Re: Livecodeshare/SampleStacks

2019-10-28 Thread Erik Beugelaar via use-livecode
Richard, no problem checking. It looks promising.

A little bit of myself and a very late introduction ;-)  
I have been following LiveCode from 2010 resulting in a license of 5.5. Because 
of my professional work (Visual Basic 6/T-SQL followed up by C#/SQL Server/ASP 
.NET until now and a bit of Dart/Flutter) I had not enough time to put my hands 
really on it but reading the docs, the forum and RunRev Magazine (!) was a 
pleasant hobby in my spare time. In 2014 I was contacted by Packt Publishing if 
I was interested in reviewing a new book called LiveCode Mobile Development 
Cook Book written by Dr. Edward Lavieri, https://www.shorturl.at/bMR27  If you 
scroll down you can read why I was interested doing the review. I like to do 
programming using visual development tools because it was a blessing after 
developing business apps with good old Clipper (5.x using OO libraries) so many 
years in qEdit (!). I knew from Kevin in 2014 that HQ was working hard to 
implement an open standard as replacement of the old way extensions were built 
in 5.5. That process took some time so I didn't renew my license. When it 
became interesting (FFi implementation) I renewed my license from 6.x up till 
now (Indy). 
Because of a professional switch in my career, I now have more time to dive 
really deep in the philosophy of LiveCode and become a contributing member 
starting first to refresh my knowledge about the messaging system, design 
patterns (Levure!) etc, LiveCode Script ending with LiveCode Builder. My hands 
are burning!
I have collected an intensive folder with libraries, scripts etc from die hard 
LiveCode developers I followed all the years so I hope within a period of 6 
months to be comfortable writing programs in LiveCode and help fixing the bug 
list ;-)

All the best,
Erik Beugelaar
https://www.solidit.nl
Amsterdam, The Netherlands




On 28/10/2019, 03:11, "use-livecode on behalf of Richard Gaskin via 
use-livecode"  wrote:

Erik Beugelaar wrote:
> Me too no problems loading GoLiveNet  (LiveCode 9.5 Indy)

Thanks for checking that, Erik.  If you do come across an issue please 
let me know. I have contact info in LiveNet, and of course you can 
always write me at the address below.

LiveNet is fairly simple today, mostly serving as an example of the ease 
and utility of downloaded stack files. But I have some plans for 
expanding it if I can get the time, so keeping the current underpinnings 
working well through LC changes remains a keen interest.

-- 
   Richard Gaskin
   Fourth World Systems
   Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
   
   Ambassador at FourthWorld.com
http://www.FourthWorld.com

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode




___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Livecodeshare/SampleStacks

2019-10-27 Thread Mark Wieder via use-livecode

On 10/26/19 9:52 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote:

Mark Wieder wrote:

 > On 10/26/19 7:59 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote:
 >> At the moment I'm running Ubuntu 18.04,
 >
 > You're aware that's not a supported platform, right?

Soon enough...

https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=22428



Yes, but... "support" for a later build isn't just a matter of updating 
the documentation. Ubuntu 18 uses a newer gcc and compiling the source 
requires a few changes to the build files. I have to patch the build 
files every time I build from source locally. It's just a matter of the 
team deciding it's time to move forward.


https://github.com/livecode/livecode/pull/7127

--
 Mark Wieder
 ahsoftw...@gmail.com

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Livecodeshare/SampleStacks

2019-10-27 Thread Erik Beugelaar via use-livecode
Me too no problems loading GoLiveNet  (LiveCode 9.5 Indy)

On 27/10/2019, 04:06, "use-livecode on behalf of Richard Gaskin via 
use-livecode"  wrote:

A bit ago I wrote:

> hh wrote:
>> Also your "GoLiveNet" (I really liked it) is unusable since more than a
>> year from Mac using Indy or Business (I wrote you and gave up).
>>
>> [It errors with message 'Error downloading URL "liveNet.livecode.gz".
>> Check network connection and proxy setup.'
>> One has to quit, open it in a community edition, quit community edition,
>> restart the Indy/Bussiness edition and relaunch GoLiveNet (that now can
>> use the cache).
> 
> Check your spam bin.  I recall thanking you for your report, and also 
> noting in my reply that I was unable to reproduce it.  I just tried it 
> again a moment ago - same good result.
> 
> I can check on macOS and Windows when I'm back in the office.  May be 
> good to know which you're using.
> 
> At the moment I'm running Ubuntu 18.04, and I do nearly all of my work 
> with an Indy edition, currently 9.5 on this laptop.

FWIW I just ran Development -> Plugins -> GoLiveNet on macOS "Catalina" 
and Windows 10 v1909, and it loaded without issue.

--
  Richard Gaskin
  Fourth World Systems
  Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
  
  ambassa...@fourthworld.comhttp://www.FourthWorld.com

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode




___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Livecodeshare/SampleStacks

2019-10-26 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode

Mark Wieder wrote:

> On 10/26/19 7:59 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote:
>> At the moment I'm running Ubuntu 18.04,
>
> You're aware that's not a supported platform, right?

Soon enough...

https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=22428

--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Systems
 Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
 
 ambassa...@fourthworld.comhttp://www.FourthWorld.com

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Livecodeshare/SampleStacks

2019-10-26 Thread Mark Wieder via use-livecode

On 10/26/19 7:59 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote:


At the moment I'm running Ubuntu 18.04,


You're aware that's not a supported platform, right?

--
 Mark Wieder
 ahsoftw...@gmail.com

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Livecodeshare/SampleStacks

2019-10-26 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode

A bit ago I wrote:


hh wrote:

Also your "GoLiveNet" (I really liked it) is unusable since more than a
year from Mac using Indy or Business (I wrote you and gave up).

[It errors with message 'Error downloading URL "liveNet.livecode.gz".
Check network connection and proxy setup.'
One has to quit, open it in a community edition, quit community edition,
restart the Indy/Bussiness edition and relaunch GoLiveNet (that now can
use the cache).


Check your spam bin.  I recall thanking you for your report, and also 
noting in my reply that I was unable to reproduce it.  I just tried it 
again a moment ago - same good result.


I can check on macOS and Windows when I'm back in the office.  May be 
good to know which you're using.


At the moment I'm running Ubuntu 18.04, and I do nearly all of my work 
with an Indy edition, currently 9.5 on this laptop.


FWIW I just ran Development -> Plugins -> GoLiveNet on macOS "Catalina" 
and Windows 10 v1909, and it loaded without issue.


--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Systems
 Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
 
 ambassa...@fourthworld.comhttp://www.FourthWorld.com

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Livecodeshare/SampleStacks

2019-10-26 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode

hh wrote:

>> Richard G. wrote:
>> I'll try to remember to never try others' scripts using "import
>> snapshot", like I'm already in the habit of never thinking about
>> having a browser widget, or the ability to play a movie or audio
>> file, or have windows layer in an expected fashion...
>
> The problem is that linux is for LiveCode a tiny niche.

Yep.  I'm familiar with the stats. In fact, I've even had another list 
user complain that I reference them too often, but like you I recognize 
that they are important for understanding ROI, for LC Ltd and for ourselves.


True enough, the desktop belongs to Windows. With its 86% market share, 
the desktop has always been a Windows story and it always will be.  Both 
macOS and Linux are niche players there.  Apple has the advantage of the 
boutique audience willing to spend more than their Win counterparts, so 
it's worth supporting their OSes.  Linux users work the other way, 
disproportionately into Free and Open software, so biz models dependent 
on per-seat licensing are challenged there.


One unique upside to the Linux audience favors dev tools in general, but 
not LiveCode specifically: they understand and contribute to open 
source.  Python, Ruby, Perl, PHP - name an open source language (which 
is most today) and you'll find a thriving contributor base.


In contrast, LiveCode's unique history works against contribution.  We 
have disproportionately fewer members versed in C++ than many other 
languages, so community engine contributions come from about half a 
dozen people (big THANK YOU to those who have!).  And although the one 
thing all LC devs have in common is a passion for LC Script, and the IDE 
half of the product is written in LC Script, we still see relatively few 
pull requests against the IDE.  No blame there, it kinda makes sense, 
given that most of this audience came up age in the '90s when 
development tools were still proprietary, so we don't have the same 
contributor culture most other modern languages do.


Another factor is the percentage of license holders among experienced 
users.  People who pay for a license feel entitled to a product that 
works as described, and can be less inclined to effectively pay a second 
time with labor.  Understandable, and quite different from audiences for 
languages which don't have a dual-license model.  MySQL is arguably an 
exception, but its market share is so uniquely vast that it defies 
realistic comparisons with anything else.


I believe the contribution problem will be addressed over time as the 
audience grows. The challenge is that the audience grows most slowly on 
the platform most accustomed to contribution, because it's the platform 
most seriously in need of contribution.  With such a weak out-of-the-box 
experience, it's an unusually imaginative soul who'll try LC on Linux 
and get excited about the potential.  A common phrase I hear is "It 
looks like they don't care about Linux."



> And much more:
> The linux users of the community are kind of "LiveCode masochists".

Many Linux users feel the same about other OSes.  Aside from the times 
I'm making fun of myself with a #fanboi tag, in more serious discussions 
I avoid fannish advocacy.


Windows, Mac, and Linux have all proven themselves for their respective 
audiences.  The Pengiuin has nothing to prove, any more than Mac does 
now that it's rebounded from its 2.2% market share.  Indeed, there are 
more Ubuntu users alone right now than the sum of all Mac users when 
Steve Jobs returned to Apple.


In our modern computing world we have a wealth of strong, viable options 
for every taste.  With OSes as with languages and text editors and 
hardware and the rest, enjoy what works for you.



> Some are so advanced with that, that they meanwhile feel *very* strong
> pain only (your list above).

Ah, but the point there was apparently lost in my poor writing.  I 
generally have no such limitations on the platform I currently spend the 
most time with.  Browsers, video editors, text editors, email, graphics 
tools -- pretty much everything I've enjoyed doing from my years when I 
spent more time on Mac, and the years I spent more time on Windows, all 
work excellently here on Ubuntu too.  The exception to that LiveCode.



> For example you didn't even notice that SampleStacks didn't work for
> weeks when using Business or Indy and, despite notification in the
> list, both livecodeshare and SampleStacks didn't loamanyd stacks of
> size > 2 MByte for two days.

Yeah, been working. Though I've read nearly every message on this list 
since it started, I miss a few.



> Also your "GoLiveNet" (I really liked it) is unusable since more than
> a year from Mac using Indy or Business (I wrote you and gave up).
>
> [It errors with message 'Error downloading URL "liveNet.livecode.gz".
> Check network connection and proxy setup.'
> One has to quit, open it in a community edition, quit community
> edition, restart the Indy/Bussiness 

Re: Livecodeshare/SampleStacks

2019-10-26 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode

Mark Wieder wrote:


On 10/26/19 3:52 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote:


Takes me down memory lane with this growing collection of
related/duplicate bugs with snapshot on Linux:

https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=15900
https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17257
https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=20104


I think you mean 15541 instead of 15900
or maybe 15103

Possibly these should all be declared duplicates of a single bug report


I thought about that, started to try to figure whether the later ones 
should be moved to the original, or all moved to the most recent, and I 
was burning wetware thinking about it it dawned on me:



so that there's only one for the team to ignore. 


Yep.  Why spend the time if nothing can be done about it?

Since Fraser and Brett left the Linux regressions are piling up.  Until 
either LC Ltd finds the strategic value in platform parity, or I get 
wealthy enough to hire Fraser to take care of these, I just make a 
mental note to ignore chunks of the feature set and move on.


Fortunately browsers work great on all platforms, so the future looks 
bright enough to keep me going


--
  Richard Gaskin
  Fourth World Systems
  Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
  
  Ambassador at FourthWorld.com
http://www.FourthWorld.com


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Livecodeshare/SampleStacks

2019-10-26 Thread Mark Wieder via use-livecode

On 10/26/19 3:52 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote:

Takes me down memory lane with this growing collection of 
related/duplicate bugs with snapshot on Linux:


https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=15900
https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17257
https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=20104


I think you mean 15541 instead of 15900
or maybe 15103

Possibly these should all be declared duplicates of a single bug report 
so that there's only one for the team to ignore. 


--
 Mark Wieder
 ahsoftw...@gmail.com

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Livecodeshare/SampleStacks

2019-10-26 Thread Mark Wieder via use-livecode

On 10/26/19 5:11 PM, hh via use-livecode wrote:


p.s. Mark Wieder wrote an 'ugly workaround' (his own words) for snapshot
on linux, I use it in "QRReader". It works well, whether ugly or not,
also where the browser widget works (LC 9.0.5 on ubuntu1604).


I do have a comment attached to the bug report that mentions that it's 
probably the second-ugliest bit of code I've ever written. And while it 
works well as a workaround, it doesn't change the fact that the 
barebones "import snapshot" command not only doesn't work on linux, but 
hangs the whole system.


And things like that are deadly for increasing market share. Yes, LC on 
linux is a tiny niche. And it's not likely to get any bigger when basic 
things don't work as advertised. Can you imagine an LC newbie on linux 
installing the product, trying the import snapshot command, rebooting 
their computer, and then not immediately uninstalling? I've done that 
after first impressions of other software and not looked back.


--
 Mark Wieder
 ahsoftw...@gmail.com

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Livecodeshare/SampleStacks

2019-10-26 Thread hh via use-livecode
> Richard G. wrote:
> I'll try to remember to never try others' scripts using "import 
> snapshot", like I'm already in the habit of never thinking about having 
> a browser widget, or the ability to play a movie or audio file, or have 
> windows layer in an expected fashion...

The problem is that linux is for LiveCode a tiny niche.
And much more:
The linux users of the community are kind of "LiveCode masochists".

Some are so advanced with that, that they meanwhile feel *very* strong
pain only (your list above).

For example you didn't even notice that SampleStacks didn't work for
weeks when using Business or Indy and, despite notification in the list,
both livecodeshare and SampleStacks didn't load stacks of size > 2 MByte
for two days.

Also your "GoLiveNet" (I really liked it) is unusable since more than a
year from Mac using Indy or Business (I wrote you and gave up).

[It errors with message 'Error downloading URL "liveNet.livecode.gz".
Check network connection and proxy setup.'
One has to quit, open it in a community edition, quit community edition,
restart the Indy/Bussiness edition and relaunch GoLiveNet (that now can
use the cache). So probably a tsNet caused bug.
It is often too tedious to work around, I still feel the pain, although
I like LC on linux (on xubuntu especially).]

p.s. Mark Wieder wrote an 'ugly workaround' (his own words) for snapshot
on linux, I use it in "QRReader". It works well, whether ugly or not,
also where the browser widget works (LC 9.0.5 on ubuntu1604).

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Livecodeshare/SampleStacks

2019-10-26 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode

hh wrote:

> Livecodeshare/SampleStacks works again:
>
> 1. With ALL editions (Business/Indy/Community).
> 2. The recently appearing size limit has been removed.
>
> Thank you very much whoever did this.
>
> Especially SampleStacks from the LC toolbar is very
> fast and robust. Just try!

Was it not working?

Your post made me nostalgic, so I checked it out. Seems to work as well 
as before, all the way down to the mystifying order of the categories. 
Alphabetical fall out of fashion?  I'm sure there's a logic there, but 
I'm not smart enough to figure it out.


Even downloaded a stack, some snapshot tool with icons whose purpose 
weren't self-evident.  Clicked one to see what would happen.  System 
froze, deep.  Had to force-reboot.  Don't see that on Linux often. 
Kinda hard to do. Quite an achievement.


Takes me down memory lane with this growing collection of 
related/duplicate bugs with snapshot on Linux:


https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=15900
https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17257
https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=20104

I'll try to remember to never try others' scripts using "import 
snapshot", like I'm already in the habit of never thinking about having 
a browser widget, or the ability to play a movie or audio file, or have 
windows layer in an expected fashion...


::sigh::

Missing Fraser and Peter, and their valiant efforts at nudging the 
product back toward something closer to feature parity across platforms...


Yeah, nostalgia...

--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Systems
 Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
 
 ambassa...@fourthworld.comhttp://www.FourthWorld.com

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Livecodeshare/SampleStacks

2019-10-26 Thread Roger Guay via use-livecode
Yes, indeed . . . Nice!!

Roger

> On Oct 26, 2019, at 6:03 AM, hh via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> Livecodeshare/SampleStacks works again:
> 
> 1. With ALL editions (Business/Indy/Community).
> 2. The recently appearing size limit has been removed.
> 
> Thank you very much whoever did this.
> 
> Especially SampleStacks from the LC toolbar is very
> fast and robust. Just try!
> 
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: Livecodeshare/SampleStacks

2019-10-26 Thread hh via use-livecode
Livecodeshare/SampleStacks works again:

1. With ALL editions (Business/Indy/Community).
2. The recently appearing size limit has been removed.

Thank you very much whoever did this.

Especially SampleStacks from the LC toolbar is very
fast and robust. Just try!

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Livecodeshare/SampleStacks

2019-10-25 Thread Hermann Hoch via use-livecode
Just to inform you.

Once again a ("maintenance"?)-change was done without any
notification.

Livecodeshare/SampleStacks has a new size limit:

If you have a sample stack there that has size > 2.1 Mbyte
(probably 2048 Kbyte) then it downloads from
http://livecodeshare.runrev.com with zero Bytes or displays
"error" in the status bar of "Sample Stacks" respectively.

I already reported it to support this morning. Hopefully
a competent staff member can solve this.

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode