[Bug 337301] Re: FFe: Update to 2.6.3

2009-03-18 Thread Martin Pitt
GMA945 (Dell Latitude D430): UXA still works fine, basically unchanged
from previous versions. I still get some fading artifacts in compiz, but
otherwise works okay.

EXA still by and large works as well, but I get one regression: When I
start glxgears and try to move the window, the original window content
is snapshot at the old position, and the windows underneath don't
redraw. I have to switch workspaces back and forth to repair it.

-- 
FFe:  Update to 2.6.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337301
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 337301] Re: FFe: Update to 2.6.3

2009-03-18 Thread Achim
Bryce,

do we have to wait for an kernel update to get better performance?
In Ioquake3 I get in Intrepid 87 FPS and in Jaunty 11 FPS w/o DRI2. (Resolution 
640x480).
compiz is also very slow, not really usable.

Maybe this bug is related to the problem?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/341363

My System:
Dell Inspiron6400L

linux-generic:
  Installed: 2.6.28.10.10
  Candidate: 2.6.28.10.10
  Version table:
 *** 2.6.28.10.10 0
500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/restricted Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS,
943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)

-- 
FFe:  Update to 2.6.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337301
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 337301] Re: FFe: Update to 2.6.3

2009-03-18 Thread Bryce Harrington
@Martin, that glxgears thing is not a regression but rather is the old
no redirected indirect rendering bug that has been there since we
first adopted Compiz, and that DRI2 (and UXA) was introduced to fix.

@Achim, Compiz performance was fine for me when I tested for this
upload.

-- 
FFe:  Update to 2.6.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337301
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 337301] Re: FFe: Update to 2.6.3

2009-03-17 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Summary changed:

- Update to 2.6.3?
+ FFe:  Update to 2.6.3

-- 
FFe:  Update to 2.6.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337301
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 337301] Re: FFe: Update to 2.6.3

2009-03-17 Thread Bryce Harrington
slangasek, brief summary from the release notes:


2.6.2: Here comes a pretty significant bugfix release for the 2.6 2D series.
The goal of this release is to get out the major fixes for GEM and KMS
that we think we've pounded on enough to be stable -- certainly more
stable than previously.  Notable fixes include a significant BO memory
usage reduction (which many have suffered from with compositing),
textured XV support with KMS, and rotation support with KMS.  Some
infrequent failure to render/xv with GEM on 965 (dmesg warnings about
being unable to bind objects) should also be fixed. 

But perhaps the exciting thing for most people will be the dynamic front
buffer allocation.  We nearly slipped this into 2.6.0, but decided that
it was just a little too new.  Well, turns out it was actually in good
shape, and it's time to get it out there.  You'll need UXA to do this.


2.6.3: This is an easy one: two bugfixes for regressions in the last release.
One broke initialization with UXA and DRI1, and the other made pixmap
allocation on i915 take insane amounts of memory.


** Description changed:

- Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel
+ [description]
  
- At least from what I've read in the mailing list, the 2.6.3 release of intel 
drivers should provide a good number of bugfixes over 2.6.1, the one present in 
jaunty's repositories.
- I'm wondering if it is the case to update, since it also requires libdrm 
2.4.5.
+ At least from what I've read in the mailing list, the 2.6.3 release of
+ intel drivers should provide a good number of bugfixes over 2.6.1, the
+ one present in jaunty's repositories.
+ 
+ 2.6.2/2.6.3 are significant bug fix releases, incorporating many fixes
+ to GEM/DRI2/UXA as well as a number of more general bugs and performance
+ issues.
+ 
+ Bringing our -intel up closer to the latest upstream stable release also
+ makes it easier to get support from upstream; 2.6.1 is too old and
+ they're just asking bug reporters to re-test against newer versions,
+ which is hampering efforts to get additional fixes backported for
+ jaunty.
+ 
+ Upstream for -intel is advocating UXA as a solution to a wide variety of
+ bugs and problems that we're seeing in the distribution currently.  Our
+ testing found that UXA as of 2.6.1 was far too unstable to consider
+ turning on as default so could not consider that as an option.
+ Supposedly, the fixes in 2.6.3 will open UXA as an option for us, that
+ may solve a wide range of issues.  However, we want to gain testing on
+ this by the wider community before biting the bullet and switching.  So
+ having this 2.6.3 release in Jaunty beta will help enable us to do this
+ testing.
+ 
+ [changelog]
+ 2.6.2:  http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2009-February/044003.html
+ 2.6.3:  http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2009-March/044186.html
+ 
+ [testing]
+ I (bryce) have built the package locally in a pbuilder environment, installed 
and tested against EXA both with and without compiz, and running my XSmoke test 
(which covers basic video, opengl, and resolution switching).

** Description changed:

  [description]
- 
- At least from what I've read in the mailing list, the 2.6.3 release of
- intel drivers should provide a good number of bugfixes over 2.6.1, the
- one present in jaunty's repositories.
+ At least from what I've read in the mailing list, the 2.6.3 release of intel 
drivers should provide a good number of bugfixes over 2.6.1, the one present in 
jaunty's repositories.
  
  2.6.2/2.6.3 are significant bug fix releases, incorporating many fixes
  to GEM/DRI2/UXA as well as a number of more general bugs and performance
  issues.
  
- Bringing our -intel up closer to the latest upstream stable release also
- makes it easier to get support from upstream; 2.6.1 is too old and
- they're just asking bug reporters to re-test against newer versions,
- which is hampering efforts to get additional fixes backported for
- jaunty.
+ [rationale]
+ Bringing our -intel up closer to the latest upstream stable release also 
makes it easier to get support from upstream; 2.6.1 is too old and they're just 
asking bug reporters to re-test against newer versions, which is hampering 
efforts to get additional fixes backported for jaunty.
  
  Upstream for -intel is advocating UXA as a solution to a wide variety of
  bugs and problems that we're seeing in the distribution currently.  Our
  testing found that UXA as of 2.6.1 was far too unstable to consider
  turning on as default so could not consider that as an option.
  Supposedly, the fixes in 2.6.3 will open UXA as an option for us, that
  may solve a wide range of issues.  However, we want to gain testing on
  this by the wider community before biting the bullet and switching.  So
  having this 2.6.3 release in Jaunty beta will help enable us to do this
  testing.
  
  [changelog]
  2.6.2:  http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2009-February/044003.html
  2.6.3:  

[Bug 337301] Re: FFe: Update to 2.6.3

2009-03-17 Thread Bryce Harrington
2.6.3 is now uploaded for testing with -beta.

** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Bryce Harrington (bryceharrington)
   Status: Triaged = Fix Committed

-- 
FFe:  Update to 2.6.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337301
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 337301] Re: FFe: Update to 2.6.3

2009-03-17 Thread Steve Langasek
FFe granted.  Let's get this in ASAP so that it's in good shape for
beta.

-- 
FFe:  Update to 2.6.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337301
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 337301] Re: FFe: Update to 2.6.3

2009-03-17 Thread Bryce Harrington
Thanks; uploaded to jaunty.

** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
FFe:  Update to 2.6.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337301
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


Re: [Bug 337301] Re: FFe: Update to 2.6.3

2009-03-17 Thread Andrea Cimitan
works fine here

-- 
FFe:  Update to 2.6.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337301
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs


[Bug 337301] Re: FFe: Update to 2.6.3

2009-03-17 Thread Sarah Hobbs
Works well here too.

-- 
FFe:  Update to 2.6.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337301
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

-- 
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs