Re: Is there a maximum data size for groups?

2010-04-22 Thread Jonathan Lynch
I got it working without eating all my RAM. This is for a faerie tale
editing program. Each story is contained in a group, and each page is a
subgroup of the main group.

To save a story, I have it copy each page/subgroup to the saving stack, but
then delete that page from the editing application right after it does that.
This way, it does not have to hold two copies of all 400 MB worth of data.

I also had to make sure it turns images that are not currently being viewed
invisible. That keeps the RAM usage down by a good bit.

It prolly woulda been simpler to just buy more RAM.

On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Phil Davis rev...@pdslabs.net wrote:

 This list is never dull!
 Phil Davis



 On 4/17/10 9:37 AM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:

  On 17/04/2010 19:17, J. Landman Gay wrote:

 Richmond Mathewson wrote:

  On 17/04/2010 18:47, Jonathan Lynch wrote:

 Hi guys,

 I think you must be right that I am using up my RAM.

 Drat, this is gonna be a pain in the bahonkus.

 One pain in the bahonkus now is probably
 better than a whole slew of pains in the
 bahonkus later on . . .  :)


 Oh so true. In one project right now, due to a lack of foresight, I can
 hardly sit down.


 Hmm; that's interesting - I was wondering exactly where the bahonkus was:
 not being a
 North American - we Europeans have different anatomy . . .   :)

 All right; we use different euphemistic terms for the same bits of anatomy
 . . .

 -


 While I'm here; I suffer from a lack of foresight too, having had it
 circumscribed at an early age . . . the old jokes are always the best!
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
 subscription preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


 --
 Phil Davis

 PDS Labs
 Professional Software Development
 http://pdslabs.net


 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
 subscription preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution




-- 
Do all things with love
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Is there a maximum data size for groups?

2010-04-17 Thread Jonathan Lynch
Both in Rev 3.5 and Rev 4.0 I have a problem trying to copy a group from one
stack to another. The group contains approximately 400 mb of information
(mostly images). This problem seems to arise whether I copy the whole group,
or copy it piecemeal into the recipient group.

So, do you guys know if there is a built-in limitation on the data size for
single groups?

-- 
Do all things with love
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Is there a maximum data size for groups?

2010-04-17 Thread Andre Garzia
Jonathan,

I have no clue there but I think if you host 400mb worth of images in a
stack, then you will take a chunk equal to that of RAM for your app to run
even with virtual memory this is a big requirement and if you want to copy
this group around, then your requirement will scale. It might be wiser to
host this images on this and just reference them, which might have the nice
side effect of allowing smooth group copying.

Then again, I don't know your software or your software needs so this
commentary might be just ridiculous and wrong.

Cheers
andre

On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Jonathan Lynch
jonathandly...@gmail.comwrote:

 Both in Rev 3.5 and Rev 4.0 I have a problem trying to copy a group from
 one
 stack to another. The group contains approximately 400 mb of information
 (mostly images). This problem seems to arise whether I copy the whole
 group,
 or copy it piecemeal into the recipient group.

 So, do you guys know if there is a built-in limitation on the data size for
 single groups?

 --
 Do all things with love
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
 subscription preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution




-- 
http://www.andregarzia.com All We Do Is Code.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Is there a maximum data size for groups?

2010-04-17 Thread Richmond Mathewson

 On 17/04/2010 18:17, Andre Garzia wrote:

Jonathan,

I have no clue there but I think if you host 400mb worth of images in a
stack, then you will take a chunk equal to that of RAM for your app to run
even with virtual memory this is a big requirement and if you want to copy
this group around, then your requirement will scale. It might be wiser to
host this images on this and just reference them, which might have the nice
side effect of allowing smooth group copying.

Then again, I don't know your software or your software needs so this
commentary might be just ridiculous and wrong.


I while back I made a stack that was 500 MB and tried to build a standalone
from it on a G4 'ET' iMac with 256 MB RAM . . . being a bit slow on the 
uptake

it took me about a week to work out that:

1. RunRev (2.0.1) couldn't cope because it had to load all that 500 MB into
256 MB RAM and whatever Virtual Memory Mac OS X 10.1 was splurging
over the boot disk (which was also very nearly full of files.

2. That the 'clever' thing to do was to chop up the single stack into about
 200 substacks that opened on top of the main stack so that 
end-users were

unaware that more than one stack was being used.

The main stack popped the substacks into RAM when it opened them and
cleared out the RAM when they closed again; so as there were never 
more than
about 3 substacks open at anyone time, the RAM overhead was 
significantly

reduced.

Having rewritten the 'thing'/beast it compiled as a standalone lickety-split
and managed to run reasonably well on computers with128 MB RAM.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Is there a maximum data size for groups?

2010-04-17 Thread Jonathan Lynch
Hi guys,

I think you must be right that I am using up my RAM.

Drat, this is gonna be a pain in the bahonkus.

I will prolly have to use some sort of piecemeal approach, like Richmond
described.

Thanks,

Jonathan

On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Richmond Mathewson 
richmondmathew...@gmail.com wrote:

  On 17/04/2010 18:17, Andre Garzia wrote:

 Jonathan,

 I have no clue there but I think if you host 400mb worth of images in a
 stack, then you will take a chunk equal to that of RAM for your app to run
 even with virtual memory this is a big requirement and if you want to copy
 this group around, then your requirement will scale. It might be wiser to
 host this images on this and just reference them, which might have the
 nice
 side effect of allowing smooth group copying.

 Then again, I don't know your software or your software needs so this
 commentary might be just ridiculous and wrong.

 I while back I made a stack that was 500 MB and tried to build a
 standalone
 from it on a G4 'ET' iMac with 256 MB RAM . . . being a bit slow on the
 uptake
 it took me about a week to work out that:

 1. RunRev (2.0.1) couldn't cope because it had to load all that 500 MB into
256 MB RAM and whatever Virtual Memory Mac OS X 10.1 was splurging
over the boot disk (which was also very nearly full of files.

 2. That the 'clever' thing to do was to chop up the single stack into about
 200 substacks that opened on top of the main stack so that end-users
 were
unaware that more than one stack was being used.

The main stack popped the substacks into RAM when it opened them and
cleared out the RAM when they closed again; so as there were never more
 than
about 3 substacks open at anyone time, the RAM overhead was
 significantly
reduced.

 Having rewritten the 'thing'/beast it compiled as a standalone
 lickety-split
 and managed to run reasonably well on computers with128 MB RAM.

 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
 subscription preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution




-- 
Do all things with love
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Is there a maximum data size for groups?

2010-04-17 Thread Richmond Mathewson

 On 17/04/2010 18:47, Jonathan Lynch wrote:

Hi guys,

I think you must be right that I am using up my RAM.

Drat, this is gonna be a pain in the bahonkus.

One pain in the bahonkus now is probably
better than a whole slew of pains in the
bahonkus later on . . .  :)
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Is there a maximum data size for groups?

2010-04-17 Thread J. Landman Gay

Richmond Mathewson wrote:

 On 17/04/2010 18:47, Jonathan Lynch wrote:

Hi guys,

I think you must be right that I am using up my RAM.

Drat, this is gonna be a pain in the bahonkus.

One pain in the bahonkus now is probably
better than a whole slew of pains in the
bahonkus later on . . .  :)


Oh so true. In one project right now, due to a lack of foresight, I can 
hardly sit down.


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Is there a maximum data size for groups?

2010-04-17 Thread Richmond Mathewson

 On 17/04/2010 19:17, J. Landman Gay wrote:

Richmond Mathewson wrote:

 On 17/04/2010 18:47, Jonathan Lynch wrote:

Hi guys,

I think you must be right that I am using up my RAM.

Drat, this is gonna be a pain in the bahonkus.

One pain in the bahonkus now is probably
better than a whole slew of pains in the
bahonkus later on . . .  :)


Oh so true. In one project right now, due to a lack of foresight, I 
can hardly sit down.




Hmm; that's interesting - I was wondering exactly where the bahonkus 
was: not being a

North American - we Europeans have different anatomy . . .   :)

All right; we use different euphemistic terms for the same bits of 
anatomy . . .


-

While I'm here; I suffer from a lack of foresight too, having had it
circumscribed at an early age . . . the old jokes are always the best!
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Is there a maximum data size for groups?

2010-04-17 Thread Phil Davis

This list is never dull!
Phil Davis


On 4/17/10 9:37 AM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:

 On 17/04/2010 19:17, J. Landman Gay wrote:

Richmond Mathewson wrote:

 On 17/04/2010 18:47, Jonathan Lynch wrote:

Hi guys,

I think you must be right that I am using up my RAM.

Drat, this is gonna be a pain in the bahonkus.

One pain in the bahonkus now is probably
better than a whole slew of pains in the
bahonkus later on . . .  :)


Oh so true. In one project right now, due to a lack of foresight, I 
can hardly sit down.




Hmm; that's interesting - I was wondering exactly where the bahonkus 
was: not being a

North American - we Europeans have different anatomy . . .   :)

All right; we use different euphemistic terms for the same bits of 
anatomy . . .


- 



While I'm here; I suffer from a lack of foresight too, having had it
circumscribed at an early age . . . the old jokes are always the best!
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



--
Phil Davis

PDS Labs
Professional Software Development
http://pdslabs.net

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution