Re: Another 2.0 Question
Bill Lynn writes: I fail to see the point of all of these posts to the list. Why doesn't someone just go to the source then post the reply rather than continuing all the speculative drivel? Another option would be to keep the discussion free and open and skip past those posts you consider drivel. Cheers... Bill Lynn Simtech Publications And how, pray tell, might one determine if a post is of interest and skip past when the subject line is Re: Another 2.0 Question? That subject is so broad that unless one examines the body of the post, how is it possible? miscdas ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Another 2.0 Question
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I fail to see the point of all of these posts to the list. Why doesn't someone just go to the source then post the reply rather than continuing all the speculative drivel? Another option would be to keep the discussion free and open and skip past those posts you consider drivel. Cheers... Bill Lynn Simtech Publications My apologies. This is a list serve where people ask about the program. I had a quesion it was answered. Sorry I have an interest about when 2.0 comes out. -Tim ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Another 2.0 Question
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And how, pray tell, might one determine if a post is of interest and skip past when the subject line is Re: Another 2.0 Question? That subject is so broad that unless one examines the body of the post, how is it possible? One quietly surveys the first few lines, and then one employs one's conveniently available 'D' key, or other applicable keystroke, to expunge the offending message from one's sight. One then graciously maintains silence, rather than airing one's complaints, when the rest of a list population is clearly having no problem with the topic at hand, particularly considering that, when one replies to an 'offending' thread, one is merely giving it an opportunity to grow, which rather increases the presence of irritants in one's sight. This is how one comports oneself in a manner that treats the availability of a mailing list (such as this one) as a privilege, rather than a right. -- Fred Hicks iago AT iago DOT net ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Another 2.0 Question
I fail to see the point of all of these posts to the list. Why doesn't someone just go to the source then post the reply rather than continuing all the speculative drivel? Another option would be to keep the discussion free and open and skip past those posts you consider drivel. Cheers... Bill Lynn Simtech Publications www.hsj.com ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Another 2.0 Question
Monte Goulding writes: Just a stab in the dark but I'd say they are waiting for the engine to be complete. Raney's on Beta 1 so they probably have a few more weeks yet. So how did they think that it was going to ship in November. Well I'd say that the expected date for the engine was about then but a 2 month discussion about the Drag and Drop API on the xTalks list slowed everything down. But it could have been anything. With 2.0 the RunRev team is attempting to close the gap between MC builds and Rev builds. That means there is two development timelines that need to converge. Two lots of testing. A hell of a lot of work to deliver a stable product. If we see it before Jan then it will be a miracle! It will be a great product and well worth the wait. Cheers Monte I fail to see the point of all of these posts to the list. Why doesn't someone just go to the source then post the reply rather than continuing all the speculative drivel? miscdas ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Another 2.0 Question
Not to sounds impatient or anything. But where is it? I wouldn't be so curious if it wasn't for the fact that it was supposed to appear in November. We are now 11 days into December and it still isn't here. Just curious of what the hold up is. I know you want it perfect but something had to throw development of track if you thought it was going to be out in November. Just wondering what that is. -Tim ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
RE: Another 2.0 Question
Just a stab in the dark but I'd say they are waiting for the engine to be complete. Raney's on Beta 1 so they probably have a few more weeks yet. Cheers Monte ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: RE: Another 2.0 Question
--- Timothy Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just a stab in the dark but I'd say they are waiting for the engine to be complete. Raney's on Beta 1 so they probably have a few more weeks yet. So how did they think that it was going to ship in November. i would assume they had the kind of unanticipated debugging problems we all run into x 100K. = [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.erikhansen.org __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
