Brave is a Chromium based browser too but without the ads so this stands to
reason it would be faster and better. Unfortunately, most corporations IT depts
are unlikely to veer from using Google Chrome to other chromium strains. And
this is the market I think LC HTML5 is going to prosper in the most for the
future.
Harman, can you put together a priority list of items that need to be fixed in
HTML5 deployment as I am currently adjusting the code. I mean things that
should just work without running external JS workarounds like most of the key
commands not working in a simple text field, etc.
All the best
Sean Cole
Pi Digital Prod Ltd
> On 30 Jan 2020, at 18:31, hh via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> While testing intensively in the LC-HTML5 builder for
> cross-browser functionality of extensions I used
> Brave, Chrome, Firefox and Safari.
>
> My personal ranking in short:
>
> Safari is fastest with huge JS (the standalone engine),
> Firefox is slowest but has more special features,
> Chrome has most features (incl. caching technique).
>
> But the winner is the open-source browser Brave:
>
> Fast as Safari, features as Chrome and runs (close to
> the same on all OS) on MacOS, Windows, Linux, Android
> and iOS.
> https://brave.com/download/ (scroll down for mobile)
>
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
