Re: [OT] Not just because

2009-05-14 Thread Stephen Cox
Heh.

I'd be happy to find simple calendar popups.


On 5/14/09 5:01 AM, Luis l...@anachreon.co.uk wrote:

 Your mention of 3rd party support triggered a thought: What would it
 take to create a Rev plugin ('connector') to handle foreign language
 libraries?

-- 
Stephen Cox
Chief geek | Networkx | networkxfla.com

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Politics and Programming

2009-05-13 Thread Stephen Cox
LOL LOL LOL.

-Stephen cox


On 5/13/09 10:09 AM, Kay C Lan lan.kc.macm...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Richmond Mathewson 
 richmondmathew...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 
 Every decision we, as programmers, make has some sort of
 political impact, and as such, needs to be thought about very
 carefully.
 
 
 Every decision? Like the choice of my background colour is going to have any
 political connotation, who cares if it's red or blue. Ah then again, bad
 example, what about green. No, seems like I'm jumping on the eco bandwagon.
 Pink? No sexual orientation might be misconstrued. OK I'll just go with
 boring old white. Ooops just lost the black and the youth vote. OK so
 its., I don't know ;-)
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Politics and Programming

2009-05-13 Thread Stephen Cox
No it's laziness. Windows is like 90% of the market. It's a pretty safe bet
that your customer will be running Windows. So companies IT departments were
lazy and wrote for IE only. Stupid, I know. It's the is the old way of
thinking. And it's changed.

With phones, the mac, and netbooks (running linux) on the rise companies are
scrambling to represent. Frankly any company that was stupid enough to
develop for IE only deserves what they get. The Bank of Scotland should lose
your business.



On 5/13/09 10:29 AM, Richmond Mathewson richmondmathew...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Now these may not be 'Political' in the sense of politics,
 but they are political insofar as they affect other people,
 marketing and so on.

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Website

2009-05-13 Thread Stephen Cox
Take a look at Squarespace @ http://www.squarespace.com/

Starts at 8 dollars a month. It's a kick ass service. Has the best CSS
implementation I've ever seen. You design your whole site at their site by
moving pieces around the sreen. And it's all done in a browser.

It's also compatible with everything. So there is no data lock with these
guys. I've turned lot on to them and not heard a bad thing yet.

Free usually means crap. Every free service I've seen either has ads, forces
you to add a link-farm page, or has such low/slow designed to get you to pay
for better. Not worth the trouble when you can get something like
Squarespace for so little.


On 5/13/09 2:17 PM, Richmond Mathewson richmondmathew...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Have finally transferred my website here:
 
 http://richmond.b0x.com/
 
 for what its worth.  For people with a lot of free time on their
 hands there is a link to my 1995 Master's Thesis in Cognitive Linguistics.
 AND, for the record, you should be able to download the file without
 joining the Yahoo group where it is stored. I will try to reset all
 my Yahoo groups so that resources can be downloaded in this way.
 
 At least in this way I can circumvent the old versu new revOnline problem
 until I am the owner of a version of RR that can access the new version.
 
 HOWEVER, that is not the point of this posting.
 
 I was recommended a number of websites by members of
 this Use-list - for which, a big Thank You! I am, confined to a free
 website, however.
 
 The most interesting suggestion was:
 
 http://www.tripod.lycos.com/
 
 when one clicks on the FREE option one is directed to a page that
 just states this:
 
 402 Payment Required
 
 This service requires payment, contact the server administrator to make
 arranements for
 payment and have the service provisioned. You will need to provide the
 following information:
 
 Your full name
 Your email address
 Contact Telephone number
 Click your browser's back button to locate help for this service.
 
 I have trawled through a further 20 services that are supposedly free,
 but, somewhere
 along the line they ask for your Credit/Debit card details.
 
 The free web-hosting I have ended up with haven't tried any financial
 trick on me, yet;
 but FREE is as FREE does; no ZIP files and no PDF files. I am prepared
 to put up with those
 restrictions for the ease and price of a free website.
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

-- 
Stephen Cox
Chief geek | Networkx | networkxfla.com

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] Not just because

2009-05-13 Thread Stephen Cox
Why not a few examples of languages that you can also use to write off line
apps too. Like Python or Ruby? Both are used on the web (Rails, Django,
Zope, Merb - to name a few). And both are used to write cross platform apps,
even gui's using something like Qt.

Also Java. And Realbasic has Yuma. Not to mention all the .Net solutions.
And Silverlight and Flex (though I hate, HATE Action Script 3.0).

What makes OnRev unique is the language. Nothing else really. In fact
considering the amount of 3rd party support for Ruby, Python and .Net you
are at a disadvantage using OnRev. Being that you have to reinvent the
wheel. 

Course this is true with off line apps as well. I like Revolution but it has
a VERY small 3rd party plug-in community. And a backward UI, compared to the
rest. What's kept it on my machine so far is the language. In fact we just
bought another copy.


On 5/13/09 12:27 PM, Luis l...@anachreon.co.uk wrote:

 Hiya,
 
 I didn't like PHP when I first went into it, plus some host apply
 restrictions to what functions you can call.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Luis.
 
 
 On 13 May 2009, at 16:53, Mark Schonewille wrote:
 
 Hi Luis,
 
 If you're in a need for an alternative, what's wrong with PHP
 (which isn't an alternative at all but rather the mainstream tool
 for server-side scripting)?
 
 --
 Best regards,
 
 Mark Schonewille
 
 Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
 http://economy-x-talk.com
 http://www.salery.biz
 Dutch forum: http://runrev.info/rrforum
 
 New: Snapper Screen Recorder 2.0.1
 Download at http://snapper.economy-x-talk.com
 
 On 13 mei 2009, at 17:14, Luis wrote:
 
 Seeing as it seems to be OT season, and I work in the office of
 stirring things up:
 
 http://runbasic.com/
 
 http://runbasicnet.com/
 
 http://www.runbasic.com/seaside/go/runbasic?
 _s=hDedgqXdSCYDuTMh_k=nFUdiyqV
 
 Actually, I was looking into comparable options to On-Rev to see
 where the advantages/disadvantages would be, and I came across
 this Smalltalk based option.
 
