Re: (way OT, WAS: )Re: Delete the first entry of an array.

2016-03-27 Thread J. Landman Gay 

On 3/27/2016 6:59 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:

I've been out-crankied!


LOL. But actually I think the final score is three out of four, so you 
are still in the running. :)


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Re: (way OT, WAS: )Re: Delete the first entry of an array.

2016-03-27 Thread Dr. Hawkins 
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Alex Tweedly  wrote:

> Hmmm ... not real Fortran. (that should be said in a deep, impressive
> voice)
> Real Fortran died when Fortran 77 took over :-(
>

I've been out-crankied!

>
> And, AFAIK, only those modern variants from (I think) Fortran90 onwards
> have sparse arrays.
>

Yes, I designed the algorithm for my dissertation in Fortran 90, longing
for some of the F95 features that weren't available yet.

Sparse arrays would have been useful, except for the detail that the
elements that I *was* generating in my search dwarfed the size of physical
memory . . .



-- 
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.
(702) 508-8462
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode