Re: Modifiable IDE [Was: Question about RevMobile]

2010-04-10 Thread Richmond Mathewson

 On 10 Apr 2010, at 18:29, Web Admin Himalayan Academy wrote:

How would we all like it if RunRev allowed any third party developer to

just upload "stuff" that was automatically incorporated into the IDE, which
then broke the IDE?

Well . . . I could point out that this happens all the time elsewhere: 
in the field(s)
of religion - there is a constant ferment of reformers/leaders/thinkers 
and so on
who produce new, reformed, extended versions of the 'original' model: 
most of them
end up as nasty little cults (or nasty big cults) some of them are a 
distinct improvement

on what they are supposedly modifying/improving/extending.

It seems, unfortunately, unless one wants to become a closed-shop (and 
that can, itself,
become like an ingrown toenail), one has to put up with the nasties for 
the sake of the

odd goody that arises.

Obviously uploading things which are directly incorporated into the IDE 
does seem

very risky. However, individuals making modified IDEs (Linux, Protestantism,
Shankaracharya, Buddha - I apologise to the millions of folk I have 
offended in

drawing those parallels) as such is not a bad thing.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Modifiable IDE [Was: Question about RevMobile]

2010-04-10 Thread David Bovill
Me too - but only within the forthcoming modular IDE and ideally with
versioning and other social features that fully supported this. Chaos needs
to be organised :)

2010/4/10 Björnke von Gierke 

> On 10 Apr 2010, at 18:29, Web Admin Himalayan Academy wrote:
>
> > How would we all like it if RunRev allowed any third party developer to
> just upload "stuff" that was automatically incorporated into the IDE, which
> then broke the IDE?
>
> I know that's completely counter the point you tried to make, but I'd
> totally love that, and I guess (for some forms of automatic incorporations)
> Jerry Daniels (tRev) too. :)
>
> cheers
> Bjoernke
> --
>
> official ChatRev page:
> http://bjoernke.com?target=chatrev
>
> Chat with other RunRev developers:
> go stack URL "http://bjoernke.com/chatrev/chatrev1.3b3.rev";
>
> ___
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Modifiable IDE [Was: Question about RevMobile]

2010-04-10 Thread Björnke von Gierke
On 10 Apr 2010, at 18:29, Web Admin Himalayan Academy wrote:

> How would we all like it if RunRev allowed any third party developer to just 
> upload "stuff" that was automatically incorporated into the IDE, which then 
> broke the IDE?

I know that's completely counter the point you tried to make, but I'd totally 
love that, and I guess (for some forms of automatic incorporations) Jerry 
Daniels (tRev) too. :)

cheers
Bjoernke
-- 

official ChatRev page:
http://bjoernke.com?target=chatrev

Chat with other RunRev developers:
go stack URL "http://bjoernke.com/chatrev/chatrev1.3b3.rev";

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution