Re: [uportal-dev] uP3 persistence libraries
There are few 'trends' that "most" in the community seem to agree on. Eclipse was the first I noticed in this community. Hibernate and Spring were the second and third (not sure the order). I don't think you'll find much dissension on using Hibernate. But If you really wanted to open the door and think about all the reasons why or not, to use Hibernate, there is one downside. RedHat/JBoss and Interface 21 do not get along. I get the impression that some people use iBatis not because they think it's better then Hibernate, but because of the riff here and a desire to use something "other" then Hibernate. Personally, I'd use Hibernate. +1. Cris J H Eric Dalquist wrote: As I progress with the Pluto 1.1 integration in the trunk I'm getting closer to the point of needing to write some new DAOs to persist some portlet domain objects. I would like to propose using Hibernate 3 for _new_ DAO implementations. Initially this just provides an easy way to write DAOs for object persistence, in the very long term we could plan on moving all DAOs to Hibernate to take advantage of schema creation and cross-database support. For 3.0 Hibernate would only be used for new DAOs and all existing data access code would remain as is. -Eric -- You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
[uportal-dev] uP3 persistence libraries
As I progress with the Pluto 1.1 integration in the trunk I'm getting closer to the point of needing to write some new DAOs to persist some portlet domain objects. I would like to propose using Hibernate 3 for _new_ DAO implementations. Initially this just provides an easy way to write DAOs for object persistence, in the very long term we could plan on moving all DAOs to Hibernate to take advantage of schema creation and cross-database support. For 3.0 Hibernate would only be used for new DAOs and all existing data access code would remain as is. -Eric smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [uportal-dev] removing RunXSLT
+1 Susan Bramhall wrote: I think this is a no brainer but just to be sure.. I propose removing the RunXSLT tool and all its accompanying xsl files from uPortal trunk (uP3). There was an ant target to run it which has already been removed. It was invented and used to convert data from uPortal 2.0 to 2.1 or 2.1 to 2.3 - I forget which. Its function is entirely subsumed by Cernunnos. Just delete it? Susan smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [uportal-dev] uP3 persistence libraries
+1 Hibernate-style DAOs will (eventually) make the Import/Export features more straightforward and easier to maintain. drew wills Eric Dalquist wrote: As I progress with the Pluto 1.1 integration in the trunk I'm getting closer to the point of needing to write some new DAOs to persist some portlet domain objects. I would like to propose using Hibernate 3 for _new_ DAO implementations. Initially this just provides an easy way to write DAOs for object persistence, in the very long term we could plan on moving all DAOs to Hibernate to take advantage of schema creation and cross-database support. For 3.0 Hibernate would only be used for new DAOs and all existing data access code would remain as is. -Eric -- Andrew Wills UNICON, Inc. Office: (480) 558-2476 http://code.google.com/p/cernunnos/ -- You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
Re: [uportal-dev] uP3 persistence libraries
+1 We've used hibernate pretty extensively on a number of projects, both large and small, overall I've been very pleased with the results. You are likely already aware of this, but the Spring community no longer recommends using the HibernateTemplate and instead prefers a template-less approach since the original reasons for the creation/usage of the HibernateTemplate no longer exist. Here is an article on the subject. http://blog.interface21.com/main/2007/06/26/so-should-you-still-use-springs-hibernatetemplate-andor-jpatemplate/ Eric Dalquist wrote: As I progress with the Pluto 1.1 integration in the trunk I'm getting closer to the point of needing to write some new DAOs to persist some portlet domain objects. I would like to propose using Hibernate 3 for _new_ DAO implementations. Initially this just provides an easy way to write DAOs for object persistence, in the very long term we could plan on moving all DAOs to Hibernate to take advantage of schema creation and cross-database support. For 3.0 Hibernate would only be used for new DAOs and all existing data access code would remain as is. -Eric -- You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
Re: [uportal-dev] removing RunXSLT
+1 drew wills Eric Dalquist wrote: +1 Susan Bramhall wrote: I think this is a no brainer but just to be sure.. I propose removing the RunXSLT tool and all its accompanying xsl files from uPortal trunk (uP3). There was an ant target to run it which has already been removed. It was invented and used to convert data from uPortal 2.0 to 2.1 or 2.1 to 2.3 - I forget which. Its function is entirely subsumed by Cernunnos. Just delete it? Susan -- Andrew Wills UNICON, Inc. Office: (480) 558-2476 http://code.google.com/p/cernunnos/ -- You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
[uportal-dev] removing RunXSLT
I think this is a no brainer but just to be sure.. I propose removing the RunXSLT tool and all its accompanying xsl files from uPortal trunk (uP3). There was an ant target to run it which has already been removed. It was invented and used to convert data from uPortal 2.0 to 2.1 or 2.1 to 2.3 - I forget which. Its function is entirely subsumed by Cernunnos. Just delete it? Susan -- It's no use trying to be clever--we are all clever here; just try to be kind--a little kind. -- F.J. Foakes Jackson -- You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
