I think you misunderstand what I'm getting at.
If you have an existing portal you want to upgrade to uPortal 3.2 when
it comes out. And if you have existing channels that *you* added that
did not conform to the new naming conventions, then they would not
import properly.
I guess we can simply tell people they'll have to hand edit their
channel files, before they reimport, but that seems kind of like a poor
workaround.
Cris J H
Eric Dalquist wrote:
I believe the export scripts are unaffected by these changes. Are they
failing for you?
Cris J Holdorph wrote:
you might want to do some work on the export scripts, so people can't
export something they can't then turn around and import.
Cris J H
Eric Dalquist wrote:
In continuation of this great work I'm working on doing additional
cleanup of the channel definition object model. One of these changes
is enforcing further restrictions on FNames. I'm committing some
changes that now enforce that all channel fnames can only contain
characters [a-zA-Z0-9_-]. We had a bunch of channels that had . and /
in the fnames which I've replaced with _ in the entity files and in
the code where they are referenced.
You will need do to do an initdb if you update from trunk after this
email.
-Eric
Jen Bourey wrote:
The new Portlet Administration Portlet is now the default channel
managing utility in uPortal. If you notice any bugs, please let me
know! The parameter-setting screen in particular still has a few
rough edges, but you should be able to use the portlet to
successfully modify, delete, and create channel definitions.
- Jen
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Jen Bourey
jennifer.bou...@gmail.com mailto:jennifer.bou...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
The new Portlet Administration Portlet described by JIRA entry
UP-2047 is now in the trunk, and I believe we've updated it to
include all features currently available in CChannelManager. I
would like to be able to switch the admin link in the layout over
to use this new portlet. Does anyone have an objection to making
this new portlet the default portlet administration tool sometime
in the near future? Are there features you rely on in
CChannelManager that don't appear to be included in the new
portlet?
We've also had discussions in the uPortal IRC channel about
potentially removing CChannelManager altogether for the 3.2
release. Doing this would allow us to move forward with the
proposed portlet workflow lifecycle work without having to worry
about its affects on the legacy channel implementation.
- Jen
-- Jen Bourey
--
Jen Bourey
--
You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as:
eric.dalqu...@doit.wisc.edu
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
--
You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as:
arch...@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