 Other than LISP based systems that only have a partial features
 set, this is all I can find that is 'similar'.
 
 We've gone through Tilestack, wondering if anyone has seen RunBASIC.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Luis.
 
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
 subscription preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
 
 
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

-- 
Stephen Cox
Chief geek | Networkx | networkxfla.com

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Cancel a repeat with a button

2009-05-13 Thread Stephen Cox
Why not just set a global variable and check it in the loop? Have the cancel
button set the variable to True when pressed.


On 5/13/09 10:01 AM, Ludovic Thébault ludovic.theba...@laposte.net
wrote:

 Hello,
 
 How interrupt a repeat loop by a button ?
 While a copy of a lot of files with rev, i want the user can cancel
 the copy.
 
   repeat for each line l in it
if char 1 of l  . then
  put convertpath(tstack/l) into tpath1
  put convertpath(tlibrary/) into tpath2
  get shell(cp tpath1tpath2)
 end if
 end repeat
 
 Thanks.
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

-- 
Stephen Cox
Chief geek | Networkx | networkxfla.com

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Cancel a repeat with a button

2009-05-13 Thread Stephen Cox
Why not? You checking a global variable. He said it would take a while to
complete. And I'm assuming he's running the loop in the background.

User presses cancel button, setting the global variable to True

In the loop, last statement checks the variable (it's global so the code
will see it).  If True, exit (or whatever cleanup he has, then exit).


On 5/13/09 11:08 PM, Colin Holgate co...@rcn.com wrote:

 
 On May 13, 2009, at 11:00 PM, Stephen Cox wrote:
 
 Why not just set a global variable and check it in the loop? Have
 the cancel
 button set the variable to True when pressed.
 
 
 You would be in a tight repeat loop at the time, so would mouseups on
 other objects even work?
 
 
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

-- 
Stephen Cox
Chief geek | Networkx | networkxfla.com

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Cancel a repeat with a button

2009-05-13 Thread Stephen Cox
I was close. ;)

I knew about the wait command.


On 5/14/09 12:31 AM, Scott Rossi sc...@tactilemedia.com wrote:

 Recently, Stephen Cox wrote:
 
 Why not? You checking a global variable. He said it would take a while to
 complete. And I'm assuming he's running the loop in the background.
 
 Revolution doesn't process events asynchronously.  During a straightforward
 repeat loop, nothing gets processed or sent while the loop executes, so a
 mouseclick would never be detected.  You need to make allowances in the
 script for this to happen.  There are a few ways this could be done:
 
 You could poll the mouse: if the mouse is down  This practice has been
 discouraged in the past because it was deemed in efficient and somewhat
 unreliable, but with recent versions of Rev and newer machines, it can work.
 
 You could add a wait command: wait 10 millisecs with messages.  The
 with messages portion allows messages and events to be processed in
 between the loops.  Here's where a global, custom property, or other
 variable could be checked.
 
 Another way entirely to run a loop is using send in...:
 
 on myProcessingLoop
   doMyStuff
   send myProcessingLoop to me in 10 millisecs
 end myProcessingLoop
 
 This method inherently allows for other events/messages to be processed.
 
 Regards,
 
 Scott Rossi
 Creative Director
 Tactile Media, Multimedia  Design
 
 
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

-- 
Stephen Cox
Chief geek | Networkx | networkxfla.com

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Example revolution apps?

2009-05-12 Thread Stephen Cox
Is ScreenSteps by Blue Mango written in Revolution?

-Stephen Cox
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Example revolution apps?

2009-05-12 Thread Stephen Cox
That's encouraging.

Learning Revolution, I've been frustrated with the design tools. But as long
as I know things are possible I'm not worried. Thanks.


On 5/12/09 5:08 AM, kl...@major.on-rev.com kl...@major.on-rev.com wrote:

 Hi Stephen,
 
 Is ScreenSteps by Blue Mango written in Revolution?
 
 Yes :-)
 
 -Stephen Cox
 
 Best
 
 Klaus
 
 --
 Klaus Major
 http://www.major.on-rev.com
 kl...@major.on-rev.com
 
 
 
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Details on how to apps mac like?

2009-05-12 Thread Stephen Cox
Hi,

So far the only application I¹ve found written in revolution that looks like
a native Mac app is ScreenSteps.  Granted, I haven¹t looked long.  :)

Anyway my questions:

How¹d they created the icon bar? And I mean the area right below the title
bar of the window? I¹ve been busting my head playing with rectangles, but
no. And I assume the blue area on the left is also a rectangle with a
background? The problem I am having is I can create the areas and background
color easy enough. Placement is my problem. No mater how close I get my icon
bar to the windows title bar, the card¹s background bleeds in. Almost like
there¹s cell padding going on.

I¹m modeling my app against the Mac Dictionary Application. Trying to
simulate a large title/tool bar (the app is a database front end ­ for
internal use). 

Thanks,

Stephen Cox
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Details on how to apps mac like?

2009-05-12 Thread Stephen Cox
Thanks. I got it worked out. And thanks about the margin.. Didn't know that.

Actually you can do some pretty nice interfaces with this. ;)


On 5/12/09 2:38 PM, J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.com wrote:

 Stephen Cox wrote:
 No mater how close I get my icon
 bar to the windows title bar, the card¹s background bleeds in. Almost like
 there¹s cell padding going on.
 
 I'm not clear what you're seeing here, but a couple of thoughts: if you
 are using a group for your toolbar, note that groups have a margin
 property. Try setting the group's margins to zero. Also make sure the
 group itself is opaque so the background card color doesn't show through.

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GIMP paint studio

2009-05-11 Thread Stephen Cox
Does the Gimp still require xwindows to run on the mac? Or did someone
finally port it to run natively?


On 5/11/09 3:17 PM, Richmond Mathewson richmondmathew...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Those of you who cannot afford Photoshop, have 'funny feelings'
 about proprietary software, don't do either Macintosh or Windows,
 can afford Photoshop but would rather spend the money on
 Runtime Revolution  :)
 
 (err, why would you spend an awful lot of money on something
 when there is something just as good available for FREE?
 
 Much more sensible to spend it on something that is extremely
 good and is not available for FREE . . . Runtime Revolution)
 
 might well give this a look:
 
 http://webupd8.blogspot.com/2009/05/gim-paint-studio-gimp-optimized-for.html
 
 It presupposes you already have GIMP installed:
 
 http://www.gimp.org/
 
 It is poly-platform!
 
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Mac icons

2009-05-10 Thread Stephen Cox
I was wondering what icons ya use for your projects (on Mac)? Looks like
Revolution uses Carbon (when are they moving to Cocoa ­ Carbon is being
dropped VERY soon). Has anyone used the Cocoa icons? Or is there a set I can
buy, for Revolution?

Thanks

-Stephen Cox
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: OT Re: Newbie... Strict Compilation mode

2009-05-10 Thread Stephen Cox
Agreed.

Now must I send bribes to end this debate?


On 5/10/09 2:50 AM, Richmond Mathewson richmondmathew...@gmail.com
wrote:

 God may forgive you, but the rest of us will . . .
 
 love you and cherish you for initiating a useful and
 stimulating discussion!
 
 And, the moral of the story is: you can be bl**dy-minded like me,
 or you can be bl**dy-minded like somebody else, or (what a luxury)
 you can be bl**dy-minded in you own way.
 
 To my mind, the 'tolerance' of Runtime Revolution is what makes it
 so much more accessible than most other programming environments.
 
 Stephen Cox wrote:
 Well..  God.. Sorry all for starting this. :)
 
 Use what you want. I'll keep it on cause I'm used to that type of
 environment. Used to declaring variables. And it's in my head.
 
 
 
 On 5/10/09 1:09 AM, Joe Lewis Wilkins pepe...@cox.net wrote:
 
   
 Following this thread has pushed another one of my buttons and I
 cannot resist getting on my soap-box and inserting my two-bits.
 
 We have all become accustomed to protecting ourselves from
 ourselves. To the point where some of us pass laws requiring that
 everyone protect themselves. I'm talking about INSURANCE. The best
 insurance against having anything happen is an alert and active
 mind.  Insurance merely puts us to sleep; allowing us to be less than
 vigilant and knowledgeable within all aspects of our lives. Not
 declaring vars merely promotes sloppiness and, eventually, stupidity.
 The President is going to spend enormous sums of money promoting
 Health Insurance, when the best insurance is almost free; preventive
 medicine which we have neglected for decades. We just need to be
 diligent about all things. Education, eduction, education
 
 Joe Wilkins
 
   On May 9, 2009, at 8:47 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
 
 
 Jacque-
 
 Saturday, May 9, 2009, 6:01:53 PM, you wrote:
 
 Ah... I *knew* this would push Jacque's buttons... g
 
   
 1. The main strength of xtalk is that you do not have to declare or
 type
 variables. Sticking them up there at the top of every handler removes
 one of the main advantages of using Rev in the first place.
 
 I seriously take issue with that being the main strength of xtalk.
 
   
 5. And finally, what's wrong with being lazy? :) The smart programmer
 finds the easiest way to do things. That's what Rev is all about.
 
 Laziness is one of the big reasons I *do* declare my variables. If the
 compiler is smart enough to catch all kinds of errors for me, why
 should I go through all the debugging work at runtime? I believe in
 letting the computer do the hard work for me, otherwise I might as
 well just be coding the cpu's opcodes by hand.
 
   
 None of these things is outweighed for me by the fact that
 explicitVars
 might catch a few typos. The engine catches most of those anyway and
 throws an error.
 
 Back to today's response:
 
 The debugger pinpoints the exact source of the misspelling if it
 happens; how hard is that? I'm a pretty good typist though, so I
 don't
 get caught out too often. I suppose if you are really as bad a
 typist as
 your theoretical example, then yes, you'd want some help. ;)
 
 puts on a SNL snarl
 ...Jacque, you ignorant slut...
 returns to reality
 You're missing the point. The purpose of explicitVars is to catch
 things that slip by the compiler otherwise. If it's just a simple
 misspelling of a keyword the compiler will catch it anyway, as you
 pointed out. But explicitVars will let you know if you've mistyped a
 variable name when the friendly compiler would helpfully generate a
 new variable instead of using the one you intended. And it will help
 when your fingers forget to place a space after the and instead of
 the variableNames ending up in a variable you end up with empty.
 
   
 I once took over a project from someone who used explicit
 variables. I
 stripped out all the declarations so I could read the scripts
 comfortably. The stack size was cut in half (!). No lie. There were
 all
 kinds of handlers in there with something like 8 lines of
 declarations
 and three lines of actual script. Waste of time and space.
 
 I recognize hyperbole when I see it, but nonetheless I don't think you
 can have 8 lines of declarations and three lines of actual script (and
 of course someone will post some code that proves me wrong). If you
 come across a handler like this then you have at least five lines of
 declarations that are not being used. And then you're absolutely right
 to strip them out g.
 
 -- 
 -Mark Wieder
 mwie...@ahsoftware.net
   
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
 
 
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit

Re: Mac icons

2009-05-10 Thread Stephen Cox
Much thanks. I got the dev tools installed.


On 5/10/09 2:53 AM, Richmond Mathewson richmondmathew...@gmail.com
wrote:

 If you have the Development tools installed there is a 'Icon Composer'
 program lurking there (in the Utilities folder); drag your RR images
 there and they will be 'magically' made into icons for you.
 
 Alternatively, just use a PNG image.  :)
 
 Stephen Cox wrote:
 I was wondering what icons ya use for your projects (on Mac)? Looks like
 Revolution uses Carbon (when are they moving to Cocoa ­ Carbon is being
 dropped VERY soon). Has anyone used the Cocoa icons? Or is there a set I can
 buy, for Revolution?
 
 Thanks
 
 -Stephen Cox
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
 
   
 
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Mac icons

2009-05-10 Thread Stephen Cox
Thanks. 

-Stephen COx


On 5/10/09 6:19 AM, Mark Schonewille m.schonewi...@economy-x-talk.com
wrote:

 Dear Stephen,
 
 Do you want to create an icon to display on your standalone
 application package in the Finder, or are you looking for pictures
 that you can use as icons in your interface?
 
 You can use Icon Composer to create icons from almost any picture.
 Icon composer creates icns files, which you can use in the standalone
 settings of Revolution.
 
 There are several sources where you can download interface icons. Here
 are a few sources:
 http://jesseross.com/clients/etoile/ui/icons/
 http://fasticon.com/freeware/
 http://www.iconshock.com/vista-icons.php
 http://www.cubeyellow.com/downloads.html
 http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/
 
 I created an unsophisticated set of small icons, which you can find
 here:
 http://economy-x-talk.com/developers.html
 
 --
 Best regards,
 
 Mark Schonewille
 
 Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
 http://economy-x-talk.com
 http://www.salery.biz
 Dutch forum: http://runrev.info/rrforum
 
 New: Snapper Screen Recorder 2.0.1
 Download at http://snapper.economy-x-talk.com
 
 On 10 mei 2009, at 08:20, Stephen Cox wrote:
 
 I was wondering what icons ya use for your projects (on Mac)? Looks
 like
 Revolution uses Carbon (when are they moving to Cocoa ­ Carbon is
 being
 dropped VERY soon). Has anyone used the Cocoa icons? Or is there a
 set I can
 buy, for Revolution?
 
 Thanks
 
 -Stephen Cox
 
 
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie question - how to check for a varible

2009-05-09 Thread Stephen Cox
Wait. I don't get this. You saying that checking if an unused variable is
empty returns false? Does revolution put some data in a variable when
created? 


On 5/9/09 2:44 AM, Martin Blackman martinblack...@gmail.com wrote:

 There is a gotcha to be aware of here.
 
 Checking if a previously unused variable is empty returns false. That
 has caught me out a few times.  I wonder why the answer is false. I
 think the engine interprets the variable as a string instead, in the
 same way that 'answer hello' without quotes around hello works.
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Newbie... Strict Compilation mode

2009-05-09 Thread Stephen Cox
I've run across something. Even with Strict Compilation Mode on the compiler
doesn't throw out an error if it sees some undeclared variables. So...

Local temp
Put 1234 into temp
Put 1234 into kemp

The compiles misses this completely. Of course it works cause you can create
variables on the fly. But isn't the point of Strict Compilation Mode to
force you to declare all variables before use?

-Stephen Cox
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie... Strict Compilation mode

2009-05-09 Thread Stephen Cox
Humm I just compiled this and get nothing.


On 5/9/09 12:57 PM, Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net wrote:

 Stephen-
 
 Saturday, May 9, 2009, 9:39:27 AM, you wrote:
 
 I've run across something. Even with Strict Compilation Mode on the compiler
 doesn't throw out an error if it sees some undeclared variables. So...
 
 Local temp
 Put 1234 into temp
 Put 1234 into kemp
 
 The compiles misses this completely. Of course it works cause you can create
 variables on the fly. But isn't the point of Strict Compilation Mode to
 force you to declare all variables before use?
 
 I get compilation error at line 5 (Chunk: can't create a variable with that
 name (explicitVariables?)) near kemp, char 15

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie... Strict Compilation mode

2009-05-09 Thread Stephen Cox
Ok I just created a new stack and put:

local temp
put 1234 into temp
put 1234 into kemp

And it compiles with no errors. Maybe I missed a checkbox someplace. Is
Strict Compilation Mode in the Script Editor section the only option that
has to be enabled?


On 5/9/09 12:57 PM, Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net wrote:

 Stephen-
 
 Saturday, May 9, 2009, 9:39:27 AM, you wrote:
 
 I've run across something. Even with Strict Compilation Mode on the compiler
 doesn't throw out an error if it sees some undeclared variables. So...
 
 Local temp
 Put 1234 into temp
 Put 1234 into kemp
 
 The compiles misses this completely. Of course it works cause you can create
 variables on the fly. But isn't the point of Strict Compilation Mode to
 force you to declare all variables before use?
 
 I get compilation error at line 5 (Chunk: can't create a variable with that
 name (explicitVariables?)) near kemp, char 15

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie question - how to check for a varible

2009-05-09 Thread Stephen Cox
By the way, off topic a bit:

Wouldn't I  am be the same as I   am? ((notice the space after
I in the second example)).


On 5/9/09 12:57 PM, J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.com wrote:

 Stephen Cox wrote:
 Wait. I don't get this. You saying that checking if an unused variable is
 empty returns false? Does revolution put some data in a variable when
 created? 
 
 Sort of, but only in specific cases, which is mostly a side-effect of
 how friendly Rev's interpreter is and how it deals with strings. (The
 discussion about quoted field names shows how flexible Rev is with
 strings.) If a variable is not specifically created with a value, the
 value of the variable is the variable's name itself.
 
 This creates a variable without assigning it any value:
 
 on mouseup
   put (var = empty)  Var =   var
 end mouseup
 
 You get: false var = var
 
 But this assigns a value and gives what you'd expect:
 
 on mouseUp
   put empty into var
   put (var = empty)  Var =   var
 end mouseUp
 
 Gives: true var =

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie... Strict Compilation mode

2009-05-09 Thread Stephen Cox
Force of habit. And there are many languages that require variable checking.
And indeed typing. Like C, C++, C#, VB , Python, JS, AS, ST, Perl, and on
and on. Anyway it's one of Revolution strengths not to requiring variable
typing and creation.


On 5/9/09 4:09 PM, Richmond Mathewson richmondmathew...@gmail.com wrote:

 Funny, I've never declared a variable in Runtime Revolution; I thought that
 was something that went out with PASCAL: even my BBC doesn't require me
 to that in BBC BASIC.  I remember feeling 'odd' when I got my BBC (ah, all
 those years ago, out in the desert) that BBC BASIC didn't even need the
 LET statement
 anymore.
 
 May be this is a goofy question; but it can probably bear
 the asking one more time:
 
 What, if any, is the advantage of declaring variables in RR ?
 
 and, just to show you exactly how goofy I am:
 
 How do you declare variables in RR ?
 
 Mark Wieder wrote:
 Stephen-
 
 Saturday, May 9, 2009, 11:10:46 AM, you wrote:
 
   
 Ok I just created a new stack and put:
 
 
   
 local temp
 put 1234 into temp
 put 1234 into kemp
 
 
   
 And it compiles with no errors. Maybe I missed a checkbox someplace. Is
 Strict Compilation Mode in the Script Editor section the only option that
 has to be enabled?
 
 
 OK - I think I see what you're doing. If I just put that into a script
 then I can compile it with or without strict compilation mode. But
 then there's nothing to execute. I'm not really clear on what is
 getting compiled at that point. I think as far as the compiler is
 concerned there's no code to run, so there's nothing to compile.
 
 Try this:
 
 on mouseUp
   local temp
 
   put 1234 into temp
   put 1234 into kemp
 end mouseUp
 
   
 
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Rev needs a cookbook (newb questions)

2009-05-09 Thread Stephen Cox
Why not just comment - leave notes - in the online Dictionary? That be easy
for all to di and help a lot.


On 5/9/09 2:59 AM, Peter Alcibiades palcibiades-fi...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:

 I said this before, but its why Rev needs a cookbook on the lines of Carla
 Schroder's great  Linux Cookbook
 
 Steven Cox's queries illustrate the problem very clearly. Imagine a kitchen
 with lots of pots and pans and ingredients in it.  It comes with a 400
 page guide detailing the function of every one.
 
 We now have an intelligent Martian who has just been employed as a cook.
 His first assignment is spaghetti carbonara, or cassoulet.  Where does he
 start?
 
 What he has is a superb kitchen manual.  What he wants is a cookbook, with
 a systematic set of entries like this (from the Rev for C programmers
 page):
 
 To filter a handler so that it only responds to certain objects, rather
 than every object below it in the hierarchy, use the target function to
 determine which object originally received the message being handled.
 
 To create a code library, place the handlers you want to re-use in any
 object that¹s available in your a stack, then use the insert script
 command to add that object to the hierarchy.
 
 So what Steven is looking for is a cookbook with entries like to empty a
 field..to check for a variable..  to make elements in a
 list field clickable  to change the mouse to a hand while
 hovering...
 
 Without this, learning becomes a Zen like experience.  You know the story
 of the young man wanting to learn swordsmanship?  He enrols with a master,
 and the first day when expecting to meet for a lesson, is astonished to be
 hit violently over the head with a stick.  His master has sneaked up on
 him.  As time goes by the attacks continue and become more and more
 devious.  One day he is about to enter a room and something makes him
 pause.  His master emerges from behind the door and bows deeply.
 
 Its OK but a recipe book is easier.
 
 Peter
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie Question 5 of N

2009-05-09 Thread Stephen Cox
Actually I'm not so sure it even matters, considering this isn't a typed
language.

I was just surprised when I ran my first try at code and had errors at
runtime. Almost every compiler I've used checked variables. Why I asked in
the first place.





On 5/9/09 5:24 PM, Richmond Mathewson richmondmathew...@gmail.com wrote:

 Writing as someone who, generally, learns from his errors, and
 trying to work out why they are error, this sounds as if it would
 not be a great advantage to me.
 
 Probably much more useful for somebody trying to belt out
 something with a very quick SDLC or turn-around.
 
 Mark Wieder wrote:
 Richmond-
 
 Saturday, May 9, 2009, 1:14:47 PM, you wrote:
 
   
 So; what is 'strict compilation', and why should we be
 interested?
 
 
 Strict compilation was formerly referred to as explictVars.
 Setting the checkbox *forces* you to declare all your variables or be
 faced with compile errors. The advantage is that it cuts down
 dramaticly on the number of bugs in one's coding. You can't, for
 example, mistakenly type and compile
 
 put the last chr of line x of field 3
 or
 put thevariablenames into field 1
 
   
 
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: OT Re: Newbie... Strict Compilation mode

2009-05-09 Thread Stephen Cox
Well..  God.. Sorry all for starting this. :)

Use what you want. I'll keep it on cause I'm used to that type of
environment. Used to declaring variables. And it's in my head.



On 5/10/09 1:09 AM, Joe Lewis Wilkins pepe...@cox.net wrote:

 Following this thread has pushed another one of my buttons and I
 cannot resist getting on my soap-box and inserting my two-bits.
 
 We have all become accustomed to protecting ourselves from
 ourselves. To the point where some of us pass laws requiring that
 everyone protect themselves. I'm talking about INSURANCE. The best
 insurance against having anything happen is an alert and active
 mind.  Insurance merely puts us to sleep; allowing us to be less than
 vigilant and knowledgeable within all aspects of our lives. Not
 declaring vars merely promotes sloppiness and, eventually, stupidity.
 The President is going to spend enormous sums of money promoting
 Health Insurance, when the best insurance is almost free; preventive
 medicine which we have neglected for decades. We just need to be
 diligent about all things. Education, eduction, education
 
 Joe Wilkins
 
   On May 9, 2009, at 8:47 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
 
 Jacque-
 
 Saturday, May 9, 2009, 6:01:53 PM, you wrote:
 
 Ah... I *knew* this would push Jacque's buttons... g
 
 1. The main strength of xtalk is that you do not have to declare or
 type
 variables. Sticking them up there at the top of every handler removes
 one of the main advantages of using Rev in the first place.
 
 I seriously take issue with that being the main strength of xtalk.
 
 5. And finally, what's wrong with being lazy? :) The smart programmer
 finds the easiest way to do things. That's what Rev is all about.
 
 Laziness is one of the big reasons I *do* declare my variables. If the
 compiler is smart enough to catch all kinds of errors for me, why
 should I go through all the debugging work at runtime? I believe in
 letting the computer do the hard work for me, otherwise I might as
 well just be coding the cpu's opcodes by hand.
 
 None of these things is outweighed for me by the fact that
 explicitVars
 might catch a few typos. The engine catches most of those anyway and
 throws an error.
 
 Back to today's response:
 
 The debugger pinpoints the exact source of the misspelling if it
 happens; how hard is that? I'm a pretty good typist though, so I
 don't
 get caught out too often. I suppose if you are really as bad a
 typist as
 your theoretical example, then yes, you'd want some help. ;)
 
 puts on a SNL snarl
 ...Jacque, you ignorant slut...
 returns to reality
 You're missing the point. The purpose of explicitVars is to catch
 things that slip by the compiler otherwise. If it's just a simple
 misspelling of a keyword the compiler will catch it anyway, as you
 pointed out. But explicitVars will let you know if you've mistyped a
 variable name when the friendly compiler would helpfully generate a
 new variable instead of using the one you intended. And it will help
 when your fingers forget to place a space after the and instead of
 the variableNames ending up in a variable you end up with empty.
 
 I once took over a project from someone who used explicit
 variables. I
 stripped out all the declarations so I could read the scripts
 comfortably. The stack size was cut in half (!). No lie. There were
 all
 kinds of handlers in there with something like 8 lines of
 declarations
 and three lines of actual script. Waste of time and space.
 
 I recognize hyperbole when I see it, but nonetheless I don't think you
 can have 8 lines of declarations and three lines of actual script (and
 of course someone will post some code that proves me wrong). If you
 come across a handler like this then you have at least five lines of
 declarations that are not being used. And then you're absolutely right
 to strip them out g.
 
 -- 
 -Mark Wieder
 mwie...@ahsoftware.net
 
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Newbie question - how to check for a varible

2009-05-08 Thread Stephen Cox
Really two questions:

How do I check if a variable is empty? Sort of like;

If !empty(tUsername)
// process here
Endif

Empty() is a Foxpro function that pops if what you are checking is empty. I
can¹t seem to find it¹s equivalent in revolution. Am I approaching this the
wrong way? And can I check fields the same way?

I suppose I could create an empty variable and just compare the 2? But is
there an easier way?

Next question; checking the existence of a variable? Now I know I can turn
on Strict Compilation (and I have) but I¹d rather have the assurance of
checking to see if a variable exist? Is this a non-issue in Revolution?

Thanks

-Stephen Cox




___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie question - how to check for a varible

2009-05-08 Thread Stephen Cox
Lol. Of course. I knew it would be easy. Thanks.

For the life of me I could not find an example in the docs; the user guild
or online.

The messagebox? I hardly use it. Gets in the way mostly. I've been using it
to look at global variables. I know you can run commands. But if you don't
know the commands, it's no help. Or am I wrong about this?


On 5/8/09 2:35 AM, Joe Lewis Wilkins pepe...@cox.net wrote:

 Stephen,
 
 Without even checking, since it's the way it would be done in HC, just
 use:
 
 if tUsername is empty then 
 
 if tUsername exists then ...
 
 You were already there. Didn't you check these out in the messagebox?
 
 Joe Wilkins
 
 On May 7, 2009, at 11:25 PM, Stephen Cox wrote:
 
 Really two questions:
 
 How do I check if a variable is empty? Sort of like;
 
 If !empty(tUsername)
// process here
 Endif
 
 Empty() is a Foxpro function that pops if what you are checking is
 empty. I
 can¹t seem to find it¹s equivalent in revolution. Am I approaching
 this the
 wrong way? And can I check fields the same way?
 
 I suppose I could create an empty variable and just compare the 2?
 But is
 there an easier way?
 
 Next question; checking the existence of a variable? Now I know I
 can turn
 on Strict Compilation (and I have) but I¹d rather have the assurance
 of
 checking to see if a variable exist? Is this a non-issue in
 Revolution?
 
 Thanks
 
 -Stephen Cox
 
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie question - how to check for a varible

2009-05-08 Thread Stephen Cox
I did search for empty in the Online Dictionary. But all I got were
property keywords. I also read the docs on put and answer and saw nothing
about empty.

Anyway know now, thanks.

As for checking for existence of variables.. Just a habit I formed over
years writing dbase and c. Always check the existence of a variable before
you take any action on it. The compilers of today are more sophisticated so
I'll probably wean my way off it.


On 5/8/09 2:40 AM, Mark Schonewille m.schonewi...@economy-x-talk.com
wrote:

 Hi Stephen,
 
 
 Search the docs for empty. It will show you things like
 
 put empty into x
 set the cProp to empty
 
 So, you will also want to read up on put and set.
 
 There is also a function variableNames, which will probably be very
 useful to you. Why do you want to check for the existence of a
 variable? I do this very, very rarely and only in really advanced
 projects.
 
 
 --
 Best regards,
 
 Mark Schonewille
 
 Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
 http://economy-x-talk.com
 http://www.salery.biz
 Dutch forum: http://runrev.info/rrforum
 
 New: Snapper Screen Recorder 2.0.1
 Download at http://snapper.economy-x-talk.com
 
 On 8 mei 2009, at 08:25, Stephen Cox wrote:
 
 Really two questions:
 
 How do I check if a variable is empty? Sort of like;
 
 If !empty(tUsername)
// process here
 Endif
 
 Empty() is a Foxpro function that pops if what you are checking is
 empty. I
 can¹t seem to find it¹s equivalent in revolution. Am I approaching
 this the
 wrong way? And can I check fields the same way?
 
 I suppose I could create an empty variable and just compare the 2?
 But is
 there an easier way?
 
 Next question; checking the existence of a variable? Now I know I
 can turn
 on Strict Compilation (and I have) but I¹d rather have the assurance
 of
 checking to see if a variable exist? Is this a non-issue in
 Revolution?
 
 Thanks
 
 -Stephen Cox
 
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie question - how to check for a varible

2009-05-08 Thread Stephen Cox
Ahhh! Exists was there. I was looking at it from the wrong end. Thanks.

God I feel like I have to unlearn all my coding habits and thinking.


On 5/8/09 2:47 AM, Joe Lewis Wilkins pepe...@cox.net wrote:

 Stephen, I should have checked. Check exists in the dictionary for
 the rev syntax. Not quite as straightforward or easy as with HC.
 Sorry,
 Joe Wilkins
 
 On May 7, 2009, at 11:35 PM, Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
 
 Stephen,
 
 Without even checking, since it's the way it would be done in HC,
 just use:
 
 if tUsername is empty then 
 
 if tUsername exists then ...
 
 You were already there. Didn't you check these out in the messagebox?
 
 Joe Wilkins
 
 On May 7, 2009, at 11:25 PM, Stephen Cox wrote:
 
 Really two questions:
 
 How do I check if a variable is empty? Sort of like;
 
 If !empty(tUsername)
   // process here
 Endif
 
 Empty() is a Foxpro function that pops if what you are checking is
 empty. I
 can¹t seem to find it¹s equivalent in revolution. Am I approaching
 this the
 wrong way? And can I check fields the same way?
 
 I suppose I could create an empty variable and just compare the 2?
 But is
 there an easier way?
 
 Next question; checking the existence of a variable? Now I know I
 can turn
 on Strict Compilation (and I have) but I¹d rather have the
 assurance of
 checking to see if a variable exist? Is this a non-issue in
 Revolution?
 
 Thanks
 
 -Stephen Cox
 
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Another newb question - How to you clear a field?

2009-05-08 Thread Stephen Cox
Don¹t hate me for asking another nub question. ;) I am reading the docs. But
this language is so different then what I am used to it¹s hard to phrase
searches correctly.

Ok, so how do I clear the contents of a field? Namely a text Field. I wanna
offer a clear button.

I¹ve been trying various forms of the Delete [Clear} Chunk command. But no
luck so far. Then I thought maybe it was related to a property of the Text
Field.  And still no.
Someone mind pointing me in the right direction?

Much thanks,

-Stephen Cox
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Another newb question - How to you clear a field?

2009-05-08 Thread Stephen Cox
If you only have 1 stack do you have to include the stack ID?


On 5/8/09 5:48 AM, stephen barncard stephenrevoluti...@barncard.com
wrote:

 put empty into fld x of stack b
 
 -
 Stephen Barncard
 San Francisco
 http://barncard.com
 
 
 2009/5/8 Stephen Cox step...@networkxfla.com
 
 Don¹t hate me for asking another nub question. ;) I am reading the docs.
 But
 this language is so different then what I am used to it¹s hard to phrase
 searches correctly.
 
 Ok, so how do I clear the contents of a field? Namely a text Field. I wanna
 offer a clear button.
 
 I¹ve been trying various forms of the Delete [Clear} Chunk command. But no
 luck so far. Then I thought maybe it was related to a property of the Text
 Field.  And still no.
 Someone mind pointing me in the right direction?
 
 Much thanks,
 
 -Stephen Cox
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
 subscription preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
 
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Another newb question - How to you clear a field?

2009-05-08 Thread Stephen Cox
Heh.

You know I tried that. But didn't use quotes. So I assume when referring to
objects on cards you have to use quotes?


On 5/8/09 5:54 AM, Phil Jimmieson p...@liverpool.ac.uk wrote:

 put empty into field yourfieldname

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Another newb question - How to you clear a field?

2009-05-08 Thread Stephen Cox
And you just answered another question I was about to scan the Dictionary
for. Thanks.

-Stephen Cox


On 5/8/09 3:25 PM, J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.com wrote:

 set cursor to none

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Another newb question - How to you clear a field?

2009-05-08 Thread Stephen Cox
The biggest problem I am having is figuring out what to search for. The
language is so unique. So take my question about emptying a field. Be easy
in an OOP language: empty(Text_field.text) - or something to that effect.
So I would search on empty and get tons of info on the function and
various examples.. AND user comments.

Now in Revolution it's also easy but completely different then any of
language. So I search the Dictionary on empty, got nothing; then Text
Entry Field, got nothing; then asked here.

I'm not harping on Revolution. I like it. It's just different from anything
else on the market. So a FAQ that shows JAVA or C syntax alongside
Revolution would be a god-send. Just some common functions and procedures.
The manual is good, but has no reference to other languages. It would help
get my head out of OOP into Revolution.



On 5/8/09 3:54 PM, Joe Lewis Wilkins pepe...@cox.net wrote:

 Hey Jacque,
 
 Has no one ever put together an FAQ for Rev newbies? I realize that
 could be a pretty horrendous effort, but should be useful and doable.
 
 Joe Wilkins
 
 On May 8, 2009, at 12:44 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
 
 Yeah, well, since you're new, *you* have to write set the cursor to
 none. The rest of us will continue to use our bad habits. :)
 
 
 -- 
 Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
 HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
 
 Joe Lewis Wilkins
 Architect
 Director of Product Development for GSI
 760-738-1721
 
 
 
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Newbie question - Set the cursor to....

2009-05-08 Thread Stephen Cox
I¹m gonna preface [the subject] all my questions with ³Newbie² so those who
have no interest in nubs can move on. Trust, I know it can be painful. ;)

I got a card. With a label or button. I want to change the cursor of the
mouse to a hand then back to arrow when the user moves on/off the object.

on mouseEnter
set the cursor to hand
end mouseEnter

on mouseLeave
   set the cursor to arrow
end mouseLeave

The above should work? Or am I missing something about the cursor command? I
placed a breakpoint and followed the code. It fires, just doesn¹t change the
cursor.

Maybe I¹m using mouseEnter/mouseLeave incorrectly?

Thanks for any info.

-Stephen Cox
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Another newb question - How to you clear a field?

2009-05-08 Thread Stephen Cox
Bookmarked. In fact, let me spend some time going over it now. Might have to
waste less of your time on this list. Thanks.

-Stephen Cox


On 5/8/09 4:30 PM, Devin Asay devin_a...@byu.edu wrote:

 
 Welcome, Stephen.
 
 shameless plug
 I teach Revolution classes for complete novices, and I have my
 tutorials online at
 
 http://revolution.byu.edu
 
 Even though you're an experienced programmer, you might find some of
 the tutorials useful, especially the ones on the Revolution scripting
 language, because I describe how basic concepts in the language work--
 things like variables, literals, if-then, and loops. There's another
 link for Scripting Language Examples, that just shows examples of
 various statements.
 /shameless plug

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Another newb question - How to you clear a field?

2009-05-08 Thread Stephen Cox
By the way, I got the printed user guide. Now this guide is one of the
best tech books I've seen. Thank you Revolution for using a font I can
actually read without using a magnifier.

-Stephen Cox


On 5/8/09 5:00 PM, Richmond Mathewson richmondmathew...@gmail.com wrote:

 Coupled with 
 the PDF file
 that comes with RR,

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: WOW Scott Rossi!

2009-05-07 Thread Stephen Cox
Add my praise to this chorus. I can't believe some of the things you've down
with Revolution. Amazing. Thanks.

-Stephen Cox


On 5/7/09 4:56 PM, viktoras d. vikto...@ekoinf.net wrote:

 Thanks Scott,
 
 extremely useful information and well done!
 
 Best regards
 Viktoras
 
 Scott Rossi wrote:
 Recently, Jim Bufalini wrote:
 
   
 GREAT article and demo stack in the latest revUP! Fantastic work, Scott. :-)
 
 
 Thanks -- hope you found something of use in there.
 
 Regards,
 
 Scott Rossi
 Creative Director
 Tactile Media, Multimedia  Design
 
 
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
 
   
 
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Question about On Rev

2009-04-23 Thread Stephen Cox
Hi,

Can¹t find some information. Hoping those of you involved will be able to
answer.

1. Can I install Rev on my own servers?
2. If so, what servers are supported (Apache, IIS, etc, etc)
3. How much? And what are the license terms?


Thanks,
Stephen Cox


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: RapidWeaver

2009-04-19 Thread Stephen Cox
Drupal has gotten easy to learn. There is also very good training available
at Lullabot (http://www.lullabot.com/). Drupal is easy to install and
maintain. Knowing PHP isn't required but is a major plus (for WordPress
too).

Lullabot is all about learning Drupal. WordPress can't compare to Drupal.
I'm not bashing WordPress. I use it. I use Drupal too.

But comparing WordPress to Drupal is like comparing c++ to html. MTV, HBO.
Amnesty International, Goldman Sacs run on Drupal. Actually, there's a mod
for Drupal that runs WordPress, in Drupal. :)

All this said, if all you want is a quick site then Drupal is way over kill.
Use WordPress. It's very good for what it does.

Also take a look at Squarespace at squarespace.com. Squarespace allows
anyone to create a website. It's that simple (It has one of the best CSS
implementations I've ever seen). You can literately build your site (design,
color - even fonts) all online. With WordPress, you either use a template or
roll up your sleeves and modify the template (not that hard - but if you
don't want to write any code, there you are).

I can't say enough good things about Squarespace. And no, I don't work for
them. But I turned my mother's church onto them.

On 4/19/09 2:28 AM, Chipp Walters ch...@chipp.com wrote:

 WordPress is much simpler to use than Drupal, and there are many who have
 used it as a CMS to build commercial websites. Of course it's not as
 all-encompassing nor as hard to learn as Drupal, but you can put up a
 website in minutes. Try Googling WordPress and CMS
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

-- 
Stephen Cox
Chief geek of NetworkX
954.537.2692 or 888.564.5223
step...@networkxfla.com


 


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: RapidWeaver

2009-04-18 Thread Stephen Cox
WordPress is a PHP blogging system. Has a template system for site design.
It's well used and respected. And there are many plug-ins. It's open source.

Drupal is a PHP framework. You can create any kind of website with it
really. It's referred to as a 'CMS' framework because of huge 3rd party
plug-in support. Drupal is used as a backend to everything from blogs to
corporate websites. Drupal is also open source.

If you needed to create a non-blog site then take a look at Drupal. Keep in
mind there are many web frameworks: like ruby on rails. Django (python),
Seaside (Smalltalk), Zope (python), CAKE (PHP)- and many more. You can
probably find a web framework written in whatever language you want. And
soon, Transcript will probably be added to the list. ;)


On 4/19/09 12:00 AM, Colin Holgate co...@rcn.com wrote:

 
 On Apr 18, 2009, at 11:50 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:
 
 
 I might suggest people interested in creating their own websites,
 check out
 WordPress. Free, very easy to use and installs automatically on your
 On-Rev
 server account
 
 
 It took a couple of minutes of research to figure out that to install
 WordPress on on-rev you would use Fantastico. In the Fantastico page
 it lists WordPress as being a blog, so is it up to be a complete site
 management? Might Drupal be a better choice?
 
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

-- 
Stephen Cox
Chief geek of NetworkX
954.537.2692 or 888.564.5223
step...@networkxfla.com


 


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution