[Bug 1029155] Re: [seeded-in-ubuntu] should be clearer that it takes a source package
This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-dev-tools - 0.144 --- ubuntu-dev-tools (0.144) experimental; urgency=low [ Stefano Rivera ] * Upload to experimental, due to the freeze * submittodebian: - Use dpkg-buildpackage instead of debuild. It really doesn't need to run lintian twice. - Use --include instead of --attach when not using reportbug's internal MUA. * submittodebian, sponsor-patch: - Pass --builder=dpkg-buildpackage to bzr bd, in case the user has configured a custom builder that doesn't do source builds (LP: #1019817) * seeded-in-ubuntu Inform the user when we couldn't determine binary packages built by a source package, as it most recently FTBFS. * requestbackport: - Avoid duplicate Reverse-Build-Deps when sources build binaries of the same name. - Explain that backports aren't to fix bugs. * sponsor-patch: Don't fall over bugs targetted at the development release (LP: #936014) * ubuntutools.question: Catch EOF and SIGINT on all input and bail out. (LP: #1037488) * pull-lp-source: Catch errors parsing JSON we got from DDE (LP: #1059848) * syncpackage, requestsync: Check the Release pocket if we can't find an Ubuntu package in the requested pocket. (LP: #1069867) [ Benjamin Drung ] * seeded-in-ubuntu: State in error message that it takes a source package. (LP: #1029155) * sponsor-patch: Fix crash if Debian patch contains a slash. [ Colin Watson ] * syncpackage: Default to current_series-proposed. -- Stefano Rivera stefa...@debian.org Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:02:29 +0100 ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029155 Title: [seeded-in-ubuntu] should be clearer that it takes a source package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1029155/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1029155] Re: [seeded-in-ubuntu] should be clearer that it takes a source package
Why not allowing binary package checks? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029155 Title: [seeded-in-ubuntu] should be clearer that it takes a source package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1029155/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
Re: [Bug 1029155] Re: [seeded-in-ubuntu] should be clearer that it takes a source package
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 02:40:29PM -, Benjamin Drung wrote: Why not allowing binary package checks? It does, with -b. It makes sense to operate primarily on source packges though, since that is what you upload. I'm undecided as to whether falling back to binaries in case the supplied package name is not found is a good idea. -- Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ] Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ] Ubuntu Developer [ la...@ubuntu.com ] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029155 Title: [seeded-in-ubuntu] should be clearer that it takes a source package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1029155/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
Re: [Bug 1029155] Re: [seeded-in-ubuntu] should be clearer that it takes a source package
On Thursday, July 26, 2012 02:40:29 PM you wrote: Why not allowing binary package checks? Agreed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029155 Title: [seeded-in-ubuntu] should be clearer that it takes a source package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1029155/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1029155] Re: [seeded-in-ubuntu] should be clearer that it takes a source package
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu-dev-tools -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029155 Title: [seeded-in-ubuntu] should be clearer that it takes a source package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1029155/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1029155] Re: [seeded-in-ubuntu] should be clearer that it takes a source package
$ seeded-in-ubuntu python-rpy seeded-in-ubuntu: Error: The source package 'python-rpy' does not exist in the Ubuntu primary archive in quantal, quantal-security, quantal-updates or quantal-proposed ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029155 Title: [seeded-in-ubuntu] should be clearer that it takes a source package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1029155/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1029155] Re: [seeded-in-ubuntu] should be clearer that it takes a source package
I disagree with this solution. We don't put sources in seeds. We put binaries. I ought to be able to feed it a binary package and it should tell me if any binaries from the source that builds that binary are seeded. It's not that hard to to and it saves the developer from having to either retry if they know the source package or go look it up if they don't. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029155 Title: [seeded-in-ubuntu] should be clearer that it takes a source package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1029155/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 1029155] Re: [seeded-in-ubuntu] should be clearer that it takes a source package
What's the use case for the requested behavior? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029155 Title: [seeded-in-ubuntu] should be clearer that it takes a source package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1029155/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
Re: [Bug 1029155] Re: [seeded-in-ubuntu] should be clearer that it takes a source package
The use case is when I'm thinking about if something is on an image, the question is about a particular binary. The broader question I'm usually trying to answer is can I upload this now which translates to are any of the binaries from this source seeded. Using source packages assume the developer has already done the mental translation from a binary to a source and they don't always (as my bug report indicates). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029155 Title: [seeded-in-ubuntu] should be clearer that it takes a source package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1029155/+subscriptions -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
