runrev2web (learning from the toolbook experience)
Hello all, some experiences from the toolbook scene to the posting of Andre Garcia and others concerning runrev2web: I came from toolbook (xtalk for windows only) to runrev where this happened some years ago. Toolbook long ago splitted in two directions: traditional ui development in openscript (xtalk dialect) and web development, with a template approach (you can define a book=stack as native or as DHTML and use predefined template books = stacks for webcourses) which can be converted automatically. For a DHTML book you can use elements out of a catalogue (I understood Andre in this direction) which work both in toolbook native (called Actions Editor AE with a subset of javascript within toolbook) AND converted in HTML (after a phase using java which was stopped) mostly for educational courses and instruction. The consequences were in my opinion the splitting of the toolbook community in web authors using toolbook as template engine for making educational courses which look almost the same native and on the web, and the traditional users like me who made measurement programs and multimedia with toolbook. And the development of the application toolbook became slower and slower, only the DHTML approach was pushed und just this year after some years of lament a 32bit version has been published! From this historical experiences I would say: In my opinion metacard/runrev has included all mechanisms for making a template approach to bring object functionality even to the web when writing converters and generators. There is a metacard-stack on the web which converts the ui into an xml-dump and restores from the xml building a new stack. In this direction I would see the best solution. One can program php or perl (server side) or javascript (client side) for some extended objects and put it into custom properties in the runrev stack or better in a runrev library stack which during the conversion to web would replace the runrev transcript. There even is the possibility to write generators who build the objects of a stack for different contexts (native,web,x3d as I did in my last project) and I would prefer if the community would define standards to use in library stacks for interoperability instead of forcing runrev to go into a direction I saw in the toolbook scene some years ago and do not want to suffer again. My approach would look like this: function newobject(button,Open,web) function newobject objecttype,name,context if context = native then if objecttype = button create button name -- or better: clone button button1 of card protoobjects -- with all functionality built in you need for this button set the topleft of button name to ... end if -- better of course condition ... ... return objectid -- for addressing of the created object in runrev end if if context = web then if objecttype = button put the buttonwebtemplate of this stack into template replace $buttonname with name in template put template after the HTMLcode of this stack put the buttonphpfunctionalitytemplate of this stack into exportfile ... end if -- better of course condition ... ... return objectid -- for usage and addressing in css end if if context = x3d then if objecttype = button put the buttonx3dtemplate of this stack into template replace $buttonname with name in template replace DEF $objectid with DEF name ... in template replace $3dposition with x y z in template ... put template after the x3dcode of this stack end if -- better of course condition ... ... return objectid -- for usage in javascript for x3d end if end and if someone likes to fake the modern point-notation just do: get newobject (stack.card.button,Franz,native) get newobject (document.form1.button,Send,web) get newobject (x3d.backgroundgroup.inline,christmastree,x3d) Regards Mit freundlichen Grüßen Franz Böhmisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.animabit.de GF Animabit Multimedia Software GmbH Am Sonnenhang 22 D-94136 Thyrnau Tel +49 (0)8501-8538 Fax +49 (0)8501-8537 To: use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Revolution 2.9 DP-2 Release Date? (Unable to launch Revolution under OpenSUSE 10.3)
Erm, if the problem prevents it from launching, how is he going to 'Check for Updates'?... Cheers, Luis. On 24 Oct 2007, at 21:27, Björnke von Gierke wrote: On 24 Oct 2007, at 21:47, Derek Bump wrote: I checked the RQCC and the reports say the bug has been fixed in the DP-2 beta release. Has this release been released yet? If not, expected time-frame? Short answer: No More details: I guess you mean bug 5495. However, it isn't marked as fixed, but there's a note about a possible cause from another already fixed bug. As for knowing whether new releases are available, _IF_ such a bug is really marked as fixed for dp2, you'll most likely be able to get the new beta via the Check for updates... Item from the Help menu very shortly after. Cheers Bjoernke PS: Please do not say bugs are fixed when they aren't, it's not good for my blood pressure ;) -- official ChatRev page: http://chatrev.bjoernke.com Chat with other RunRev developers: go stack URL http://homepage.mac.com/bvg/chatrev1.3.rev; ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: The Documentation
Tim, I am an RR user like you. I agree with the things that you wrote (have included only part of it here). I had been thinking the same things, but had not taken the time to compose a message. Regards, Steven Axtell - Original Message - From: Timothy Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:49 PM Subject: The Documentation It seems there aren't many RR users like me, at present. The majority of discussion on the use-rev list is over my head, for instance. Most users seem much more knowledgeable than me. But it seems like there are millions of mildly geekish potential RR users out there. If they find the docs approachable and digestible, they might discover RR and become enthusiastic. Otherwise, it just isn't going to happen. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: The Documentation
Are the docs all being redone for the 3.0 release? If they are then maybe none of this matters. And speaking of 3.0, is there a projected timeline for that yet? Mark ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: runrev2web (learning from the toolbook experience)
Very interesting Toolbook history. And your approach to creating objects for multiple environments is also intriguing. Thanks, Jim Lambert ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Convertion functions
Hi, Is there a method in Revolution to convert integer to string and vice versa. Example: repeat with count = 1 to 10Put text count into value // where I want the value to be 'text1,text2' end repeat Thank you Kavitha ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Convertion functions
Hi Kavitha, In Revolution, there is no need to convert strings to integers and vv. Your repeat loop will work fine. repeat with x = 1 to 10 put text x comma after myList end repeat return char 1 to -2 of myList Best regards, Mark Schonewille -- Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering http://economy-x-talk.com http://www.salery.biz Quickly extract data from your HyperCard stacks with DIFfersifier. http://differsifier.economy-x-talk.com Op 25-okt-2007, om 17:44 heeft Kavitha het volgende geschreven: Hi, Is there a method in Revolution to convert integer to string and vice versa. Example: repeat with count = 1 to 10Put text count into value// where I want the value to be 'text1,text2' end repeat Thank you Kavitha ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Convertion functions
Hi Kavitha, Le 25 oct. 07 à 17:44, Kavitha a écrit : Hi, Is there a method in Revolution to convert integer to string and vice versa. Example: repeat with count = 1 to 10Put text count into value// where I want the value to be 'text1,text2' end repeat Thank you Kavitha Not sure I understand well ;-) I assume that text1, text2 are variables and you want to concatenate the contents of these variables using a loop? So: repeat with count = 1 to 10 do put text i after tValue put cr after tValue -- return or whatever end repeat delete char -1 of tValue -- return Or repeat with count = 1 to 10 do put text i into tValue Process tValue end repeat If it does not help here, may be it will help elsewhere :-) Best regards from Paris, Eric Chatonet. Plugins and tutorials for Revolution: http://www.sosmartsoftware.com/ Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
The Documentation
What is missing exactly? The dictionary is a pretty good version of a man page. Dan's book is ok at the level of 'how to think like a computer scientist' - simple how to get started. Very nice as far as it goes. Needs a second edition. The pdf is ok also as a printable version of the dictionary with a few more examples, assuming it ever gets finished. There are two things missing, or rather, there is one thing missing, but it comes in two flavors. One is the equivalent of Dive Into Python, which early on contains the immortal line You know how other books go on and on about programming fundamentals and finally work up to building a complete, working program? Let's skip all that. This is the sort of book that says, you already know about classes, here is how they work in Python. The second is the equivalent of Hetland's Python book. It is step by step, this is how you do certain things, using various bits of the language, with an account of pitfalls. Starts simple and moves you through writing real applications. Both are the reverse of the dictionary: they both start with something to do, and then show how to combine different bits of the language to get it done. The Perl book Minimal Perl is about halfway between these two. Chapters like, why Perl is a better awk. So start from an assumed knowledge and then show how Rev does this particular set of tasks, that the known language was designed to do, but does it better. Again its in reverse, it goes from problem to multiple bits of the language. Not that I'm being hung up on Perl, Python or Ruby - these are just well regarded examples of docs. Getting to be a beginner in Rev is easy. Getting to be a sophisticated user in Rev after that is a Zen like experience. You go to live with the master who attacks you at random intervals, whatever you are doing, for no reason. Eventually, you hesitate before entering a doorway. The master emerges and bows deeply. Son, you are getting there, he says. The priority ought to be: One, finish what you started. So either trash the pdf or finish it, don't just leave it there twisting in the wind. Two must be, the reverse dictionary - here is how to do specific things, using various parts of the language together. The tutorials are a start but only a start. Its a lot of work - Hetland's book is amazing, and Mark Lutz' book even more so. But I really think that 400-500 systematic pages of this is what you need if you're to attract a lot of new people who are not oriented to Zen based learning. If you are doing Dive into Rev for the experienced, then it can be shorter. I don't know which should have priority, Dive, or something introductory. It depends on which market you're going after. Whether the less experienced new people are worth the trouble, you'd have to know more about the numbers for Rev to assess. I'm not complaining by the way. Personally I don't mind the odd frustrations and find them well compensated by the sudden blinding flash of illumination. In fact, I sort of like the mental exercise. But a lot of people are in more of a hurry, and if you want to get to them, you have to offer them something like that. Peter ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Concatenate mp3-Files on Macintosh
Hello Klaus, Hello Mark, Thank you for your quick response; as the script of Klaus didn´t work at once (you wrote not tested ;-), I now use the One-Line of Mark to concatenate mp3-files in sourceFolder and to store it in targetpath. get shell(cat quote sourceFolder quote *.mp3 quote targetPath quote) One little hint: the last char of sourcefolder should be /! Greetings Richard. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: The Documentation
Le 16 oct. 07, à 22:42, Richmond Mathewson a écrit : François Chaplais wrote: version 2.6.1... looks much better organized than in version 2.8.1 Hmm, there is a question of licencing here; but (?) I suppose people who own licences to 2.8.1 may in some way be allowed access to components from 2.6.1. A fine point here actually. I do not have access to the 2.6.1 documentation. At this second, I am considering a buttons for dummies stack which, among other things, point to the Rev docs. I do not want to go into the details of parsing the official Revolution doc, so I will be happy with a simple copy and paste of the doc. I can check the environment to see if the user is in development mode, to make sure the user has legal access to the doc anyway. If the people at Runtime Revolution are not over sensitive over the display of their documentation, this would be fine. Anybody from runRev can attempt an answer to this issue in this mailing list? Very best Francois It is extremely simple to hive-off the Documentation stack from 2.6.1 as a renamed stack so that 2.8.1 users could have it as a documentation source. Obviously it does not contain the updated stuff such as Launch document. Love, Richmond Francois Chaplais 35 rue Saint-Honore 77305 Fontainebleau Cedex France http://cas.ensmp.fr/~chaplais/index-e.html ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: The Documentation
Le 25 oct. 07, à 23:38, François Chaplais a écrit : A fine point here actually. I do not have access to the 2.6.1 documentation. At this second, I am considering a buttons for dummies stack which, among other things, point to the Rev docs. I do not want to go into the details of parsing the official Revolution doc, so I will be happy with a simple copy and paste of the doc. I can check the environment to see if the user is in development mode, to make sure the user has legal access to the doc anyway. If the people at Runtime Revolution are not over sensitive over the display of their documentation, this would be fine. Anybody from runRev can attempt an answer to this issue in this mailing list? on the other hand, I just realized I can use BvG Docu to drive the doc display Francois Chaplais 35 rue Saint-Honore 77305 Fontainebleau Cedex France http://cas.ensmp.fr/~chaplais/index-e.html ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: The Documentation
The original HyperCard manuals are hard to beat for parsimony, elegance, and darn good writing in my opinion. Gregory ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: The Documentation
The original manuals were more than skimpy. I think you mean the Winkler and Shafer books. The original HyperCard manuals are hard to beat for parsimony, elegance, and darn good writing in my opinion. Gregory -- stephen barncard s a n f r a n c i s c o - - - - - - - - - - - - ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: The Documentation
On 10/25/07, Timothy Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 24, 2007, at 12:12 PM, Richmond Mathewson wrote: I learnt RR by trial and error, old HC knowledge (founded on Danny goodman's EXCELLENT book...) Me too. However, in my case, my understanding and skill have not grown much beyond that point. cut... But it seems like there are millions of mildly geekish potential RR users out there. If they find the docs approachable and digestible, they might discover RR and become enthusiastic. Otherwise, it just isn't going to happen. True, but I think what everyone needs to appreciate is that Apple had a LOT more resources, both personnel and monetary, than Rev has and still people flocked to third party authors to get to grips with HC. People seem to be expecting from Rev what Apple itself couldn't achieve. Jim Ault wrote: Moving off topic a bit.. the sample stack library, much like Rev User Spaces. Again, Beginner, Adv, Expert ratings. Showing a working example is worth a 1000 visits to the Dictionary. I might be exaggerating, but not by much. Sample stacks don't consistently work well for me, especially if they are sample projects. Buttons, fields and graphics are easy. Scripts are hard. The projects themselves rarely interest me. Sample lines of script in the docs work great for me. If the docs, in their current form, had five or ten times as many sample lines of transcript for every command, property, function, etc., and, sometimes, possibly, very short working scripts, I would almost always be able to answer my own questions. The large number of samples would reflect various contexts and purposes, varying degrees of difficulty, and so on. I'm 110% with you here. It's why I believe BvG Docu + WebNotes Plus (other's contributions) has so much potential. You and I will never have the authoring skills of the like of Danny, Dan, David or DeVoto (is it because we don't have a D in our initials?) but I have no doubt that even you, after struggling to understand some terse example and finally having the 'penny drop' would pen an inclusion aimed at newbies giving a fuller layman's explanation of what it all means and how you make it work. In the mean time, we continue to go around and around in circles. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Double Clicking App Icon Opens Rev but not the App
I assume that I'm ignorant of some pretty basic stuff. Sorry to inconvenience you folks, but I sure would appreciate some help. I'm using Rev Studio and OSX 10.4.10 I have an App that I've been using in the development environment for several years. I have always opened it and Rev at the same time by double clicking the App's icon in the finder. Now double clicking the App's icon opens Rev, but does not make the App visible and does not run the openstack hander in the mainstack. However, the App can then be 'opened' using Application Browser. Additionally, the same is true for backup copies of the App that are several months old. Double clicking their icons opens Rev, but not the BU App. If I open Rev directly (without clicking on an app), I can then use the Open command in the File menu to open my App and it does all the stuff in the App's openstack handler. Double clicking other unrelated Apps continues to open both that App and Rev. I have reinstalled Rev and uninstalled GLX2. The problem persists. Thanks Blair Morrissey ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: The Documentation
And of course Danny Goodman. The original manuals were more than skimpy. I think you mean the Winkler and Shafer books. The original HyperCard manuals are hard to beat for parsimony, elegance, and darn good writing in my opinion. Gregory -- stephen barncard -- stephen barncard s a n f r a n c i s c o - - - - - - - - - - - - ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: The Documentation
I agree with Gregory. I loved the Hypercard documentation: clear, well-organized, concise, nice examples. I'm looking at the Hypercard Script Language Guide right now. It's 583 pages. I wouldn't call that skimpy. -- Regards, Howard Bornstein --- www.designeq.com - Hide quoted text - On 10/25/07, Stephen Barncard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The original manuals were more than skimpy. I think you mean the Winkler and Shafer books. The original HyperCard manuals are hard to beat for parsimony, elegance, and darn good writing in my opinion. Gregory -- stephen barncard s a n f r a n c i s c o ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: The Documentation
On 10/26/07, Stephen Barncard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The original manuals were more than skimpy. I think you mean the Winkler and Shafer books. The original HyperCard manuals are hard to beat for parsimony, elegance, and darn good writing in my opinion. Gregory Yes, again, the Apple 'Offical' Docs were better than the Rev's 'Official' Docs, but considering the resources available to Apple it's not surprising. BUT, the Docs everyone wants are the ones penned by third party interests. Even the examples given for python and Perl books are all third party authors. None have been penned by the mother ship. People shouldn't be saying the Rev Docs should be this or that. People should be complaining that Goodman, Shafer, DeVoto, Progue et al have failed to see the vast market of purchasers, stepped into the void to wield their talent in the direction of Rev books. Then again, Dan has and didn't follow up, so maybe the market isn't worth the effort. So back to a user driven approach we go. So the Doc thread continues to go around and around in circles. (Death, Taxes, and the Doc thread:-) ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: The Documentation
Kay C Lan wrote: People shouldn't be saying the Rev Docs should be this or that. People should be complaining that Goodman, Shafer, DeVoto, Progue et al have failed to see the vast market of purchasers, stepped into the void to wield their talent in the direction of Rev books. The majority of Rev's 4000+ pages of documentation was authored by the DeVoto mentioned above, using a style guideline very similar to the one she used for HyperTalk 2.2: The Book. As for a third-party opportunities, get Apple to bundle Rev for free with every Mac and I think we'd see plenty of new books about it. ;) -- Richard Gaskin Managing Editor, revJournal ___ Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: The Documentation
On 10/26/07, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The majority of Rev's 4000+ pages of documentation was authored by the DeVoto mentioned above, using a style guideline very similar to the one she used for HyperTalk 2.2: The Book. I was more partial to Dan's 'The Complete Book of HyperTalk 2' and Danny's 'The Complete HyperCard 2.2 Handbook'. I think though the distinction is that 'they were books'. I liked the supplied Docs that came with HC and the sample stacks, but I still needed Dan and Danny's books beside me to make things gel. I like Jeanne's work with the Rev Doc's, it's a pity that in the upgrade that some of the Quick Guides from 2.6 were lost, but still, if she wrote a physical book with a 'style guideline slightly different' I'd definitely consider purchasing it - price dependent:-) As for a third-party opportunities, get Apple to bundle Rev for free with every Mac and I think we'd see plenty of new books about it. ;) Well I guess that's another one of those resources that Apple had for HC that Rev doesn't. Sounds like a job for a highly motivated Marketing Whiz... know anyone that fits that Bill;-) ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: The Documentation
As for a third-party opportunities, get Apple to bundle Rev for free with every Mac and I think we'd see plenty of new books about it. ;) iPerCard? ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: The Documentation
Le 26 oct. 07, à 05:55, Richard Gaskin a écrit : The majority of Rev's 4000+ pages of documentation huh? pages? do you mean paper pages? Or do you mean the online doc? (I do not mention the pdf which is not finished). OK, I have just spent the night looking at DocsLib by BvG, and i'm tired. To make things simple, a VERY nice (and IMHO, simple) improvement on the rev online doc would by the ability to send a doc command with syntax doc string where string may be anything and which would have the same effect as typing the string in the search field of the online doc (nothing more, nothing less than the doc window). This would make it easier to produce introductory stacks with links to the official documentation. Should not be that difficult from the developers' point of view. Very best, Francois was authored by the DeVoto mentioned above, using a style guideline very similar to the one she used for HyperTalk 2.2: The Book. As for a third-party opportunities, get Apple to bundle Rev for free with every Mac and I think we'd see plenty of new books about it. ;) Francois Chaplais 35 rue Saint-Honore 77305 Fontainebleau Cedex France http://cas.ensmp.fr/~chaplais/index-e.html ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: The Documentation
François Chaplais wrote: To make things simple, a VERY nice (and IMHO, simple) improvement on the rev online doc would by the ability to send a doc command with syntax doc string where string may be anything and which would have the same effect as typing the string in the search field of the online doc (nothing more, nothing less than the doc window). This would make it easier to produce introductory stacks with links to the official documentation. Should not be that difficult from the developers' point of view. That's a very excellent idea. Right now I think Rev is the only producer of a Rev dictionary that doesn't have such a call. I added one to the MC docs a while back, Jerry's GLX2 has one, and I believe BVG's has one too. It would be ideal if all of us used the same syntax, so folks could mix and match their favorite dictionary and it would work with their favorite script editor, etc. My only question is whether doc is the best token for us. It seems a bit general, perhaps hard to discern it's for Transcript dictionary lookups. Any suggestions for alternatives? Should we get buy-in from RunRev on whatever we propose, so everything -- including their stuff -- will work well with third-party options? -- Richard Gaskin Managing Editor, revJournal ___ Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
