name that wasn't a 
source package.
+ 
+ === Bug Report ===
+ trying to download mysql-5.5, but mistakenly typed mysql-server I got this 
crash.
  
  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
  Package: ubuntu-dev-tools 0.143
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-16.25-generic 3.5.4
  Uname: Linux 3.5.0-16-generic i686
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu1
  Architecture: i386
  CheckboxSubmission: c4273c0f4f2b8d26cd6bf31cadfd2912
  CheckboxSystem: a871981cb5bdf4d6ebd55be46becf77e
  Date: Mon Oct  1 23:15:49 2012
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/pull-lp-source
  InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.7
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/pull-lp-source mysql-server precise
  PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/pull-lp-source', 'mysql-server', 'precise']
  SourcePackage: ubuntu-dev-tools
  Title: pull-lp-source crashed with ValueError in raw_decode(): Expecting 
object: line 1 column 5 (char 5)
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to quantal on 2008-10-18 (1444 days ago)
  UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip fax floppy fuse lpadmin netdev 
plugdev pulse pulse-access scanner tape users video

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059848

Title:
  pull-lp-source crashed with ValueError in raw_decode(): Expecting
  object: line 1 column 5 (char 5)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1059848/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1069867] Re: syncpackage picks up too many changelog versions when the target is -proposed

2012-10-29 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Also affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069867

Title:
  syncpackage picks up too many changelog versions when the target is
  -proposed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1069867/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1059848] Re: pull-lp-source crashed with ValueError in raw_decode(): Expecting object: line 1 column 5 (char 5)

2012-10-29 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Also affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059848

Title:
  pull-lp-source crashed with ValueError in raw_decode(): Expecting
  object: line 1 column 5 (char 5)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1059848/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 936014] Re: [sponsor-patch] crashed with AssertionError in get_open_ubuntu_bug_task()

2012-10-29 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Also affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936014

Title:
  [sponsor-patch] crashed with AssertionError in
  get_open_ubuntu_bug_task()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/936014/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1069867] Re: syncpackage picks up too many changelog versions when the target is -proposed

2012-10-22 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069867

Title:
  syncpackage picks up too many changelog versions when the target is
  -proposed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1069867/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1059848] Re: pull-lp-source crashed with ValueError in raw_decode(): Expecting object: line 1 column 5 (char 5)

2012-10-17 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Information type changed from Private to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059848

Title:
  pull-lp-source crashed with ValueError in raw_decode(): Expecting
  object: line 1 column 5 (char 5)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1059848/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1055325] Re: submittodebian crashed with TypeError in _execute_child(): coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer, NoneType found

2012-10-17 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Information type changed from Private to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1055325

Title:
  submittodebian crashed with TypeError in _execute_child(): coercing to
  Unicode: need string or buffer, NoneType found

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1055325/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1055325] Re: submittodebian crashed with TypeError in _execute_child(): coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer, NoneType found

2012-10-17 Thread Stefano Rivera
I'm afraid, I can't figure this out from the traceback. Some more
information would be useful:

Can you reproduce this? If so, how?
What editor do you use?

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1055325

Title:
  submittodebian crashed with TypeError in _execute_child(): coercing to
  Unicode: need string or buffer, NoneType found

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1055325/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1059848] Re: pull-lp-source crashed with ValueError in raw_decode(): Expecting object: line 1 column 5 (char 5)

2012-10-17 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Committed

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Medium = Low

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059848

Title:
  pull-lp-source crashed with ValueError in raw_decode(): Expecting
  object: line 1 column 5 (char 5)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1059848/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1029620] Re: [seeded-in-ubuntu] lies about non existing binary package

2012-10-17 Thread Stefano Rivera
Checking if it existed would require a separate call to LP. It's simpler
to just not do that. We could change the message to say that it isn't
seeded and/or may not exist...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029620

Title:
  [seeded-in-ubuntu] lies about non existing binary package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1029620/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1019887] Re: requestsync crashed with KeyError in __getitem__(): 'hostname'

2012-10-17 Thread Stefano Rivera
Don't know where the 'hostname' came from. But not from the sources

$ bzr log -p requestsync | grep hostname
$

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1019887

Title:
  requestsync crashed with KeyError in __getitem__(): 'hostname'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1019887/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1019896] Re: requestbackport crashed with KeyError in __getitem__(): 'hostname'

2012-10-17 Thread Stefano Rivera
And again. Don't know where the 'hostname' came from. I suspect you've
modified your requsestbackport fairly brokenly...

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1019896

Title:
  requestbackport crashed with KeyError in __getitem__(): 'hostname'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1019896/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1037488] Re: syncpackage crashed with EOFError in ask()

2012-10-08 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1037488

Title:
  syncpackage crashed with EOFError in ask()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1037488/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 936014] Re: [sponsor-patch] crashed with AssertionError in get_open_ubuntu_bug_task()

2012-10-07 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936014

Title:
  [sponsor-patch] crashed with AssertionError in
  get_open_ubuntu_bug_task()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/936014/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1037488] Re: syncpackage crashed with EOFError in ask()

2012-10-07 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1037488

Title:
  syncpackage crashed with EOFError in ask()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1037488/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1036966] Re: syncpackage crashed with SSLError in do_handshake(): [Errno 8] _ssl.c:504: EOF occurred in violation of protocol

2012-10-07 Thread Stefano Rivera
I really doubt there is much we can do here. Looks like a network issue.

** Visibility changed to: Public

** This bug has been flagged as a security vulnerability

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1036966

Title:
  syncpackage crashed with SSLError in do_handshake(): [Errno 8]
  _ssl.c:504: EOF occurred in violation of protocol

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1036966/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1042754] Re: syncpackage: fails with JSON error in chroot

2012-08-29 Thread Stefano Rivera
Which package? This was a change in python-keyring, and your bug is
failed against ubuntu-dev-tools.

Looking at the source, it should have manually migrated your keyring:

https://bitbucket.org/kang/python-keyring-
lib/src/6e6fa0815446/keyring/backend.py#cl-548

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042754

Title:
  syncpackage: fails with JSON error in chroot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1042754/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1042754] Re: syncpackage: fails with JSON error in chroot

2012-08-28 Thread Stefano Rivera
Sounds like you need to delete and recreate the credential file.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042754

Title:
  syncpackage: fails with JSON error in chroot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1042754/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1041504] Re: syncpackage: ValueError: IV must be 16 bytes long

2012-08-25 Thread Stefano Rivera
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1004845 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004845

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1004845
   python-keyring CryptedFileKeyring is insecure (was: doesn't work with 
python-crypto 2.6-1 (ValueError: IV must be 16 bytes long))

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041504

Title:
  syncpackage: ValueError: IV must be 16 bytes long

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1041504/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1029155] Re: [seeded-in-ubuntu] not working on precise

2012-07-26 Thread Stefano Rivera
It should say source package

** Summary changed:

- [seeded-in-ubuntu] not working on precise
+ [seeded-in-ubuntu] should be clearer that it takes a source package

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029155

Title:
  [seeded-in-ubuntu] should be clearer that it takes a source package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1029155/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1021917] [NEW] [submittodebian]'s update-maintainer reversal isn't always the right thing to do

2012-07-06 Thread Stefano Rivera
Public bug reported:

When submitting a patch from an Ubuntu upload that superseded an Ubuntu
upload, reversing update-maintainer doesn't improve the patch. In fact,
it has the opposite effect.

So, a little more intelligence is required...

** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021917

Title:
  [submittodebian]'s update-maintainer reversal isn't always the right
  thing to do

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1021917/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


Re: [Bug 1019817] [NEW] submittodebian not working in Quantal

2012-07-02 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Jeremy (2012.07.01_18:19:12_+0200)
 Building the package in 
 /home/jeremy/devel/test/openconnect/build-area/network-manager-openconnect-0.9.4.0,
  using sbuild -A -d quantal-amd64 -uc -us -nc -S
 Unknown option: u
...
 subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['bzr', 'bd', '-S', '--', '-uc', 
 '-us', '-nc']' returned non-zero exit status

Your bzr is configured to use sbuild when doing source builds? That
seems crazy, or am I missing something?
How do you usually source build in a bzr branch?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1019817

Title:
  submittodebian not working in Quantal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1019817/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


Re: [Bug 1019817] Re: submittodebian not working in Quantal

2012-07-02 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Jeremy (2012.07.02_18:39:32_+0200)
 builder = sbuild -A -d quantal-amd64
 quick-builder = debuild -S -sa

Looking at the documentation, I see we only have builder and
quick-builder, not a dedicated source builder.
So the appropriate thing to do here is to specify
--builder=dpkg-buildpackage on our command line.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1019817

Title:
  [submittodebian] not working with custom bzr builddeb builder

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1019817/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1019817] Re: submittodebian not working in Quantal

2012-07-02 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Fix Committed

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Low

** Summary changed:

- submittodebian not working in Quantal
+ submittodebian not working with custom bzr builddeb builder

** Summary changed:

- submittodebian not working with custom bzr builddeb builder
+ [submittodebian] not working with custom bzr builddeb builder

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1019817

Title:
  [submittodebian] not working with custom bzr builddeb builder

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1019817/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 992739] Re: [backportpackage] fails if no GPG present

2012-06-20 Thread Stefano Rivera
* or install it from the PPA: https://launchpad.net/~udt-
developers/+archive/daily

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/992739

Title:
  [backportpackage] fails if no GPG present

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/992739/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1014669] Re: [mk-sbuild] fails to find source image during chroot creation

2012-06-20 Thread Stefano Rivera
Already fixed in trunk. I'll close this bug in the changelog...

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Committed

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014669

Title:
  [mk-sbuild] fails to find source image during chroot creation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1014669/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1015066] Re: [submittodebian] fails with Version number suggests Ubuntu changes, but Maintainer: does not have Ubuntu address unless DEBEMAIL overridden

2012-06-20 Thread Stefano Rivera
 Not sure what the rationale for changing this was

So that we could reverse update-maintainer before building the source
package.

This sounds like a relative of LP: #1007042. I'll take the same
approach.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015066

Title:
  [submittodebian] fails with Version number suggests Ubuntu changes,
  but Maintainer: does not have Ubuntu address unless DEBEMAIL
  overridden

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1015066/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1015066] Re: [submittodebian] fails with Version number suggests Ubuntu changes, but Maintainer: does not have Ubuntu address unless DEBEMAIL overridden

2012-06-20 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015066

Title:
  [submittodebian] fails with Version number suggests Ubuntu changes,
  but Maintainer: does not have Ubuntu address unless DEBEMAIL
  overridden

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1015066/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1010951] Re: [requestsync] crashed with AssertionError in rmadison()

2012-06-20 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010951

Title:
  [requestsync] crashed with AssertionError in rmadison()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1010951/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1008783] Re: [seeded-in-ubuntu] crashed with IOError in _read_eof(): CRC check failed 0x282b98f1 != 0xdff779cL

2012-06-20 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008783

Title:
  [seeded-in-ubuntu] crashed with IOError in _read_eof(): CRC check
  failed 0x282b98f1 != 0xdff779cL

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1008783/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1007564] Re: [backportpackage] undocumented --key, --dont-sign options

2012-06-20 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007564

Title:
  [backportpackage] undocumented --key, --dont-sign options

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1007564/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1005834] Re: [submittodebian] UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\u2192' in position 555: ordinal not in range(128)

2012-06-20 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005834

Title:
  [submittodebian] UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode
  character u'\u2192' in position 555: ordinal not in range(128)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1005834/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 999727] Re: [backportpackage] -v and -m options don't work

2012-06-20 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/999727

Title:
  [backportpackage] -v and -m options don't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/999727/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1011870] Re: [pbuilder-dist] wheezy-updates does not exist

2012-06-19 Thread Stefano Rivera
This sounds like a variant of LP: #993006

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011870

Title:
  [pbuilder-dist] wheezy-updates does not exist

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1011870/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1011870] Re: [pbuilder-dist] wheezy-updates does not exist

2012-06-19 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011870

Title:
  [pbuilder-dist] wheezy-updates does not exist

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1011870/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1007042] Re: [backportpackage] errors out on packages with no ubuntu revision

2012-06-18 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007042

Title:
  [backportpackage] errors out on packages with no ubuntu revision

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1007042/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1010951] Re: requestsync crashed with AssertionError in rmadison()

2012-06-09 Thread Stefano Rivera
The server behind Debian's rmadison is currently down for maintainance

https://lists.debian.org/debian-infrastructure-
announce/2012/06/msg0.html

Error could obviously be improved :)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010951

Title:
  requestsync crashed with AssertionError in rmadison()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1010951/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1009758] Re: requestsync crashed with SSLError in do_handshake(): [Errno 8] _ssl.c:504: EOF occurred in violation of protocol

2012-06-06 Thread Stefano Rivera
 it's *possible* that this crash was caused by an interrupted SSL
handshake.

Yes, that's what I'd put my money on.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009758

Title:
  requestsync crashed with SSLError in do_handshake(): [Errno 8]
  _ssl.c:504: EOF occurred in violation of protocol

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1009758/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1008783] Re: seeded-in-ubuntu crashed with IOError in _read_eof(): CRC check failed 0x282b98f1 != 0xdff779cL

2012-06-05 Thread Stefano Rivera
Yeah, we could make it handle broken data a little better.

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid = Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008783

Title:
  seeded-in-ubuntu crashed with IOError in _read_eof(): CRC check failed
  0x282b98f1 != 0xdff779cL

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1008783/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1008783] Re: seeded-in-ubuntu crashed with IOError in _read_eof(): CRC check failed 0x282b98f1 != 0xdff779cL

2012-06-04 Thread Stefano Rivera
Works for me.

Try deleting ~/.cache/ubuntu-dev-tools/seeded.json.gz and trying again.

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008783

Title:
  seeded-in-ubuntu crashed with IOError in _read_eof(): CRC check failed
  0x282b98f1 != 0xdff779cL

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1008783/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1008021] Re: [backportpackage] backportpackage errors out on packages with no Ubuntu revision

2012-06-03 Thread Stefano Rivera
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1007042 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007042

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1007042
   [backportpackage] fails but worked last week

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008021

Title:
  [backportpackage] backportpackage errors out on packages with no
  Ubuntu revision

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1008021/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


Re: [Bug 1007042] [NEW] [backportpackage] fails but worked last week

2012-06-01 Thread Stefano Rivera
subscribe ubuntu-backporters

Hi Jeremy (2012.05.31_20:04:33_+0200)
 This worked last week, but now fails. I'm filing against ubuntu-dev-
 tools since I know that just got an update this week.

It's fallout from the backport version schema change.

The versions are now ~ubuntu12.04.1 instead of ~precise1 (as code names
are due to wrap in the foreseeable future)

That matches some code in the Ubuntu Vendor plugin to dpkg-source that
looks for ubuntu in the version without @ubuntu.com in the Maintainer.

This can be lowered from an error to a warning by un-exporting DEBEMAIL.

Or we could update the maintainer field of backports. But that's up to
the backporters.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007042

Title:
  [backportpackage] fails but worked last week

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1007042/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1004579] Re: pbuilder-dist overwrite OTHERMIRROR set in ~/.pbuilderrc

2012-05-30 Thread Stefano Rivera
This one is mostly by design. I don't see any straightforward solution
for it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004579

Title:
  pbuilder-dist overwrite OTHERMIRROR set in ~/.pbuilderrc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1004579/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1004579] Re: pbuilder-dist overwrite OTHERMIRROR set in ~/.pbuilderrc

2012-05-30 Thread Stefano Rivera
Oh, sorry, wrong bug. I thought it was another one about othermirror,
where the proposed patch didn't do anything useful.

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004579

Title:
  pbuilder-dist overwrite OTHERMIRROR set in ~/.pbuilderrc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1004579/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1004579] Re: pbuilder-dist overwrite OTHERMIRROR set in ~/.pbuilderrc

2012-05-28 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004579

Title:
  pbuilder-dist overwrite OTHERMIRROR set in ~/.pbuilderrc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1004579/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 999727] Re: [backportpackage] -v and -m options don't work

2012-05-28 Thread Stefano Rivera
metavars are things that are displayed in help.

parser.add_option('-v', '--version', metavar='VERSION', help='Package
version to backport (or verify)')

will store any provided value in opts.version (from the long option
name).

So, both -v and -m should have effects.


** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/999727

Title:
  [backportpackage] -v and -m options don't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/999727/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1004579] Re: pbuilder-dist overwrite OTHERMIRROR set in ~/.pbuilderrc

2012-05-26 Thread Stefano Rivera
pbuilder-dist will respect an OTHERMIRROR variable from the environment,
if you need to add a mirror. It sounds like you are working around LP:
#371221, so we should rather just fix that.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004579

Title:
  pbuilder-dist overwrite OTHERMIRROR set in ~/.pbuilderrc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1004579/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 1002999] Re: [sponsor-patch/update-maintainer] Failing when maintainer already is correctly set

2012-05-25 Thread Stefano Rivera
Fallout from my submittodebian patch (LP: #902233)

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Committed

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Stefano Rivera (stefanor)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1002999

Title:
  [sponsor-patch/update-maintainer] Failing when maintainer already is
  correctly set

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1002999/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 986108] [NEW] reverse-depends usability

2012-04-20 Thread Stefano Rivera
Public bug reported:

Two requests:
* combined reverse Deps and Build-Deps.
* be clearer that it works on binary packages unless src: is specified

11:16  infinity tumbleweed: This is just a documentation issue, apparently.
11:17  infinity tumbleweed: Or, it's an I can't read issue.
11:17  tumbleweed probably needs to say binary package so that it's more
obvious what the problem is
11:17  infinity tumbleweed: src is there in help, just cleverly hidden in the
  middle of my terminal.
11:20  infinity tumbleweed: Okay, then once we get over my inability to read,
  I think my only remaining complaint is that I need to run 
  it twice.
11:21  infinity tumbleweed: Since I can't seem to get it to give me both
  rdeps and rbdeps together.

** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Wishlist
 Status: Triaged

** Description changed:

  11:16  infinity tumbleweed: This is just a documentation issue, apparently.
  11:17  infinity tumbleweed: Or, it's an I can't read issue.
- 11:17  tumbleweed probably needs to say binary package so that it's more 
- obvious what the problem is
- 11:17  infinity tumbleweed: src is there in help, just cleverly hidden in 
the 
-   middle of my terminal.
- 11:20  infinity tumbleweed: Okay, then once we get over my inability to 
read, 
-   I think my only remaining complaint is that I need to run 
it 
-   twice.
- 11:21  infinity tumbleweed: Since I can't seem to get it to give me both 
-   rdeps and rbdeps together.
+ 11:17  tumbleweed probably needs to say binary package so that it's more
+ obvious what the problem is
+ 11:17  infinity tumbleweed: src is there in help, just cleverly hidden in 
the
+   middle of my terminal.
+ 11:20  infinity tumbleweed: Okay, then once we get over my inability to 
read,
+   I think my only remaining complaint is that I need to run it
+   twice.
+ 11:21  infinity tumbleweed: Since I can't seem to get it to give me both
+   rdeps and rbdeps together.

** Description changed:

+ Two requests:
+ * combined reverse Deps and Build-Deps.
+ * be clearer that it works on binary packages unless src: is specified
+ 
  11:16  infinity tumbleweed: This is just a documentation issue, apparently.
  11:17  infinity tumbleweed: Or, it's an I can't read issue.
  11:17  tumbleweed probably needs to say binary package so that it's more
  obvious what the problem is
  11:17  infinity tumbleweed: src is there in help, just cleverly hidden in 
the
    middle of my terminal.
  11:20  infinity tumbleweed: Okay, then once we get over my inability to 
read,
-   I think my only remaining complaint is that I need to run it
-   twice.
+   I think my only remaining complaint is that I need to run   
it twice.
  11:21  infinity tumbleweed: Since I can't seem to get it to give me both
    rdeps and rbdeps together.

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Wishlist

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986108

Title:
  reverse-depends usability

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/986108/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 979849] Re: [syncpackage] --no-lp option requires authorization

2012-04-12 Thread Stefano Rivera
Ack

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Triaged

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979849

Title:
  [syncpackage] --no-lp option requires authorization

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/979849/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 979845] Re: requestsync crashed with BadStatusLine in _read_status(): ''

2012-04-12 Thread Stefano Rivera
Not too much we can do about things like this except fail with an error
that isn't a crash.

** Visibility changed to: Public

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979845

Title:
  requestsync crashed with BadStatusLine in _read_status(): ''

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/979845/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 980048] Re: seeded-in-ubuntu crashed with IOError in get_password()

2012-04-12 Thread Stefano Rivera
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 783991 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/783991

These happen regularly with python-keyring. We don't know why :/

** Visibility changed to: Public

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 783991
   [requestsync] crashed with IOError in get_password()

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/980048

Title:
  seeded-in-ubuntu crashed with IOError in get_password()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/980048/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 970626] Re: pull-debian-source crashed with ValueError in rmadison(): need more than 1 value to unpack

2012-04-12 Thread Stefano Rivera
I haven't seen this, and can't reproduce it. You sure you don't have
some custom rmadison configuration that's screwing with this?

** Visibility changed to: Public

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/970626

Title:
  pull-debian-source crashed with ValueError in rmadison(): need more
  than 1 value to unpack

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/970626/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 979117] Re: dgetlp crashes

2012-04-11 Thread Stefano Rivera
Switching to Python3 doesn't magically remove all unicode issues in
Python code.

The first bug here is that dgetlp doesn't know about xz files, and a
bunch of other things.

The second one is that error message printing won't work in non-UTF-8
locales.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979117

Title:
  dgetlp crashes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/979117/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 964731] Re: pull-debian-source wildcard support

2012-03-28 Thread Stefano Rivera
Handling wildcards is non-trivial. It requires package lists.

But the crash is easy enough.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964731

Title:
  pull-debian-source wildcard support

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/964731/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 964731] Re: pull-debian-source wildcard support

2012-03-28 Thread Stefano Rivera
Committed an error message for parse failures in rev 1299.

Enrico is fixing the bug in DDE that caused it to return unparseable
JSON.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964731

Title:
  pull-debian-source wildcard support

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/964731/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 885514] Re: backportpackage should prompt to cleanup directories from past build failures

2012-03-28 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = Stefano Rivera (stefanor)

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885514

Title:
  backportpackage should prompt to cleanup directories from past build
  failures

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/885514/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 691897] Re: [backportpackage] detect if orig.tar.gz upload needed

2012-03-28 Thread Stefano Rivera
there isn't a listing on +files, but we could do a HEAD request on the
expecetd file name.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691897

Title:
  [backportpackage] detect if orig.tar.gz upload needed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/691897/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 693217] Re: [backportpackage] please support UPLOAD configuration variable

2012-03-28 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Stefano Rivera (stefanor)

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693217

Title:
  [backportpackage] please support UPLOAD configuration variable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/693217/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 935643] Re: requestsync: Does not set non-free packages in multiverse

2012-03-28 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Stefano Rivera (stefanor)

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Fix Committed

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/935643

Title:
  requestsync: Does not set non-free packages in multiverse

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/935643/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 964731] Re: pull-debian-source wildcard support

2012-03-28 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Medium = Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964731

Title:
  pull-debian-source wildcard support

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/964731/+subscriptions

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


  1   2   3   4   >