Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] Community Squeeze OS F19 Release 1

2014-02-12 Thread Triode

JackOfAll wrote: 
> Remote control
> 
> Said I'd come back to you on remotes I've got 6 MCE remotes now.
> LOL. The one I want to talk about is this one
> [image: http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41i%2BwsjHRKL.jpg]
> 
> 'GMYLE® Windows 7 Vista XP Media Center MCE PC Remote Control and
> Infrared Receiver for Home, Premium and Ultimate Edition'
> (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Windows-Control-Infrared-Receiver-Ultimate/dp/B003ZV3J72).
> 

I have one of these now.  Using the supplied dongle it looks like we can
get the key codes, but we will need to patch sdl to process them and
then patch jivelite.  The one thing i notice is that although there is a
separate play and pause button, they both send the same code.  Is this
something you notice when using flirc with it?  I think this may be an
annoyance when using as a squeezebox controller..?  Any views?

Interested if others have MCE remotes which we can validate if they do
the same thing?



Triode's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=99395

___
unix mailing list
unix@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix


Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] Howto: build a self-contained LMS

2014-02-12 Thread gharris999

Cabal2002 wrote: 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for this tutorial but it's not working for me :(
> The buildme.sh script failed building DBD-SQLite-1.34_01. So i modified
> the script and DBD-SQLite-1.38_05 went through. But now when i try to
> run slimserver.pl I get this error:
> 
> > 
Code:

  >   > DBD::SQLite object version 1.38_05 does not match bootstrap parameter 
1.34_01 at 
/opt/perl-5.14.2-LMS/lib/5.14.2/i686-linux-thread-multi/DynaLoader.pm line 213.

> > 
> 
> What am I missing:confused:
> 
> Regards Cabal
> 
> NOTE TO SELF:
> libstdc++-v3 was missing and this caused DBD-SQLite-1.34_01 build to
> fail. LMS-7.7.3 is now up and running with Perl 5.14.4
The version number '1.34_01' is hard-coded into CPAN/DBD/SQLite.pm at
line 13.  You could try editing that file and putting in the new version
number.



gharris999's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=115
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=99648

___
unix mailing list
unix@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix


Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] Community Squeeze OS F19 Release 1

2014-02-12 Thread slackhead

I'm just catching up with the updates from last few days.  Is the
following anything to worry about?


Code:


  [root@wandboard ~]# csos-cleanInstall-testing squeeze-web-gui-ROOT 
squeeze-web-gui-httpd
  Loaded plugins: langpacks
  Cleaning repos: community-squeeze community-squeeze-testing
  4 metadata files removed
  4 sqlite files removed
  0 metadata files removed
  Loaded plugins: langpacks
  community-squeeze  | 2.9 
kB  00:00:00
  community-squeeze-testing  | 2.9 
kB  00:00:00
  (1/2): community-squeeze-testing/19/armhfp/primary_db  | 9.5 
kB  00:00:00
  (2/2): community-squeeze/19/armhfp/primary_db  |  73 
kB  00:00:00
  Resolving Dependencies
  --> Running transaction check
  ---> Package squeeze-web-gui-ROOT.noarch 0:1-81.20140208git9b4c676.fc19 will 
be installed
  ---> Package squeeze-web-gui-httpd.noarch 0:1-81.20140208git9b4c676.fc19 will 
be installed
  --> Finished Dependency Resolution
  
  Dependencies Resolved
  
  
  Package Arch Version  
   Repository   Size
  
  Installing:
  squeeze-web-gui-ROOTnoarch   
1-81.20140208git9b4c676.fc19community-squeeze-testing   
8.0 k
  squeeze-web-gui-httpd   noarch   
1-81.20140208git9b4c676.fc19community-squeeze-testing   
7.9 k
  
  Transaction Summary
  
  Install  2 Packages
  
  Total download size: 16 k
  Installed size: 2.2 k
  Is this ok [y/d/N]: y
  Downloading packages:
  (1/2): squeeze-web-gui-ROOT-1-81.20140208git9b4c676.fc19.noarch.rpm   
   | 8.0 kB  00:00:00
  (2/2): squeeze-web-gui-httpd-1-81.20140208git9b4c676.fc19.noarch.rpm  
   | 7.9 kB  00:00:00
  

  Total 
   26 kB/s |  16 kB  00:00:00
  Running transaction check
  Running transaction test
  
  Transaction check error:
  file /etc/httpd/conf.d/squeeze-web-gui-proxy.conf from install of 
squeeze-web-gui-httpd-1-81.20140208git9b4c676.fc19.noarch conflicts with file 
from package squeeze-web-gui-1-69.20140129gite3254b5.fc19.noarch
  
  Error Summary
  -
  



Beyond that the Webgui appears to be working fine, although I've not
really tested it yet apart from restarting squeezelite.  Must say the
extra functions for mounting drives looks very promising - Triode has
done some great work again.



slackhead's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13963
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=99395

___
unix mailing list
unix@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix


Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] Community Squeeze OS F19 Release 1

2014-02-12 Thread sideways2

When I was setting up the wireless...the WB was at my computer with the
router I was trying to connect to within two feet away...I was thinking
faulty antenna but a friend said he runs his without and it works just
fine...

I'm running the quad...

As for my card...it's a Kingston 32G...not sure of the class
though...but I'm willing to go buy a new card today and try!!! Thanks!!!



sideways2's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=62468
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=99395

___
unix mailing list
unix@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix


Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] Community Squeeze OS F19 Release 1

2014-02-12 Thread Pascal Hibon

sideways2 wrote: 
> 
> So far...the only thing I've notice is the scan time with the build in
> server...I accessed my network share...38000+ music files...ran about 13
> hours to complete...is this code or a product of the WB itself?? Would
> an attached HD work better?? Either USB or SATA??
> 
> 

13 hours for a 38.000+ track database is huge!
During the tests I did at my friends house, who has a 50.000+ track
database, the wb quad scanned that database in 1.5 hours or so. I'm
using SanDisk 8 Gb class 10 SD cards. 
I'm pretty confident that the poor scanning performance is produced by
the quality of your SD card.



1 x SB3, 1 x SB Boom, 1 x SB Radio and 2 x SB Touch - all wireless
1 x Wandboard Dual behind the bedroom ceiling
1 x Wandboard Dual for 'msqueeze' (http://www.msqueeze.co.nf/index.html)
project
ReadyNAS NVX running LMS 7.7.3. w iTunes plugin
iPeng 7 on iPhone.
SqueezePad & iPeng 7 on iPad.
http://www.last.fm/user/phibon

Pascal Hibon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7969
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=99395

___
unix mailing list
unix@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix


Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] Community Squeeze OS F19 Release 1

2014-02-12 Thread Alcaudon

sideways2 wrote: 
> 
> Any ideas about my wireless issue?? The gent who got me into this is now
> having the same issue with his wireless...he was helping me troubleshoot
> cause in the beginning his was working fine although he switched all to
> wired shortly afterwards...
> Thanks kindly!!!

Seems like the same issue I reported a while back. Since I was the only
one having this issue and JackOfAll and Pascal tested their own setups
over wifi for a few days without experimenting it, I thought it might be
hardware related (some problem specific to my own wandboard) or maybe
there was something wrong with my setup or config (although I tested
with three different routers and my cellphone ap with no luck).

Anyhow, since I was using wireless only because it was easier than
runing a wire all trough the room to where the router is (the original
idea was to wire it), the problem seemed to be in my hardware, and the
tube amp I'm using right now was clearly picking noise from the
wandboard when using wifi, I finally gave up and found a way to set the
wire. Maybe, when I get back home I can do some more testing and see if
we can figure out the problem. I have both a dual and a quad, but ever
since the quad arrived the dual is in it's box. Before wiring I was
planning to try with the dual and see if I have the same issues just to
try to confirm/discard a possible hardware problem.

Do you have a quad or a dual? As someone else pointed (I think it was
Pascal), I've also noticed that the quad seems to be more sensitive to
interferences (thanks to my samsung tv creating some kind of ap of it's
own in the same channel), but the last time I checked, I was the only
one using the channel.



Alcaudon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59446
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=99395

___
unix mailing list
unix@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix