Re: Ink Settings and Printing

2010-05-02 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, Marty Knapp wrote:

 I'm trying to print a card with a jpeg image on it and have noticed that
 when I set the Ink to anything other than the standard  srcCopy that the
 image quality suffers noticeably. I think I tired every setting that
 allows underlaying objects to show through the white bounding box of my
 jpeg - which is what I need. Has anyone else tried something like this?
 
 I've tried this also with png images and gif images as well- all seems
 to suffer when set to (for example) blendMultiply.

Marty, have you tried creating a snapshot of the card first, and then
printing the snapshot?  Might work better than trying to force the
inks/image formats.

Regards,

Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, UX Design


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Ink Settings and Printing

2010-05-02 Thread Richmond Mathewson

 On 02/05/2010 21:33, Scott Rossi wrote:

Recently, Marty Knapp wrote:


I'm trying to print a card with a jpeg image on it and have noticed that
when I set the Ink to anything other than the standard  srcCopy that the
image quality suffers noticeably. I think I tired every setting that
allows underlaying objects to show through the white bounding box of my
jpeg - which is what I need. Has anyone else tried something like this?

I've tried this also with png images and gif images as well- all seems
to suffer when set to (for example) blendMultiply.

Marty, have you tried creating a snapshot of the card first, and then
printing the snapshot?  Might work better than trying to force the
inks/image formats.



I've had to do a lot of this sort of thing recently. My experience is 
that if

one has an image with various settings such as ink/blending, graphic effects
(I am in love with a charcoal inner glow on a white border) and one attempts
to export it as an image all those settings are lost; similarly so 
exporting a

snapshot.

If, however, one groups the image after one has set all the effects 
(just create
a group out of the image by itself; a bit counter intuitive, but there 
we are) and
then exports either it or the whole card as a snapshot everything is 
preserved.

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Ink Settings and Printing

2010-05-02 Thread Scott Rossi
When trying export (or import) all elements on a card, there is no need to
do any grouping.  As in Marty's case, one only needs to import a snapshot of
the card.  Here's one way:

 import snapshot from rect (rect of this cd) of this cd

Grouping allows you import/export the objects independently of the card
itself and maintain the empty space/effects around the objects, as you
mention.

Regards,

Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, UX Design



Recently, Richmond Mathewson wrote:

 I'm trying to print a card with a jpeg image on it and have noticed that
 when I set the Ink to anything other than the standard  srcCopy that the
 image quality suffers noticeably. I think I tired every setting that
 allows underlaying objects to show through the white bounding box of my
 jpeg - which is what I need. Has anyone else tried something like this?

 Marty, have you tried creating a snapshot of the card first, and then
 printing the snapshot?  Might work better than trying to force the
 inks/image formats.
 

 I've had to do a lot of this sort of thing recently. My experience is
 that if
 one has an image with various settings such as ink/blending, graphic effects
 (I am in love with a charcoal inner glow on a white border) and one attempts
 to export it as an image all those settings are lost; similarly so
 exporting a
 snapshot.
 
 If, however, one groups the image after one has set all the effects
 (just create
 a group out of the image by itself; a bit counter intuitive, but there
 we are) and
 then exports either it or the whole card as a snapshot everything is
 preserved.


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Ink Settings and Printing

2010-05-02 Thread Richmond Mathewson

 On 02/05/2010 22:35, Scott Rossi wrote:

When trying export (or import) all elements on a card, there is no need to
do any grouping.  As in Marty's case, one only needs to import a snapshot of
the card.  Here's one way:

  import snapshot from rect (rect of this cd) of this cd

Grouping allows you import/export the objects independently of the card
itself and maintain the empty space/effects around the objects, as you
mention.



Thanks for putting me right on that one . . .  :)

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Ink Settings and Printing

2010-05-02 Thread Marty Knapp
Thanks Scott - I've played around some with printing snapshots, but the 
resolution is too low for this project. I do have a work-around for what 
I'm doing, for the most part.


Thanks,
Marty

Recently, Marty Knapp wrote:

  

I'm trying to print a card with a jpeg image on it and have noticed that
when I set the Ink to anything other than the standard  srcCopy that the
image quality suffers noticeably. I think I tired every setting that
allows underlaying objects to show through the white bounding box of my
jpeg - which is what I need. Has anyone else tried something like this?

I've tried this also with png images and gif images as well- all seems
to suffer when set to (for example) blendMultiply.



Marty, have you tried creating a snapshot of the card first, and then
printing the snapshot?  Might work better than trying to force the
inks/image formats.

Regards,

Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, UX Design


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

  


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Ink Settings and Printing

2010-05-01 Thread Marty Knapp
I'm trying to print a card with a jpeg image on it and have noticed that 
when I set the Ink to anything other than the standard  srcCopy that the 
image quality suffers noticeably. I think I tired every setting that 
allows underlaying objects to show through the white bounding box of my 
jpeg - which is what I need. Has anyone else tried something like this?


I've tried this also with png images and gif images as well- all seems 
to suffer when set to (for example) blendMultiply.


Thanks for any input,
Marty Knapp
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Ink Settings and Printing

2010-05-01 Thread J. Landman Gay

Marty Knapp wrote:
I'm trying to print a card with a jpeg image on it and have noticed that 
when I set the Ink to anything other than the standard  srcCopy that the 
image quality suffers noticeably. I think I tired every setting that 
allows underlaying objects to show through the white bounding box of my 
jpeg - which is what I need. Has anyone else tried something like this?


I've tried this also with png images and gif images as well- all seems 
to suffer when set to (for example) blendMultiply.


If I remember the change notes right, you bascially get a screen shot if 
there are blended inks on the image. The engine can't render those. Wish 
I could remember which set of notes to point you to, it was somewhere 
around when the revised image capabilities kicked in.


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Ink Settings and Printing

2010-05-01 Thread Marty Knapp

I was afraid of that. Oh well - thanks for letting me know.

Marty

Marty Knapp wrote:
I'm trying to print a card with a jpeg image on it and have noticed 
that when I set the Ink to anything other than the standard  srcCopy 
that the image quality suffers noticeably. I think I tired every 
setting that allows underlaying objects to show through the white 
bounding box of my jpeg - which is what I need. Has anyone else tried 
something like this?


I've tried this also with png images and gif images as well- all 
seems to suffer when set to (for example) blendMultiply.


If I remember the change notes right, you bascially get a screen shot 
if there are blended inks on the image. The engine can't render those. 
Wish I could remember which set of notes to point you to, it was 
somewhere around when the revised image capabilities kicked in.




___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution