[uportal-dev] Renaming https://www.ja-sig.org/svn/up2

[Eric Dalquist]

So way back when uPortal 2 and uPortal 3 were separate code bases we 
moved from CVS to SVN. As part of this move I had the brilliant idea to 
include a version number in the name of the SVN path for uPortal 2.X 
(up2) and uPortal 3.X (up3). With the very smart change in direction we 
made in the last year /up3 has been moved to /sandbox/portal but /up2 
remains. As we get closer to a 3.0.0-GA release this may be an issue we 
want to address.


I would like to get peoples feelings on renaming /up2 to /uPortal. I 
believe that if we did this everyone that currently has /up2 checked out 
would need to do a new check out of /uPortal. Is the 2 in the path 
something we need to worry about?


-Eric


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [uportal-dev] Renaming https://www.ja-sig.org/svn/up2

[Cris J Holdorph]

I think the naming change to the subversion repository is both necessary 
and required if we're really going to call the next release version 3.0.


So, +1 from me, despite any challenges it might bring.

 Cris J H

Eric Dalquist wrote:
So way back when uPortal 2 and uPortal 3 were separate code bases we 
moved from CVS to SVN. As part of this move I had the brilliant idea to 
include a version number in the name of the SVN path for uPortal 2.X 
(up2) and uPortal 3.X (up3). With the very smart change in direction we 
made in the last year /up3 has been moved to /sandbox/portal but /up2 
remains. As we get closer to a 3.0.0-GA release this may be an issue we 
want to address.


I would like to get peoples feelings on renaming /up2 to /uPortal. I 
believe that if we did this everyone that currently has /up2 checked out 
would need to do a new check out of /uPortal. Is the 2 in the path 
something we need to worry about?


-Eric


--
You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev

Re: [uportal-dev] Renaming https://www.ja-sig.org/svn/up2

[Eric Dalquist]

That is true, an svn switch should work though I don't have any real 
experience using the svn switch command so I can't say how exactly that 
works :)



Jen Bourey wrote:

+1 for renaming.

Wouldn't it be possible for people to do an svn switch rather than a 
fresh checkout if they so desired?


- Jen


On Feb 4, 2008 2:52 PM, Eric Dalquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> wrote:


So way back when uPortal 2 and uPortal 3 were separate code bases we
moved from CVS to SVN. As part of this move I had the brilliant
idea to
include a version number in the name of the SVN path for uPortal 2.X
(up2) and uPortal 3.X (up3). With the very smart change in
direction we
made in the last year /up3 has been moved to /sandbox/portal but /up2
remains. As we get closer to a 3.0.0-GA release this may be an
issue we
want to address.

I would like to get peoples feelings on renaming /up2 to /uPortal. I
believe that if we did this everyone that currently has /up2
checked out
would need to do a new check out of /uPortal. Is the 2 in the path
something we need to worry about?

-Eric


--
You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [uportal-dev] Renaming https://www.ja-sig.org/svn/up2

[Drew Wills]

+1 for the name change.

drew wills

Cris J Holdorph wrote:
I think the naming change to the subversion repository is both necessary 
and required if we're really going to call the next release version 3.0.


So, +1 from me, despite any challenges it might bring.

 Cris J H

Eric Dalquist wrote:
So way back when uPortal 2 and uPortal 3 were separate code bases we 
moved from CVS to SVN. As part of this move I had the brilliant idea 
to include a version number in the name of the SVN path for uPortal 
2.X (up2) and uPortal 3.X (up3). With the very smart change in 
direction we made in the last year /up3 has been moved to 
/sandbox/portal but /up2 remains. As we get closer to a 3.0.0-GA 
release this may be an issue we want to address.


I would like to get peoples feelings on renaming /up2 to /uPortal. I 
believe that if we did this everyone that currently has /up2 checked 
out would need to do a new check out of /uPortal. Is the 2 in the path 
something we need to worry about?


-Eric




--
Andrew Wills
UNICON, Inc.
Office:  (480) 558-2476
http://code.google.com/p/cernunnos/

--
You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev

Re: [uportal-dev] Renaming https://www.ja-sig.org/svn/up2

[Jen Bourey]

+1 for renaming.

Wouldn't it be possible for people to do an svn switch rather than a fresh
checkout if they so desired?

- Jen


On Feb 4, 2008 2:52 PM, Eric Dalquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> So way back when uPortal 2 and uPortal 3 were separate code bases we
> moved from CVS to SVN. As part of this move I had the brilliant idea to
> include a version number in the name of the SVN path for uPortal 2.X
> (up2) and uPortal 3.X (up3). With the very smart change in direction we
> made in the last year /up3 has been moved to /sandbox/portal but /up2
> remains. As we get closer to a 3.0.0-GA release this may be an issue we
> want to address.
>
> I would like to get peoples feelings on renaming /up2 to /uPortal. I
> believe that if we did this everyone that currently has /up2 checked out
> would need to do a new check out of /uPortal. Is the 2 in the path
> something we need to worry about?
>
> -Eric
>

-- 
You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev

Re: [uportal-dev] Renaming https://www.ja-sig.org/svn/up2

[Dustin S.]

I already mentioned my confusion on this in IRC so +1 for me on the change.

Don't forget to update: http://www.uportal.org/cvs.html

On Feb 4, 2008 1:22 PM, Eric Dalquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  That is true, an svn switch should work though I don't have any real
> experience using the svn switch command so I can't say how exactly that
> works :)
>
>
> Jen Bourey wrote:
>
> +1 for renaming.
>
> Wouldn't it be possible for people to do an svn switch rather than a fresh
> checkout if they so desired?
>
> - Jen
>
>
> On Feb 4, 2008 2:52 PM, Eric Dalquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So way back when uPortal 2 and uPortal 3 were separate code bases we
> > moved from CVS to SVN. As part of this move I had the brilliant idea to
> > include a version number in the name of the SVN path for uPortal 2.X
> > (up2) and uPortal 3.X (up3). With the very smart change in direction we
> > made in the last year /up3 has been moved to /sandbox/portal but /up2
> > remains. As we get closer to a 3.0.0-GA release this may be an issue we
> > want to address.
> >
> > I would like to get peoples feelings on renaming /up2 to /uPortal. I
> > believe that if we did this everyone that currently has /up2 checked out
> > would need to do a new check out of /uPortal. Is the 2 in the path
> > something we need to worry about?
> >
> > -Eric
> >
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
>
>

-- 
You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev

Re: [uportal-dev] Renaming https://www.ja-sig.org/svn/up2

[Trenton D. Adams]

On your local working copy, do the following... 

svn sw --relocate svn+ssh://192.168.7.2/var/svn/repos/x-module/ 
svn+ssh://192.168.99.2/var/svn/repos/x-module/ 

- Original Message - 
From: "Eric Dalquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
To: uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org 
Sent: Monday, February 4, 2008 1:22:42 PM (GMT-0700) America/Denver 
Subject: Re: [uportal-dev] Renaming https://www.ja-sig.org/svn/up2 


That is true, an svn switch should work though I don't have any real experience 
using the svn switch command so I can't say how exactly that works :) 


Jen Bourey wrote: 

+1 for renaming. 

Wouldn't it be possible for people to do an svn switch rather than a fresh 
checkout if they so desired? 

- Jen 



On Feb 4, 2008 2:52 PM, Eric Dalquist < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: 


So way back when uPortal 2 and uPortal 3 were separate code bases we 
moved from CVS to SVN. As part of this move I had the brilliant idea to 
include a version number in the name of the SVN path for uPortal 2.X 
(up2) and uPortal 3.X (up3). With the very smart change in direction we 
made in the last year /up3 has been moved to /sandbox/portal but /up2 
remains. As we get closer to a 3.0.0-GA release this may be an issue we 
want to address. 

I would like to get peoples feelings on renaming /up2 to /uPortal. I 
believe that if we did this everyone that currently has /up2 checked out 
would need to do a new check out of /uPortal. Is the 2 in the path 
something we need to worry about? 

-Eric 

-- 
You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev 

__ 
This communication is intended for the use of the recipient to whom it
is addressed, and may contain confidential, personal, and or privileged
information. Please contact us immediately if you are not the intended
recipient of this communication, and do not copy, distribute, or take
action relying on it. Any communications received in error, or
subsequent reply, should be deleted or destroyed.
---

-- 
You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev

Re: [uportal-dev] Renaming https://www.ja-sig.org/svn/up2

[John Fereira]

At 03:22 PM 2/4/2008, Eric Dalquist wrote:
That is true, an svn switch should work though I don't have any real 
experience using the svn switch command so I can't say how exactly 
that works :)


I have used it a few times and it seems to work as adveritised.



John Fereira
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ithaca, NY 



--
You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev

Re: [uportal-dev] Renaming https://www.ja-sig.org/svn/up2

[Jason Shao]

On Feb 4, 2008, at 2:52 PM, Eric Dalquist wrote:

So way back when uPortal 2 and uPortal 3 were separate code bases we  
moved from CVS to SVN. As part of this move I had the brilliant idea  
to include a version number in the name of the SVN path for uPortal  
2.X (up2) and uPortal 3.X (up3). With the very smart change in  
direction we made in the last year /up3 has been moved to /sandbox/ 
portal but /up2 remains. As we get closer to a 3.0.0-GA release this  
may be an issue we want to address.



How about we svn copy up2 to uPortal, and doing some commit script  
magic to make up2 read only? I'd hate to break all the existing tag  
links (I know you can still use them if you specify the revision, but  
it still breaks all the existing tag links that don't)


Jason

--

Jason Shao
Application Developer
Rutgers University, Office of Instructional & Research Technology
v. 732-445-8726 | f. 732-445-5539 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://jay.shao.org



--
You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev

Re: [uportal-dev] Renaming https://www.ja-sig.org/svn/up2

[Eric Dalquist]

That is an interesting idea. Do you think having two places in SVN with 
the code would cause confusion for those looking for the code for the 
first time?


Also how many locations online have links directly into svn? Doing a 
quick search excluding mailing list archives there look to be about 10 
pages that need updating: 
http://google.decenturl.com/ja-sig.org-svn-up2-inurl


It would of course break links in mailing list archives if we just moved 
versus copied and disallowed changes to the old url.


Do others have thoughts on this approach?

-Eric

Jason Shao wrote:

On Feb 4, 2008, at 2:52 PM, Eric Dalquist wrote:

So way back when uPortal 2 and uPortal 3 were separate code bases we 
moved from CVS to SVN. As part of this move I had the brilliant idea 
to include a version number in the name of the SVN path for uPortal 
2.X (up2) and uPortal 3.X (up3). With the very smart change in 
direction we made in the last year /up3 has been moved to 
/sandbox/portal but /up2 remains. As we get closer to a 3.0.0-GA 
release this may be an issue we want to address.



How about we svn copy up2 to uPortal, and doing some commit script 
magic to make up2 read only? I'd hate to break all the existing tag 
links (I know you can still use them if you specify the revision, but 
it still breaks all the existing tag links that don't)


Jason

--

Jason Shao
Application Developer
Rutgers University, Office of Instructional & Research Technology
v. 732-445-8726 | f. 732-445-5539 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 
http://jay.shao.org






smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [uportal-dev] Renaming https://www.ja-sig.org/svn/up2

[Dustin S.]

I just wanted to bring this back up as we get closer and closer to
3.0.0GA...any status on this?

I think the way that Jason proposed is an excellent idea. svn copy up2 to
uPortal and update all references in documentation to point to the new
uPortal and encourage everyone to make the switch. Then at some point in the
future svn delete up2. This would allow for a 'phased out' approach and give
people time to update.

On Wed, Feb 6, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Eric Dalquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> That is an interesting idea. Do you think having two places in SVN with
> the code would cause confusion for those looking for the code for the
> first time?
>
> Also how many locations online have links directly into svn? Doing a
> quick search excluding mailing list archives there look to be about 10
> pages that need updating:
> http://google.decenturl.com/ja-sig.org-svn-up2-inurl
>
> It would of course break links in mailing list archives if we just moved
> versus copied and disallowed changes to the old url.
>
> Do others have thoughts on this approach?
>
> -Eric
>
> Jason Shao wrote:
> > On Feb 4, 2008, at 2:52 PM, Eric Dalquist wrote:
> >
> >> So way back when uPortal 2 and uPortal 3 were separate code bases we
> >> moved from CVS to SVN. As part of this move I had the brilliant idea
> >> to include a version number in the name of the SVN path for uPortal
> >> 2.X (up2) and uPortal 3.X (up3). With the very smart change in
> >> direction we made in the last year /up3 has been moved to
> >> /sandbox/portal but /up2 remains. As we get closer to a 3.0.0-GA
> >> release this may be an issue we want to address.
> >
> >
> > How about we svn copy up2 to uPortal, and doing some commit script
> > magic to make up2 read only? I'd hate to break all the existing tag
> > links (I know you can still use them if you specify the revision, but
> > it still breaks all the existing tag links that don't)
> >
> > Jason
> >
> > --
> >
> > Jason Shao
> > Application Developer
> > Rutgers University, Office of Instructional & Research Technology
> > v. 732-445-8726 | f. 732-445-5539 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> > http://jay.shao.org
> >
> >
> >
>

-- 
Join your friends and colleagues at JA-SIG 2008 - "Higher Education Solutions: 
The Community Source Way!"
April 27th - 30th, 2008 in St. Paul, Minnesota USA

Featuring CAS, DSpace, Fedora, Fluid, Internet2, Kuali, Sakai, uPortal, and 
more!
Information/Registration at: 
http://www.ja-sig.org/conferences/08spring/index.html

You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev

Re: [uportal-dev] Renaming https://www.ja-sig.org/svn/up2

[Eric Dalquist]

We do need to address this soon. I personally am for the 'just rename 
it' approach as while it will be a bit more pain up front I think it 
will be less confusing down the road trying to explain to people what 
the 'old /up2 path is'. I'll be sending another email in just a bit 
calling for a vote on each approach so we can get the changes made 
before we do the GA release.


-Eric

Dustin S. wrote:
I just wanted to bring this back up as we get closer and closer to 
3.0.0 GA...any status on this?


I think the way that Jason proposed is an excellent idea. svn copy up2 
to uPortal and update all references in documentation to point to the 
new uPortal and encourage everyone to make the switch. Then at some 
point in the future svn delete up2. This would allow for a 'phased 
out' approach and give people time to update.


On Wed, Feb 6, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Eric Dalquist 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:


That is an interesting idea. Do you think having two places in SVN
with
the code would cause confusion for those looking for the code for the
first time?

Also how many locations online have links directly into svn? Doing a
quick search excluding mailing list archives there look to be about 10
pages that need updating:
http://google.decenturl.com/ja-sig.org-svn-up2-inurl

It would of course break links in mailing list archives if we just
moved
versus copied and disallowed changes to the old url.

Do others have thoughts on this approach?

-Eric

Jason Shao wrote:
> On Feb 4, 2008, at 2:52 PM, Eric Dalquist wrote:
>
>> So way back when uPortal 2 and uPortal 3 were separate code
bases we
>> moved from CVS to SVN. As part of this move I had the brilliant
idea
>> to include a version number in the name of the SVN path for uPortal
>> 2.X (up2) and uPortal 3.X (up3). With the very smart change in
>> direction we made in the last year /up3 has been moved to
>> /sandbox/portal but /up2 remains. As we get closer to a 3.0.0-GA
>> release this may be an issue we want to address.
>
>
> How about we svn copy up2 to uPortal, and doing some commit script
> magic to make up2 read only? I'd hate to break all the existing tag
> links (I know you can still use them if you specify the
revision, but
> it still breaks all the existing tag links that don't)
>
> Jason
>
> --
>
> Jason Shao
> Application Developer
> Rutgers University, Office of Instructional & Research Technology
> v. 732-445-8726 | f. 732-445-5539 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |
> http://jay.shao.org
>
>
>


--
You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature