Re: different windows in the same stack
--- yves COPPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I've tried to go to different cds in the same stack but don't reach my goal : I'd like to go to some cds of the stack as modal and some other cds of the same stack as toplevel go to cd one of stack myStack as modal when I'm on this cd, I have a btn with this script go to cd two of stack myStack as toplevel It makes problems. Is it possible to do such a thing ? -- Greetings. Yves COPPE Hi Yves, My first response would be that you should move the 'modal' cards into one or more substacks. You could try to 'clone this stack' but maintaining any data sets and knowing which stack you're in could very well become a problem at that point. Maybe we can provide an alternative approach if you tell us why you would want to keep these 'modal' cards in your stack at all cost? Bestregards, Jan Schenkel. = As we grow older, we grow both wiser and more foolish at the same time. (La Rochefoucauld) __ Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/ ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: different windows in the same stack
Hi Yves, My first response would be that you should move the 'modal' cards into one or more substacks. You could try to 'clone this stack' but maintaining any data sets and knowing which stack you're in could very well become a problem at that point. Maybe we can provide an alternative approach if you tell us why you would want to keep these 'modal' cards in your stack at all cost? To avoid access to menus in the menubar (mac OS X) -- Greetings. Yves COPPE Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: different windows in the same stack
--- yves COPPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Yves, My first response would be that you should move the 'modal' cards into one or more substacks. You could try to 'clone this stack' but maintaining any data sets and knowing which stack you're in could very well become a problem at that point. Maybe we can provide an alternative approach if you tell us why you would want to keep these 'modal' cards in your stack at all cost? To avoid access to menus in the menubar (mac OS X) -- Greetings. Yves COPPE Hi Yves, You could always act as-if the stack is modal by disabling the menus yourself. As menus are essentially buttons, use the 'disable' command: disable btn File Hope this helped, Jan Schenkel. = As we grow older, we grow both wiser and more foolish at the same time. (La Rochefoucauld) __ Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/ ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: different windows in the same stack
You could always act as-if the stack is modal by disabling the menus yourself. As menus are essentially buttons, use the 'disable' command: disable btn File Hope this helped, I thought to do it so but with some lock messages here and there I had problems; I will trace the lock messages and make as you say diasble btn. Thank you. -- Greetings. Yves COPPE Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Correct shell command
I'm trying to figure out a reliable way to set the user's shellcommand properly for his or her system. Is cmd.exe always the right shell for Windows 2K and XP? I've been thinking along these lines: on setshell set the hideconsolewindows to true get shell(vol) end setshell on errordialog x if setshell is in x then set the shellcommand to cmd.exe end if end errordialog Would something like this be dependable? Is there a better way? Thanks, Curry Kenworthy ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Screenmouseloc
Can't get the screenmouseloc() command to work under OS 9.2, even enclosing the coordinates in quotes. Does this work for others? -- Best regards, Richard Miller, CEO Advanced Training Systems, Inc. ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: iCalendar/vCalendar (OT: joke)
(although V isn't the symbol for voltage anymore, it now is U) Now I feel really old. V is for volt U is for ? = [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.erikhansen.org __ Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/ ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: iCalendar/vCalendar (OT: joke)
So what standards body issued the U for voltage? And, is U still expressed in volts? miscdas Sjoerd Op 't Land writes: erik hansen wrote/ schreef: V is for volt U is for ? voltage as: A is for ampere I is for current R is for resistance is for ohms Regards, / Groeten, Sjoerd ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Screenmouseloc
Richard D. Miller wrote/ schreef: Can't get the screenmouseloc() command A bit more precise, the screenmouseloc is a global property (a bit like a function, but it is settable. to work under OS 9.2, even enclosing the coordinates in quotes. Does this work for others? I guess you mean setting it here. On MacOS 9.0.4 (here) it doesn't work. I heard something like that it only worked on Windows. Regards, / Groeten, Sjoerd ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: iCalendar/vCalendar (OT: joke)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote/ schreef: So what standards body issued the U for voltage? SI (system internationale) And, is U still expressed in volts? Yes. I propose to stop this OT-thread. If you have any questions about electronics, mail me or search the web, but let's stop posting it here. Regards, / Groeten, Sjoerd ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Relational database capabilities?
There's loads of stuff about FileMaker and Rev in the searchable archives at http://www.google.com/advanced_search?q=site:lists.runrev.com I prefer the web companion method, which briefly... Quote You can use FileMaker Pro web companion to exchange data between FMP and Rev either on the local network or on the internet. Normally, all you have to do (after setting up web companion) is to send put http://folderInPath/folderWithResponseFile/FMPro; into theURL post -db=MyDbNameHere-lay=DBLayoutNameHere-format=FormatFileName.html-findAll put urlDecode(it) This reply is rather discontinuous. None of the statements seem to relate to each other. First a variable is declared, then never used. Then a post statemenet is issued. Then you put something, referring to a variable that hasn't been defined, and not actually putting it anywhere. I have searched the referenced site and can't find the orginal which this quote is supposed to have come from. Is there a real and complete example of this technique somewhere? ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Repeats repeated
Hi all, Last week I asked a question about filtering the double lines in a var with many lines. The list helped very well by pointing out that I shouldn't use repeat with, but repeat for each, which brought the processing time back from 60 hours to 4 seconds (!) So I tried the same technique with another script that has a triple repeat loop. The var t contains about 150 short lines and the script is intended to put every possible combination of 3 lines of t into a field: repeat with f1 = 1 to the number of lines of t - 2 put line f1 of t into g1 repeat with f2 = f1+1 to the number of lines of t - 1 put line f2 of t into g2 repeat with f3 = f2+1 to the number of lines of t put line f3 of t into g3 put g1,g2,g3 return after fld uitvoer end repeat end repeat end repeat That took 101 seconds. So I tried to speed it up with what I learned about repeat for each: put line 1 to -3 of t into t1 put 0 into f1 repeat for each line g1 in t1 add 1 to f1 put line f1+1 to -2 of t into t2 put 0 into f2 repeat for each line g2 in t2 add 1 to f2 put line f2+1 to -1 of t into t3 repeat for each line g3 in t3 put g1,g2,g3 return after fld uitvoer end repeat end repeat end repeat 364 seconds! And I thought it would be faster! It involved some extra vars, but since it is not much data processed, I don't think memory issues could explain this. Any thoughts why this is much slower than the original script and how I can speed this up? Terry ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Repeats repeated
Terry Vogelaar wrote: Last week I asked a question about filtering the double lines in a var with many lines. The list helped very well by pointing out that I shouldn't use repeat with, but repeat for each, which brought the processing time back from 60 hours to 4 seconds (!) So I tried the same technique with another script that has a triple repeat loop. The var t contains about 150 short lines and the script is intended to put every possible combination of 3 lines of t into a field: repeat with f1 = 1 to the number of lines of t - 2 put line f1 of t into g1 repeat with f2 = f1+1 to the number of lines of t - 1 put line f2 of t into g2 repeat with f3 = f2+1 to the number of lines of t put line f3 of t into g3 put g1,g2,g3 return after fld uitvoer end repeat end repeat end repeat That took 101 seconds. So I tried to speed it up with what I learned about repeat for each: put line 1 to -3 of t into t1 put 0 into f1 repeat for each line g1 in t1 add 1 to f1 put line f1+1 to -2 of t into t2 put 0 into f2 repeat for each line g2 in t2 add 1 to f2 put line f2+1 to -1 of t into t3 repeat for each line g3 in t3 put g1,g2,g3 return after fld uitvoer end repeat end repeat end repeat 364 seconds! And I thought it would be faster! It involved some extra vars, but since it is not much data processed, I don't think memory issues could explain this. Any thoughts why this is much slower than the original script and how I can speed this up? Every time you count a line number it eats time. Arrays are faster for this -- check out the split and combine commands to see how to convert chunks to arrays andback again. Also, take anything that touches a field out of the loop for an even greater speed increase. -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Media Corporation Custom Software and Web Development for All Major Platforms Developer of WebMerge 2.0: Publish any database on any site ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com Tel: 323-225-3717 AIM: FourthWorldInc ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Repeats repeated
On Sunday, Nov 3, 2002, at 17:13 Australia/Sydney, Terry Vogelaar wrote: Hi all, snip So I tried the same technique with another script that has a triple repeat loop. The var t contains about 150 short lines and the script is intended to put every possible combination of 3 lines of t into a field: repeat with f1 = 1 to the number of lines of t - 2 put line f1 of t into g1 repeat with f2 = f1+1 to the number of lines of t - 1 put line f2 of t into g2 repeat with f3 = f2+1 to the number of lines of t put line f3 of t into g3 put g1,g2,g3 return after fld uitvoer end repeat end repeat end repeat That took 101 seconds. So I tried to speed it up with what I learned about repeat for each: put line 1 to -3 of t into t1 put 0 into f1 repeat for each line g1 in t1 add 1 to f1 put line f1+1 to -2 of t into t2 put 0 into f2 repeat for each line g2 in t2 add 1 to f2 put line f2+1 to -1 of t into t3 repeat for each line g3 in t3 put g1,g2,g3 return after fld uitvoer end repeat end repeat end repeat 364 seconds! And I thought it would be faster! It involved some extra vars, but since it is not much data processed, I don't think memory issues could explain this. Any thoughts why this is much slower than the original script and how I can speed this up? Terry I can see why repeat for each failed here - you need to extract subsets of the main list for each of the inner RFE loops for each time through its outer loop. Thus, you are extracting by line numbers and doing more work than in the first instance. RFE is fast through each sub-list but the work of continually creating new lists is an overwhelming burden. Not sure how to solve it using arrays as you seem to wind up with the same problem only this time fiddling with keys. Since Richard suggested that approach, perhaps he has something in mind. regards David Terry ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Relational database capabilities?
--- Bruce Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] This reply is rather discontinuous. None of the statements seem to relate to each other. First a variable is declared, then never used. Then a post statemenet is issued. Then you put something, referring to a variable that hasn't been defined, and not actually putting it anywhere. I have searched the referenced site and can't find the orginal which this quote is supposed to have come from. Is there a real and complete example of this technique somewhere? Hi Bruce, Actually, all that was missing was a target URL at the end of the 'post' command. So it should have read: put http://folderInPath/folderWithResponseFile/FMPro; into theURL post -db=MyDbNameHere-lay=DBLayoutNameHere-format=FormatFileName.html-findAll to theUrl put urlDecode(it) At any rate, I went sniffing around my own archives, and retrieved the following post from the use-revolution archives: http://lists.runrev.com/pipermail/use-revolution/2002-March/002769.html Hope this helped, Jan Schenkel. = As we grow older, we grow both wiser and more foolish at the same time. (La Rochefoucauld) __ Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/ ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
